Skip to main content
ExplainerAviation RegulationExplainer· 4 min read· in Travel

The Part 135 Loophole: How Semi-Private Airlines Bypass Standard Airport Security

By combining DOT public charter rules with FAA commuter regulations, semi-private carriers allow passengers to arrive just 20 minutes before departure. Now, major airlines and regulators are scrutinizing the framework that makes it possible.

By Lan Xu

Semi-Private Carriers 50%Legacy Aviation Advocates 50%
Semi-Private Carriers
Advocate for regulatory flexibility to provide innovative, time-saving travel options.
Legacy Aviation Advocates
Demand uniform safety and labor standards for all scheduled passenger flights.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • General Aviation Airports
  • Corporate Travel Managers

Key terms

Fixed Base Operator (FBO)
A private terminal at an airport that provides services like fueling, parking, and passenger lounges for general aviation and charter flights.
Part 135
The section of Federal Aviation Regulations that governs commuter and on-demand operations, typically allowing for smaller aircraft and lower pilot hour minimums.
Part 121
The strict regulatory framework that governs major scheduled commercial airlines, mandating 1,500 hours of pilot experience and mandatory retirement at age 65.
Public Charter
A flight arranged by a DOT-approved charter operator who sells individual seats to the public, while contracting a separate air carrier to actually fly the plane.

Key points

  • Semi-private airlines allow passengers to arrive just 20 minutes before departure by operating out of private FBO terminals.
  • The model relies on FAA Part 135 regulations, which permit 30-seat aircraft to fly with lower pilot hour minimums than major airlines.
  • Passengers bypass standard TSA checkpoints, undergoing streamlined security vetting and luggage swabs instead.
  • Major commercial airlines and pilot unions are lobbying the FAA to close the loophole, citing safety and unfair competition.
  • The FAA is currently evaluating whether to move scheduled public charters into a stricter regulatory category.

One hundred and twenty minutes. That is the standard buffer every major commercial airline demands you surrender before a domestic flight just to navigate the labyrinth of parking garages, bag drops, and security lines. But for a growing subset of travelers, that mandatory waiting period has shrunk to exactly 20 minutes.[1]

The experience of flying out of a Fixed Base Operator, or FBO, strips away the modern airport concourse entirely. There are no sprawling gate areas, no public address announcements, and no taking off your shoes. You pull up to a private terminal, hand your luggage to a valet, and walk directly onto the tarmac to board the aircraft.[3]

This is the operational model of the semi-private airline, a rapidly expanding middle market that bridges the gap between commercial economy and full private jet charter. "If the Wright brothers had seen what we've done to commercial aviation and all the barriers that we put between the individual who wants to get somewhere and getting on the airplane, they'd turn over in their graves," says Alex Wilcox, CEO of the semi-private carrier JSX.

The mechanism that makes this 20-minute arrival possible is not a secret VIP program, but a specific combination of federal aviation regulations. It relies entirely on the intersection of Department of Transportation (DOT) Part 380 and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 135.[2][4]

The regulatory differences that define the semi-private travel market.

DOT Part 380 governs public charters. It allows a company—acting strictly as a charter broker—to sell individual seats on a flight directly to the general public.[4]

However, the company selling the ticket does not actually fly the plane. They contract a direct air carrier to operate the flight under FAA Part 135 rules, which govern commuter and on-demand operations.[2]

Part 135 is the critical regulatory lever. Traditional major airlines operate under Part 121, which mandates ultra-strict safety, rest cycle, and crew requirements designed for massive jetliners. Part 135 was originally drafted for smaller, on-demand air taxis.[2]

By capping the aircraft capacity at 30 seats—typically using modified Embraer ERJ 135 or 145 regional jets—these semi-private carriers legally qualify for the Part 135 framework while flying scheduled routes.[3]

By capping capacity at 30 seats, carriers legally qualify for the Part 135 framework while offering business-class legroom.

The regulatory differences between the two frameworks are stark. Under Part 121, a first officer must have a minimum of 1,500 hours of flight time. Under Part 135, that minimum drops to just 250 hours.[2]

The regulatory differences between the two frameworks are stark.

Furthermore, Part 135 pilots are not subject to the mandatory retirement age of 65 that governs Part 121 commercial pilots. This allows semi-private carriers to recruit both younger pilots building hours and highly experienced retired captains who still want to fly.[2]

But the most visible difference for the passenger is the security protocol. Because these flights operate out of private FBOs and fall under different security directives, they bypass the standard Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints found in commercial terminals.[1]

Passengers still undergo security screening—including TSA Secure Flight vetting, explosive trace detection swabs on luggage, and weapons checks—but the streamlined process takes seconds rather than hours.[3]

Semi-private flights occupy a distinct middle market between commercial economy and full private charter.

This regulatory arbitrage has infuriated major commercial airlines and pilot unions. Organizations representing traditional carriers argue that companies operating scheduled service should be held to the same Part 121 safety standards as traditional airlines, regardless of aircraft size.

The traditional carriers view the Part 135 model as an unfair competitive advantage, particularly during a nationwide pilot shortage, as it allows these upstarts to hire from a much larger pool of aviators.

In response to the mounting pressure, the FAA began scrutinizing the model in 2024. The agency has signaled intentions to evaluate whether these public charters should be moved into a new, stricter regulatory category to standardize oversight.

Proponents of the semi-private model argue that they voluntarily exceed Part 135 minimums by implementing advanced safety management systems, and that their operations provide vital connectivity to smaller regional airports that major airlines have abandoned.[3]

For now, the framework remains intact. Travelers willing to pay a premium over commercial economy can still legally bypass the terminal crowds and reclaim their time.[1]

The deciding factor will be the FAA's upcoming rulemaking process, which must determine whether a 30-seat jet flying a scheduled route is fundamentally a charter flight or a commercial airliner.[5]

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

2 viewpoints surfaced

Semi-Private Carriers 50%Legacy Aviation Advocates 50%
  1. [1]The Points GuySemi-Private Carriers

    This tiny airline lets you skip TSA and fly between small airports for less

    Read on The Points Guy
  2. [2]eCFR

    14 CFR Part 135 -- Operating Requirements: Commuter and on Demand Operations

    Read on eCFR
  3. [3]JSXSemi-Private Carriers

    JSX: Hop On - Semi-Private Air Travel

    Read on JSX
  4. [4]Department of Transportation

    Public Charters (14 CFR Part 380)

    Read on Department of Transportation
  5. [5]Factlen Editorial Team

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Travel stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.