How the US and Canada Are Wiring Together the World's Largest Clean Energy Grid
A series of massive cross-border transmission projects is turning Canadian hydropower into a continent-sized battery for American wind and solar.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Grid Operators & Developers
- Focus on baseload reliability and the mathematical necessity of dispatchable power.
- Energy Industry Analysts
- Track the economic and technical execution of cross-border infrastructure.
- Climate Policy Advocates
- Prioritize rapid, large-scale decarbonization to meet urgent emissions targets.
What's not represented
- · Indigenous First Nations
- · Local Ratepayers
Why this matters
As the United States races to decarbonize its economy, the intermittent nature of wind and solar power poses a severe threat to grid reliability. Integrating with Canada's massive hydroelectric reservoirs provides the steady, zero-carbon baseload needed to prevent blackouts and retire fossil fuel plants.
Key points
- US states are increasingly relying on Canadian hydropower to provide a stable baseload for their intermittent wind and solar grids.
- The 339-mile Champlain Hudson Power Express will deliver 1,250 MW of clean energy to New York City by 2026.
- To avoid land-use disputes, 60 percent of the CHPE is being buried underwater in Lake Champlain and the Hudson River.
- Cross-border grid integration enhances national security by preventing catastrophic blackouts during extreme weather events.
The most consequential infrastructure project in North America is not a single bridge, highway, or tunnel. Instead, it is a quiet, continent-spanning effort to physically wire the United States and Canada together into a unified clean energy grid. Across the border, utility companies and government planners are constructing a series of massive high-voltage transmission lines designed to fundamentally alter how electricity flows across the continent. This cross-border integration represents a pragmatic solution to one of the most stubborn challenges of the green transition: how to keep the lights on when the wind stops blowing and the sun goes down.[7]
As American states mandate aggressive transitions away from fossil fuels, grid operators face a daunting mathematical reality. Wind and solar power are inherently intermittent, meaning their energy production peaks and valleys rarely align perfectly with human demand. To maintain a stable grid, operators need a reliable "baseload"—a massive, dispatchable source of power that can be turned on or off at a moment's notice to fill the gaps left by renewable shortfalls. Historically, coal and natural gas plants served this role, but climate targets are rapidly forcing those facilities into retirement.[7]
The solution lies just across the northern border. Canada possesses some of the most extensive hydroelectric resources on the planet, particularly in the provinces of Quebec, Manitoba, and British Columbia. Thanks to these massive river systems and legacy dam projects, nearly 80 percent of Canada's domestic electricity is already generated from non-emitting sources. These vast northern reservoirs hold millions of gallons of water that represent stored potential energy, waiting to be unleashed through turbines exactly when the grid demands it.[2]
By linking the two nations with high-voltage direct current (HVDC) lines, grid operators are effectively turning Canada's hydroelectric dams into a continent-sized battery for the United States. The mechanism operates as a two-way street. When American wind farms overproduce during blustery nights, the excess power is exported north, allowing Canadian utilities to hold water back in their reservoirs. Conversely, during peak demand hours when American renewables fall short, Canada opens its spillways and sends a surge of zero-carbon hydroelectricity south. This symbiotic relationship already sees more than 70 terawatt-hours of electricity traded annually.[1][2]

The most ambitious of these new arteries is the Champlain Hudson Power Express (CHPE), a $6 billion infrastructure marvel currently under construction. Scheduled to commence commercial operations in 2026, the CHPE will stretch 339 miles from the Canadian border directly into the heart of Astoria, Queens. Once energized, the line will deliver 1,250 megawatts of continuous clean power to New York City—enough to supply more than one million homes and fundamentally reshape the energy profile of the nation's largest metropolis.[4]
Building transmission lines in the densely populated Northeast is notoriously difficult, often killed by fierce local opposition and endless permitting battles. To bypass this resistance, the developers of the CHPE opted for an unconventional and highly technical route: they are hiding the cables. Approximately 60 percent of the transmission line is being buried deep underwater. Specialized marine vessels are currently spooling heavily armored cables into the beds of Lake Champlain and the Hudson River, keeping the infrastructure entirely out of sight while minimizing disruption to local communities.[4][5]
The environmental stakes for New York City are immense. Currently, the five boroughs rely on fossil fuels for roughly 85 percent of their electricity, largely generated by aging natural gas "peaker" plants located in environmentally overburdened neighborhoods. By injecting a massive stream of Canadian hydropower directly into the local grid, the CHPE is projected to reduce New York City's carbon emissions by 3.4 million metric tons annually. Planners equate this reduction to permanently removing nearly a third of all passenger vehicles from the city's congested streets.[4]

Planners equate this reduction to permanently removing nearly a third of all passenger vehicles from the city's congested streets.
Further east, a similar dynamic is unfolding to power New England. The Appalaches-Maine Interconnection, linked to the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC), is designed to funnel 1,200 megawatts of Quebec hydropower into Massachusetts. This 100-kilometer extension on the Canadian side connects to a newly carved transmission corridor through the state of Maine. Like the New York project, the NECEC is intended to displace regional reliance on thermal generating stations and accelerate the decarbonization of the broader New England grid.[3]
However, the Maine corridor illustrates the intense friction inherent in building overland infrastructure. Unlike the underwater CHPE, the NECEC required clearing a new overhead path through Maine's commercial forests. This sparked years of bitter political battles, a statewide referendum, and complex legal fights. The saga highlighted a recurring tension in the modern environmental movement: the clash between macro-level climate goals, which require massive new infrastructure, and micro-level conservation efforts aimed at protecting local ecosystems and pristine landscapes from industrial intrusion.[3][7]
While the East Coast projects battle through their final phases of construction, the Midwest has already proven that the cross-border model works flawlessly. In 2020, utilities energized the Great Northern Transmission Line (GNTL), a 500-kilovolt lifeline connecting the hydro-rich province of Manitoba to the iron range of northern Minnesota. Spanning 224 miles on the American side, the GNTL was completed on schedule and immediately began reshaping the regional energy market.[6]
The Minnesota project serves as a textbook execution of the "hydro-battery" concept. Minnesota Power explicitly designed the GNTL to pair Manitoba's dispatchable hydropower with the utility's own sprawling wind farms in North Dakota. By perfectly balancing the intermittent wind with the steady flow of northern water, the transmission line allowed the utility to push past its mandate of 50 percent renewable generation, proving that heavy industry and residential grids can run reliably without coal.[6]

Beyond carbon accounting, the integration of the North American grid represents a massive economic engine. The United States and Canada currently share 37 major transmission connections, facilitating a bilateral electricity trade valued at over $3 billion annually. For American ratepayers, accessing cheap, abundant Canadian hydro helps suppress the price spikes associated with volatile natural gas markets. For Canadian utilities, exporting surplus power provides a lucrative revenue stream that subsidizes domestic infrastructure investments.[1]
Crucially, this physical integration provides a vital layer of national security and grid resilience. As climate change accelerates the frequency of extreme weather events, isolated power grids are increasingly vulnerable to catastrophic failure. During severe cold snaps like Winter Storm Uri, the ability to import surplus power from neighboring regions proved to be the difference between temporary rolling blackouts and total system collapse. A highly interconnected, continent-wide grid is inherently more robust than a fragmented one.[1][2]
Looking ahead, the demand for cross-border transmission will only intensify. As the United States and Canada aggressively electrify their transportation sectors with EVs and replace residential gas furnaces with electric heat pumps, total electricity demand is projected to skyrocket. Meeting this surging demand without triggering a corresponding spike in fossil fuel emissions will require building dozens of new high-voltage arteries to move clean power from where it is generated to where it is consumed.[7]
The era of the isolated, state-by-state power grid is rapidly drawing to a close. While the logistics of permitting and constructing these continent-spanning lines remain grueling, the ongoing success of the US-Canada hydro-partnership offers a clear blueprint for the future. By treating the North American power system as a single, integrated organism, grid operators are proving that international cooperation is not just a diplomatic ideal, but a physical necessity for a sustainable future.[7]
How we got here
Early 1990s
Hydro-Québec inaugurates the Radisson-Sandy Pond line, establishing the first major HVDC link to neighboring US markets.
2010
Initial planning and permitting begins for the Champlain Hudson Power Express to connect Quebec to New York City.
June 2020
The Great Northern Transmission Line is energized, successfully linking Manitoba's hydro resources to Minnesota's wind grid.
November 2022
Construction officially breaks ground on the 339-mile Champlain Hudson Power Express.
2026
The CHPE is scheduled to commence commercial operations, delivering 1,250 megawatts of clean power to New York City.
Viewpoints in depth
Grid Planners & Utilities
Focus on baseload reliability and the mathematical necessity of dispatchable power.
This camp argues that wind and solar alone cannot sustain a modern industrial grid without massive, currently unscalable battery storage. They view Canadian hydropower as the only viable, immediate solution to provide the "baseload" necessary to retire coal and natural gas plants without risking catastrophic blackouts during extreme weather.
Macro-Climate Advocates
Prioritize rapid, large-scale decarbonization to meet urgent emissions targets.
Environmental groups focused on the global climate crisis strongly support cross-border transmission. They argue that the immediate reduction of millions of tons of greenhouse gases—achieved by shutting down fossil-fuel peaker plants in major cities—far outweighs the localized disruptions caused by laying cables or clearing regional transmission corridors.
Local Conservationists
Emphasize the protection of local ecosystems and landscapes from industrial infrastructure.
This perspective highlights the localized costs of mega-projects. Advocates argue that clearing forests for overhead lines fragments wildlife habitats and disrupts pristine landscapes. Even underwater routes face scrutiny over their potential impact on riverbed ecosystems and aquatic life during the intensive dredging and cable-laying construction phases.
What we don't know
- Whether future cross-border projects will face the same intense political and legal opposition seen in Maine.
- How climate-induced droughts might affect the long-term storage capacity of Canada's hydroelectric reservoirs.
- The exact timeline for when the US grid will require additional HVDC lines to support the mass adoption of electric vehicles.
Key terms
- Baseload Power
- The minimum amount of electrical demand on a grid over a given period, historically met by power plants that run continuously.
- Dispatchable Energy
- Sources of electricity that can be turned on or off, or adjusted, at the request of grid operators to meet fluctuating demand.
- Intermittency
- The unpredictable nature of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, which only generate power when weather conditions permit.
- Peaker Plant
- Power plants, typically running on natural gas, that only operate during periods of peak electricity demand to prevent blackouts.
- Terawatt-hour (TWh)
- A massive unit of energy equal to one billion kilowatt-hours, used to measure the electricity consumption of entire cities or nations.
Frequently asked
What is high-voltage direct current (HVDC)?
HVDC is a highly efficient method of transmitting electricity over long distances. Unlike alternating current (AC), which loses energy over hundreds of miles, HVDC lines can move massive amounts of power across continents with minimal loss.
How does Canadian hydropower act as a battery?
When US wind and solar farms produce excess energy, it is sent to Canada, allowing utilities there to hold water in their dams. When US renewables fall short, Canada releases that water through turbines, sending steady electricity back south.
Why is the Champlain Hudson Power Express built underwater?
To avoid the political opposition and land-use conflicts that typically block overhead power lines, developers opted to bury 60 percent of the CHPE cables in the beds of Lake Champlain and the Hudson River.
Will these projects lower electricity bills?
Yes, accessing abundant Canadian hydropower helps stabilize energy markets. By reducing reliance on natural gas, which is subject to volatile price spikes, cross-border trade saves ratepayers billions of dollars over the long term.
Sources
[1]U.S. Department of EnergyGrid Operators & Developers
Consensus to Enhance North American Electricity Integration
Read on U.S. Department of Energy →[2]Center for Climate and Energy SolutionsClimate Policy Advocates
Electricity Integration Between Canada and the United States
Read on Center for Climate and Energy Solutions →[3]Hydro-QuébecGrid Operators & Developers
Appalaches-Maine Interconnection Project
Read on Hydro-Québec →[4]CHPE OfficialGrid Operators & Developers
Champlain Hudson Power Express: Powering New York's Future
Read on CHPE Official →[5]Offshore EnergyEnergy Industry Analysts
Cables for New York's largest clean energy project cross US-Canada border
Read on Offshore Energy →[6]NS EnergyEnergy Industry Analysts
Great Northern Transmission Line
Read on NS Energy →[7]Factlen Editorial TeamClimate Policy Advocates
Synthesis by Factlen editorial team
Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
Every angle. Every day.
Get world stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.







