Factlen ExplainerMass TimberExplainerJun 8, 2026, 4:15 AM· 7 min read· #4 of 4 in culture

How Mass Timber is Replacing Concrete to Build the Next Generation of Skyscrapers

Engineered wood products like cross-laminated timber are allowing architects to build towering skyscrapers that sequester carbon and rival the strength of steel.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Sustainable Architecture Advocates 40%Fire Safety & Structural Engineers 30%Urban Developers & Contractors 30%
Sustainable Architecture Advocates
Argue that mass timber is essential for decarbonizing the construction industry and transforming cities into carbon sinks.
Fire Safety & Structural Engineers
Emphasize the need for rigorous performance-based testing and caution against over-simplifying the fire risks of exposed wood.
Urban Developers & Contractors
Focus on the economic viability, rapid prefabrication speeds, and the practical benefits of hybrid concrete-timber models.

What's not represented

  • · Traditional Steel & Concrete Manufacturers
  • · Local Zoning Boards

Why this matters

The built environment is responsible for nearly 40% of global carbon emissions. Transitioning from concrete to mass timber transforms cities from massive polluters into carbon sinks, fundamentally changing how we build the future.

Key points

  • Mass timber products like CLT are replacing concrete and steel in high-rise construction due to their immense structural strength.
  • The built environment accounts for nearly 40% of global emissions, making timber's ability to sequester carbon highly attractive.
  • Milwaukee is currently leading the global race for the tallest timber skyscrapers, with multiple record-breaking towers built or proposed.
  • Mass timber survives fires through a process called 'charring,' where the burnt outer layer insulates and protects the structural core.
  • Modern building codes now permit timber buildings up to 18 stories, though many developers use hybrid concrete-timber designs for taller structures.
8%
Global carbon emissions from cement
110 meters
Height of The Edison (Milwaukee)
50%
Embodied carbon reduction in hybrid towers
18 stories
IBC height limit for timber without variance

The skyline of the 21st century is being fundamentally reimagined, and the material of choice for the next generation of high-rises isn't a futuristic titanium alloy or a new iteration of reinforced steel. It is wood. After more than a century of concrete dominating urban architecture, a renaissance of timber construction is sweeping through the world's major cities. Across the globe, from the industrial corridors of the American Midwest to the suburbs of Paris and the bustling center of Sydney, developers are racing to build the world's tallest timber skyscrapers, promising to alter both the aesthetics and the environmental impact of the built environment.[8]

This architectural revolution has nothing to do with the traditional 'stick-frame' lumber used to build sprawling suburban homes or low-rise apartment complexes. The current high-rise boom is driven entirely by 'mass timber,' a category of highly engineered wood products specifically designed to rival the compressive strength of concrete and the tensile flexibility of steel. By rethinking how wood is processed and assembled, engineers have unlocked the ability to build massive, load-bearing structures out of a renewable resource, fundamentally challenging the long-held assumption that skyscrapers require carbon-intensive materials to safely reach the clouds.[3]

The crown jewel of this structural movement is Cross-Laminated Timber, universally known in the commercial construction industry as CLT. To manufacture a CLT panel, massive boards of raw timber are stacked in alternating directions—each layer resting at an exact 90-degree angle to the one below it—and bonded together under immense industrial pressure. By crossing the direction of the natural wood grain, CLT achieves a profound level of structural rigidity along both the vertical and horizontal axes. The complex physics involved in this perpendicular lamination results in a wooden panel that performs remarkably like reinforced concrete, capable of bearing immense loads and resisting severe seismic forces without fracturing.[3]

While CLT forms the rigid floors and walls of these new towers, it is typically paired with Glulam, or glued laminated timber. Glulam complements CLT by aligning the wood grain in a single, continuous direction to form the massive, load-bearing columns and beams that hold the skyscraper aloft. Together, these two engineered materials form a structural skeleton that is significantly lighter than a traditional concrete frame, allowing for faster construction times and requiring less extensive foundation work deep underground.[3][8]

Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) achieves immense strength by gluing layers of wood at alternating 90-degree angles.
Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) achieves immense strength by gluing layers of wood at alternating 90-degree angles.

But why are the world's top architecture firms suddenly abandoning the steel-and-glass orthodoxy that has defined urban centers since the late 19th century? The answer lies in the atmosphere. The built environment is responsible for nearly 40 percent of global carbon emissions, with the energy-intensive production of cement alone accounting for roughly 8 percent of the world's total carbon footprint. As the climate crisis accelerates, the architectural industry is under immense pressure to decarbonize its supply chains.[1]

Mass timber fundamentally flips this environmental equation, offering a rare opportunity to turn massive infrastructure projects into ecological assets. Trees naturally sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere during photosynthesis, locking the carbon into their cellular structure as they grow. When those trees are harvested from sustainably managed forests and engineered into mass timber products, that captured carbon remains trapped inside the building's physical frame for decades or even centuries. Furthermore, the manufacturing process for mass timber requires a mere fraction of the fossil fuels needed to forge steel beams or mix industrial concrete, drastically lowering the 'embodied carbon' of the construction phase.[1][8]

The global race for the sky is accelerating rapidly, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has emerged as an unlikely global capital for timber architecture. The Midwestern city already boasts the 87-meter Ascent tower, which was completed in 2022 and currently holds the official record for the world's tallest mass timber building. However, that record is already in jeopardy. Construction is currently underway just blocks away on The Edison, a 110-meter, 31-story timber high-rise slated to open its doors to residents and commercial tenants in 2027, proving that the scale of these projects is growing exponentially.[4]

Mass timber drastically reduces the 'embodied carbon' of a building compared to traditional cement and steel.
Mass timber drastically reduces the 'embodied carbon' of a building compared to traditional cement and steel.
The global race for the sky is accelerating rapidly, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has emerged as an unlikely global capital for timber architecture.

Not content with those impending records, the Vancouver-based firm Michael Green Architecture recently proposed a staggering 55-story timber tower for Milwaukee. Representing a massive $700 million investment, the proposed development aims to set a completely new global benchmark for regenerative development and urban density. If approved and completed, a 55-story wooden skyscraper would shatter the psychological and engineering barriers that have historically limited timber construction, proving that wood can compete with steel at the absolute highest echelons of urban design.[1]

In Europe, the push toward mass timber is driven by a potent mix of engineering ambition and strict new climate regulations. France, for instance, has mandated strict carbon limits on new construction and required that new public buildings utilize sustainable materials. This regulatory environment has sparked a wooden skyscraper boom in cities like Bordeaux and Paris, where towers like Hyperion and Wood Up are proving the material's viability. By forcing developers to account for the embodied carbon of their materials, European regulators are effectively pricing concrete out of the market for environmentally conscious urban developments.[6]

Meanwhile, Switzerland is pushing the engineering boundaries of what is possible with Rocket&Tigerli, a 100-meter residential tower expected to complete construction in 2026. Unlike many of the 'hybrid' timber towers currently rising around the world—which still rely on a traditional concrete core to house elevator shafts and provide lateral stability—Rocket&Tigerli features a pioneering all-timber core. By replacing the heavy concrete core with an innovative wooden structural system, the Swiss engineering team has significantly reduced the overall weight of the building, allowing it to reach unprecedented heights without requiring massive, carbon-intensive foundation work.[5]

Because mass timber panels are prefabricated off-site, construction is often faster and quieter than pouring concrete.
Because mass timber panels are prefabricated off-site, construction is often faster and quieter than pouring concrete.

Despite the widespread enthusiasm among architects and environmentalists, the most persistent question from the general public, city regulators, and insurance underwriters remains inevitable: What happens when a wooden skyscraper catches fire? It is a visceral fear rooted in centuries of urban conflagrations, but modern engineering has a highly technical answer.[2]

Fire safety engineers point to a well-documented and heavily tested phenomenon known as 'charring.' When mass timber is exposed to the intense heat of a structural fire, the outer layer of the wood burns and rapidly turns to charcoal. This charred layer acts as a highly effective thermal insulator, protecting the unburned wood deep inside the beam and maintaining its structural load-bearing capacity even as the fire rages around it. Because mass timber panels are so thick and dense, they do not ignite easily or burn rapidly like traditional lumber.[2][7]

Unlike structural steel, which can rapidly weaken, buckle, and melt under extreme temperatures, or concrete, which can violently spall and crack as trapped moisture expands, mass timber burns at a slow, highly predictable rate. This predictability gives occupants crucial time to evacuate and allows firefighters to calculate exactly how long the structure will hold before a catastrophic failure becomes a risk.[7]

Still, leading fire experts caution against overconfidence. The behavior of exposed timber in a massive, multi-story fire is incredibly complex, and unlike inert concrete, the wooden structure itself becomes a potential fuel source if the fire manages to breach the protective char layer. Experts warn that the industry must not rely on charring alone, emphasizing that the consequences of a high-rise fire in a timber building could be devastating if proper precautions are ignored.[2]

In a fire, the outer layer of mass timber turns to char, creating an insulating barrier that protects the structural core.
In a fire, the outer layer of mass timber turns to char, creating an insulating barrier that protects the structural core.

To mitigate these inherent risks, modern building codes have evolved to mandate strict safety redundancies. The International Building Code (IBC), which recently expanded its allowances to permit mass timber buildings up to 18 stories tall without special variances, requires rigorous encapsulation techniques. In many tall timber buildings, significant portions of the wood are covered in fire-resistant drywall, and the structures are outfitted with advanced, highly reliable sprinkler systems. Engineers must utilize performance-based fire modeling to prove to local authorities that the building can withstand a worst-case scenario burnout.[7]

Ultimately, the immediate future of the ultra-tall timber skyscraper will likely be hybrid. Projects like Sydney's Atlassian Central—which is currently under construction and aims to be the tallest hybrid timber tower in the world—use a combination of steel exoskeletons, concrete cores, and mass timber floors. This hybrid approach balances wind loads, fire safety, and carbon reduction, utilizing each material for its specific strengths. As the mass timber revolution matures, it promises to transform our cities from massive carbon emitters into towering, habitable carbon sinks, proving that the oldest building material on earth might just be the blueprint for a sustainable future.[4][8]

How we got here

  1. 2010s

    Cross-laminated timber factories begin scaling production in North America and Europe, moving the material from a niche concept to a viable commercial product.

  2. 2021

    The International Building Code (IBC) is updated to allow mass timber structures up to 18 stories, unlocking high-rise development across the United States.

  3. 2022

    The 25-story Ascent tower in Milwaukee is completed, becoming the world's tallest mass timber building at 87 meters.

  4. 2025

    Updated French fire safety codes and sustainability mandates formally accelerate the use of mass timber in public and high-rise buildings across France.

  5. 2026

    Projects like The Edison in the US and Rocket&Tigerli in Switzerland push timber construction past the 100-meter mark, setting new global benchmarks.

Viewpoints in depth

Sustainable Architecture Advocates

Argue that mass timber is essential for decarbonizing the construction industry and transforming cities into carbon sinks.

For environmental advocates and progressive architecture firms, the shift away from concrete is an existential necessity. They point out that cement production alone is responsible for roughly 8% of global carbon emissions. Because trees naturally absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, harvesting them sustainably and locking that carbon into the frame of a building effectively turns skyscrapers into massive carbon sinks. This camp argues that replacing steel and concrete with mass timber is the single most impactful change the construction industry can make to meet global climate targets.

Fire Safety & Structural Engineers

Emphasize the need for rigorous performance-based testing and caution against over-simplifying the fire risks of exposed wood.

While structural engineers acknowledge the safety of mass timber, they frequently push back against the overly optimistic marketing of the material's fire resistance. They agree that the 'charring' effect provides crucial insulation during a blaze, but they warn that a wooden building inherently introduces a massive fuel load that concrete does not. This camp advocates for strict regulatory oversight, demanding that tall timber buildings utilize performance-based fire engineering, extensive sprinkler redundancies, and partial encapsulation (covering the wood in fire-resistant drywall) to ensure the structure does not contribute to the fire's spread.

Urban Developers & Contractors

Focus on the economic viability, rapid prefabrication speeds, and the practical benefits of hybrid concrete-timber models.

For the developers financing these towers and the contractors building them, the appeal of mass timber is largely economic and logistical. Because CLT panels are prefabricated in off-site factories to exact millimeter specifications, they can be assembled on-site much faster and with significantly less noise than pouring concrete. However, this camp tends to favor 'hybrid' structures over purist all-wood designs. By utilizing a concrete core for stability and mass timber for the floors, developers can balance the cost, satisfy strict insurance requirements, and still achieve massive carbon reductions.

What we don't know

  • How insurance markets will price premiums for 30+ story mass timber buildings over the long term.
  • The long-term maintenance costs associated with protecting exposed exterior timber from moisture and UV degradation at extreme heights.
  • Whether the global timber supply chain can scale sustainably if mass timber becomes the default material for all new urban high-rises.

Key terms

Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT)
An engineered wood panel made by gluing layers of lumber together at right angles, providing immense structural strength in multiple directions.
Glulam (Glued Laminated Timber)
Structural beams and columns made by gluing layers of wood in the same directional grain, used to support heavy vertical loads.
Embodied Carbon
The total greenhouse gas emissions generated by the extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and assembly of building materials.
Charring Rate
The predictable speed at which the outer layer of mass timber burns and turns to an insulating layer of charcoal during a fire.
Hybrid Timber Structure
A building that combines mass timber with traditional materials like a concrete core or steel frame to optimize strength, cost, and fire safety.

Frequently asked

Is a mass timber skyscraper a fire hazard?

No. Mass timber relies on a phenomenon called 'charring.' In a fire, the outer layer of the thick wood panels burns and turns to char, which insulates the structural core and prevents the building from collapsing.

How is mass timber different from the wood used in houses?

Traditional houses use light-frame lumber like 2x4s. Mass timber uses engineered products like Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT), where multiple layers of wood are glued together under immense pressure to create panels as strong as concrete.

Does cutting down trees for skyscrapers harm the environment?

When sourced from sustainably managed forests, harvesting timber actually helps sequester carbon. The carbon absorbed by the tree during its life remains locked in the building's structure, while new trees are planted to absorb more CO2.

Can wooden skyscrapers withstand earthquakes and high winds?

Yes. Timber is significantly lighter than concrete and has natural flexibility, which allows it to absorb and dissipate seismic forces effectively. Many tall timber buildings use a hybrid concrete core to further stiffen the structure against wind sway.

Sources

Source coverage

8 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Sustainable Architecture Advocates 40%Fire Safety & Structural Engineers 30%Urban Developers & Contractors 30%
  1. [1]The GuardianSustainable Architecture Advocates

    Milwaukee plans to build tallest timber building in the world

    Read on The Guardian
  2. [2]DezeenFire Safety & Structural Engineers

    Architects enthusiastic about mass timber must improve their understanding of fire safety

    Read on Dezeen
  3. [3]ArchDailySustainable Architecture Advocates

    Is Concrete Ruining the Promise of Mass Timber?

    Read on ArchDaily
  4. [4]Construction BriefingUrban Developers & Contractors

    Construction started on Neutral Edison, set to become 'world's tallest' mass timber building

    Read on Construction Briefing
  5. [5]New AtlasSustainable Architecture Advocates

    World's tallest timber tower is a triumph of sustainable design

    Read on New Atlas
  6. [6]BluebeamUrban Developers & Contractors

    Inside France's Wooden Skyscraper Boom

    Read on Bluebeam
  7. [7]WoodWorksFire Safety & Structural Engineers

    Demonstrating Fire-Resistance Ratings for Mass Timber Elements

    Read on WoodWorks
  8. [8]Factlen Editorial TeamUrban Developers & Contractors

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get culture stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.