Landmark ADA/AAOMR Consensus Recommends Ending Use of Thyroid Shields in Dental X-Rays
The American Dental Association and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology have officially recommended discontinuing lead aprons and thyroid collars, citing modern digital technology that makes the shields unnecessary and potentially counterproductive.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Clinical Researchers
- Focus on the biophysical data proving that modern digital radiography renders shielding obsolete.
- General Dental Practitioners
- Focus on the practical implementation of the guidelines and managing patient expectations.
- Patient Safety Advocates
- Emphasize the need for clear communication to prevent patient anxiety over the missing aprons.
What's not represented
- · State Dental Regulators
- · Dental Equipment Manufacturers
Why this matters
Patients visiting the dentist will no longer be draped in heavy lead aprons, a shift that reflects massive improvements in X-ray safety but requires a major psychological adjustment for a public conditioned to equate the heavy shields with responsible care.
Key points
- The ADA and AAOMR officially recommend ending the use of lead aprons and thyroid collars during dental X-rays.
- Modern digital radiography emits up to 10,000 times less radiation than 1970s film-based machines.
- Advanced 'rectangular collimation' tightly focuses the X-ray beam, virtually eliminating scatter radiation.
- Protective shields can actually be counterproductive by blocking the primary beam and forcing a retake.
- The new guidelines apply to all patients, including pregnant women and children.
- Many dental practices are keeping aprons on hand to help ease patient anxiety during the transition.
The familiar ritual of the dental visit—the heavy, lead-lined apron draped over the chest and the snug collar wrapped around the neck—is officially becoming a relic of the past.[4]
In a landmark consensus that fundamentally rewrites decades of clinical protocol, the American Dental Association (ADA) and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR) have formally recommended ending the use of thyroid shields and lead abdominal aprons during routine dental X-rays.[1]
The new guidelines, published in the Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), apply universally to all patients, regardless of age, health status, or pregnancy.[2]
The shift is not a concession to convenience, but a reflection of how radically dental imaging technology has advanced. Today’s digital radiography systems emit a fraction of the radiation used by the film-based machines of the 1970s.[3]

Specifically, the radiation dose from a single modern intraoral digital X-ray is between 1 and 2 micrograys. This represents a 5,000- to 10,000-fold reduction compared to the near-10,000 microgray doses common fifty years ago when the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements first mandated lead shielding.
At these microscopic exposure levels, the risk of radiation-induced cancer from dental imaging is effectively zero. The ADA’s expert panel concluded that the reproductive organs and the thyroid gland are no longer at measurable risk from the scatter radiation produced by modern machines.[1][2]
Beyond the sheer drop in radiation volume, the mechanics of how the X-ray beam is delivered have also been optimized. Modern equipment utilizes 'rectangular collimation,' a technique that tightly restricts the X-ray beam to the exact dimensions of the digital sensor inside the mouth.[2][3]
Because the beam is so narrowly focused, stray radiation—known as scatter—is virtually eliminated. Consequently, there is no errant radiation for a lead apron or thyroid collar to block.[4]

Because the beam is so narrowly focused, stray radiation—known as scatter—is virtually eliminated.
In fact, the consensus panel found that protective shields can actually be counterproductive. A thyroid collar or lead apron can inadvertently obstruct the primary X-ray beam or interfere with the digital sensor's placement.[1][3]
When a shield blocks the necessary anatomy, the image is rendered non-diagnostic, forcing the dentist to retake the X-ray. This exposes the patient to a second round of radiation, entirely defeating the purpose of the protective gear.[1][2]
The recommendation to abandon the aprons aligns dentistry with broader medical physics guidelines. Organizations including the American College of Radiology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine have similarly advised against routine shielding in modern diagnostic imaging.
Despite the unequivocal science, the transition presents a massive psychological hurdle for both practitioners and patients. For over half a century, the heavy weight of the lead apron has served as a physical manifestation of safety.[4]

Dr. Alan Lurie, chair of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology at the UConn School of Dental Medicine and a key architect of the new guidelines, noted that overcoming this ingrained public perception will require persistent education. Patients have been conditioned to equate the apron with responsible care.
To manage the transition, many dental practices are adopting a phased approach. While they no longer proactively drape patients, they keep the aprons accessible for individuals who experience severe anxiety without the familiar weight, prioritizing psychological comfort over clinical necessity.[4]
Regulatory lag also complicates the rollout. While the ADA sets the clinical standard of care, dental practices are governed by state-level health departments. Some states have yet to update their legal codes to reflect the consensus, meaning dentists in those jurisdictions must legally continue using the aprons until local laws catch up.[2][4]
Ultimately, the retirement of the lead apron is a profound success story for medical engineering. It underscores a central tenet of radiation safety known as ALARA—As Low As Reasonably Achievable.[4]

By transitioning from analog film to highly sensitive digital sensors and refining beam geometry, the dental industry has achieved an ALARA milestone where the traditional physical barriers are no longer scientifically justifiable.[3]
For patients, the message is clear: the absence of the heavy apron is not a lapse in safety protocols, but proof that the technology protecting them has become invisible, built directly into the machinery itself.[4]
How we got here
1970
The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements sets the original standards requiring lead aprons for dental X-rays.
2003
Radiologists publish updated reports noting that cancer risk from dental exposure is minimal, though aprons remain in use.
2019
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine recommends ending routine patient shielding in medical imaging.
2023
The AAOMR forms an ad hoc committee to formally evaluate patient shielding in dentistry.
Feb 2024
The ADA officially recommends discontinuing the use of lead aprons and thyroid collars for all patients.
Viewpoints in depth
Dental Radiologists and Researchers
Argue that the science is unequivocal and shields offer zero benefit while risking retakes.
From a purely biophysical standpoint, radiologists view the lead apron as an obsolete artifact. They emphasize that the transition to digital sensors and rectangular collimation has reduced scatter radiation to negligible levels. For this camp, continuing to use shields is not just unnecessary—it is actively harmful if it blocks the primary beam and forces a retake, thereby doubling the patient's radiation exposure.
Practicing Dentists
Focus on the practical challenge of re-educating patients who have been conditioned to expect the lead apron.
General practitioners are caught between following the latest scientific guidelines and managing patient psychology. Many dentists report that patients feel vulnerable or anxious without the heavy apron, which has served as a 'security blanket' for decades. Consequently, many clinics are adopting a soft rollout—explaining the new science but keeping aprons on hand for patients who insist on wearing them for peace of mind.
Patient Safety Advocates
Emphasize the need for clear communication and transparent regulatory updates.
Advocates stress that the sudden disappearance of a long-standing safety measure can breed mistrust if not communicated properly. They urge the ADA and local health departments to launch robust public education campaigns. Furthermore, they highlight the confusion caused by regulatory lag, where state laws mandating aprons have not yet caught up with the clinical consensus.
What we don't know
- How long it will take for all 50 state health departments to update their legal codes to reflect the new clinical consensus.
- Whether the removal of the physical 'security blanket' of the lead apron will temporarily increase dental anxiety among patients.
Key terms
- Digital Radiography
- A form of X-ray imaging where digital X-ray sensors are used instead of traditional photographic film, requiring significantly less radiation.
- Rectangular Collimation
- A technique that restricts the size and shape of the X-ray beam to match the digital sensor, minimizing stray radiation.
- Scatter Radiation
- Secondary radiation that spreads in different directions when the primary X-ray beam interacts with the patient's tissue.
- Microgray
- A unit of measurement used to quantify the absorbed dose of ionizing radiation.
- ALARA Principle
- An acronym for 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable,' a fundamental safety principle aiming to minimize radiation exposure.
Frequently asked
Is it safe to get a dental X-ray without a lead apron?
Yes. Modern digital X-ray machines use such low doses of radiation and are so tightly focused that the risk of harm to other parts of the body is essentially zero.
Does this new recommendation apply to pregnant women?
Yes. The ADA and AAOMR explicitly state that the recommendation to discontinue lead aprons applies to all patients, including pregnant women and children.
Why did dentists use lead aprons in the past?
In the 1970s, dental X-rays used photographic film that required 5,000 to 10,000 times more radiation than modern digital sensors, making shielding necessary to protect the body.
Can I still request a lead apron if I want one?
Most dental practices still keep lead aprons on hand and will provide one upon request to help patients feel more comfortable during the transition.
Sources
[1]American Dental AssociationClinical Researchers
ADA releases updated recommendations to enhance radiography safety in dentistry
Read on American Dental Association →[2]Journal of the American Dental AssociationClinical Researchers
Optimizing radiation safety in dentistry: Clinical recommendations and regulatory considerations
Read on Journal of the American Dental Association →[3]Dental TribuneGeneral Dental Practitioners
ADA recommends discontinuing use of lead aprons and thyroid collars
Read on Dental Tribune →[4]Factlen Editorial TeamPatient Safety Advocates
Synthesis by Factlen editorial team
Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
Every angle. Every day.
Get health stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.





