Supreme Court
Follow Supreme Court in the Factlen app and get an alert when there is news. Get the app
Immigration Detention
Supreme Court Weighs Due Process Limits on Prolonged Immigration Detention
6 sources · 41d ago
Redistricting Standoff
Conflicting Federal Court Orders Leave Missouri Congressional Map in Limbo
2 sources · 43d ago
Redistricting Fight
Missouri Appeals to US Supreme Court After State Justices Block Congressional Map
2 sources · 46d ago
More in Supreme Court
ExplainerAppellate Procedure
En Banc Rehearings Require Full-Bench Majorities to Resolve Clashing Appellate Panels
Judicial Efficiency Advocates 40%Uniformity Proponents 30%Appellate Litigants 30%
Deep DiveJudicial Ethics
How Apparent Bias Tests Disqualify Judges Without Proof of Actual Prejudice
Institutional Ethicists 40%Judicial Efficiency Advocates 30%Behavioral Legal Scholars 30%
ExplainerHorizontal Effect
Indirect Horizontal Effect Radiates Constitutional Rights Into Private Disputes by Requiring Judges to Reinterpret Open Civil Law Clauses
Constitutional Supremacists 35%Private Law Autonomists 35%Institutional Pragmatists 30%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
How Advisory References Allow Governments to Test Legislation in Apex Courts Before Enactment
Pragmatic Constitutionalists 40%Strict Constructionists 30%Executive Branches 30%
ExplainerLegal Precedent
Wambaugh's Inversion Test Separates Binding Precedent From Persuasive Dicta by Negating the Rule
Rule-Based Formalists 40%Material Fact Theorists 35%Judicial Pragmatists 25%
ExplainerLegal Theory
How Prospective Overruling Allows Supreme Courts to Change the Law Without Rewriting the Past
Institutional Pragmatists 40%Traditional Formalists 30%Equal Protection Advocates 30%
ExplainerAppellate Procedure
Why Supreme Courts Reject 90% of Appeals: The Shift From Error Correction to Legal Harmonization
Appellate Scholars 40%Judicial Efficiency Advocates 30%Appellate Practitioners 30%
ExplainerAppellate Procedure
Cassation Limits Apex Review to Errors of Law: Why Civil Law Supreme Courts Quash and Remand Rather Than Substitute Judgments
Civil Law Traditionalists 40%Procedural Efficiency Advocates 30%Common Law Comparativists 30%
ExplainerConstitutional Remedies
Suspended Declarations of Invalidity Give Parliaments Time to Redraft Flawed Statutes Without Creating Legal Vacuums
Judicial Pragmatists 40%Civil Liberties Advocates 30%Institutional Dialogue Theorists 30%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
Amending Clauses Grant Constituted Rather Than Constituent Authority: Why Supreme Courts Strike Down Constitutional Amendments
Constitutional Guardians 45%Democratic Majoritarians 35%Textual Formalists 20%
ExplainerJudicial Power
The Structural Divide Between Abstract and Concrete Judicial Review
Concrete Review Advocates 40%Abstract Review Proponents 40%Hybrid System Theorists 20%
ExplainerProportionality Doctrine
The Four-Part Proportionality Test High Courts Use to Weigh Fundamental Rights
Rights Advocates 40%State Defenders 35%Legal Formalists 25%
ExplainerLegal Framework
The Binding Authority of Stare Decisis Versus the Persuasive Weight of Jurisprudence Constante
Common Law Advocates 50%Civil Law Purists 50%
Deep DiveJudicial Architecture
The Structural Divide Between Constitutional Courts and Supreme Courts in Civil Law Systems
Constitutional Law Scholars 50%Judicial Administrators 50%
ExplainerJudicial Precedent
Applying the 1977 Marks Rule to Interpret Supreme Court Plurality Opinions
Pragmatic Jurists 40%Formalist Legal Scholars 35%Lower Court Administrators 25%
ExplainerFifth Amendment
The Four Warnings That Must Be Given Before a Custodial Interrogation
Procedural Formalists 50%Law Enforcement Practitioners 30%Empirical Legal Scholars 20%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
The Three Requirements That Must Be Met for a Law to Survive Intermediate Scrutiny Under the First Amendment
Civil Liberties Advocates 50%Government Regulators 50%
ExplainerFederal Courts
The Three Exceptions That Allow a Federal Court to Hear a Case That is Otherwise Moot
Prudential Pragmatists 40%Strict Textualists 30%Government Defendants 30%
ExplainerOriginal Jurisdiction
The Two Requirements That Must Be Met for a Case to Be Heard Under the Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction
Judicial Restraint Proponents 45%State Sovereignty Advocates 35%Textualist Dissenters 20%
ExplainerJury Selection
The Three-Step Burden-Shifting Framework That Determines a Batson Challenge to Peremptory Strikes
Abolitionists 35%State-Level Reformers 35%Procedural Traditionalists 30%
ExplainerFourth Amendment
The Three Requirements That Must Be Met for a Valid Search Warrant Under the Fourth Amendment
Civil Liberties Advocates 35%Law Enforcement Officials 35%Judicial Officers 30%
ExplainerFirst Amendment
The Three Criteria That Define Obscenity Under the First Amendment's Miller Standard
Civil Liberties Advocates 40%Legal Scholars 40%Community Standards Proponents 20%
ExplainerJudicial Review
The Three Requirements That Justify Judicial Review Under Marbury v. Madison
Judicial Supremacists 45%Departmentalists 30%Strict Constructionists 25%
ExplainerImplied Powers
The Two Criteria From McCulloch v. Maryland That Define the Scope of the Necessary and Proper Clause
Broad Constructionists 60%Strict Constructionists 40%
ExplainerSeverability Doctrine
The Two Requirements That Determine If an Unconstitutional Statute Can Be Severed
Judicial Restraint Advocates 60%Strict Textualists 40%
ExplainerImmigration Detention
Supreme Court Dismisses Major Immigration Detention Case Following State Pardon
Due Process Advocates 40%Federal Enforcement 40%State Executives 20%
ExplainerConstitutional Avoidance
Ashwander Rules Require Federal Courts to Avoid Ruling on Constitutional Questions
Judicial Restraint Advocates 45%Statutory Text Purists 35%Constitutional Litigators 20%
ExplainerCivil Procedure
The Three Requirements That Define Claim Preclusion (Res Judicata)
Judicial Efficiency Advocates 40%Corporate Defense Counsel 35%Plaintiffs' Rights Advocates 25%
ExplainerPolitical Question Doctrine
Defining the Six Criteria That Force Federal Courts to Defer to the Political Branches
Judicial Restraint Advocates 40%Judicial Engagement Proponents 35%Executive Branch Defenders 25%
ExplainerPreliminary Injunctions
Defining the Four-Factor Test That Controls Preliminary Injunctions in Federal Court
Strict Traditionalists 45%Agency Deference Advocates 35%Sliding-Scale Proponents 20%
ExplainerDormant Commerce Clause
The Two-Track Framework of the Dormant Commerce Clause: Facial Discrimination and Pike Balancing
State Regulatory Advocates 35%National Market Proponents 35%Judicial Minimalists 30%
ExplainerSurrogacy Law
Supreme Court Faces Emergency Appeal Over Surrogacy Contract and Newborn's Medical Care
Intended Parents' Rights 45%Surrogate Autonomy & Fetal Life 35%Legal & Medical Consensus 20%
ExplainerCivil Procedure
General vs. Specific Personal Jurisdiction: How 'Minimum Contacts' Dictate Where Companies Can Be Sued
Plaintiffs' Bar 40%Corporate Defense Counsel 40%Civil Procedure Scholars 20%
ExplainerArticle III Standing
Defining Article III Standing: The Three-Part Test That Controls Access to Federal Courts
Strict Constitutionalists 40%Access-to-Justice Advocates 30%Corporate Defense Bar 30%
ExplainerExecutive Power
How Justice Jackson's Three-Part Youngstown Framework Defines Executive Power
Judicial Pragmatists 40%Executive Branch Advocates 30%Congressional Supremacy Proponents 30%
ExplainerHabeas Corpus
Defining the 'Unreasonable Application' Standard That Blocks Federal Habeas Relief for State Prisoners
State Sovereignty Advocates 35%Civil Rights Organizations 35%Capital Defense Attorneys 30%
ExplainerJurisdictional Limits
The Four Requirements That Block Federal Courts From Rewriting State Judgments
Federalist Advocates 40%Civil Rights Plaintiffs 30%Bankruptcy Practitioners 30%
ExplainerShadow Docket
Supreme Court Faces Third Emergency Appeal on 2026 Mail-In Ballot Rules
Judicial Transparency Advocates 50%Executive Branch Advocates 30%Independent Analysts 20%
ExplainerCriminal Procedure
Custody and Interrogation: The Two Conditions That Trigger the Requirement for Miranda Warnings
Civil Liberties Advocates 40%Law Enforcement Practitioners 35%Judicial Originalists 25%
ExplainerProsecutorial Disclosure
Why the Brady Doctrine Requires Prosecutors to Disclose Favorable Evidence
Constitutional Originalists & Courts 40%Defense & Reform Advocates 30%Legal Scholars 30%
ExplainerConstitutional Doctrine
Navigating the Free Exercise Clause: How General Applicability and Strict Scrutiny Divide Religious Liberty Claims
Religious Liberty Advocates 35%Civil Rights Organizations 35%Judicial Minimalists 30%
ExplainerEstablishment Clause
Tracing the Supreme Court's Three Frameworks for the Establishment Clause
Strict Separationists 35%Historical Originalists 35%Doctrinal Pragmatists 30%
ExplainerSubstantive Due Process
Substantive Due Process: The Two-Track Framework That Determines Which Unwritten Rights Survive
Living Constitutionalists 40%Judicial Restraint Advocates 35%Structural Formalists 25%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
Deficient Performance and Prejudice: The Two-Part Test for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Judicial Efficiency Advocates 40%Criminal Justice Reformers 40%Constitutional Originalists 20%
ExplainerConstitutional Law
The Three-Part Calculus That Defines Procedural Due Process in Administrative Law
Utilitarian Pragmatists 40%Dignitary Theorists 35%Executive Branch Defenders 25%
ExplainerCriminal Procedure
How Grand Juries and Preliminary Hearings Give Defendants Different Procedural Rights
Prosecutorial Strategists 40%Defense Advocates 40%Judicial Efficiency Proponents 20%
Per page