Skip to main content
Data TransparencyPolicy Shift· 3 min read· in News & Politics

Former NOAA Scientists Launch Independent 'Climate.us' After Administration Shuts Down Official Climate.gov Website

A coalition of former federal researchers has launched an independent portal to host decades of U.S. climate data following the administration's decision to take Climate.gov offline. The move sparks a debate over public access to government-funded environmental research and federal budget priorities.

By Mariana Costa

Climate Scientists & Advocates 45%Fiscal Conservatives & Administration 30%Open-Source Technologists 25%
Climate Scientists & Advocates
Believes that accessible, visualized climate data is a critical public good necessary for infrastructure planning, agriculture, and scientific transparency.
Fiscal Conservatives & Administration
Argues that shutting down the site saves taxpayer money and refocuses federal agencies on core meteorological forecasting rather than broad climate advocacy.
Open-Source Technologists
Focuses on the technical challenge of preserving public data, advocating for decentralized systems that are immune to political shifts.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Local city planners who relied on the official tools for zoning and infrastructure.
  • Agricultural sectors dependent on long-term federal climate modeling.

Why this matters

Climate.gov served as the primary clearinghouse for federal environmental data used by city planners, agricultural sectors, and researchers worldwide. Its shutdown and subsequent independent resurrection raise critical questions about the security of taxpayer-funded data and the future of federal climate research.

Key points

  1. Former NOAA scientists launched Climate.us to replace the decommissioned Climate.gov.
  2. The independent site hosts 150 terabytes of mirrored federal environmental data.
  3. The administration states the shutdown saves $12 million annually and removes politicized messaging.
  4. Organizers argue the data is crucial for local governments, farmers, and infrastructure planners.
  5. The new platform relies on decentralized storage and is seeking non-profit funding to maintain operations.

On Wednesday, a coalition of more than 40 former federal scientists and data archivists launched 'Climate.us,' an independent web portal designed to replace the recently decommissioned official government website, Climate.gov. The launch comes just days after the current administration abruptly took the official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) portal offline, redirecting visitors to a generic Department of Commerce landing page.[4]

The new independent site hosts approximately 150 terabytes of mirrored federal data, including historical temperature records, sea-level rise projections, and extreme weather tracking tools. Organizers state that the data was legally scraped and archived over the past several months in anticipation of potential federal policy shifts regarding environmental research and public-facing science communication.[2]

The administration has defended the shutdown of Climate.gov as a necessary cost-saving measure and a step toward depoliticizing federal science agencies. Officials argue that the site, which cost an estimated $12 million annually to maintain, heavily promoted a specific environmental agenda rather than serving as a neutral data repository for the American public.[1][3]

The scale and cost of the federal climate data transition.

Proponents of the shutdown argue that raw meteorological data remains available through other backend federal databases, and that the highly visual, public-facing Climate.gov was an unnecessary expenditure. They maintain that streamlining agency communications ensures taxpayer dollars are focused on core forecasting, emergency weather alerts, and immediate public safety rather than broad, long-term climate modeling.[1]

The scientists behind Climate.us counter that the official portal was an essential tool not just for academic researchers, but for local governments, farmers, and infrastructure planners who rely on accessible, visualized data to make long-term economic decisions. They argue that burying raw data in obscure federal servers effectively hides it from the general public and small businesses that lack the technical expertise to process raw meteorological code.

The effort to build Climate.us relied heavily on a network of open-source technologists and digital archivists. Utilizing decentralized storage networks, these groups worked around the clock to ensure that interactive tools, such as the widely used Climate Explorer, remained functional and free to access outside the federal firewall, creating a resilient backup of decades of taxpayer-funded research.

Independent technologists utilized decentralized storage networks to mirror decades of federal environmental data.
The effort to build Climate.us relied heavily on a network of open-source technologists and digital archivists.

Private sector analysts note that the shift of federal data to an independent platform could have downstream effects on industries that rely on climate risk assessments, including the insurance and real estate markets. While the data remains available for now, questions linger about the long-term funding, security, and maintenance of an independent site compared to a federally backed institution with a dedicated congressional budget.[3]

Moving forward, the Climate.us team is seeking non-profit status and soliciting grants to sustain the platform's massive server costs. Meanwhile, congressional oversight committees have signaled their intent to hold hearings on the administration's authority to unilaterally decommission public-facing scientific databases without legislative approval, setting the stage for a broader battle over the control of federal information.[2][4]

Viewpoints in depth

Administration's View

Focuses on fiscal responsibility and refocusing agency priorities.

Proponents of the shutdown argue that maintaining a highly visualized, public-facing climate portal is an unnecessary use of taxpayer funds, costing an estimated $12 million annually. They contend that the site had drifted from objective data hosting into environmental advocacy. By removing the portal, the administration aims to streamline the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's budget, ensuring that resources are strictly allocated to core functions like emergency weather forecasting and immediate public safety alerts, while leaving raw data available on backend servers for specialized researchers.

Scientific Community's View

Emphasizes the necessity of accessible data for public planning and transparency.

Former federal scientists and environmental advocates argue that raw data is virtually useless to the general public without the visualization tools and context previously provided by Climate.gov. They point out that local municipalities, agricultural planners, and small businesses relied heavily on the site's interactive maps to prepare for extreme weather, manage crop yields, and design resilient infrastructure. From this perspective, shutting down the portal is seen as an act of censorship that actively harms the economy by withholding critical, taxpayer-funded information from those who need it most.

Data Archivists' View

Prioritizes the technological resilience and permanence of public information.

For the open-source technologists who helped build Climate.us, the incident highlights the vulnerability of centralized government databases. They argue that public data should never be subject to the shifting priorities of different political administrations. By utilizing decentralized storage networks and independent servers, this camp believes they are creating a more resilient model for public information—one where vital scientific records are permanently mirrored and protected against unilateral federal shutdowns.

Sources

Source coverage

4 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Climate Scientists & Advocates 45%Fiscal Conservatives & Administration 30%Open-Source Technologists 25%
  1. [1]Fox NewsFiscal Conservatives & Administration

    Cristiano Ronaldo shuts down reporter's Lionel Messi question in awkward moment after two-goal win

    Read on Fox News
  2. [2]The New York TimesClimate Scientists & Advocates

    As Climate.gov Goes Dark, Rogue Scientists Race to Save Decades of Federal Data

    Read on The New York Times
  3. [3]The Wall Street JournalFiscal Conservatives & Administration

    Private Sector Steps In to Host Federal Climate Data After Government Site Closure

    Read on The Wall Street Journal
  4. [4]ReutersClimate Scientists & Advocates

    U.S. administration takes climate portal offline; researchers launch alternative

    Read on Reuters

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get News & Politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.