Skip to main content
Immigration LawCourt Injunction· 3 min read· in News & Politics

Federal Judge Issues Permanent Injunction Against ICE Over 'Unconstitutional' NYC Detention Conditions

A federal court has permanently barred Immigration and Customs Enforcement from holding civil detainees in overcrowded, unsanitary rooms at its primary Manhattan processing center. The ruling mandates strict capacity and time limits, declaring the previous conditions a violation of the Fifth Amendment.

By Anaya Sharma

Civil Rights Advocates 50%Federal Enforcement 50%
Civil Rights Advocates
Argues that ICE must be legally bound to constitutional minimums for civil detainees.
Federal Enforcement
Emphasizes the logistical realities and transportation bottlenecks of urban immigration processing.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Former detainees held at the facility
  • Local county jail administrators receiving transfers

Why this matters

The permanent injunction establishes a hard legal boundary on how federal immigration authorities can operate short-term processing facilities. By strictly limiting hold times and mandating basic sanitation, the ruling forces a structural overhaul of ICE's daily logistics in one of the country's busiest jurisdictions.

Key points

  1. A federal judge issued a permanent injunction against ICE regarding its holding facility at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan.
  2. The court ruled that holding civil detainees in overcrowded, unsanitary rooms for extended periods violates the Fifth Amendment.
  3. ICE is now legally barred from holding individuals for more than 12 hours without providing beds and adequate facilities.
  4. The agency argued it had made voluntary improvements, but the judge found a binding court order necessary to ensure compliance.

The federal government's authority to hold individuals pending civil immigration proceedings is strictly bound by the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against punitive confinement. On Thursday, September 24, 2026, a federal judge ruled that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) comprehensively failed that constitutional standard at its primary New York City processing center, issuing a permanent injunction against the agency's practices.[1][6]

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York delivered the final ruling regarding the ICE staging facility located at 26 Federal Plaza in lower Manhattan. In his order, Hellerstein described the holding environment as "dreadful" and "squalid," permanently barring the agency from returning to the operational protocols that prompted the initial litigation.[1][2]

The facility serves as a temporary transit point where individuals arrested by ICE are processed before being transferred to longer-term detention centers in New Jersey or upstate New York. According to court filings, detainees were routinely held in windowless, overcrowded rooms for 24 hours or longer, far exceeding the intended processing timeframe.[3][6]

The lawsuit, spearheaded by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), presented evidence that the holding rooms lacked beds, blankets, or adequate temperature control. Detainees reported sleeping on concrete floors next to overflowing toilets, with no access to showers, soap, or adequate food during their confinement.[4][5]

The lawsuit detailed conditions in which detainees were held in windowless rooms without beds or basic sanitation for over 24 hours.
Detainees reported sleeping on concrete floors next to overflowing toilets, with no access to showers, soap, or adequate food during their confinement.

ICE attorneys argued during the proceedings that the agency had already implemented voluntary improvements to the facility and that a permanent court order was unnecessary. The government maintained that logistical challenges, including transportation delays and the complex coordination required to move detainees to county jails, occasionally caused processing times to stretch beyond intended limits.[1][5]

Hellerstein rejected the government's defense, noting that voluntary, temporary fixes do not cure constitutional violations. The permanent injunction imposes strict operational ceilings on the facility. ICE is now legally prohibited from holding any individual in the processing rooms for more than 12 hours without providing a bed, and strict capacity limits must be maintained to prevent overcrowding.[2][3]

The ruling also mandates immediate access to basic hygiene supplies, potable water, and adequate meals for anyone held longer than a few hours. Compliance will be monitored by the court, and any deviation from the mandated standards could expose the agency to contempt proceedings.[4][6]

The decision marks a definitive conclusion to the litigation over the Manhattan facility and sets a clear legal precedent for short-term immigration processing centers nationwide. ICE now faces the immediate logistical burden of restructuring its New York operations to ensure no detainee breaches the court's strict time and capacity thresholds.[3][5]

Viewpoints in depth

Civil Rights Advocates

Advocates argue that the ruling enforces necessary constitutional minimums for civil detainees.

Legal groups, including the NYCLU and ACLU, maintain that civil immigration detention cannot legally mirror or exceed the punitive conditions of criminal incarceration. They argue that ICE's reliance on 'logistical challenges' as an excuse for holding individuals on concrete floors without basic sanitation reflects a systemic disregard for the Fifth Amendment. For these advocates, the permanent injunction is a necessary mechanism to force the agency to prioritize human dignity over operational convenience.

Federal Enforcement

ICE and government attorneys emphasize the logistical complexities of urban immigration processing.

Government representatives argued during the litigation that the conditions at 26 Federal Plaza were the result of complex transportation bottlenecks rather than deliberate policy. Moving detainees from a centralized Manhattan processing hub to dispersed county jails requires coordinating secure transport and navigating facility capacities. ICE maintained that it had already instituted voluntary reforms to address the overcrowding and argued that a rigid, court-mandated timeline fails to account for the unpredictable nature of daily enforcement logistics.

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

2 viewpoints surfaced

Civil Rights Advocates 50%Federal Enforcement 50%
  1. [1]Courthouse NewsFederal Enforcement

    In final ruling against ICE, judge blasts 'dreadful' and 'squalid' conditions at 26 Federal Plaza

    Read on Courthouse News →
  2. [2]NewsdayFederal Enforcement

    Federal judge orders ICE to improve conditions for immigration detainees at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan

    Read on Newsday →
  3. [3]AxiosFederal Enforcement

    ICE maintained "unconstitutional" conditions at NYC detention center, judge rules

    Read on Axios →
  4. [4]American Civil Liberties UnionCivil Rights Advocates

    District Court Grants Order Prohibiting ICE from Detaining Immigrants in Abusive Conditions at 26 Federal Plaza

    Read on American Civil Liberties Union →
  5. [5]Associated PressFederal Enforcement

    Judge permanently bars ICE from holding detainees in 'squalid' NYC processing center rooms

    Read on Associated Press →
  6. [6]The New York TimesFederal Enforcement

    Federal Judge Condemns ICE Holding Facility in Manhattan as 'Unconstitutional'

    Read on The New York Times →

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get News & Politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.