Skip to main content
ExplainerEcodesign MandatesExplainer· 4 min read· in Guides

The EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR): A Guide to the Digital Product Passport, the Ban on Destroying Unsold Goods, and the New Durability Mandates

The European Union's sweeping Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) is reshaping global manufacturing by mandating Digital Product Passports, enforcing strict durability standards, and banning the destruction of unsold apparel.

By Ivan Smirnov

European Regulators 35%Global Manufacturers 35%Circular Economy Advocates 30%
European Regulators
Focus on enforcing circularity, reducing carbon emissions, and eliminating product waste.
Global Manufacturers
Focus on the logistical feasibility, data integration costs, and supply chain complexities of the new mandates.
Circular Economy Advocates
Focus on maximizing transparency, ending planned obsolescence, and holding brands accountable.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Non-EU Tier-3 Raw Material Suppliers

How we got here

  1. July 2024

    The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) officially enters into force across the European Union.

  2. February 2026

    The European Commission adopts secondary legislation detailing the rules and exemptions for the ban on destroying unsold consumer products.

  3. July 2026

    The ban on the destruction of unsold apparel and footwear takes effect for large enterprises.

  4. February 2027

    The first mandatory Digital Product Passport goes live for industrial and electric vehicle batteries under aligned EU regulations.

  5. 2027–2028

    The first ESPR delegated acts are expected to mandate Digital Product Passports for textiles, iron, and steel.

  6. 2030

    The destruction ban extends to medium-sized enterprises, and the DPP rollout expands to cover the vast majority of consumer goods.

Why it matters

If you manufacture, import, or sell physical goods in the European market, the ESPR fundamentally changes your compliance obligations. The regulation forces a shift from a linear 'take-make-dispose' model to a circular economy, requiring unprecedented supply chain transparency and ending the era of disposable retail.

For decades, the European Union's product regulations focused primarily on energy efficiency, targeting appliances like refrigerators and washing machines. That era is over. With the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), the EU has expanded its regulatory reach to encompass virtually all physical goods placed on its market.[2]

The ESPR, which officially entered into force in July 2024, serves as the legislative backbone of the European Green Deal's circular economy action plan. Rather than a single set of rules, it is a sweeping framework that empowers the European Commission to set binding sustainability requirements for specific product categories through a rolling series of delegated acts.[2][4]

The regulation's core philosophy is simple but disruptive: products sold in Europe must be designed to last longer, be easier to repair, incorporate recycled materials, and be fully traceable from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal. This represents a fundamental shift away from the traditional linear manufacturing model.[2][8]

While many of the ESPR's requirements will phase in gradually over the next decade, one major provision arrives imminently. Starting July 19, 2026, large enterprises will be legally prohibited from destroying unsold apparel, clothing accessories, and footwear.[2][7]

The ESPR rolls out through a phased timeline of delegated acts between 2026 and 2030.

The scale of the waste problem driving this ban is staggering. Every year in Europe, an estimated 4% to 9% of all unsold textiles are destroyed before ever being worn, generating approximately 5.6 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions. Under the new rules, companies can no longer simply write off and incinerate excess inventory.[2]

Crucially, the EU's definition of 'destruction' is exceptionally broad. It encompasses not only incineration and landfill disposal but also certain types of recycling and energy recovery. Shredding unsold jackets to recover fibers, for instance, is still classified as destruction under the ESPR.[4][7]

Instead of disposal, large brands and retailers must prioritize reuse, donation, remanufacturing, or resale. Furthermore, companies must publicly disclose the volume of unsold goods they discard and the reasons for doing so, introducing a new level of reputational risk for wasteful inventory management.[2][7]

Instead of disposal, large brands and retailers must prioritize reuse, donation, remanufacturing, or resale.

Beyond the destruction ban, the most technologically ambitious pillar of the ESPR is the mandate for a Digital Product Passport (DPP). The DPP is essentially a digital twin or identity card for a physical product, accessible via a scannable data carrier such as a QR code or RFID tag affixed directly to the item or its packaging.[5][8]

The Digital Product Passport will allow consumers and regulators to access a product's entire material history via a scannable data carrier.

The passport will store a comprehensive, machine-readable record of the product's entire lifecycle. While the exact data fields will vary by product category, a standard DPP is expected to include material composition, the origin of raw materials, carbon footprint data, repairability scores, and the presence of any substances of concern.[6][8]

The DPP is designed to serve multiple stakeholders simultaneously. Consumers will scan the passport to verify sustainability claims and access repair instructions; customs authorities will use it to check compliance at the border; and recyclers will rely on it to safely dismantle products at the end of their useful life.[3][8]

Implementing the DPP requires a monumental data-gathering effort. Manufacturers can no longer rely on siloed internal databases; they must extract verified, granular data from deep within their supply chains, often reaching down to tier-three and tier-four suppliers located outside of Europe.[3][6]

The rollout of these requirements is governed by the ESPR Working Plan, which prioritizes industries with the highest environmental impact. The first specialized DPP—the Battery Passport—will become mandatory for industrial and electric vehicle batteries in February 2027 under a separate but aligned regulation.[6][8]

A Digital Product Passport serves as a comprehensive digital twin, aggregating data from across the supply chain.

Under the ESPR framework itself, the first wave of delegated acts will target iron, steel, and textiles. Industry analysts expect the textile delegated act to be adopted by 2027, with full compliance and DPP requirements for apparel taking effect around 2028 or 2029.[6]

Subsequent waves will bring furniture, tires, aluminum, and electronics into scope. For electronics, the mandates will likely focus heavily on the 'Right to Repair,' requiring manufacturers to guarantee the availability of spare parts and provide clear dismantling instructions for devices like smartphones and tablets.[6][8]

The jurisdictional reach of the ESPR is global. There are no geographic exemptions; if a North American or Asian manufacturer wants to sell a covered product to European consumers, that product must carry a compliant Digital Product Passport and meet all ecodesign criteria.[8]

The destruction of unsold apparel generates millions of tons of preventable carbon emissions annually.

Non-compliance carries severe commercial consequences. Products that fail to meet the ecodesign requirements or lack a valid DPP will be barred from entering the EU market. Member states are also mandated to establish dissuasive penalties, which can include heavy administrative fines and the revocation of CE markings.[4][8]

For global supply chains, the ESPR signals the end of voluntary sustainability reporting. By hardcoding circularity into market access rules, the European Union is leveraging its massive consumer base to force a worldwide upgrade in how physical goods are designed, tracked, and ultimately retired.[1][8]

What to know

  • The EU's ESPR mandates a shift from a linear economy to a circular economy for almost all physical goods.
  • Starting July 19, 2026, large enterprises are banned from destroying unsold apparel and footwear.
  • Products will be required to carry a Digital Product Passport (DPP) detailing their material composition and environmental impact.
  • The DPP requirements will roll out via delegated acts between 2026 and 2030, starting with batteries, textiles, and steel.
  • The regulation applies to any company selling into the EU market, regardless of where the product was manufactured.

Where opinion splits

European Regulators

The European Commission views the ESPR as an essential tool to decarbonize the economy and eliminate waste.

Regulators argue that the traditional linear economy is fundamentally incompatible with the EU's climate goals. By mandating ecodesign and the Digital Product Passport, the European Commission aims to make sustainable products the default standard on the market. They emphasize that the destruction of perfectly usable goods is an unacceptable market failure, and that mandatory transparency is the only way to hold global supply chains accountable for their environmental footprint.

Global Manufacturers

Manufacturers are concerned about the immense data-gathering burden and the complexity of compliance.

While many large brands support the transition to a circular economy in principle, they warn that the technical execution of the Digital Product Passport presents a massive logistical hurdle. Gathering verified lifecycle data requires cooperation from tier-three and tier-four suppliers in regions where digital tracking is virtually non-existent. Industry groups caution that the rolling timeline of delegated acts could create a fragmented compliance landscape, disproportionately burdening companies that produce a wide variety of consumer goods.

Circular Economy Advocates

Sustainability advocates argue the regulation is a long-overdue death knell for fast fashion and planned obsolescence.

Environmental organizations and circular economy startups view the ESPR as a watershed moment. They argue that voluntary sustainability initiatives have largely resulted in greenwashing, and that only strict legal mandates can force industries to internalize the environmental costs of their products. Advocates are particularly supportive of the broad definition of 'destruction' in the unsold goods ban, noting that it prevents brands from using low-grade shredding or incineration as a loophole to avoid genuine reuse and repair.

Sources

Source coverage

8 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

European Regulators 35%Global Manufacturers 35%Circular Economy Advocates 30%
  1. [1]Factlen Editorial TeamCircular Economy Advocates

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team
  2. [2]European CommissionEuropean Regulators

    Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation

    Read on European Commission
  3. [3]IntereconomicsCircular Economy Advocates

    Digital Product Passport: Finding the Right Balance Between Transparency for Circularity and Added Red Tape

    Read on Intereconomics
  4. [4]Cooley LLPGlobal Manufacturers

    Secondary legislation clarifies the new rules for unsold consumer products under the ESPR

    Read on Cooley LLP
  5. [5]American National Standards InstituteGlobal Manufacturers

    ANSI Roundtable Gathers Stakeholder Input on European Commission's Proposed Digital Product Passport

    Read on American National Standards Institute
  6. [6]MyProductPassportCircular Economy Advocates

    ESPR Timeline at a Glance

    Read on MyProductPassport
  7. [7]nShiftGlobal Manufacturers

    What is the EU ban on destroying unsold goods?

    Read on nShift
  8. [8]One Click LCACircular Economy Advocates

    Digital Product Passport: What's a DPP

    Read on One Click LCA

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Guides stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.