US Oil Giants Sign First Deals in Two Decades to Re-Enter Venezuela Following Maduro's Capture
Eight months after the US military captured Nicolás Maduro, American energy firms including Hunt Oil and SLB have signed the first major contracts to rebuild Venezuela's degraded oil infrastructure.
- Early-Mover Upstream Investors
- Firms willing to deploy capital directly into extraction to secure prime acreage before the market fully stabilizes.
- Cautious Supermajors
- Large legacy operators waiting for sovereign guarantees and a stabilized legal framework before committing capital.
- Oilfield Service Providers
- Companies seeking immediate revenue through exploration and mapping contracts without taking ownership of the underlying assets.
- 1.2 million bpd
- Current estimated Venezuelan oil production
- 2.0 million bpd
- Target production level by the 2030s
- 9%
- Venezuela's historical share of the global heavy crude market
Fast facts
- US oil companies Hunt Oil and SLB have signed the first major energy deals in Venezuela since the January capture of Nicolás Maduro.
- The agreements signal a split industry strategy, with independent drillers and service providers moving faster than risk-averse supermajors.
- Venezuela currently produces roughly 1.2 million barrels per day, with analysts projecting a return to 2 million barrels per day will take until the 2030s.
- ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips are actively scouting opportunities but await a stabilized legal framework before committing upstream capital.
The tension at the heart of Venezuela's energy sector is a collision between geopolitical ambition and infrastructural reality. Following the January 2026 capture of Nicolás Maduro by US forces, the Trump administration has aggressively pushed for American capital to rebuild the country's oil industry. Yet, the physical degradation of the national power grid and the absence of a tested legal framework have created a massive risk barrier. The resolution is emerging not through a unified industry push, but through a fractured strategy: agile independent drillers and service providers are signing the first deals, while the largest supermajors hold back.[1][3][4]
This week, the interim Venezuelan government, led by Delcy Rodríguez, secured its first major commercial energy partnerships with US firms in nearly two decades. During the IMAGE 2026 energy conference in Houston, Venezuelan Oil Minister Paula Henao announced that Dallas-based Hunt Oil Company and Houston-based SLB (formerly Schlumberger) had signed formal agreements to re-enter the country. The deals mark a critical inflection point for a nation that holds the world's largest proven oil reserves but has seen its output crippled by years of underinvestment and sanctions.[1][5]
The agreements represent distinct approaches to a highly volatile market. Hunt Oil has entered into a direct contract to expand oil and gas production within the Orinoco Belt, committing to upstream extraction. Conversely, SLB has signed an agreement focused strictly on oil exploration and mapping underground reserves. By operating as a service provider, SLB can generate immediate revenue from the sector's reopening without exposing massive capital to the risk of asset seizure.[1]
The physical mechanics of returning Venezuelan crude to the global market present a daunting timeline. According to S&P Global Energy, the country is currently in a cautious recovery phase, producing approximately 1.2 million barrels per day. Analysts project that returning to a baseline output of 2 million barrels per day will require tens of billions of dollars in infrastructure overhauls and will likely not materialize until the 2030s.[2]
The physical mechanics of returning Venezuelan crude to the global market present a daunting timeline.
The primary bottleneck is not the availability of hydrocarbons, but the systems required to extract and transport them. Heavy crude, which constitutes the bulk of Venezuela's reserves, requires specialized diluents and immense amounts of reliable electricity to pump and process. The national grid, severely degraded after years of deferred maintenance, remains a critical vulnerability for any operator attempting to scale up production.[2][4]
This systemic risk explains the hesitation of the largest US supermajors. ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, both of which had their Venezuelan assets expropriated by former President Hugo Chávez in 2007, have begun scouting opportunities but have refrained from signing binding upstream commitments. Industry advisors note that these risk-averse giants require sovereign guarantees, a stabilized fiscal landscape, and a secure physical environment before deploying the billions necessary to upgrade creaking infrastructure.[3][4]
While US supermajors wait for regulatory clarity, other international players are utilizing proxy structures to dilute their exposure. BP recently secured a license to develop the second phase of the offshore Loran gas field. To mitigate the geopolitical and financial risks, the London-listed company is partnering with investment vehicles linked to the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, effectively spreading the capital burden across state-backed entities.[3]
Despite the severe operational hurdles, the gravitational pull of Venezuelan crude remains strong for the US Gulf Coast. Venezuela historically accounted for roughly 9 percent of the global market for heavy crude, a specific grade that complex refineries in Texas and Louisiana require to efficiently produce diesel, jet fuel, and heating oil. The geographic proximity of the Orinoco Belt to the Gulf Coast offers a structural supply chain advantage that few other global basins can match.[4]
As the interim government attempts to rewrite its hydrocarbon laws to attract foreign capital, the industry is closely monitoring these initial contracts. The success or failure of Hunt Oil and SLB will serve as a bellwether for the broader market. If these early movers can successfully navigate the transitional governance and physical bottlenecks, the cautious supermajors may be forced to accelerate their timelines or risk being locked out of the most significant reserve reopening of the decade.[1][4]
Viewpoints in depth
Early-Mover Upstream Investment
Committing direct capital to oil and gas extraction to secure prime acreage before the market fully stabilizes.
For: Secures long-term access to the world's largest proven heavy crude reserves at a steep discount; establishes a dominant market position while competitors hesitate. Against: Exposes billions of dollars to expropriation risk, political instability, and a severely degraded national power grid that complicates extraction. Evidence: BP's recent partnership to develop the Loran gas field and Hunt Oil's production expansion contracts demonstrate that early movers can negotiate highly favorable terms with the interim government. Fits well when: A company can partner with state-backed investment funds (such as UAE or Qatari vehicles) to dilute financial risk, or when the firm has a high tolerance for geopolitical volatility. Does not fit when: A company requires immediate, predictable quarterly returns or lacks the internal security infrastructure to operate in a transitional state.
Cautious Service-Led Re-Entry
Entering via exploration, mapping, and oilfield services rather than direct asset ownership.
For: Generates immediate revenue through service contracts without exposing massive capital to asset seizure; allows companies to evaluate the physical and political environment from the ground. Against: Forfeits the upside of owning the extracted hydrocarbons; leaves the company vulnerable to non-payment if the interim government's funding falters. Evidence: SLB's recent agreement to map underground reserves and conduct exploration services allows the firm to profit from the reopening without buying the underlying fields, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips remain in a scouting phase. Fits well when: A company specializes in technical services, or when a supermajor is waiting for a finalized legal framework and sovereign guarantees before committing upstream capital. Does not fit when: The strategic objective is to book new proven reserves to replace depleting assets in other global basins.
Sources
[1]WSHUEarly-Mover Upstream InvestorsU.S. oil companies sign some of the first deals with Venezuela since Maduro's capture
Read on WSHU →
[2]MarketplaceOilfield Service ProvidersU.S. oil companies ink production deals with Venezuela
Read on Marketplace →
[3]The GuardianEarly-Mover Upstream InvestorsBP has answered Donald Trump's call for oil companies to help rebuild Venezuela's fossil fuel industry
Read on The Guardian →
[4]CBS NewsCautious SupermajorsExecutives from Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Exxon are planning to meet with Trump administration officials
Read on CBS News →
[5]The New ArabEarly-Mover Upstream InvestorsVenezuela signed deals with US companies on Thursday in a bid to boost oil and gas production
Read on The New Arab →
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get energy stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.

