Skip to main content
UN Security CouncilStakes WatchAug 20, 2026, 5:54 PM· 3 min read· in news politics

UN Security Council Holds Emergency Session After US-Israel Airstrikes on Iran and Tehran's Retaliation

The UN Security Council convened an emergency meeting to address escalating Middle East violence following coordinated US and Israeli strikes on Iran and subsequent Iranian retaliatory attacks.

By Svetlana Pavlova

US and Israeli Administrations 35%Iran and Allied Nations 35%European and UN Diplomats 30%
US and Israeli Administrations
Argues that the strikes were a lawful and necessary preemptive measure to stop Iran's nuclear program.
Iran and Allied Nations
Views the US-Israeli strikes as unprovoked aggression and a violation of international law, justifying retaliation.
European and UN Diplomats
Focuses on condemning regional escalation and pushing for a return to diplomatic negotiations over Iran's nuclear program.

The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency session in New York to address a rapidly escalating military confrontation in the Middle East, following coordinated airstrikes by the United States and Israel against Iran, and Tehran's subsequent retaliatory attacks. The session, requested by Russia, China, France, Bahrain, and Colombia, laid bare deep international divisions over the conflict.[1][2][5]

The crisis intensified after US and Israeli forces launched strikes aimed at Iranian military and leadership targets, an offensive the US has dubbed 'Operation Epic Fury'. In response, Iran launched waves of drones and missiles targeting locations in Israel and several Gulf states, prompting airspace closures and widespread military alerts across the region.[2][5][6]

Addressing the 15-member Security Council, UN Secretary-General António Guterres delivered a stark warning, condemning the military actions of all involved parties. Guterres stated that the US and Israeli airstrikes violated international law and the UN Charter, while equally condemning Iran's retaliatory attacks for violating the sovereignty of neighboring Arab states. He urged an immediate cessation of hostilities to pull the world 'back from the brink'.[3][4]

The UN Security Council consists of 15 members, including five permanent members with veto power.

The diplomatic exchange during the session was highly polarized. US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz defended the American military action as lawful and necessary for global security, asserting that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon' and that the operation aims to dismantle missile capabilities and disrupt proxy militias. Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon echoed this stance, calling the strikes a preemptive measure against an 'existential threat' and dismissing the council's condemnation as 'hypocrisy'.[3][4][6]

The diplomatic exchange during the session was highly polarized.

Conversely, Iran's Permanent Representative to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, characterized the joint US-Israeli operation as a 'deliberate and unprovoked military attack'. Iravani accused the US and Israel of committing war crimes and violating the UN Charter, demanding that the Security Council take immediate action to halt the aggression.[2][3]

The Russian mission to the UN supported Tehran's position, formally requesting the session over what it termed an 'unprovoked act of armed aggression' by Washington and Jerusalem. China's representative also denounced the strikes, expressing shock that military action occurred while diplomatic negotiations were ostensibly ongoing.[1][5]

The emergency session highlighted deep divisions among international powers regarding the Middle East conflict.

Meanwhile, European powers sought to navigate a middle path. In a joint statement, the leaders of Britain, France, and Germany condemned the Iranian retaliatory strikes but notably refrained from condemning the initial US-Israeli attacks. The European nations emphasized the need to resume negotiations regarding Tehran's nuclear program, a framework that has been largely defunct since the US withdrawal in 2018.[3][4]

The humanitarian toll of the escalation is already mounting. UN relief officials warned that the violence is exacerbating an increasingly daunting crisis, with strikes reportedly hitting civilian infrastructure across the region. As the Security Council debates its next steps, the international community remains deeply concerned that the cycle of retaliation could spiral beyond control, triggering a devastating region-wide war.[2][4]

What to know

  1. The UN Security Council held an emergency session requested by Russia, China, France, Bahrain, and Colombia.
  2. UN Secretary-General António Guterres condemned both the US-Israeli strikes and Iran's retaliatory attacks.
  3. US and Israeli ambassadors defended the strikes as necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
  4. Iran's ambassador called the US-Israeli strikes a 'flagrant violation' of the UN Charter.
  5. European leaders urged a return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear program.

Key terms

UN Security Council
The United Nations organ responsible for the maintenance of international peace and security, comprising 15 members, including five permanent veto-wielding members.
UN Charter
The foundational treaty of the United Nations that establishes the principles of international law, including the prohibition of the use of force against the territorial integrity of any state.
Operation Epic Fury
The operational name given by the United States to the coordinated military strikes aimed at dismantling Iranian missile capabilities and proxy networks.

Reader questions

Why did the UN Security Council hold an emergency session?

The session was convened at the request of Russia, China, France, Bahrain, and Colombia to address the escalating military conflict following US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran and Iran's subsequent retaliation.

What was the US and Israeli justification for the strikes?

The US and Israel stated the strikes were necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and to neutralize an existential threat to regional and global security.

How did the UN Secretary-General respond?

António Guterres condemned the military actions of all parties, stating that both the US-Israeli strikes and Iran's retaliatory attacks violated international law and the UN Charter.

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

US and Israeli Administrations 35%Iran and Allied Nations 35%European and UN Diplomats 30%
  1. [1]Times of IsraelIran and Allied Nations

    Russia and others request special session over 'unprovoked act of armed aggression'

    Read on Times of Israel
  2. [2]UN NewsEuropean and UN Diplomats

    Violent escalation in the Middle East has entered a third day as coordinated US and Israeli strikes

    Read on UN News
  3. [3]PBSUS and Israeli Administrations

    UN chief condemns U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran during emergency Security Council meeting

    Read on PBS
  4. [4]LA TimesEuropean and UN Diplomats

    U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres condemned both U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran and Iran's retaliatory attacks

    Read on LA Times
  5. [5]CGTNIran and Allied Nations

    The United Nations Security Council has held an emergency meeting in response to US-Israeli strikes on Iran

    Read on CGTN
  6. [6]US Mission to the UNUS and Israeli Administrations

    Ambassador Mike Waltz U.S. Representative to the United Nations New York, New York

    Read on US Mission to the UN

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get news politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.