Skip to main content
Lipoprotein(a)Clinical Trial Results· Updated · 2 min read· in Health

Lp(a)-Lowering Drug Pelacarsen Fails to Reduce Major Cardiovascular Events in Phase 3 Trial

Novartis's highly anticipated drug pelacarsen successfully lowered Lipoprotein(a) levels but failed to significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes in a massive 8,323-patient trial.

By Daria Mikhailova

Share this story

Listen

On September 4, 2026, the pharmaceutical company Novartis announced that its experimental drug pelacarsen failed to prevent heart attacks and strokes in a massive 8,323-patient clinical trial.

The result marks a major setback in the effort to treat elevated Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), a genetically determined cholesterol particle that affects approximately 20% of the global population. Unlike standard LDL cholesterol, Lp(a) is largely immune to diet, exercise, and conventional statins.[2]

Pelacarsen, developed in partnership with Ionis Pharmaceuticals, is an antisense oligonucleotide administered as one monthly injection. It was designed to block the production of Lp(a) in the liver.

The Phase 3 trial, known as Lp(a)HORIZON, enrolled patients who already had established cardiovascular disease and elevated Lp(a) levels above the 70 mg/dL threshold. All participants were already receiving optimized, guideline-directed care, including standard lipid-lowering and antihypertensive therapies.[1]

Pelacarsen lowers Lp(a) by roughly 80%, while newer drugs in development target reductions exceeding 90%.

Chemically, the drug worked exactly as intended. Novartis confirmed that patients receiving pelacarsen achieved substantially lower Lp(a) levels compared to those on a placebo.

However, that chemical reduction did not translate into a clinical benefit. The trial missed its primary endpoint, failing to significantly reduce the 4-point composite risk of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization.

"Although lower Lp(a) levels were observed with pelacarsen, the findings did not demonstrate that this translated into reduced cardiovascular risk in the overall study population," said Shreeram Aradhye, M.D., Novartis' chief medical officer.

For patients who recently discovered they have high Lp(a) following new screening guidelines, the result is disappointing but does not change immediate management. The clinical focus remains on aggressively controlling all other modifiable risk factors, such as blood pressure and LDL cholesterol, to mitigate overall risk.[2]

For patients with elevated Lp(a), the clinical focus remains on aggressively controlling standard modifiable risk factors like LDL cholesterol.

The failure now forces the cardiology community to ask whether the entire Lp(a) hypothesis is flawed, or if pelacarsen simply did not lower the particle deeply enough. In previous studies, pelacarsen reduced Lp(a) by roughly 72% to 80%.

Newer therapies currently in Phase 3 trials, such as Amgen's olpasiran and Eli Lilly's lepodisiran, utilize a different mechanism—small interfering RNA (siRNA)—and have demonstrated the ability to lower Lp(a) by more than 90%.

Analysts note that those deeper reductions might be necessary to actually prevent cardiovascular events. Novartis plans to present the full Lp(a)HORIZON data at an upcoming medical congress, which will provide crucial details on whether any specific subgroups saw a benefit during the minimum 2.5 years of follow-up.[1]

Viewpoints in depth

Pharmaceutical Analysts

Focusing on the depth of Lp(a) reduction and pipeline implications.

Industry analysts suggest the failure of pelacarsen does not necessarily invalidate the entire Lp(a) hypothesis. They point out that pelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, typically reduces Lp(a) by 72% to 80%. Newer therapies in the pipeline, such as Amgen's olpasiran and Eli Lilly's lepodisiran, use small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology to achieve reductions exceeding 90%. Analysts argue that this deeper suppression might be the critical threshold required to translate biomarker changes into actual cardiovascular event prevention.

Clinical Cardiologists

Prioritizing immediate patient management and overall risk reduction.

For practicing cardiologists, the trial result reinforces the importance of focusing on what can currently be controlled. Because there is still no approved targeted therapy for elevated Lp(a), clinicians emphasize that patients with this genetic marker must be managed aggressively for all other modifiable risk factors. This means driving standard LDL cholesterol to extremely low levels, strictly managing blood pressure, and optimizing lifestyle factors to mitigate the patient's overall cardiovascular risk profile.

Key points

  • Novartis announced its Lp(a)-lowering drug pelacarsen failed to meet its primary endpoint in the Phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON trial.
  • The trial enrolled 8,323 patients with established cardiovascular disease and elevated Lp(a) levels.
  • While the drug successfully lowered Lp(a) levels, it did not significantly reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events.
  • The failure raises questions about whether deeper Lp(a) reductions, targeted by newer drugs in development, are necessary for clinical benefit.

How we got here

  1. Dec 2019

    Novartis initiates the Phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON trial, enrolling over 8,000 patients.

  2. Apr 2026

    The trial completes its patient follow-up period.

  3. Sep 2026

    Novartis announces the drug failed to meet its primary cardiovascular outcomes endpoint.

Clinical Cardiologists 40%Pharmaceutical Analysts 30%Drug Developers 30%
Clinical Cardiologists
Emphasize that patients with high Lp(a) must continue to aggressively control standard modifiable risks like LDL and blood pressure.
Pharmaceutical Analysts
Argue that the failure might be specific to pelacarsen's potency rather than the target itself, noting that newer siRNA drugs achieve deeper reductions.
Drug Developers
View the trial as proof that chemical reduction of a biomarker does not automatically guarantee clinical outcome improvements.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Patients with elevated Lp(a)
  • Advocacy groups for genetic heart disease

Sources

Source coverage

2 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Clinical Cardiologists 40%Pharmaceutical Analysts 30%Drug Developers 30%
  1. [1]ClinicalTrials.gov

    Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein (a) Lowering With Pelacarsen (TQJ230) on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With CVD (Lp(a)HORIZON)

    Read on ClinicalTrials.gov →
  2. [2]Factlen Editorial TeamClinical Cardiologists

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
Listen

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Health stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.