Skip to main content
Election LawLegal Ruling· 3 min read· in Law & Justice

Supreme Courts Block Michigan Proof-of-Citizenship Ballot Measure

The U.S. and Michigan Supreme Courts have denied emergency requests to place a constitutional amendment requiring proof of citizenship to vote on the state's November ballot.

By Adel Khoury

Ballot Measure Organizers 40%State Election Officials 35%Voting Rights Advocates 25%
Ballot Measure Organizers
Argues that the strict enforcement of procedural deadlines disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of voters who signed the petition.
State Election Officials
Maintains that signature verification rules and submission deadlines must be applied uniformly to all ballot initiatives.
Voting Rights Advocates
Contends that the measure was an unnecessary barrier to the ballot box designed to solve a non-existent problem.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Voters whose signatures were invalidated
  • Local county clerks responsible for administering the Qualified Voter File

Why this matters

The rulings finalize the rules for Michigan's 2026 elections, maintaining the current voter identification and registration systems in a critical swing state while defeating a multi-million dollar campaign to mandate documentary proof of citizenship.

The Michigan Board of State Canvassers holds the authority to certify citizen-led constitutional amendments for the state ballot, a discretionary power the state's highest court has now ruled it cannot override. Following a 2-2 partisan deadlock by the board over signature validity, both the Michigan Supreme Court and U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh declined emergency interventions last week, finalizing the November 2026 ballot without a proposed proof-of-citizenship voting measure. The campaign's organizers must now wait until the 2028 election cycle to mount a new petition drive.[2][3]

The legal dispute centered on the mathematics of signature verification. The group Americans for Citizen Voting Michigan submitted more than 750,000 signatures in March to qualify the amendment, which would have required residents to show photo identification to vote and mandated a systematic review of the state's Qualified Voter File. Under Michigan law, a ballot initiative requires 446,198 valid signatures—equivalent to 10% of the votes cast for governor in the previous election.[1][3]

Rather than verify every signature, the Michigan Bureau of Elections analyzes a random sample of 1,000 entries. To meet the threshold, at least 629 of those sampled signatures needed to be valid. After processing challenges and rebuttals, the state determined that only 626 signatures in the sample were valid, leaving the campaign three signatures short of the requirement.[2][4]

The campaign fell three signatures short in the state's 1,000-signature random sample.

The shortfall triggered a deadlock at the Board of State Canvassers. The board's two Republican members voted to certify the measure, while its two Democratic members voted against it. The disagreement hinged partly on affidavits submitted by the campaign to cure defective signatures; five of those affidavits were filed within 48 hours of the board's meeting, missing a procedural deadline imposed by the board.[3][4]

The shortfall triggered a deadlock at the Board of State Canvassers.

Americans for Citizen Voting appealed the deadlock to the Michigan Supreme Court, seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the board to certify the amendment. In a 16-page, 6-1 ruling, the state justices denied the request. The court concluded that the canvassers' decision on the 48-hour deadline and signature validity fell within their administrative discretion, meaning there was no strict ministerial duty for the court to enforce. Justice Brian Zahra cast the lone dissenting vote.[3][4]

Hours before the state court ruled, the campaign also sought an emergency injunction from the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who handles emergency applications arising from the Sixth Circuit, denied the request without referring it to the full court and without providing a written explanation. The dual rejections arrived just ahead of the September 4 deadline for state election officials to finalize the November ballot.[1][2]

The proposed amendment would have mandated documentary proof of citizenship and photo identification at the polls.

The proposed amendment represents the state-level front of a broader national effort by Republican lawmakers and conservative advocacy groups to mandate documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration. Both federal and Michigan state law already prohibit noncitizens from voting. State audits indicate the practice is exceptionally rare; of the more than 5.7 million votes cast in Michigan during the 2024 election, officials publicly charged six individuals with voting without citizenship.[1][3]

The campaign's defeat concludes an effort that raised millions of dollars, including more than $3 million spent specifically on petition management and paid signature gathering. "We are deeply disappointed by today's decision, particularly for the nearly 710,000 Michigan citizens who put their names on this petition believing they would have an opportunity to vote on it," Americans for Citizen Voting spokesperson Kristin Combs said following the rulings. The group has indicated it plans to restart the process for the 2028 ballot.[3][4]

Viewpoints in depth

Ballot Measure Organizers

The campaign views the court rulings as a denial of due process for the citizens who supported the initiative.

Americans for Citizen Voting Michigan argues that the Board of State Canvassers improperly discarded valid signatures over minor technicalities and an arbitrary 48-hour deadline for curing defects. 'For these voters, this was never an abstract legal argument,' ACVM chairman Paul Jacob said. The group contends that the sheer volume of signatures submitted—over 750,000—demonstrates a clear public mandate that election administrators thwarted through bureaucratic strictures.

State Election Officials

Administrators emphasize that statutory thresholds and procedural deadlines are mandatory for all petition drives.

The Michigan Bureau of Elections and the Board of State Canvassers maintain that the random sampling process is a standard, legally mandated mechanism for verifying massive petition drives. When the sample yielded only 626 valid signatures against a requirement of 629, the board concluded the campaign failed to meet the constitutional threshold. The Michigan Supreme Court affirmed this stance, ruling that the board acted within its legal discretion when it refused to accept affidavits submitted after its established deadlines.

Voting Rights Advocates

Opponents argue the measure was designed to suppress turnout rather than secure elections.

Groups opposing the amendment, including Promote the Vote Action, praised the rulings as a defense of election integrity rules. They argue that proof-of-citizenship requirements disproportionately disenfranchise marginalized communities, elderly voters, and those who have recently changed their names. Advocates point out that noncitizen voting is already illegal and statistically negligible, noting that Michigan officials identified only six instances out of 5.7 million votes cast in the 2024 election.

Key points

  1. The U.S. and Michigan Supreme Courts denied emergency requests to place a proof-of-citizenship voting amendment on the 2026 ballot.
  2. The campaign fell three signatures short of the 629 valid signatures required in a 1,000-signature random sample.
  3. The Michigan Board of State Canvassers deadlocked 2-2 on certifying the measure after rejecting late-filed affidavits.
  4. The Michigan Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that the canvassers' decision was discretionary and could not be overridden by the court.
  5. Federal and state laws already prohibit noncitizens from voting, a practice state audits show is extremely rare.

How we got here

  1. March 2026

    Americans for Citizen Voting Michigan submits over 750,000 signatures to qualify the amendment.

  2. August 2026

    The Board of State Canvassers deadlocks 2-2 after a random sample leaves the campaign three signatures short.

  3. September 3, 2026

    U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh denies an emergency request to force the measure onto the ballot.

  4. September 3, 2026

    The Michigan Supreme Court rules 6-1 that it cannot compel the canvassers to certify the amendment.

  5. September 4, 2026

    The statutory deadline passes for state officials to finalize the November 2026 ballot.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Ballot Measure Organizers 40%State Election Officials 35%Voting Rights Advocates 25%
  1. [1]Democracy DocketVoting Rights Advocates

    Supreme Court denies right-wing group's bid to force Michigan proof-of-citizenship measure on November ballot - Democracy Docket

    Read on Democracy Docket
  2. [2]Courthouse News ServiceState Election Officials

    Supreme Court refuses to put proof-of-citizenship amendment on Michigan ballot

    Read on Courthouse News Service
  3. [3]VotebeatBallot Measure Organizers

    Supreme Court: Michigan won't vote on proof-of-citizenship amendment in 2026 election

    Read on Votebeat
  4. [4]Michigan PublicBallot Measure Organizers

    Michigan voter ID, proof of citizenship amendment loses at state, U.S. Supreme Court

    Read on Michigan Public
  5. [5]WOWO

    Michigan Supreme Court Rejects Effort to Put Proof-of-Citizenship Voting Proposal on November Ballot - WOWO

    Read on WOWO

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Law & Justice stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.