Skip to main content
ExplainerFundamental ConstantsExplainer· 6 min read· in Science

The 1/137.036 Value: How the Fine-Structure Constant Quantifies the Strength of the Electromagnetic Interaction

The fine-structure constant, a dimensionless number approximately equal to 1/137.036, dictates the exact strength of the electromagnetic force. Recent high-precision measurements confirm its value, which establishes the fundamental limits of atomic structure and the periodic table.

By Sofia Matos

Standard Model Theorists 70%Cosmological Variation Proponents 30%
Standard Model Theorists
Physicists who view the fine-structure constant as a fixed parameter that validates quantum electrodynamics.
Cosmological Variation Proponents
Astrophysicists investigating whether the laws of physics change over space and time.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • String Theorists
  • Experimental Metrologists

What we don’t know

  • Why the fine-structure constant has the specific value of 1/137.036, rather than any other number.
  • Whether the constant has remained perfectly stable since the Big Bang, or if it fluctuates over cosmological timescales.
  • If the fine-structure constant can be derived mathematically from a deeper, yet-to-be-discovered unified theory of physics.

For matter to exist as we know it, the force that binds electrons to atomic nuclei must operate within a strict mathematical boundary relative to the speed of light. If the electromagnetic interaction were too strong, electrons would collapse into the nucleus; if it were too weak, they would fly apart, rendering chemistry and complex molecules impossible. This binding constraint is quantified by a single, dimensionless number that currently holds steady at approximately 1/137.036. Known as the fine-structure constant, or alpha, it dictates the exact strength of the electromagnetic force across the observable universe, serving as the fundamental parameter that makes atomic structure viable.[2][6]

Unlike the speed of light or the mass of an electron, the fine-structure constant carries no physical units. It is a pure ratio, constructed from four other fundamental physical constants: the elementary charge of an electron squared, divided by the product of the speed of light, Planck's constant, and the vacuum permittivity. Because the units of those four underlying components perfectly cancel each other out in the equation, alpha remains 1/137.036 regardless of whether the observer measures the universe in meters, miles, or light-years.[5][6]

The constant was introduced in 1916 by the German physicist Arnold Sommerfeld to explain a persistent discrepancy in the hydrogen atom. When early 20th-century spectroscopists examined the light emitted by hydrogen gas, they found that the spectral lines were not singular, uniform bands, but were instead split into closely spaced 'fine' lines. Sommerfeld realized that electrons orbiting a nucleus at high speeds experience relativistic mass increases, causing their energy levels to shift. The fine-structure constant emerged naturally in his equations as the ratio of the velocity of an electron in the lowest energy orbit of a hydrogen atom to the speed of light in a vacuum.[2][5]

The fine-structure constant is a dimensionless ratio constructed from four fundamental physical constants.

Today, the fine-structure constant does far more than explain the fine lines of hydrogen spectra. In the Standard Model of particle physics, it serves as the foundational coupling constant for quantum electrodynamics (QED), the theory that describes how light and matter interact. In this framework, alpha determines the precise probability that an electron will emit or absorb a photon. Every time an electromagnetic field interacts with a charged particle, alpha governs the transaction, making it the mathematical bedrock of all electromagnetism.[5][6]

Because of its foundational role, experimental physicists continually test whether alpha is truly constant. In 2020, a team of researchers measured the constant to an unprecedented accuracy of 81 parts per trillion. They achieved this extreme precision by firing a laser at a cloud of supercooled rubidium atoms and measuring the exact recoil velocity as the atoms absorbed individual photons. By comparing the recoil kinetic energy to the photon's momentum, they extracted the mass of the rubidium atom, which in turn allowed them to calculate alpha without relying on earlier assumptions.[3]

Because of its foundational role, experimental physicists continually test whether alpha is truly constant.

Two years later, in 2022, another independent measurement confirmed the constant's value using a completely different approach. While the 2020 experiment relied on matter-wave interferometry to measure atomic recoil, other teams have derived alpha by measuring the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. This phenomenon is a slight deviation in how an electron spins in a magnetic field, caused by its continuous interaction with a surrounding cloud of virtual photons popping in and out of existence in the quantum vacuum.[3][4]

The agreement between these radically different methods—one measuring the physical recoil of whole atoms, the other measuring the quantum spin of single electrons—provides one of the most rigorous tests of the Standard Model to date. The current recommended value from the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) stands at 0.0072973525643, or roughly 1/137.035999177, with a relative standard uncertainty of just 1.6 parts per 10 billion, cementing it as one of the most precisely known numbers in science.[1][6]

Recent measurements of atomic recoil have pushed the precision of the fine-structure constant to 81 parts per trillion.

The precise magnitude of alpha imposes a hard mathematical limit on the physical universe. In the semi-classical Bohr model of the atom, the velocity of an electron in the innermost shell scales directly with the atomic number (the number of protons) multiplied by the fine-structure constant and the speed of light. Therefore, an atom with exactly 137 protons would require its innermost electron to travel at exactly the speed of light just to maintain a stable orbit around the nucleus.[6][7]

If a hypothetical nucleus were to contain 138 protons, the required electron velocity would exceed the cosmic speed limit, causing the mathematical framework of the Bohr model to break down entirely. While fully relativistic Dirac equations push the theoretical limit of the periodic table slightly higher to element 173, the fine-structure constant fundamentally dictates how large an atomic nucleus can grow before its electron cloud becomes physically unsustainable and the atom ceases to exist as a stable, recognizable entity.[6][7]

In the Bohr model, the fine-structure constant dictates that an atom with more than 137 protons would require its innermost electron to exceed the speed of light.

Despite its precision, the origin of the number 137 remains one of the most profound mysteries in modern physics. The constant is not derived from any broader mathematical theory; it is simply a measured property of the universe. As Richard Feynman, one of the originators of quantum electrodynamics, wrote of the constant: 'There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e – the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455.' (The value 0.08542455 is the elementary charge, which squares to yield alpha).[6]

As quantum electrodynamics dictates, the strength of the electromagnetic interaction actually grows logarithmically at higher energy scales, meaning alpha is only 1/137 at the low-energy limit of the everyday macroscopic world. If the low-energy value of alpha were larger, the electromagnetic force would overpower the strong nuclear force, preventing protons from binding together to form atomic nuclei. If it were smaller, the force would be too weak to hold electrons in stable orbits, meaning molecular bonds could not form and the universe would consist entirely of isolated, drifting particles.[2][6]

Researchers continue to probe whether alpha has changed over the 13.8-billion-year history of the universe. Observations of light from distant quasars passing through ancient gas clouds have occasionally suggested that the fine-structure constant might have been slightly different billions of years ago, or might vary across different regions of space. However, the most recent and precise laboratory measurements show no evidence of local variation, leaving the magic number 1/137.036 as an enduring, unexplained fixture of our physical reality.[3][6]

Key points

  1. The fine-structure constant (alpha) is a dimensionless ratio of 1/137.036 that determines the strength of the electromagnetic force.
  2. Recent experiments using rubidium atom interferometry have measured alpha to an unprecedented accuracy of 81 parts per trillion.
  3. Because alpha dictates electron velocity, the Bohr model mathematically breaks down for any element containing more than 137 protons.
  4. The precise value of alpha allows atoms to form; if it were slightly larger or smaller, complex chemistry would be impossible.
1/137.036
Approximate value of alpha
81 parts per trillion
Accuracy of 2020 measurement
1.6×10⁻¹⁰
Relative standard uncertainty
137
Bohr model maximum atomic number

Sources

Source coverage

7 outlets

2 viewpoints surfaced

Standard Model Theorists 70%Cosmological Variation Proponents 30%
  1. [1]NISTStandard Model Theorists

    CODATA Value: fine-structure constant

    Read on NIST
  2. [2]BritannicaCosmological Variation Proponents

    Fine-structure constant

    Read on Britannica
  3. [3]Quanta MagazineStandard Model Theorists

    Physicists Nail Down the 'Magic Number' That Shapes the Universe

    Read on Quanta Magazine
  4. [4]Physics WorldStandard Model Theorists

    Physicists measure the fine structure constant directly for the first time

    Read on Physics World
  5. [5]NISTStandard Model Theorists

    Current advances: The fine-structure constant

    Read on NIST
  6. [6]WikipediaCosmological Variation Proponents

    Fine-structure constant

    Read on Wikipedia
  7. [7]Factlen Editorial Team

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Science stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.