Skip to main content
Education FundingPolicy Reversal· 3 min read· in Education

Federal Judge Voids Education Department Directive, Restoring $600 Million in Teacher-Training Grants

A federal judge struck down a 2025 Department of Education policy that canceled over $600 million in teacher-preparation grants over their ties to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The ruling found the agency's directive arbitrary and capricious, reviving funding pathways for programs that recruit and train K-12 educators in high-need areas.

By Juliette Monroe

State Education Coalitions 50%Federal Administration Advocates 50%
State Education Coalitions
Argue that the grants are essential for addressing teacher shortages and that the cancellations were arbitrary and harmful to local schools.
Federal Administration Advocates
Maintain that federal taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund diversity, equity, and inclusion programs or divisive ideologies.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Individual teacher candidates whose training was interrupted by the sudden loss of grant funding.
  • Local school district administrators facing immediate hiring shortfalls due to the reduced pipeline.

How we got here

  1. Feb 2025

    The Department of Education cancels over $600 million in teacher-training grants over ties to DEI initiatives.

  2. Apr 2025

    The U.S. Supreme Court allows the grant cancellations to proceed while litigation continues in lower courts.

  3. Sep 2026

    U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley strikes down the cancellation directive as arbitrary and capricious.

Why it matters

The restoration of these funds directly impacts the pipeline of new K-12 teachers, particularly in high-need and special education subjects where shortages are most acute. School districts and universities relying on these federal grants can now legally resume recruitment and training programs that were abruptly halted last year.

On September 17, 2026, U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley struck down a Department of Education directive that had abruptly canceled more than $600 million in federal teacher-training grants. The ruling declared the agency's actions "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure Act, effectively voiding a policy that targeted programs associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.[1][2]

The decision revives funding pathways for the Teacher Quality Partnership and the Supporting Effective Educator Development programs. These federal initiatives are explicitly designed to recruit, prepare, and retain K-12 teachers in high-need subjects, including special education and early childhood instruction. When the Department of Education issued its termination directive in February 2025, it wiped out more than 90 percent of the awards issued under these programs, affecting 109 grants across the country.[2][3]

In her ruling, Judge Kelley noted that the federal government failed to provide discernible criteria for what constituted a "DEI" program or a "divisive ideology." The court found that the agency bypassed mandatory public notice and comment periods, issuing the cuts without a clear regulatory framework. "Rather than confining the Directive to actions that are traditionally understood to constitute discrimination, the record instead reflects that Defendants terminated grants with topics such as 'acknowledging … racism' and 'anti-racism'—activities expressly undertaken to oppose discrimination," Kelley wrote.[1][3]

The scope of the February 2025 grant cancellations.

The court also emphasized that the Department of Education ignored how heavily states, universities, and local school districts relied on the funding to maintain their educator pipelines. The abrupt loss of $600 million forced many institutions to scale back or suspend their training cohorts entirely. "The Directive does not acknowledge the fact that thousands of teachers, as well as teachers in teacher-training pipelines, would be affected, upending the careers of much-needed educators," Kelley wrote in the decision.[1][2][3]

The abrupt loss of $600 million forced many institutions to scale back or suspend their training cohorts entirely.

The legal challenge was spearheaded by a coalition of eight Democratic-led states, including California, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. These states argued that the canceled grants were essential for addressing severe teacher shortages and improving retention in schools that historically struggle to fill positions. Forty of the 109 terminated grants were awarded to universities and nonprofits within these eight states, directly impacting their local workforce development.[2]

The Department of Education had previously defended the cuts by stating the funds were being used to train educators on "inappropriate and unnecessary topics." According to a February 2025 agency release, the targeted training materials included instruction on social justice activism, critical race theory, and white privilege. The administration maintained that taxpayer dollars should not support these frameworks, prompting the sweeping cancellations.[1]

U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley ruled the Department of Education bypassed mandatory public notice and comment periods.

While the ruling voids the cancellation directive, the mechanism for recovering the lost funds remains complex. Judge Kelley specified that institutions and states seeking direct financial compensation for the terminated grants must pursue those claims in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, a specialized venue that handles monetary disputes involving the federal government. This means the $600 million will not automatically reappear in university bank accounts overnight.[2]

The decision marks a significant turning point in a year-and-a-half-long legal battle over federal education spending. In April 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court had allowed the administration to proceed with the grant terminations while the litigation continued in lower courts, putting an earlier injunction on hold. Now, with the underlying policy officially struck down on administrative grounds, educator preparation programs have a legal basis to rebuild the training infrastructure that was dismantled last year.[1][2][3]

What to know

  • U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley ruled the Department of Education's cancellation of teacher-training grants violated federal administrative law.
  • The February 2025 directive had stripped over $600 million from the Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development programs.
  • The court found the agency failed to provide a workable definition of "divisive ideologies" or consider the impact on educators.
  • More than 90 percent of the awards in the affected programs had been canceled under the original directive.

Where opinion splits

State Education Coalitions

States and universities argue that the abrupt cancellation of $600 million in grants severely damaged the pipeline for new teachers.

Education advocates and state officials emphasize that programs like the Teacher Quality Partnership are vital for recruiting educators in high-need subjects, such as special education and early childhood instruction. They argue that the loss of funding directly harmed under-resourced school districts that rely on these federal pipelines to fill chronic vacancies, and that the Department of Education failed to consider the real-world impact on local workforce development.

Federal Administration Advocates

Supporters of the original Department of Education directive maintain that federal taxpayer dollars should not fund diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

Proponents of the cuts argue that the grants were promoting divisive ideologies and social justice activism rather than focusing on core academic instruction. They maintain that the Department of Education was well within its authority to ensure that federal funds are not used to train educators on topics like critical race theory or white privilege, justifying the sweeping cancellations as necessary oversight of taxpayer money.

Sources

Source coverage

3 outlets

2 viewpoints surfaced

State Education Coalitions 50%Federal Administration Advocates 50%
  1. [1]The College FixFederal Administration Advocates

    Federal judge strikes down Education Department rule stripping DEI grants

    Read on The College Fix
  2. [2]African American News and IssuesState Education Coalitions

    Federal Judge Strikes Down Anti-DEI Teacher-Grant Policy

    Read on African American News and Issues
  3. [3]District AdministrationState Education Coalitions

    US judge strikes down Education Department's anti-DEI grant policy

    Read on District Administration

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Education stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.