Factlen ExplainerThermal NetworksExplainerJun 24, 2026, 10:15 PM· 5 min read· #3 of 3 in home

The Evidence Pack: How Networked Geothermal is Turning Gas Utilities into Clean Heating Providers

By replacing natural gas pipelines with shared underground water loops, thermal energy networks are allowing neighborhoods to share heat and achieve up to 600% efficiency.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Decarbonization Advocates 40%Gas Utilities and Labor 35%Grid and Ratepayer Analysts 25%
Decarbonization Advocates
Focus on the massive efficiency gains, the reduction of winter grid peaks, and the elimination of neighborhood combustion emissions.
Gas Utilities and Labor
Focus on the survival of the utility business model, the preservation of pipefitter jobs, and the ability to leverage existing right-of-way infrastructure.
Grid and Ratepayer Analysts
Focus on the massive capital costs of trenching streets and the need for strict regulatory oversight to ensure equitable access.

What's not represented

  • · Homeowners currently reliant on delivered heating oil who lack existing utility gas connections.
  • · Municipal public works departments managing the disruption of street trenching.

Why this matters

This technology provides a realistic, scalable pathway to decarbonize entire neighborhoods at once, removing the massive upfront costs of geothermal for homeowners while preserving the jobs and infrastructure expertise of existing gas utility workers.

Key points

  • Thermal energy networks replace natural gas pipes with a shared loop of ambient-temperature water.
  • The system uses the earth's constant 55-degree temperature to achieve up to 600% heating efficiency.
  • Buildings on the network share energy, allowing a building that needs cooling to warm the homes down the street.
  • The utility model removes the massive upfront cost of geothermal for individual homeowners.
  • The transition preserves the jobs of gas utility workers, who already possess the necessary pipefitting skills.
500–600%
Efficiency of networked geothermal
55°F
Constant shallow earth temperature
25–62%
Winter peak electricity reduction
125
Customers in Framingham pilot

Building heat is a massive source of carbon emissions, primarily driven by the combustion of natural gas and heating oil in residential basements. While individual air-source heat pumps are an excellent solution for many homes, electrifying entire cold-climate cities building-by-building presents a looming infrastructure challenge. As millions of homes switch to electric heating, the winter peak demand on the power grid is projected to skyrocket, requiring billions of dollars in new transmission lines and power plants.[5]

Enter the Thermal Energy Network (TEN), also known as networked geothermal. Instead of relying on millions of individual outdoor air compressors fighting against freezing winter temperatures, this approach reimagines heating and cooling as a shared neighborhood utility. By replacing aging natural gas pipelines with a closed loop of ambient-temperature water, utilities can connect entire city blocks to a single, highly efficient thermal web.[1][4]

The mechanism begins with the earth itself, which acts as a massive, inexhaustible thermal battery. Just a few hundred feet below the frost line, the ground maintains a constant temperature of roughly 55 degrees Fahrenheit year-round, regardless of blizzards or heatwaves on the surface. To tap into this stable environment, utility crews drill a series of deep, vertical boreholes and insert U-shaped pipes filled with water and an environmentally friendly antifreeze.[1][2][3][4]

A central borefield taps into the earth's constant 55-degree temperature, circulating water to individual homes.
A central borefield taps into the earth's constant 55-degree temperature, circulating water to individual homes.

This central borefield connects to a horizontal water main running beneath the street—occupying the exact same right-of-way previously used by natural gas pipes. Service lines branch off this main into individual homes and businesses. Inside the building, a ground-source heat pump extracts thermal energy from the water loop, concentrates it using a standard refrigerant cycle, and distributes warm air through the building's existing ductwork.[1][2][6]

In the summer, the system simply runs in reverse. The heat pump pulls warm air out of the house and rejects it into the water loop, which carries the heat back underground to be absorbed by the cool earth. Because the system is exchanging heat with the mild 55-degree ground rather than fighting against sweltering summer air, it requires dramatically less electricity to operate than a traditional air conditioner.[1][2][6]

But the true breakthrough of a thermal energy network is "load cancellation"—the ability to share energy between buildings with fundamentally different needs. In a diverse neighborhood, an office building, a grocery store, a data center, or an ice rink might require heavy cooling even in the dead of winter due to internal equipment or refrigeration demands.[1][4]

In a traditional setup, that commercial building would vent its excess heat into the outside air, wasting it entirely. On a thermal network, the building rejects its heat directly into the shared water loop. That injected thermal energy raises the temperature of the loop, and the residential homes down the street immediately absorb that exact same heat to warm their living rooms.[1][4]

Load cancellation allows buildings that need cooling to reject heat into the loop, which is then absorbed by buildings that need heating.
Load cancellation allows buildings that need cooling to reject heat into the loop, which is then absorbed by buildings that need heating.
In a traditional setup, that commercial building would vent its excess heat into the outside air, wasting it entirely.

This synchronous energy sharing allows thermal networks to achieve staggering efficiencies. While a high-efficiency gas furnace operates at about 95 percent efficiency, and a standard air-source heat pump reaches 250 to 300 percent, a networked geothermal system can achieve efficiencies of 500 to 600 percent. For every one unit of electrical energy used to run the pumps, the system delivers five to six units of heating or cooling.[1][3][7]

This hyper-efficiency translates directly to grid stability. Research by Synapse Energy Economics found that transitioning neighborhoods to thermal energy networks instead of individual air-source heat pumps reduces the winter peak electricity demand by 25 to 62 percent. Scaled across a region, this peak reduction could save ratepayers billions of dollars in avoided electrical grid upgrades and new power plant construction.[5]

Networked geothermal systems can achieve efficiencies up to 600 percent by sharing thermal energy.
Networked geothermal systems can achieve efficiencies up to 600 percent by sharing thermal energy.

Beyond the physics, thermal networks offer a profound socioeconomic benefit: they provide a survival strategy for natural gas utilities and their workforce. As states mandate aggressive decarbonization targets, gas utilities face an existential threat. If customers defect to individual heat pumps one by one, the remaining customers are left paying the maintenance costs of a sprawling, increasingly obsolete gas network.[4][7]

Thermal networks allow these companies to transition from selling combustible gas to selling clean thermal energy. The infrastructure requires the exact same skill sets—trenching streets, laying pipes, welding joints, and managing fluid dynamics—that gas pipefitters and utility workers already possess. It preserves union jobs and leverages existing utility capital to finance the clean energy transition.[3][4][7]

This transition is already moving from theory to reality. In Framingham, Massachusetts, the utility company Eversource recently launched the nation's first gas-utility-owned networked geothermal pilot. The mile-long loop connects 36 buildings, including private residences, a fire station, and a public housing complex, serving 125 customer accounts. Similar utility-led pilots are underway in New York, led by Central Hudson and other regional providers.[2][3][4][7]

Thermal networks utilize the exact same trenching and pipefitting skills currently used by natural gas workers.
Thermal networks utilize the exact same trenching and pipefitting skills currently used by natural gas workers.

For the homeowner, the utility model removes the largest historical barrier to geothermal energy: the upfront cost. In the past, installing a private ground-source heat pump required a homeowner to pay upwards of $30,000 to drill their own private boreholes. Under the network model, the utility finances, owns, and maintains the underground infrastructure, while the customer simply pays a predictable monthly utility bill for their thermal connection.[1][4][7]

Despite the immense promise, scaling these networks presents significant challenges. The upfront capital required to drill borefields and trench city streets is massive, and regulatory frameworks in most states do not yet legally allow gas utilities to sell anything other than gas. State legislatures must pass new laws—as New York, Massachusetts, Colorado, and Maryland recently have—to redefine utility charters and permit the sale of thermal energy.[3][6][7]

As these early pilots generate real-world performance data, urban planners and energy experts are watching closely. If successful, thermal energy networks could rewrite the blueprint for the modern city, transforming the ground beneath our feet into a shared, zero-emission engine for human comfort.[3][4][7]

How we got here

  1. 2022

    New York passes the Utility Thermal Energy Networks and Jobs Act, requiring utilities to pilot TENs.

  2. 2023

    Eversource begins drilling boreholes for the nation's first gas-utility-owned networked geothermal pilot in Framingham, MA.

  3. June 2024

    The Framingham pilot officially launches, connecting 36 buildings to a shared thermal loop.

  4. 2025–2026

    Additional states, including Maryland and Colorado, pass legislation enabling gas utilities to transition into thermal energy providers.

Viewpoints in depth

Decarbonization Advocates

Focuses on the massive efficiency gains and the elimination of neighborhood combustion emissions.

Climate advocates view thermal energy networks as the missing puzzle piece for urban decarbonization. By shifting entire neighborhoods off combustion fuels simultaneously, cities can meet aggressive emissions targets without overwhelming the electrical grid. They point to data showing that networked geothermal reduces winter peak electricity demand by up to 62 percent compared to standard air-source heat pumps, saving billions in avoided power plant construction.

Gas Utilities and Organized Labor

Focuses on the survival of the utility business model and the preservation of pipefitter jobs.

For the natural gas industry, thermal networks represent a lifeline. As policy shifts away from fossil fuels, gas utilities face the threat of a "death spiral" where departing customers leave remaining ratepayers to foot the bill for an obsolete pipeline network. By transitioning to thermal utilities, these companies can leverage their existing right-of-way access and capital. Crucially, labor unions strongly support the transition, as laying thermal water pipes requires the exact same trenching and welding skills currently used by gas workers.

Grid and Ratepayer Analysts

Focuses on the massive capital costs of trenching streets and the need for strict regulatory oversight.

While acknowledging the physical efficiency of the systems, ratepayer advocates caution about the staggering upfront capital required to drill borefields and tear up city streets. They argue that state public utility commissions must carefully regulate how these infrastructure costs are amortized, ensuring that low-income ratepayers are not unfairly burdened during the transition period. They also highlight the need for new legal frameworks, as most utility charters currently only permit the sale of combustible gas or electricity, not ambient thermal energy.

What we don't know

  • How quickly state public utility commissions will rewrite regulations to allow gas utilities to legally sell thermal energy at scale.
  • The exact lifespan and long-term maintenance costs of the underground borefields compared to traditional gas pipelines.
  • How effectively these systems can be retrofitted into ultra-dense urban environments where drilling space is severely limited.

Key terms

Thermal Energy Network (TEN)
A utility-scale system of underground water pipes that connects multiple buildings to shared thermal sources for heating and cooling.
Ground-Source Heat Pump
An appliance that transfers heat between a building and the earth, rather than pulling heat from the outside air.
Load Cancellation
The process where buildings with opposite thermal needs (one needing heat, one needing cooling) exchange energy through a shared loop, minimizing the need for external energy.
Coefficient of Performance (COP)
A metric of efficiency for heat pumps; a COP of 5 means five units of heat are moved for every one unit of electricity consumed.

Frequently asked

Do I still need a furnace with a thermal network?

No. The ground-source heat pump installed in your home provides 100 percent of your heating and cooling needs year-round, replacing both your furnace and your air conditioner.

Who pays for the underground pipes and boreholes?

In a utility-model thermal network, the utility company finances, owns, and maintains the underground infrastructure, just as they do with natural gas pipelines.

Can this work in dense urban areas?

Yes. Urban systems often use angled drilling for boreholes or tap into alternative thermal sources like municipal sewer lines, data centers, or bodies of water to balance the network's temperature.

Does the water in the pipes enter my home's ductwork?

No. The ambient-temperature water loop only goes to the heat pump in your basement, which then uses a closed refrigerant cycle to heat or cool the air blown through your ducts.

Sources

Source coverage

7 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Decarbonization Advocates 40%Gas Utilities and Labor 35%Grid and Ratepayer Analysts 25%
  1. [1]HEET (Home Energy Efficiency Team)Decarbonization Advocates

    Networked Geothermal Explainer

    Read on HEET (Home Energy Efficiency Team)
  2. [2]EversourceGas Utilities and Labor

    Framingham Geothermal Pilot Project

    Read on Eversource
  3. [3]Massachusetts Clean Energy CenterGrid and Ratepayer Analysts

    Clean, Efficient & Reliable: Why TENs matter

    Read on Massachusetts Clean Energy Center
  4. [4]Building Decarbonization CoalitionDecarbonization Advocates

    What are thermal energy networks (TENs)?

    Read on Building Decarbonization Coalition
  5. [5]Synapse Energy EconomicsGrid and Ratepayer Analysts

    Evaluating the Benefits of Thermal Energy Networks

    Read on Synapse Energy Economics
  6. [6]Canadian Climate InstituteDecarbonization Advocates

    What is a thermal energy network?

    Read on Canadian Climate Institute
  7. [7]Factlen Editorial TeamDecarbonization Advocates

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get home stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.