Factlen ExplainerGrid TechExplainerJun 8, 2026, 6:13 AM· 7 min read

How the US and Canada Are Wiring Together the World's Largest Clean Energy Grid

A series of massive cross-border transmission projects is turning Canadian hydropower into a continent-sized battery for American wind and solar.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Grid Operators & Developers 45%Energy Industry Analysts 30%Climate Policy Advocates 25%
Grid Operators & Developers
Focus on baseload reliability and the mathematical necessity of dispatchable power.
Energy Industry Analysts
Track the economic and technical execution of cross-border infrastructure.
Climate Policy Advocates
Prioritize rapid, large-scale decarbonization to meet urgent emissions targets.

What's not represented

  • · Indigenous First Nations
  • · Local Ratepayers

Why this matters

As the United States races to decarbonize its economy, the intermittent nature of wind and solar power poses a severe threat to grid reliability. Integrating with Canada's massive hydroelectric reservoirs provides the steady, zero-carbon baseload needed to prevent blackouts and retire fossil fuel plants.

Key points

  • US states are increasingly relying on Canadian hydropower to provide a stable baseload for their intermittent wind and solar grids.
  • The 339-mile Champlain Hudson Power Express will deliver 1,250 MW of clean energy to New York City by 2026.
  • To avoid land-use disputes, 60 percent of the CHPE is being buried underwater in Lake Champlain and the Hudson River.
  • Cross-border grid integration enhances national security by preventing catastrophic blackouts during extreme weather events.
1,250 MW
CHPE capacity to NYC
3.4 million
Metric tons of CO2 CHPE cuts annually
70 TWh
Annual US-Canada electricity trade
339 miles
Length of the CHPE line
80%
Canada's non-emitting electricity share

The most consequential infrastructure project in North America is not a single bridge, highway, or tunnel. Instead, it is a quiet, continent-spanning effort to physically wire the United States and Canada together into a unified clean energy grid. Across the border, utility companies and government planners are constructing a series of massive high-voltage transmission lines designed to fundamentally alter how electricity flows across the continent. This cross-border integration represents a pragmatic solution to one of the most stubborn challenges of the green transition: how to keep the lights on when the wind stops blowing and the sun goes down.[7]

As American states mandate aggressive transitions away from fossil fuels, grid operators face a daunting mathematical reality. Wind and solar power are inherently intermittent, meaning their energy production peaks and valleys rarely align perfectly with human demand. To maintain a stable grid, operators need a reliable "baseload"—a massive, dispatchable source of power that can be turned on or off at a moment's notice to fill the gaps left by renewable shortfalls. Historically, coal and natural gas plants served this role, but climate targets are rapidly forcing those facilities into retirement.[7]

The solution lies just across the northern border. Canada possesses some of the most extensive hydroelectric resources on the planet, particularly in the provinces of Quebec, Manitoba, and British Columbia. Thanks to these massive river systems and legacy dam projects, nearly 80 percent of Canada's domestic electricity is already generated from non-emitting sources. These vast northern reservoirs hold millions of gallons of water that represent stored potential energy, waiting to be unleashed through turbines exactly when the grid demands it.[2]

By linking the two nations with high-voltage direct current (HVDC) lines, grid operators are effectively turning Canada's hydroelectric dams into a continent-sized battery for the United States. The mechanism operates as a two-way street. When American wind farms overproduce during blustery nights, the excess power is exported north, allowing Canadian utilities to hold water back in their reservoirs. Conversely, during peak demand hours when American renewables fall short, Canada opens its spillways and sends a surge of zero-carbon hydroelectricity south. This symbiotic relationship already sees more than 70 terawatt-hours of electricity traded annually.[1][2]

The two-way flow of electricity allows US grid operators to use Canadian reservoirs as a massive energy storage system.
The two-way flow of electricity allows US grid operators to use Canadian reservoirs as a massive energy storage system.

The most ambitious of these new arteries is the Champlain Hudson Power Express (CHPE), a $6 billion infrastructure marvel currently under construction. Scheduled to commence commercial operations in 2026, the CHPE will stretch 339 miles from the Canadian border directly into the heart of Astoria, Queens. Once energized, the line will deliver 1,250 megawatts of continuous clean power to New York City—enough to supply more than one million homes and fundamentally reshape the energy profile of the nation's largest metropolis.[4]

Building transmission lines in the densely populated Northeast is notoriously difficult, often killed by fierce local opposition and endless permitting battles. To bypass this resistance, the developers of the CHPE opted for an unconventional and highly technical route: they are hiding the cables. Approximately 60 percent of the transmission line is being buried deep underwater. Specialized marine vessels are currently spooling heavily armored cables into the beds of Lake Champlain and the Hudson River, keeping the infrastructure entirely out of sight while minimizing disruption to local communities.[4][5]

The environmental stakes for New York City are immense. Currently, the five boroughs rely on fossil fuels for roughly 85 percent of their electricity, largely generated by aging natural gas "peaker" plants located in environmentally overburdened neighborhoods. By injecting a massive stream of Canadian hydropower directly into the local grid, the CHPE is projected to reduce New York City's carbon emissions by 3.4 million metric tons annually. Planners equate this reduction to permanently removing nearly a third of all passenger vehicles from the city's congested streets.[4]

To avoid land-use conflicts, projects like the CHPE are burying high-voltage cables deep within riverbeds.
To avoid land-use conflicts, projects like the CHPE are burying high-voltage cables deep within riverbeds.
Planners equate this reduction to permanently removing nearly a third of all passenger vehicles from the city's congested streets.

Further east, a similar dynamic is unfolding to power New England. The Appalaches-Maine Interconnection, linked to the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC), is designed to funnel 1,200 megawatts of Quebec hydropower into Massachusetts. This 100-kilometer extension on the Canadian side connects to a newly carved transmission corridor through the state of Maine. Like the New York project, the NECEC is intended to displace regional reliance on thermal generating stations and accelerate the decarbonization of the broader New England grid.[3]

However, the Maine corridor illustrates the intense friction inherent in building overland infrastructure. Unlike the underwater CHPE, the NECEC required clearing a new overhead path through Maine's commercial forests. This sparked years of bitter political battles, a statewide referendum, and complex legal fights. The saga highlighted a recurring tension in the modern environmental movement: the clash between macro-level climate goals, which require massive new infrastructure, and micro-level conservation efforts aimed at protecting local ecosystems and pristine landscapes from industrial intrusion.[3][7]

While the East Coast projects battle through their final phases of construction, the Midwest has already proven that the cross-border model works flawlessly. In 2020, utilities energized the Great Northern Transmission Line (GNTL), a 500-kilovolt lifeline connecting the hydro-rich province of Manitoba to the iron range of northern Minnesota. Spanning 224 miles on the American side, the GNTL was completed on schedule and immediately began reshaping the regional energy market.[6]

The Minnesota project serves as a textbook execution of the "hydro-battery" concept. Minnesota Power explicitly designed the GNTL to pair Manitoba's dispatchable hydropower with the utility's own sprawling wind farms in North Dakota. By perfectly balancing the intermittent wind with the steady flow of northern water, the transmission line allowed the utility to push past its mandate of 50 percent renewable generation, proving that heavy industry and residential grids can run reliably without coal.[6]

New high-voltage direct current lines are designed to move massive amounts of baseload power across the border.
New high-voltage direct current lines are designed to move massive amounts of baseload power across the border.

Beyond carbon accounting, the integration of the North American grid represents a massive economic engine. The United States and Canada currently share 37 major transmission connections, facilitating a bilateral electricity trade valued at over $3 billion annually. For American ratepayers, accessing cheap, abundant Canadian hydro helps suppress the price spikes associated with volatile natural gas markets. For Canadian utilities, exporting surplus power provides a lucrative revenue stream that subsidizes domestic infrastructure investments.[1]

Crucially, this physical integration provides a vital layer of national security and grid resilience. As climate change accelerates the frequency of extreme weather events, isolated power grids are increasingly vulnerable to catastrophic failure. During severe cold snaps like Winter Storm Uri, the ability to import surplus power from neighboring regions proved to be the difference between temporary rolling blackouts and total system collapse. A highly interconnected, continent-wide grid is inherently more robust than a fragmented one.[1][2]

Looking ahead, the demand for cross-border transmission will only intensify. As the United States and Canada aggressively electrify their transportation sectors with EVs and replace residential gas furnaces with electric heat pumps, total electricity demand is projected to skyrocket. Meeting this surging demand without triggering a corresponding spike in fossil fuel emissions will require building dozens of new high-voltage arteries to move clean power from where it is generated to where it is consumed.[7]

The era of the isolated, state-by-state power grid is rapidly drawing to a close. While the logistics of permitting and constructing these continent-spanning lines remain grueling, the ongoing success of the US-Canada hydro-partnership offers a clear blueprint for the future. By treating the North American power system as a single, integrated organism, grid operators are proving that international cooperation is not just a diplomatic ideal, but a physical necessity for a sustainable future.[7]

How we got here

  1. Early 1990s

    Hydro-Québec inaugurates the Radisson-Sandy Pond line, establishing the first major HVDC link to neighboring US markets.

  2. 2010

    Initial planning and permitting begins for the Champlain Hudson Power Express to connect Quebec to New York City.

  3. June 2020

    The Great Northern Transmission Line is energized, successfully linking Manitoba's hydro resources to Minnesota's wind grid.

  4. November 2022

    Construction officially breaks ground on the 339-mile Champlain Hudson Power Express.

  5. 2026

    The CHPE is scheduled to commence commercial operations, delivering 1,250 megawatts of clean power to New York City.

Viewpoints in depth

Grid Planners & Utilities

Focus on baseload reliability and the mathematical necessity of dispatchable power.

This camp argues that wind and solar alone cannot sustain a modern industrial grid without massive, currently unscalable battery storage. They view Canadian hydropower as the only viable, immediate solution to provide the "baseload" necessary to retire coal and natural gas plants without risking catastrophic blackouts during extreme weather.

Macro-Climate Advocates

Prioritize rapid, large-scale decarbonization to meet urgent emissions targets.

Environmental groups focused on the global climate crisis strongly support cross-border transmission. They argue that the immediate reduction of millions of tons of greenhouse gases—achieved by shutting down fossil-fuel peaker plants in major cities—far outweighs the localized disruptions caused by laying cables or clearing regional transmission corridors.

Local Conservationists

Emphasize the protection of local ecosystems and landscapes from industrial infrastructure.

This perspective highlights the localized costs of mega-projects. Advocates argue that clearing forests for overhead lines fragments wildlife habitats and disrupts pristine landscapes. Even underwater routes face scrutiny over their potential impact on riverbed ecosystems and aquatic life during the intensive dredging and cable-laying construction phases.

What we don't know

  • Whether future cross-border projects will face the same intense political and legal opposition seen in Maine.
  • How climate-induced droughts might affect the long-term storage capacity of Canada's hydroelectric reservoirs.
  • The exact timeline for when the US grid will require additional HVDC lines to support the mass adoption of electric vehicles.

Key terms

Baseload Power
The minimum amount of electrical demand on a grid over a given period, historically met by power plants that run continuously.
Dispatchable Energy
Sources of electricity that can be turned on or off, or adjusted, at the request of grid operators to meet fluctuating demand.
Intermittency
The unpredictable nature of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, which only generate power when weather conditions permit.
Peaker Plant
Power plants, typically running on natural gas, that only operate during periods of peak electricity demand to prevent blackouts.
Terawatt-hour (TWh)
A massive unit of energy equal to one billion kilowatt-hours, used to measure the electricity consumption of entire cities or nations.

Frequently asked

What is high-voltage direct current (HVDC)?

HVDC is a highly efficient method of transmitting electricity over long distances. Unlike alternating current (AC), which loses energy over hundreds of miles, HVDC lines can move massive amounts of power across continents with minimal loss.

How does Canadian hydropower act as a battery?

When US wind and solar farms produce excess energy, it is sent to Canada, allowing utilities there to hold water in their dams. When US renewables fall short, Canada releases that water through turbines, sending steady electricity back south.

Why is the Champlain Hudson Power Express built underwater?

To avoid the political opposition and land-use conflicts that typically block overhead power lines, developers opted to bury 60 percent of the CHPE cables in the beds of Lake Champlain and the Hudson River.

Will these projects lower electricity bills?

Yes, accessing abundant Canadian hydropower helps stabilize energy markets. By reducing reliance on natural gas, which is subject to volatile price spikes, cross-border trade saves ratepayers billions of dollars over the long term.

Sources

Source coverage

7 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Grid Operators & Developers 45%Energy Industry Analysts 30%Climate Policy Advocates 25%
  1. [1]U.S. Department of EnergyGrid Operators & Developers

    Consensus to Enhance North American Electricity Integration

    Read on U.S. Department of Energy
  2. [2]Center for Climate and Energy SolutionsClimate Policy Advocates

    Electricity Integration Between Canada and the United States

    Read on Center for Climate and Energy Solutions
  3. [3]Hydro-QuébecGrid Operators & Developers

    Appalaches-Maine Interconnection Project

    Read on Hydro-Québec
  4. [4]CHPE OfficialGrid Operators & Developers

    Champlain Hudson Power Express: Powering New York's Future

    Read on CHPE Official
  5. [5]Offshore EnergyEnergy Industry Analysts

    Cables for New York's largest clean energy project cross US-Canada border

    Read on Offshore Energy
  6. [6]NS EnergyEnergy Industry Analysts

    Great Northern Transmission Line

    Read on NS Energy
  7. [7]Factlen Editorial TeamClimate Policy Advocates

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get world stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.