Law & Justice
Follow Law & Justice in the Factlen app and get an alert when there is news. Get the app
Catalan Amnesty
Spain's Supreme Court Lifts Arrest Warrant for Carles Puigdemont Following Amnesty Ruling
7 sources · 11d ago
International Law
International Criminal Court Unseals Arrest Warrants for Taliban Leaders Over Gender Persecution
3 sources · 17d ago
Litigation Costs
How Statutory Tariffs and Proportionality Tests Leave Prevailing Litigants With Unrecovered Legal Fees
7 sources · 17d ago
More in Law & Justice
Deep DiveDrug Policy
How Synthetic Substitution and Agricultural Declines Reshaped the 2026 Global Drug Market
Public Health and Harm Reduction Advocates 40%International Drug Control Agencies 35%Law Enforcement and Border Security 25%
Research BriefCrime Statistics
US Violent Crime Rate Stabilizes as Sexual Assault Reporting Plummets, BJS Survey Shows
Criminologists and Statisticians 40%Victim Advocacy Organizations 35%Law Enforcement Agencies 25%
ExplainerLegal Doctrine
How Transferred Malice Shifts Specific Intent to Unintended Victims Without Proof of Recklessness
Strict Liability Advocates 40%Mens Rea Purists 30%Statutory Reformers 30%
ExplainerJudicial Statistics
Immigration and Pro Se Filings Drive Federal Court Caseloads in 2025
Court Administrators 40%Criminal Justice Analysts 30%Economic Observers 30%
ExplainerInternational Law
Margin of Appreciation Gives States Discretion to Balance Universal Rights With Local Interests
National Sovereignty Advocates 40%Universal Human Rights Defenders 35%Pragmatic Institutionalists 25%
ExplainerInternational Arbitration
Lex Loci Arbitri Determines Procedural Annulment Law Independent of Contract Choice-of-Law Clauses
Territorial Traditionalists 45%Commercial Drafters 40%Delocalisation Advocates 15%
ExplainerAppellate Procedure
En Banc Rehearings Require Full-Bench Majorities to Resolve Clashing Appellate Panels
Judicial Efficiency Advocates 40%Uniformity Proponents 30%Appellate Litigants 30%
ExplainerComparative Law
Lay Judges Versus Professional Benches: How Mixed Panels Resolve the Credibility Divide
Mixed Tribunal Advocates 40%Legal Traditionalists 30%Comparative Law Analysts 30%
ExplainerStandard of Proof
Continental Courts Reject the 51-Percent Balance of Probabilities, Requiring Full Judicial Conviction in Civil Lawsuits
Common Law Pragmatists 40%Continental Truth Seekers 40%Procedural Realists 20%
Deep DiveJudicial Ethics
How Apparent Bias Tests Disqualify Judges Without Proof of Actual Prejudice
Institutional Ethicists 40%Judicial Efficiency Advocates 30%Behavioral Legal Scholars 30%
ExplainerHorizontal Effect
Indirect Horizontal Effect Radiates Constitutional Rights Into Private Disputes by Requiring Judges to Reinterpret Open Civil Law Clauses
Constitutional Supremacists 35%Private Law Autonomists 35%Institutional Pragmatists 30%
ExplainerExtradition Law
Extradition's Rule of Specialty Bars Receiving States From Expanding Charges Beyond Surrendered Offenses
State Prosecutors 35%International Law Scholars 35%Defense Advocates 30%
ExplainerComparative Law
The Lawful Judge Guarantee: Why Civil Law Courts Cannot Decline Competent Lawsuits
Common Law Jurists 35%Civil Law Constitutionalists 35%International Litigators 30%
ExplainerSovereign Immunity
Commercial Nature Determines When Courts Strip Foreign Governments of Sovereign Immunity
Strict Commercial Nature Proponents 45%Contextual Purpose Advocates 35%Absolute Immunity Traditionalists 20%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
Dualist Constitutions Bar Domestic Enforcement of Unincorporated Treaties Regardless of Ratification
Constitutional Dualists 40%International Human Rights Advocates 35%Judicial Pragmatists 25%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
How Advisory References Allow Governments to Test Legislation in Apex Courts Before Enactment
Pragmatic Constitutionalists 40%Strict Constructionists 30%Executive Branches 30%
ExplainerLegal Precedent
Wambaugh's Inversion Test Separates Binding Precedent From Persuasive Dicta by Negating the Rule
Rule-Based Formalists 40%Material Fact Theorists 35%Judicial Pragmatists 25%
ExplainerLegal Theory
How Prospective Overruling Allows Supreme Courts to Change the Law Without Rewriting the Past
Institutional Pragmatists 40%Traditional Formalists 30%Equal Protection Advocates 30%
Deep DiveArbitration Law
Why the 1958 New York Convention Makes Arbitral Awards Easier to Enforce Than Court Judgments
Corporate Counsel 45%National Judiciary Advocates 30%Access to Justice Critics 25%
ExplainerInternational Law
Interpol Red Notices Confer No Power of Arrest: Why Cross-Border Detentions Depend on Domestic Judicial Warrants
Sovereign Law Enforcement 40%Human Rights Advocates 30%Interpol Administration 30%
ExplainerAppellate Procedure
Why Supreme Courts Reject 90% of Appeals: The Shift From Error Correction to Legal Harmonization
Appellate Scholars 40%Judicial Efficiency Advocates 30%Appellate Practitioners 30%
ExplainerAppellate Procedure
Cassation Limits Apex Review to Errors of Law: Why Civil Law Supreme Courts Quash and Remand Rather Than Substitute Judgments
Civil Law Traditionalists 40%Procedural Efficiency Advocates 30%Common Law Comparativists 30%
ExplainerConstitutional Remedies
Suspended Declarations of Invalidity Give Parliaments Time to Redraft Flawed Statutes Without Creating Legal Vacuums
Judicial Pragmatists 40%Civil Liberties Advocates 30%Institutional Dialogue Theorists 30%
ExplainerJudicial Independence
Deliberation Secrecy Shields Judges From Political Retaliation, Banning Dissenting Opinions in Civil Law and EU Apex Courts
Civil Law Traditionalists 35%Common Law Advocates 35%Institutional Pragmatists 30%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
How Constructive Votes of No Confidence Prevent Negative Majorities
Institutional Stabilizers 55%Democratic Accountability Advocates 45%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
Amending Clauses Grant Constituted Rather Than Constituent Authority: Why Supreme Courts Strike Down Constitutional Amendments
Constitutional Guardians 45%Democratic Majoritarians 35%Textual Formalists 20%
ExplainerDiplomatic Law
Diplomatic Inviolability Protects Embassy Premises, Not Fugitives
Strict Territorial Sovereignty 60%Humanitarian Asylum Advocates 40%
ExplainerLegal Procedure
Res Judicata Attaches Only After Appellate Rights Expire: Why Civil Law and International Courts Allow Prosecutors to Appeal Acquittals
Common Law Finality 35%Civil Law Continuum 35%International Jurisprudence 30%
ExplainerExclusionary Rule
Balancing Procedural Violations Against Trial Fairness: Why Most Legal Systems Reject the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Systemic Integrity Defenders 35%Material Truth Proponents 35%Deterrence Advocates 30%
Election LawIsraeli Supreme Court
Israeli Supreme Court Overturns Election Panel Ban on Arab Parties Ahead of Knesset Vote
Arab Rights Advocates 40%Israeli Right-Wing 30%Neutral Legal Observers 30%
Copyright LawGenerative AI
Third Circuit Rejects AI Fair Use Defense in Landmark Thomson Reuters Copyright Ruling
Legal Publishers & IP Owners 45%Neutral Legal Observers 30%Open Access & Digital Rights Advocates 25%
Immigration PolicySupreme Court
US Supreme Court Allows Immediate Resumption of Third-Country Migrant Deportations
Trump Administration 40%Migrant Advocates 40%Lower Federal Courts 20%
ExplainerJudicial Power
The Structural Divide Between Abstract and Concrete Judicial Review
Concrete Review Advocates 40%Abstract Review Proponents 40%Hybrid System Theorists 20%
International LawCourt Verdict
Rome Court Sentences Three Egyptian Security Officials to 10 Years for Kidnapping of Giulio Regeni
Italian Judiciary & Prosecutors 40%Egyptian State Authorities 30%Human Rights Organizations 30%
ExplainerLegal Systems
The Allocation of Investigative Power in Adversarial and Inquisitorial Court Systems
Adversarial System Advocates 50%Inquisitorial System Advocates 50%
ExplainerProportionality Doctrine
The Four-Part Proportionality Test High Courts Use to Weigh Fundamental Rights
Rights Advocates 40%State Defenders 35%Legal Formalists 25%
Deep DiveProsecutorial Frameworks
The Legality Principle's Obligation to Prosecute Versus the Opportunity Principle's Discretionary Authority
Opportunity Principle Defenders 40%Strict Legality Advocates 35%Restorative Justice Proponents 25%
ExplainerLegal Framework
The Binding Authority of Stare Decisis Versus the Persuasive Weight of Jurisprudence Constante
Common Law Advocates 50%Civil Law Purists 50%
Deep DiveJudicial Architecture
The Structural Divide Between Constitutional Courts and Supreme Courts in Civil Law Systems
Constitutional Law Scholars 50%Judicial Administrators 50%
Global OrderDiplomatic Warning
World Leaders at UN General Assembly Warn Selective Enforcement of International Law Is Eroding Global Order
Reform Advocates and Global South 40%Multilateral System Defenders 30%Geopolitical Analysts 30%
ExplainerInsanity Defense
M'Naghten, Irresistible Impulse, Durham, and MPC: The Four Legal Standards for the Insanity Defense
Cognitive Traditionalists 47%Volitional Advocates 35%Psychiatric Modernists 18%
Carbon TariffsTrade Dispute
WTO Establishes Panel to Rule on Russia's Challenge to EU Carbon Border Levy
European Union 45%Russian Federation 35%Third-Party Observers 20%
ExplainerAnti-Commandeering
The Two Anti-Commandeering Doctrines That Limit Federal Power Over States
State Sovereignty Advocates 40%Federal Supremacy Proponents 35%Administrative Law Scholars 25%
Voting RightsCourt Decision
Texas Highest Criminal Court Upholds Acquittal of Crystal Mason in Voting Case
Civil Rights Advocates 55%Neutral Legal Reporting 45%
International LawRights Hearing
European Court of Human Rights Hears Case on Russia's Forced Adoption of Ukrainian Children
Ukrainian Legal Advocates 60%European Institutional Monitors 40%
ExplainerFederal Courts
The Two Requirements That Must Be Met for a Complaint to State a Plausible Claim for Relief
Defense Bar 35%Plaintiffs' Advocates 35%Judicial Administration 30%
Per page