Right to RepairPolicy ExplainerJul 6, 2026, 4:48 AM· 9 min read

Trump Signs Executive Order to Allow Aftermarket Parts, Targeting Auto Repair Monopoly

A new presidential memorandum directs the EPA to expedite aftermarket part certifications and deprioritize enforcement against DIY mechanics. The 'Freedom to Fix' order aims to break OEM monopolies and lower the cost of car maintenance.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Independent Mechanics & DIYers 40%Franchise Auto Dealers 30%Environmental Regulators 30%
Independent Mechanics & DIYers
Advocates for consumer choice and affordable repair options.
Franchise Auto Dealers
Prioritizes vehicle safety, cybersecurity, and OEM standards.
Environmental Regulators
Focuses on maintaining strict emissions standards and pollution controls.

What's not represented

  • · Auto Insurance Providers

Why this matters

By breaking the regulatory bottleneck that restricts aftermarket parts, this order empowers independent mechanics and DIYers to fix vehicles without relying on expensive dealership monopolies, directly lowering the cost of car ownership.

Key points

  • A new presidential memorandum directs the EPA to clarify allowable emissions repairs and expedite aftermarket part certifications.
  • The order aims to break the California Air Resources Board (CARB) monopoly on certifying third-party replacement parts.
  • Federal officials are instructed to deprioritize civil enforcement actions against individuals repairing their own vehicles in good faith.
  • Franchise auto dealers warn that the deregulation could lead to an influx of substandard 'knockoff' parts that compromise vehicle safety.
30 days
Deadline for EPA emissions repair guidance
75%
Post-warranty repairs done at independent shops
$33,000
Avg. savings per repair from prior agricultural order

On June 29, 2026, the White House issued a sweeping presidential memorandum aimed at fundamentally reshaping how Americans maintain, repair, and upgrade their vehicles. Dubbed the "Freedom to Fix" directive, the executive action directly targets the growing monopoly that automakers and franchise dealerships hold over replacement parts and diagnostic data. By ordering federal agencies to strip away regulatory barriers, the administration is attempting to lower the soaring costs of car ownership that have squeezed consumers at the repair shop. The move represents a major escalation in the national right-to-repair debate, shifting the battlefield from state legislatures to the federal regulatory apparatus and promising immediate relief for independent mechanics.

For years, the automotive right-to-repair movement has fought a localized, state-by-state battle against manufacturers who increasingly use software locks, proprietary tools, and voided-warranty threats to force drivers into expensive dealership service centers. Consumer advocates argue that once a vehicle is purchased, the owner should have the absolute right to decide who fixes it and what parts are used. However, automakers have successfully leveraged the increasing digitization of modern vehicles to create closed ecosystems. This federal directive elevates that localized fight to the national stage, signaling that the executive branch views OEM repair monopolies as an artificial tax on the American driver that must be dismantled.[3]

By ordering the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to rewrite the rules governing aftermarket parts and emissions systems, the administration is attempting to break a specific regulatory bottleneck that has artificially inflated the cost of car maintenance. Under the new directive, the EPA has exactly 30 days to issue comprehensive guidance clarifying what actions individuals and independent shops can legally take to fix their own vehicles' emissions systems without violating the Clean Air Act. This rapid timeline underscores the administration's urgency in deregulating the aftermarket parts industry and providing immediate legal cover for do-it-yourself mechanics who have previously operated in a regulatory gray area.[1]

To fully understand the significance of the executive order, one must look at the current, highly digitized state of the auto repair industry. Modern vehicles are essentially rolling computers, generating gigabytes of telematics data and relying on complex, interconnected sensors for even the most basic mechanical functions. A simple bumper replacement now often requires recalibrating advanced driver-assistance systems, while a minor engine issue can trigger software lockouts that only a dealership's proprietary diagnostic tablet can clear. This technological shift has transformed car repair from a mechanical discipline into a software management challenge, heavily favoring the original manufacturers.[3]

Automakers have aggressively leveraged this technological complexity to restrict who can safely and legally fix their cars. By limiting access to essential diagnostic software and threatening to void powertrain warranties if third-party parts are installed, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) have steadily squeezed independent mechanics out of the repair ecosystem. When a local garage cannot access the digital keys required to reset a vehicle's computer after replacing a part, the consumer is forced to return to the dealership, where labor rates and OEM part markups are significantly higher than the independent market average.[2]

Despite OEM restrictions, the vast majority of post-warranty repairs are handled by independent shops.
Despite OEM restrictions, the vast majority of post-warranty repairs are handled by independent shops.

Despite these mounting technological hurdles, the independent repair sector remains a critical pillar of the automotive economy. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation notes that roughly 75 percent of all post-warranty vehicle repairs are currently performed at independent shops rather than franchise dealerships. Yet, these small businesses face an existential threat as newer, hyper-connected vehicle models lock them out of crucial repair information. The "Freedom to Fix" order is designed to throw a lifeline to these independent operators, ensuring they have the legal backing and the physical parts necessary to compete with dealership service centers.

The most significant regulatory hurdle addressed by the new memorandum involves the federal Clean Air Act and the complex certification process for aftermarket parts. Historically, federal environmental law has strictly prohibited any tampering with a vehicle's emissions-control system, including catalytic converters, oxygen sensors, and exhaust gas recirculation valves. The EPA has traditionally taken a hardline stance on these components, operating under the assumption that only factory-original parts or highly vetted alternatives can guarantee a vehicle meets federal pollution standards over its entire lifespan.[1]

In practice, this strict federal prohibition meant that if an independent mechanic or a do-it-yourself automotive enthusiast replaced a faulty emissions component with an affordable third-party part, they risked massive federal fines unless that specific part was officially certified. The threat of civil enforcement actions created a chilling effect across the aftermarket industry, discouraging manufacturers from producing cheaper alternatives and terrifying independent shops away from performing routine emissions maintenance. The new executive order directly addresses this fear by instructing the EPA to deprioritize enforcement against good-faith repairs.[1][2]

The core of the aftermarket parts bottleneck lies in the certification process itself. Currently, the only widely recognized pathway for certifying aftermarket emissions parts is managed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Because California's emissions standards are so strict, and because many other states adopt CARB rules, this single state agency effectively dictates the national supply chain for replacement auto parts. If a third-party manufacturer wants to sell a replacement catalytic converter nationwide, they must first navigate California's labyrinthine regulatory approval process.[1]

The core of the aftermarket parts bottleneck lies in the certification process itself.

According to the White House and industry advocates, the CARB certification process routinely takes well over a year to complete, even when parts manufacturers submit flawless paperwork and comprehensive emissions testing data. This severe bureaucratic backlog chokes the national supply of affordable aftermarket parts, leaving consumers with no choice but to purchase expensive OEM replacements directly from the dealership. By targeting this specific bottleneck, the executive order aims to strip California of its de facto monopoly over the national auto parts supply chain.

The EPA has been directed to create an expedited 30-day certification pathway to bypass California's lengthy CARB process.
The EPA has been directed to create an expedited 30-day certification pathway to bypass California's lengthy CARB process.

The "Freedom to Fix" order directs EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin to establish alternative, expedited federal certification pathways that completely bypass the California regulatory apparatus. By creating a streamlined federal approval process, the administration aims to flood the market with compliant, affordable third-party components. This move is expected to drastically reduce the time it takes for new aftermarket parts to reach mechanic shop shelves, fostering intense competition that should ultimately drive down prices for the end consumer.[1]

Furthermore, the directive explicitly instructs federal environmental officials to deprioritize civil enforcement actions against individuals who attempt to repair their own vehicles to their original configuration. During the Oval Office signing ceremony, the President expressed visible disbelief that everyday citizens were facing legal jeopardy simply for turning a wrench on their own property. By officially calling off federal enforcement agents, the administration is sending a clear signal that the government will no longer act as the enforcement arm for OEM parts monopolies.[2]

While consumer advocates, DIYers, and independent mechanics have loudly cheered the executive move, the franchise dealership lobby is pushing back with significant concerns. The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) has historically opposed broad right-to-repair legislation, citing severe safety, cybersecurity, and quality control issues. Dealership groups argue that modern vehicles are too complex and dangerous to be repaired with unvetted third-party components, warning that the deregulation will inevitably lead to compromised vehicles on public roads.

Automakers and dealership groups specifically argue that manufacturers need to restrict access to vehicle software to protect against malicious cybersecurity threats and hacking. They also warn that a flood of expedited, federally approved aftermarket parts could lead to a dangerous rise in substandard "knockoff" components. If a third-party sensor fails at highway speeds, or if a cheap replacement brake module malfunctions, the dealership lobby argues that the resulting accidents will far outweigh any marginal savings achieved at the repair counter.

NADA further cautions that empowering third-party parts manufacturers gives auto insurance companies dangerous new leverage over the repair process. Dealerships warn that insurers will exploit this deregulation to force independent mechanics into using the absolute cheapest available components after a collision, rather than the safest or most durable ones. This dynamic, they argue, strips the consumer of true choice, replacing an OEM monopoly with an insurance-mandated race to the bottom in part quality.[2]

Despite these industry objections, the federal momentum for the right to repair appears to be accelerating rapidly. This automotive directive follows a highly popular executive order signed earlier in February 2026 that granted farmers the explicit right to repair their own agricultural equipment. That previous move, which broke similar OEM monopolies held by tractor manufacturers, was widely celebrated in rural communities, with the EPA estimating it saves farmers an average of $33,000 per major repair.[2]

The automotive directive follows a similar February 2026 order that granted farmers the right to repair their own agricultural equipment.
The automotive directive follows a similar February 2026 order that granted farmers the right to repair their own agricultural equipment.

The new federal action also complements and complicates ongoing state-level right-to-repair efforts. States like Massachusetts and Maine have already passed comprehensive, voter-approved right-to-repair laws that force automakers to share wireless telematics data with independent shops. While those state laws have survived intense legal challenges from the auto industry, they have remained a patchwork solution, offering protections to drivers in New England while leaving the rest of the country subject to OEM restrictions.[3]

While the state laws focus primarily on the digital side of the equation—mandating access to diagnostic data and wireless telematics—the new federal memorandum tackles the physical hardware and emissions regulations. Together, the state data laws and the federal parts deregulation represent a formidable, multi-front pincer movement against the traditional dealership repair monopoly. If both efforts succeed, independent mechanics will have unprecedented access to both the software needed to diagnose a car and the affordable parts needed to fix it.[1][3]

For the average American driver, the immediate impact of this executive order will likely be felt directly at the mechanic's counter over the coming months. As alternative federal certification pathways open up and the national supply of aftermarket parts increases, the basic laws of market competition should drive down the cost of routine maintenance. Independent shops will be able to offer a wider variety of price points for repairs, giving consumers the ability to choose between premium OEM parts and budget-friendly aftermarket alternatives.[2]

Ultimately, the "Freedom to Fix" directive reasserts a fundamental, common-sense principle of private property ownership: if you bought the vehicle, you should have the absolute right to decide who fixes it, and what parts they use to do the job. By dismantling the regulatory barriers that have protected automaker monopolies, the administration is betting that a free and open repair market will deliver exactly what drivers have been demanding for years—lower costs, greater choice, and the simple freedom to turn a wrench.

How we got here

  1. 2012

    Massachusetts passes the nation's first comprehensive automotive right-to-repair law.

  2. 2020

    Massachusetts voters expand the state law to include wireless telematics data.

  3. Feb 2026

    The administration signs an executive order granting farmers the right to repair agricultural equipment.

  4. Jun 29, 2026

    The 'Freedom to Fix' presidential memorandum is signed, targeting the auto repair monopoly.

  5. Late Jul 2026

    Deadline for the EPA to issue new guidance on alternative aftermarket part certifications.

Viewpoints in depth

Independent Mechanics & DIYers

Advocates for consumer choice and affordable repair options.

This camp views the OEM monopoly on parts and data as an artificial tax on car ownership. By breaking the CARB certification bottleneck, independent shops argue they will finally have reliable access to the affordable aftermarket parts they need to service modern vehicles. They maintain that a car owner should have the ultimate authority over who fixes their property and what components are used, without facing federal harassment or voided warranties.

Franchise Auto Dealers

Prioritizes vehicle safety, cybersecurity, and OEM standards.

Dealerships and automaker lobbying groups warn that modern vehicles are highly complex machines that require specialized, proprietary knowledge to repair safely. They argue that flooding the market with expedited aftermarket parts could lead to an influx of substandard 'knockoffs.' Furthermore, they express concern that insurance companies will exploit this deregulation to force independent mechanics to use the cheapest available parts after a collision, potentially compromising the vehicle's structural integrity and safety systems.

Environmental Regulators

Focuses on maintaining strict emissions standards and pollution controls.

Environmental advocates and state regulators worry that bypassing California's rigorous CARB certification process will open the door to widespread emissions tampering. They argue that the Clean Air Act's strict prohibitions are necessary to prevent drivers from installing 'defeat devices' or substandard catalytic converters that increase urban smog. From this perspective, the federal push to deprioritize civil enforcement against DIY mechanics risks rolling back decades of progress on vehicle pollution.

What we don't know

  • How quickly the EPA will be able to establish and scale a new federal certification pathway that effectively bypasses California's CARB system.
  • Whether insurance companies will use the influx of cheaper aftermarket parts to mandate their use in collision repairs over OEM components.

Key terms

CARB
The California Air Resources Board, a state agency that currently holds a de facto monopoly on certifying aftermarket emissions parts for the entire US.
OEM
Original Equipment Manufacturer; parts made directly by the car's manufacturer, which are often significantly more expensive than third-party alternatives.
Aftermarket Parts
Replacement vehicle components manufactured by third-party companies rather than the original automaker.
Telematics
Wireless data transmitted by modern vehicles, often restricted by manufacturers to control diagnostic and repair access.

Frequently asked

Does this mean I can legally remove my car's catalytic converter?

No. The Clean Air Act still prohibits bypassing or removing emissions controls. The order simply clarifies what legitimate repairs are allowed and expedites the approval of third-party replacement parts.

Will this executive order lower my car repair bills?

Likely yes. By increasing the supply of certified aftermarket parts and protecting independent mechanics from federal fines, increased competition is expected to drive down prices.

How does this affect my vehicle's factory warranty?

Using aftermarket parts generally does not void a warranty under existing federal law, and this new directive further reinforces consumer choice in selecting replacement components.

Sources

Source coverage

3 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Independent Mechanics & DIYers 40%Franchise Auto Dealers 30%Environmental Regulators 30%
  1. [1]Politico ProEnvironmental Regulators

    Trump directs rollback of emissions penalties for those who fix cars

    Read on Politico Pro
  2. [2]The Washington TimesIndependent Mechanics & DIYers

    Trump signs order allowing Americans to fix their own cars, targeting auto parts monopoly

    Read on The Washington Times
  3. [3]NewsweekEnvironmental Regulators

    Where You Can Legally Repair Your Car as Trump Signs 'Freedom to Fix' Order

    Read on Newsweek
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get automotive stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.