Skip to main content
Grid ReliabilityPolicy Conflict· 4 min read· in Energy

DOE Extends Emergency Order for Washington Coal Plant Hours After Court Rejects Similar Mandate

The Department of Energy has ordered Washington state's last coal-fired power plant to remain on standby through December, defying a federal appeals court ruling that struck down the agency's use of emergency powers to halt planned retirements.

By Hunter Cole

State Regulators & Utilities 35%Environmental Advocates 35%Federal Energy Officials 30%
State Regulators & Utilities
Values local control over resource planning and protecting ratepayers from the costs of uneconomic plants.
Environmental Advocates
Focuses on enforcing environmental agreements and challenging what they view as illegal fossil-fuel bailouts.
Federal Energy Officials
Prioritizes immediate grid security and baseload capacity retention over state-level retirement plans.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Industrial Ratepayers
  • Coal Mining Communities

On Friday, September 11, 2026, just hours after a federal appeals court struck down the Department of Energy's use of emergency powers to keep a Michigan coal plant open, Energy Secretary Chris Wright issued a new emergency order extending the life of Washington state's last coal-fired power plant. The directive orders TransAlta Centralia Generation to keep Unit 2 of its Centralia Generating Station available to operate through December 11, 2026, overriding a long-planned retirement.

The sequence of events began when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit unanimously ruled that the DOE overstepped its authority under Section 202(c) of the 1935 Federal Power Act. The court invalidated a May 2025 order that had forced the 64-year-old J.H. Campbell plant in Michigan to remain online past its scheduled closure date.[1][3][4]

In the ruling, Appeals Court Judge Cornelia Pillard wrote that the emergency statute "is essentially a narrow, last-resort backstop." The court found that the DOE's use of the provision to halt planned retirements disrupted state-level resource adequacy planning and invited federal interventions unsupported by the law.[3][4][5]

Despite the judicial rebuke, the DOE immediately applied the same statutory authority to the Centralia facility in Washington. The plant, which operates under a 2011 agreement with the state to cease coal combustion, was originally scheduled to shut down its final unit at the end of 2025.

The Department of Energy asserts its emergency orders prevented 17 gigawatts of coal generation from retiring in 2025.

Secretary Wright defended the new order, arguing that the Northwest region faces elevated reliability risks during extreme weather. "America needs more reliable power, not less, and today's order will help ensure reliable electricity generation remains available to help address periods of peak demand," Wright stated, adding that the administration is committed to reversing "energy subtraction policies."

Secretary Wright defended the new order, arguing that the Northwest region faces elevated reliability risks during extreme weather.

The DOE asserts that its interventions have prevented blackouts and saved more than 17 gigawatts of coal-power electricity generation from going offline nationwide in 2025. The agency cited a North American Electric Reliability Corporation assessment projecting energy shortfalls in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council region over the next five years.

However, state officials and environmental groups contend the emergency is fabricated. Data from the Energy Information Administration indicates that the Centralia plant has not generated any meaningful electric power since January 2026, despite previous DOE orders keeping it on standby. During the early months of the year, regional hydropower met 70 percent of total electricity demand, leaving the coal unit idle.[2]

"The Centralia plant hasn't been producing any power over this supposed 'emergency' period because the grid has more than enough electricity without it," said Ted Kelly, U.S. clean energy director at the Environmental Defense Fund. Kelly argued that the orders force families and businesses to bear the costs of keeping uneconomic plants operational.[2][3]

State officials argue the Northwest grid has sufficient capacity from hydropower and other sources without the Centralia plant.

Those costs are substantial. TransAlta previously estimated it would need $23 million to repair and refurbish the aging coal-burning power plant to keep it in safe operating condition if ordered to remain on standby into the latter half of 2026. In Michigan, Attorney General Dana Nessel noted that the Campbell order had cost utility customers $180 million through March.[4]

The Centralia directive is part of a broader administration strategy that has utilized Section 202(c) to force at least seven fossil-fuel power plants to stay open across the country, including facilities in Colorado, Florida, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. These orders consistently override utility and state regulator decisions that determined it was prudent and safe to shut the plants down.[2][4]

The legal battle is expected to escalate. While the D.C. Circuit ruling directly addresses only the initial May 2025 order for the Michigan plant, environmental organizations are preparing to challenge the Centralia renewal in court. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice could seek a rehearing or appeal the appellate decision to the Supreme Court.[2][3]

For now, the Centralia order goes into effect on September 13, 2026. The facility will remain on standby, burning through maintenance budgets and stockpiling coal, waiting for a grid dispatch call that state regulators insist will never come.

The stakes

The Department of Energy's repeated use of emergency powers to override state-level power plant retirements forces ratepayers to fund the maintenance of aging fossil-fuel facilities. The outcome of the escalating legal battle will determine whether the federal government can unilaterally dictate local grid resource planning.

The essentials

  1. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a Department of Energy emergency order that forced a Michigan coal plant to remain open.
  2. Hours later, the DOE issued a new emergency order extending the life of Washington state's Centralia coal plant through December 11, 2026.
  3. Energy Secretary Chris Wright argues the orders are necessary to prevent blackouts and address grid reliability risks during peak demand.
  4. State officials and environmental groups note the Centralia plant has generated almost no power this year, with regional demand met largely by hydropower.
  5. The orders mandate that utility customers bear the multimillion-dollar costs of keeping the aging coal facilities on standby.

Perspectives explored

Federal Energy Officials

The administration argues that retaining baseload coal generation is a necessary backstop against grid failure.

The Department of Energy maintains that premature retirements of fossil-fuel plants expose regional grids to unacceptable risks during extreme weather events. Citing projections from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, federal officials argue that the Northwest faces potential energy shortfalls over the next five years. By utilizing emergency powers under the Federal Power Act, the administration asserts it has saved 17 gigawatts of generation capacity nationwide, prioritizing immediate grid security over state-level transition timelines.

State Regulators & Utilities

Local authorities view the federal interventions as an expensive overreach that disrupts long-term resource planning.

State utility commissions and grid operators argue that the DOE is fabricating emergencies to bypass established regulatory processes. They point out that the targeted coal plants are often uneconomic and that their continued operation imposes massive costs on ratepayers—such as the estimated $180 million incurred by Michigan customers. Utilities stress that they have already secured replacement power sources and that forced federal mandates undermine their ability to manage grid transitions efficiently.

Environmental Advocates

Climate groups contend the orders are an illegal bailout for the coal industry that ignores actual grid data.

Environmental organizations highlight that the plants kept open by the DOE, including the Centralia facility, are frequently sitting idle because their power is too expensive to dispatch. They argue that the administration is misusing a narrow statutory provision intended for acute, unforeseen crises—like a hurricane or cyberattack—to prop up aging infrastructure. Advocates are leveraging the recent D.C. Circuit ruling to systematically challenge the remaining emergency orders in federal court.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

State Regulators & Utilities 35%Environmental Advocates 35%Federal Energy Officials 30%
  1. [1]TribLIVE.comState Regulators & Utilities

    Federal court rejects Trump order keeping Michigan coal plant open

    Read on TribLIVE.com
  2. [2]EarthjusticeEnvironmental Advocates

    Trump Administration Loses First Court Case Challenging DOE Orders for Coal Plants

    Read on Earthjustice
  3. [3]PBSState Regulators & Utilities

    Federal court rejects Trump administration order keeping Michigan coal plant open

    Read on PBS
  4. [4]Canary MediaState Regulators & Utilities

    Court rules that Trump can’t force a Michigan coal plant to keep running

    Read on Canary Media
  5. [5]Utility DiveState Regulators & Utilities

    Court rejects DOE ‘emergency’ order delaying coal plant retirement as overstep

    Read on Utility Dive

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Energy stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.