US and Iran Reach Final Text for Peace Agreement Following Pakistani Mediation
Following months of conflict and recent tit-for-tat missile strikes, the United States and Iran have reportedly finalized the text of a peace agreement mediated by Pakistan. The deal aims to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, extend a fragile ceasefire, and establish a framework for addressing Iran's nuclear program.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- US Administration
- Views the deal as a strategic victory that secures shipping lanes and curbs nuclear proliferation.
- Iranian Leadership
- Approaches the deal cautiously, demanding sanctions relief and unfreezing of assets before final approval.
- Israeli Government
- Insists the agreement must completely dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities and proxy support networks.
- Pakistani Mediators
- Frames the agreement as a historic diplomatic triumph that averts a catastrophic regional war.
- International Observers
- Highlights the fragility of the deal and the high risk of collapse due to domestic political spoilers.
What's not represented
- · Gulf Arab States
- · Global Energy Importers
Why this matters
The February outbreak of war between the US and Iran severely disrupted global energy markets and blocked 20% of the world's fuel supply through the Strait of Hormuz. A finalized peace deal would avert a full-scale regional war, stabilize global oil prices, and reshape Middle Eastern security dynamics.
Key points
- Pakistan announced the US and Iran have reached a final text for a peace agreement.
- The deal includes a 60-day ceasefire extension and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
- US sanctions would be lifted in phases in exchange for the destruction of highly enriched uranium.
- President Trump says the deal is nearly complete and could be signed this weekend.
- Iranian officials caution that final approval from their supreme leadership is still pending.
The United States and Iran have reached a "final, agreed upon text" for a peace agreement, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced on Friday, signaling a potential end to the war that erupted in late February. The breakthrough comes after intense mediation by Islamabad, which has hosted indirect and direct talks between the two adversaries for months. Sharif stated on the social media platform X that "peace has never been this close as it is now," adding that Pakistani diplomats are working closely with Washington and Tehran to finalize the immediate next steps.[2][4][5][6]
US President Donald Trump corroborated the diplomatic progress, telling reporters in the Oval Office that the deal is "pretty much completed" and that a formal signing could take place as early as this weekend in Europe. Trump stated that the agreement would secure the reopening of critical shipping lanes and ensure that Iran does not pursue nuclear weapons. Vice President JD Vance, who previously traveled to Islamabad in April to negotiate directly with Iranian officials, is expected to attend the signing ceremony if the final hurdles are cleared.[1][3][4]
The diplomatic breakthrough follows a perilous week in the Middle East that nearly saw the conflict spiral out of control. Just days ago, the fragile ceasefire brokered by Pakistan in early April appeared to collapse as the US and Iran exchanged a series of tit-for-tat missile strikes. The escalation prompted Trump to threaten a massive retaliatory bombardment against Iranian assets, before he abruptly canceled the strikes on Thursday, citing the sudden progress in the peace negotiations.[2][3][7][8]

According to regional officials and leaked details of the draft, the "Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding" centers on a 60-day extension of the current ceasefire and the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. The vital shipping lane, which normally facilitates roughly 20 percent of the world's fuel supply, has been effectively shut down by a US naval blockade and Iranian military action since the war began. The agreement reportedly mandates a return to pre-war shipping volumes within 30 days, with the US lifting its blockade in tandem.[1][3][4]
The agreement reportedly mandates a return to pre-war shipping volumes within 30 days, with the US lifting its blockade in tandem.
Beyond maritime security, the framework outlines a phased lifting of US sanctions and the release of frozen Iranian assets to provide economic relief to Tehran. In exchange, the tentative deal includes provisions for the removal and destruction of Iran's highly enriched uranium. However, both US and Iranian officials have indicated that the current memorandum does not resolve every aspect of Iran's nuclear program; instead, it establishes a 60-day window during which detailed nuclear negotiations will take place.[1][3][4]

Despite the optimism from Washington and Islamabad, Iranian leadership has maintained a more cautious public stance. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed that an agreement "has never been closer," but he urged the media to refrain from speculating on the exact terms until the text is officially finalized. Iranian state media and foreign ministry spokespeople emphasized that the country's supreme leadership has not yet given final approval, warning that Tehran will not compromise on its core red lines.[1][3][5][6]
Israel, which launched the initial military action alongside the US on February 28, is not a direct party to the negotiations. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated on Friday that he is in "complete agreement" with Trump that Iran must be permanently stripped of its nuclear capabilities. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reiterated expectations that the US will uphold principles preventing Iran from supporting regional proxy groups, noting that Israel will closely monitor the enforcement of the deal.[1][4][5]

If signed, the agreement would mark a historic diplomatic pivot, ending months of direct military confrontation that have rattled global energy markets and threatened to engulf the broader Middle East. Yet diplomats close to the talks warn that the deal still faces significant vulnerabilities. With hardliners in both Washington and Tehran scrutinizing the concessions, and the volatile security environment on the ground prone to sudden escalations, officials estimate there remains a substantial risk that the agreement could collapse before the ink is dry.[3][7]
How we got here
Feb 28, 2026
The US and Israel launch military action against Iran, sparking the war.
April 8, 2026
Pakistan brokers an initial, fragile ceasefire between the US and Iran.
April 11, 2026
US Vice President JD Vance and Iranian officials hold high-level talks in Islamabad.
June 10, 2026
The ceasefire nearly collapses as the US and Iran exchange tit-for-tat missile strikes.
June 12, 2026
Pakistan announces a final text for a peace agreement has been reached.
Viewpoints in depth
US Administration's view
The deal is a decisive victory that secures global shipping and curbs Iran's nuclear ambitions.
President Trump and Vice President Vance frame the agreement as a successful culmination of maximum pressure and military deterrence. They argue that the US naval blockade and recent strikes forced Tehran to the negotiating table, resulting in a deal that prioritizes American and allied security interests. The administration emphasizes that the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the framework for destroying highly enriched uranium represent major strategic wins, achieved without committing to a prolonged ground war.
Iranian Leadership's view
The agreement is a necessary step for sanctions relief, but final approval depends on US adherence to economic commitments.
Iranian officials, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, view the memorandum as a pragmatic mechanism to end the crippling US naval blockade and secure the release of frozen assets. While acknowledging that an agreement is close, Tehran's leadership remains deeply skeptical of Washington's long-term reliability. They stress that Iran has not surrendered its core red lines and that any concessions regarding highly enriched uranium will be strictly conditional on the phased lifting of economic sanctions during the 60-day ceasefire window.
Israeli Government's view
The peace deal is acceptable only if it permanently dismantles Iran's nuclear infrastructure and proxy networks.
Although not a direct signatory to the Islamabad Memorandum, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government views the US-Iran negotiations with intense scrutiny. Israeli officials argue that any pause in military pressure must not allow Tehran to covertly advance its nuclear weapons program or resupply regional militant groups. Israel expects the Trump administration to enforce strict verification mechanisms for the removal of nuclear material, warning that it reserves the right to take independent military action if Iran violates the terms.
What we don't know
- Whether Iranian supreme leadership will officially sign off on the final text without demanding last-minute changes.
- The exact mechanisms and timeline for the removal and destruction of Iran's highly enriched uranium.
- How Israel will respond if it determines the agreement fails to adequately curb Iran's nuclear capabilities.
Key terms
- Strait of Hormuz
- A crucial waterway between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman through which roughly 20% of the world's oil supply passes.
- Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU)
- Uranium that has been processed to contain a high concentration of the U-235 isotope, which can be used to develop nuclear weapons.
- Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding
- The working title for the draft peace agreement mediated by Pakistan between the US and Iran.
Frequently asked
Is the war officially over?
Not yet. While the final text of a peace agreement has been reached, Iranian leadership still needs to formally approve it, and a signing ceremony has not yet taken place.
What happens to the Strait of Hormuz?
The draft agreement includes provisions to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days and lift the US naval blockade, restoring global shipping volumes.
Does this deal eliminate Iran's nuclear program?
The current memorandum establishes a framework for removing and destroying Iran's nuclear material, but detailed negotiations on the future of the nuclear program are expected to take place during the 60-day ceasefire extension.
Was Israel involved in the negotiations?
No. Israel is not a party to the US-Iran deal, though Israeli leaders have communicated their security demands directly to the Trump administration.
Sources
[1]AP NewsUS Administration
US, Iran close to signing agreement aimed at ending war
Read on AP News →[2]The Washington PostUS Administration
Pakistan says US, Iran have agreed to wording of peace deal
Read on The Washington Post →[3]The GuardianInternational Observers
Trump says US and Iran on verge of signing peace agreement
Read on The Guardian →[4]CBS NewsUS Administration
Pakistan prime minister says 'final, agreed upon text' of US-Iran peace deal reached
Read on CBS News →[5]The Jerusalem PostIsraeli Government
Final text of US-Iran peace deal agreed upon, Pakistani PM announces
Read on The Jerusalem Post →[6]Anadolu AgencyIranian Leadership
US, Iran agree on peace deal's 'final text' to end war: Pakistan
Read on Anadolu Agency →[7]Iran InternationalIranian Leadership
Tit-for-tat under ceasefire: Experts warn of new normal in Mideast conflict
Read on Iran International →[8]Yeni SafakPakistani Mediators
Pakistan urges US, Iran to adhere to ceasefire, widen diplomatic space
Read on Yeni Safak →
Every angle. Every day.
Get news politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.










