Skip to main content
Auto Supply ChainsProduction Shift· 4 min read· in Automotive & Transportation

Honda Shifts SUV Production to US Citing US-Canada Trade Tariffs

Facing a proposed 50% import tariff on Canadian-built vehicles, Honda is reevaluating its North American manufacturing footprint to protect its best-selling models. The automaker is weighing a shift of CR-V production to US facilities while indefinitely delaying an $11 billion investment in Canada.

By Elena Ivanova

How this story has developed

This report is part of a developing story — read the earlier chapters below.

  1. U.S. Escalates Trade War With 50% Tariff on Canadian Autos and Steel
  2. The Strategic Shift: Comparing Electricity Surcharges to Critical Mineral Export Bans in the US-Canada Trade War
  3. U.S. Implements 50% Tariffs on Canadian Dairy as USMCA Trade Negotiations Collapse
  4. Canada Imposes Dollar-for-Dollar Counter-Tariffs on 700+ US Products, Solidifying Trade War
  5. How Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 Reshapes Executive Power in US Trade Policy
  6. Honda Shifts SUV Production to US Citing US-Canada Trade Tariffs (this article)
Cross-Border Automakers 40%US Manufacturing Advocates 35%Canadian Industrial Sector 25%
Cross-Border Automakers
Maintains that sudden tariff shifts disrupt decades of integrated supply chains, costing billions and delaying future EV investments.
US Manufacturing Advocates
Argues that tariffs are necessary to force automakers to repatriate jobs and build vehicles in the markets where they sell them.
Canadian Industrial Sector
Warns that a 50% tariff on exports to their largest market poses an existential threat to local manufacturing and jobs.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Local dealership owners facing inventory shortages
  • US auto parts suppliers reliant on Canadian assembly plants

Honda is preparing to shift production of its high-volume SUVs from Ontario to its United States facilities to bypass a looming 50% import tariff on Canadian-built vehicles. The decision, triggered by new trade policies set to take effect on January 1, 2027, ensures that a family walking into a US dealership next year will not face a sudden, five-figure markup on popular models like the CR-V.[1][3]

The stakes for the North American automotive market are unusually high, and the impact on local dealership lots will be immediate. Toyota and Honda currently manufacture more than 75% of all passenger cars built in Canada, with the vast majority destined for American driveways. A 50% border tax—doubling the existing 25% levy—would fundamentally break the pricing model for these vehicles, turning a standard $30,000 commuter SUV into a $45,000 luxury purchase overnight.[1][3][4]

To prevent that sticker shock for American buyers, Honda is retooling its existing US footprint. The automaker relies heavily on its Alliston, Ontario complex to build the CR-V and Civic, which together account for roughly 25% of Honda's total US sales volume. Shifting that capacity to plants in Ohio and Indiana requires significant logistical maneuvering, as assembly schedules are typically locked in years in advance.[3][4]

Toyota and Honda manufacture the vast majority of vehicles assembled in Canada.

The relocation is not without significant corporate casualties that will affect future vehicle availability. Honda had recently outlined a major multi-billion-dollar investment plan for its North American operations, heavily weighted toward establishing a comprehensive electric vehicle supply chain. However, Honda Executive Vice President Noriya Kaihara confirmed the automaker has indefinitely delayed an $11 billion EV and battery investment plan for Canada.[5]

The relocation is not without significant corporate casualties that will affect future vehicle availability.

"Without a new USMCA deal or at least some kind of stability, we may have to change our direction," Kaihara told reporters in Washington, D.C., noting that tariffs cost the company more than $3 billion in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026. He added that while Honda needs an eighth manufacturing plant in North America by 2030 to meet buyer demand, that investment may not happen with trade policies currently up in the air.[5]

Industry analysts note that the tariff policy specifically targets the integrated cross-border supply chains that have defined North American auto manufacturing since the 1990s. Parts frequently cross the US-Canada border multiple times before final assembly. Seiji Sugiura, a senior analyst at Tokai Tokyo Intelligence Laboratory, noted that rerouting Canadian output to other countries while replacing US supply with local production represents a "major shift from the way things were before."[1][4]

Honda's Alliston, Ontario complex currently builds a significant portion of the CR-Vs sold in the US market.

Toyota finds itself in a nearly identical predicament with its RAV4, the best-selling SUV in the United States. Canadian-built vehicles represent 17% of Toyota's US sales, according to Barclays analysts. While Toyota has not formally announced a complete production shift, the company is investing $3.6 billion into its San Antonio, Texas plant, signaling a broader pivot toward localized US manufacturing that will keep its trucks and SUVs affordable for local buyers.[3][4]

For consumers currently shopping for a vehicle, the immediate effect will be a shift in inventory composition. Dealerships are expected to heavily discount remaining Canadian-built 2026 models before the January 2027 deadline, while 2027 models rolling off US assembly lines will maintain current pricing structures but may face initial supply constraints as local plants ramp up to maximum capacity.[1][3]

The next verifiable checkpoint for buyers and dealers arrives in mid-November, when Honda must finalize its first-quarter 2027 allocation schedules. If the Ohio and Indiana plants cannot fully absorb the volume previously slated for Ontario, dealerships will face a hard mathematical reality: either pass the 50% tariff on imported stock to the consumer, or operate with empty lots during the spring buying season.[1][5]

Key points

  1. Honda is shifting production of its high-volume SUVs to US plants to avoid a proposed 50% tariff on Canadian imports.
  2. The tariffs, set to take effect January 1, 2027, would double the existing 25% levy on Canadian-built vehicles.
  3. Honda has indefinitely delayed an $11 billion electric vehicle and battery investment plan for Canada.
  4. Toyota and Honda currently manufacture more than 75% of all passenger cars built in Canada.
  5. The production shift aims to prevent massive price hikes for US buyers of popular models like the CR-V.

Viewpoints in depth

US Manufacturing Advocates

Tariffs as a tool for domestic job repatriation.

Proponents of the 50% tariff argue that the North American Free Trade Agreement and its successors allowed automakers to offshore production while maintaining unfettered access to US buyers. By heavily taxing Canadian-built vehicles, the administration aims to force companies like Honda and Toyota to expand their US footprints. This perspective views the short-term logistical costs to automakers as a necessary trade-off for long-term wage growth and industrial stability in states like Ohio, Indiana, and Texas.

Cross-Border Automakers

The logistical impossibility of sudden production shifts.

For the automakers, the primary friction point is time. Vehicle assembly schedules, supplier contracts, and factory tooling are locked in 18 to 24 months in advance. Honda and Toyota argue that a 50% tariff taking effect in January 2027 does not provide sufficient runway to relocate production lines for high-volume models like the CR-V and RAV4. Consequently, the tariffs act less as an incentive to move and more as a direct tax on the consumer, while simultaneously draining capital that was earmarked for next-generation electric vehicle development.

Canadian Industrial Sector

An existential threat to Ontario's economy.

The Canadian auto sector views the tariffs as a catastrophic blow to its industrial base. Because Toyota and Honda account for more than 75% of all passenger cars built in Canada, a policy that makes those vehicles unsellable in the US effectively shutters the plants. Canadian officials and union leaders argue that the integrated nature of the supply chain—where parts cross the border multiple times before final assembly—means that destroying Canadian assembly plants will also harm the US parts suppliers that feed them.

Why this matters

For the average American car buyer, this production shift prevents a massive price spike on the country's most popular family vehicles. By moving assembly south of the border, Honda ensures its best-selling SUVs remain financially accessible, though the transition may temporarily limit inventory on local dealership lots.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Cross-Border Automakers 40%US Manufacturing Advocates 35%Canadian Industrial Sector 25%
  1. [1]CBT NewsCanadian Industrial Sector

    Toyota and Honda face biggest impacts from Trump's Canada auto tariff

    Read on CBT News
  2. [2]Business InsiderUS Manufacturing Advocates

    Trump's Canada Tariffs Take Aim at America's Favorite Cars

    Read on Business Insider
  3. [3]Autonocion.comCanadian Industrial Sector

    Toyota and Honda Build Three Quarters of Canada's Cars. A 50% Tariff Hits Them in January, and the CR-V and RAV4 on the Lot Were Built on the Wrong Side of the Border

    Read on Autonocion.com
  4. [4]autoevolutionCross-Border Automakers

    50% Import Tariff Could Upend Canadian Production for Toyota and Honda

    Read on autoevolution
  5. [5]CarBuzzCross-Border Automakers

    Honda Might Have To Cancel A Major North American Investment

    Read on CarBuzz

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Automotive & Transportation stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.