Major Payment Networks Pivot to Stablecoins, Slashing Global Remittance Fees for Emerging Markets
A wave of acquisitions and partnerships by financial giants like Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe is bringing near-zero-fee stablecoin remittances to the mainstream, bypassing traditional correspondent banks.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Traditional Payment Networks
- Incumbent financial giants integrating blockchain to maintain dominance and capture the lucrative cross-border market.
- Financial Inclusion Advocates
- Researchers and NGOs celebrating the drastic reduction in remittance fees for migrant workers and unbanked populations.
- Crypto-Native Issuers
- Established stablecoin companies defending their market share as traditional finance encroaches on their infrastructure.
What's not represented
- · Local correspondent banks losing revenue
- · Regulators in emerging markets managing capital flight
Why this matters
For decades, migrant workers and families in emerging markets have lost billions to exorbitant wire fees and foreign exchange markups. The integration of stablecoins by major payment networks is finally slashing these costs to near zero, allowing families to keep significantly more of the money sent home.
Key points
- Traditional remittance fees average 6.36%, costing migrant workers billions annually.
- Stablecoins allow direct wallet-to-wallet transfers, settling in minutes for fractions of a cent.
- Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe are actively building or acquiring stablecoin infrastructure.
- Mastercard recently acquired blockchain payments startup BVNK for up to $1.8 billion.
- Regulatory frameworks like the U.S. GENIUS Act and Europe's MiCA have spurred institutional adoption.
The long-promised crypto revolution for everyday people is finally materializing, not through volatile speculation, but through stablecoins quietly rewiring the global remittance market.[3]
The shift is accelerating this month following reports that payment titans Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe are developing a shared stablecoin platform to bypass traditional banking rails.[1][4]
This pivot represents a lifeline for migrant workers and families in emerging markets. For decades, sending money home meant navigating correspondent banks and cash-out agents, with the global average cost hovering around 6.36% per transaction.[2][7]
Stablecoins—digital tokens pegged one-to-one with fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar—bypass these intermediaries entirely. They move value directly between digital wallets, settling in minutes for fractions of a cent.[6]

The savings are staggering. A new June 2026 study projects that person-to-person stablecoin remittances will hit $860 million this year, driven by deep dissatisfaction with legacy banking infrastructure.[2]
"The opportunity in remittances lies in the difference between what migrants pay today and lower on-chain settlement costs," noted industry analysts, emphasizing that the technology is finally reaching the corridors that need it most.[2]
Traditional financial institutions are no longer fighting the trend; they are buying their way in. In March, Mastercard acquired blockchain payments startup BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, explicitly targeting the remittance sector.[1]
Traditional financial institutions are no longer fighting the trend; they are buying their way in.
Stripe previously laid the groundwork by acquiring stablecoin infrastructure firm Bridge for $1.1 billion in early 2025, and recently launched features allowing developers to charge AI agents directly using USDC.[1][6]

Visa, meanwhile, expanded its settlement pilot to nine different blockchains this spring. The credit card giant reported that its stablecoin settlement program is now running at a $7 billion annualized rate.[1][3]
The infrastructure is also reaching the physical world. In April, MoneyGram partnered with fintech firm NALA to utilize stablecoin settlement for cross-border payouts across Africa and Asia, delivering near real-time settlements to local mobile money providers.[5]
This corporate land grab poses a direct threat to crypto-native incumbents like Tether and Circle, who currently dominate the $325 billion stablecoin market.[1]
While Tether and Circle control the minting and reserves, they lack the ubiquitous merchant terminals and bank relationships that Visa and Mastercard have spent six decades building.[1]

How we got here
2024
The European Union implements the MiCA regulatory framework, setting strict standards for stablecoin issuers.
Early 2025
Stripe acquires stablecoin infrastructure firm Bridge for $1.1 billion, signaling a major push into blockchain payments.
Late 2025
The U.S. passes the GENIUS Act, providing federal regulatory clarity for dollar-pegged stablecoins.
March 2026
Mastercard acquires blockchain payments startup BVNK for up to $1.8 billion to target the remittance sector.
June 2026
Reports emerge that Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe are developing a shared stablecoin platform.
Viewpoints in depth
Traditional Payment Networks
Incumbent financial giants are integrating blockchain to maintain dominance and capture the lucrative cross-border market.
Companies like Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe view stablecoins not as a threat, but as an essential infrastructure upgrade. By acquiring blockchain native startups and building shared settlement platforms, these giants aim to replace the aging SWIFT correspondent banking system. Their ultimate goal is to own the distribution layer of digital dollars, leveraging their massive existing networks of merchant terminals and bank relationships to route stablecoin transactions globally.
Financial Inclusion Advocates
Researchers and NGOs celebrate the drastic reduction in remittance fees for migrant workers and unbanked populations.
For development organizations and economists, the shift to stablecoins represents a long-awaited solution to a structural injustice. The global average cost of sending money home has stubbornly remained above 6%, eating into the capital that developing nations rely on for GDP growth. Advocates argue that on-chain settlement, which bypasses rent-seeking intermediaries, finally democratizes access to U.S. dollar liquidity and allows families to keep the billions of dollars previously lost to foreign exchange markups and wire fees.
Crypto-Native Issuers
Established stablecoin companies are defending their market share as traditional finance encroaches on their infrastructure.
Firms like Circle and Tether, which pioneered the stablecoin market and currently hold the vast majority of the $325 billion in reserves, face a new existential challenge. While they control the minting process, they lack the ubiquitous physical and digital distribution networks of the legacy credit card companies. In response, these crypto-native firms are racing to build their own enterprise blockchains and programmable payment networks, hoping to lock in developers and merchants before the traditional giants can fully deploy their own competing tokens.
What we don't know
- Whether emerging market central banks will attempt to block stablecoin inflows to protect their sovereign currencies.
- How quickly local merchants in developing nations will adopt stablecoin point-of-sale systems.
Key terms
- Stablecoin
- A digital currency pegged to a stable asset, such as the U.S. dollar, to minimize price volatility.
- Remittance
- Money sent by a person in a foreign country to their home country, often by migrant workers to their families.
- Correspondent Banking
- A traditional financial arrangement where one bank provides services on behalf of another in a different country, often slowing down international transfers.
- On-chain Settlement
- The process of finalizing a transaction directly on a blockchain network, rather than through a centralized clearinghouse.
- Fiat Currency
- Government-issued currency, such as the U.S. dollar or the euro, that is not backed by a physical commodity.
Frequently asked
What is a stablecoin?
A cryptocurrency pegged to a stable asset, like the U.S. dollar, designed to maintain a constant value and avoid the volatility of tokens like Bitcoin.
Why are traditional remittance fees so high?
They rely on a chain of correspondent banks and cash-out agents, each of which adds a fee and settlement delay to the transaction.
How do stablecoins reduce costs?
They move value directly between digital wallets on a public blockchain, bypassing intermediaries and settling in minutes for fractions of a cent.
What is the GENIUS Act?
A 2025 U.S. federal framework that requires stablecoin issuers to maintain 1:1 reserves and publish monthly reports, providing regulatory clarity for the industry.
Sources
[1]ForbesTraditional Payment Networks
Why Visa And Mastercard Are Building The Stablecoin That Could Sink Circle
Read on Forbes →[2]Juniper ResearchFinancial Inclusion Advocates
Stablecoin P2P Remittances to Cross $10 Billion in 2030, as On-chain Settlement Undercuts Traditional Rails
Read on Juniper Research →[3]Market.us NewsCrypto-Native Issuers
Stablecoin Market Growth 2026: Insights from Stablecoin Insider
Read on Market.us News →[4]CoinDeskTraditional Payment Networks
Stripe, Visa and Mastercard Weigh Shared Stablecoin Platform
Read on CoinDesk →[5]Fintech News AEFinancial Inclusion Advocates
MoneyGram and NALA Use Stablecoins for Payouts in Africa and Asia
Read on Fintech News AE →[6]StripeTraditional Payment Networks
Stablecoins for Cross-Border Payments: A Guide
Read on Stripe →[7]World Bank BlogFinancial Inclusion Advocates
Remittance flows continue to grow in 2025, but costs remain high
Read on World Bank Blog →
Every angle. Every day.
Get finance stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.










