Acting AG Blanche Rescinds $1.8B 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund to Secure Senate Confirmation
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche formally terminated a controversial $1.8 billion settlement fund and limited a sweeping tax immunity deal, yielding to Senate Republicans who used their confirmation votes to force the concessions.
- Senate Institutionalists
- Lawmakers who prioritize the Senate's constitutional duty to check executive power over partisan alignment.
- Executive Branch Advocates
- Supporters of the original settlement who argue the fund was necessary to address political grievances.
- Legal & Constitutional Watchdogs
- Outside legal experts and transparency advocates who viewed the original settlement as an abuse of power.
Why this matters
This standoff provides a real-time demonstration of how constitutional checks and balances function. By withholding their confirmation votes, individual lawmakers successfully forced the executive branch to abandon a multi-billion-dollar initiative and limit sweeping legal protections.
Key points
- Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche formally rescinded a $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' to secure his permanent confirmation.
- The fund was originally established in a May 2026 IRS lawsuit settlement to compensate individuals claiming political persecution.
- Republican Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis blocked Blanche's nomination until they received binding written orders terminating the fund.
- The new Justice Department order also limits a sweeping tax audit immunity deal, restricting it strictly to retroactive claims.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a formal order late Sunday terminating a highly contested $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization fund," dismantling a core component of a recent executive settlement to save his own cabinet nomination.[2][6]
The move breaks a weeks-long deadlock in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where two Republican senators—John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina—had adamantly refused to advance Blanche's nomination for permanent Attorney General.[1][3]
By leveraging their constitutional "advice and consent" power, the senators forced the executive branch to abandon a controversial financial initiative. The episode offers a textbook demonstration of how legislative checks and balances function in real time, proving that individual committee members can still exert profound influence over executive actions.
The standoff originated from a May 18, 2026, settlement between President Donald Trump and the Justice Department, resolving a massive lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department.[2]

That settlement included the creation of the $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund," designed to compensate individuals who claimed they were unfairly targeted by politically motivated federal investigations during the previous administration.[1][5]
The proposal immediately drew bipartisan scrutiny. Critics warned it could function as a taxpayer-financed slush fund for political allies, expressing particular outrage over the possibility that individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol attack could be considered for payouts.[2][6]
While Blanche had previously offered verbal assurances during committee hearings that the fund would not move forward, Cornyn and Tillis demanded a binding, written rescission before they would cast their confirmation votes.[2][3]
"We needed a written document addressing our concerns," the senators noted in a joint statement, emphasizing that verbal promises were insufficient when evaluating a nominee for the nation's top law enforcement position.[1]
The formal order issued Sunday night leaves no room for ambiguity. It explicitly states that the May 18 directive establishing the fund is "rescinded and shall have no force or effect."[2][3]
The formal order issued Sunday night leaves no room for ambiguity.
The Justice Department further clarified that the fund never actually became operational: no members were appointed to oversee it, no funds were transferred from the Treasury, and no claims were processed or paid.[5][6]
Beyond the $1.8 billion fund, the senators also secured major concessions regarding a second, equally controversial component of the May settlement: sweeping tax audit immunity for the president and his family.[1]
The original agreement appeared to offer broad, forward-looking protection against IRS examinations for the president and potentially dozens of affiliated corporate entities.[2]
The new, binding written order significantly narrows that scope. The Justice Department clarified that the audit immunity applies strictly retroactively to claims that were open at the time of the settlement, explicitly stating it does not protect the president or his businesses from examinations of future tax filings.[1][2]
The agreement materialized despite intense public pressure from the White House. Over the weekend, President Trump took to social media to threaten that he would keep Blanche in an "acting" capacity indefinitely if the Senate refused to confirm him.[3][4]

Trump also vowed to push Congress to pass the Anti-Weaponization Bill legislatively, signaling his continued support for the compensation effort even as his Attorney General nominee dismantled the executive version of the fund.[4]
However, the reality of governing and the necessity of a confirmed cabinet ultimately prevailed. An acting official wields limited long-term authority, and securing a permanent Attorney General required yielding to the Senate's oversight demands.
With the formal order in hand, Cornyn and Tillis officially announced their support for Blanche on Monday, expressing gratitude that the Justice Department had addressed their concerns in writing.[1][6]
The Senate Judiciary Committee is now scheduled to advance Blanche's nomination to the full Senate during its Tuesday markup session, clearing the final significant hurdle for his confirmation.[1]
Ultimately, the standoff illustrates the enduring power of the Senate confirmation process. Even in an era of intense partisan loyalty, individual lawmakers can effectively halt executive initiatives by withholding their consent for key personnel.
How we got here
May 18, 2026
The Justice Department and President Trump reach a settlement establishing the $1.8 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund and granting tax audit immunity.
June 2026
Acting AG Todd Blanche verbally assures lawmakers the fund will not move forward amid bipartisan backlash.
July 2026
Senators Cornyn and Tillis demand binding written orders, stalling Blanche's committee confirmation vote.
August 1, 2026
President Trump threatens to keep Blanche as Acting AG indefinitely if the Senate refuses to confirm him.
August 2, 2026
Blanche issues a formal written order rescinding the fund and limiting the tax audit immunity.
August 3, 2026
Senators Cornyn and Tillis officially announce their support, clearing the path for Blanche's confirmation.
Viewpoints in depth
Senate Institutionalists
Lawmakers who prioritize the Senate's constitutional duty to check executive power over partisan alignment.
For these lawmakers, verbal assurances from executive branch appointees are insufficient when billions of taxpayer dollars and sweeping legal immunities are at stake. By withholding their confirmation votes, they assert that the Senate's "advice and consent" role is a tangible mechanism for oversight, demanding binding, written legal orders to prevent the creation of unauthorized funds or overly broad executive protections.
Executive Branch Advocates
Supporters of the original settlement who argue the fund was necessary to address political grievances.
This camp maintains that the $1.8 billion fund was a justified mechanism to compensate individuals who faced politically motivated investigations during the previous administration. They view the Senate's blockade as an unnecessary obstruction of the president's agenda, arguing that the executive branch should have the latitude to settle lawsuits and direct agency funds without micromanagement from individual committee members.
Legal & Constitutional Watchdogs
Outside legal experts and transparency advocates who viewed the original settlement as an abuse of power.
Legal advocacy groups and transparency organizations strongly condemned the initial May settlement, arguing that creating a massive compensation fund without congressional appropriation violated the separation of powers. They view the formal rescission not just as a political compromise, but as a necessary correction to an unconstitutional overreach that would have effectively created a taxpayer-funded slush pool outside of standard legislative channels.
What we don't know
- Whether President Trump will attempt to revive the compensation fund through legislative channels as he recently suggested.
- How the retroactive tax audit immunity will be applied in practice to the specific claims that were open at the time of the May settlement.
Key terms
- Advice and Consent
- The constitutional power of the United States Senate to approve or reject presidential appointments, including cabinet positions like Attorney General.
- Acting Attorney General
- An official temporarily leading the Justice Department without permanent Senate confirmation, often wielding limited long-term administrative authority.
- Anti-Weaponization Fund
- A proposed $1.8 billion pool of money intended to compensate individuals who claimed they were unfairly targeted by politically motivated federal investigations.
- Audit Immunity
- A legal protection preventing the Internal Revenue Service from examining an individual's or entity's tax returns.
Frequently asked
Why was Todd Blanche's nomination stalled?
Republican Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis refused to advance his nomination until he formally rescinded a $1.8 billion fund and limited a tax audit immunity deal.
What was the Anti-Weaponization Fund?
It was a proposed $1.8 billion fund, created as part of a May 2026 IRS lawsuit settlement, intended to compensate allies of President Trump who claimed political persecution.
Does the tax audit immunity still exist?
Yes, but the new Justice Department order clarifies that it only applies retroactively to claims open at the time of the settlement, not to future tax filings.
What happens next for Todd Blanche?
With the senators' concerns addressed, the Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to advance his nomination to the full Senate for a final confirmation vote.
Sources
[1]CBS NewsSenate Institutionalists
Cornyn, Tillis announce support for Blanche after DOJ rescinds anti-weaponization fund
Read on CBS News →[2]PBSLegal & Constitutional Watchdogs
Acting AG Blanche formally terminates $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' fund
Read on PBS →[3]CBC
Acting U.S. Attorney General rescinds 'anti-weaponization' fund to secure confirmation
Read on CBC →[4]NewsweekExecutive Branch Advocates
Trump threatens to keep Todd Blanche as Acting A.G. amid Senate standoff
Read on Newsweek →[5]LiveMintLegal & Constitutional Watchdogs
Todd Blanche formally terminates Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund'
Read on LiveMint →[6]OPBLegal & Constitutional Watchdogs
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche formally rescinds $1.8 billion fund
Read on OPB →
Every angle. Every day.
Get world stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.







