Israel, Lebanon, and US Sign Trilateral Framework Agreement to End War and Disarm Hezbollah
The United States, Israel, and Lebanon have signed a performance-based framework agreement aimed at ending hostilities, establishing Lebanese military control over pilot zones, and disarming Hezbollah. However, the Iran-backed militant group has already rejected the US-brokered deal, raising questions about its enforceability.
- US & Israeli Diplomats
- View the framework as a necessary, performance-based mechanism to permanently dismantle Hezbollah and secure Israel's northern border.
- Lebanese State Officials
- Desperate to end the war and restore national sovereignty, but highly wary of the internal conflict that forcibly disarming Hezbollah could trigger.
- Hezbollah Leadership
- Rejects the agreement as an illegitimate capitulation to Israeli demands and insists on an unconditional IDF withdrawal.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Lebanese civilians displaced from the southern security zone
- Rank-and-file soldiers in the Lebanese Armed Forces tasked with enforcing the zones
The United States, Israel, and Lebanon signed a trilateral framework agreement in Washington on Friday, marking a formal diplomatic effort to end months of devastating war. Brokered by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the pact outlines a phased, performance-based approach to restoring Lebanese sovereignty, disarming Hezbollah, and enabling an eventual Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon.[2]
The signing ceremony at the State Department featured Israeli Ambassador Yechiel Leiter and Lebanese Ambassador Nada Hamadeh, who both framed the accord as a critical first step toward long-term stability. "In this performance-based trilateral framework agreement, Iran is out, Hezbollah is out, and the road to peace between Israel and Lebanon is in," Leiter stated during the announcement.
A central pillar of the agreement is the creation of two "pilot zones"—one situated south of the Litani River and one to the north. Within these designated areas, the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) are mandated to assume exclusive security control, explicitly barring all non-state actors, including Hezbollah, from operating or maintaining weapons caches.[1]
To support this ambitious security transition, the United States announced intentions to bolster the fighting capacity and logistical capabilities of the Lebanese military. Additionally, Washington pledged $100 million in humanitarian assistance, which will be coordinated through the United Nations to aid communities devastated by the recent fighting.
The primary obstacle to the framework's success is Hezbollah itself, which was not a party to the negotiations in Washington. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem swiftly rejected the proposal, demanding a full, unconditional Israeli withdrawal and a comprehensive ceasefire before any internal security arrangements or disarmament protocols are discussed.[1][2]
The primary obstacle to the framework's success is Hezbollah itself, which was not a party to the negotiations in Washington.
Hezbollah maintains that previous diplomatic agreements and United Nations resolutions only require the disarmament of its forces south of the Litani River. The militant group has warned that attempting to disarm its operatives nationwide fulfills "the enemy's objectives" and has vowed to continue its resistance operations as long as Israeli troops remain on Lebanese soil.[1]
On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the framework as a "major achievement" but clarified that Israeli forces will not immediately vacate Lebanese territory. Netanyahu emphasized that the IDF intends to remain in its declared security zone in southern Lebanon until Hezbollah's military infrastructure is verifiably dismantled and the group poses no further threat to northern Israel.
The diplomatic push follows a brutal escalation that began in early March 2026, triggered by Hezbollah rocket fire in the wake of a US-Israeli military campaign against Iran. The ensuing Israeli ground invasion of southern Lebanon and intense aerial bombardment have left over 4,000 people dead, devastated civilian infrastructure, and displaced more than a million residents.[3]
The agreement places immense pressure on the Lebanese government and its armed forces. While Beirut has previously vowed to establish a state monopoly on weapons, Lebanese authorities have long feared that attempting to forcibly disarm Hezbollah could fracture the military and ignite a devastating civil war, given the group's deep integration into the country's political and social fabric.[2]
Representatives from Israel and Lebanon are scheduled to hold follow-up meetings the week of June 22 to negotiate the specific boundaries and implementation timeline of the pilot zones. Meanwhile, the fragile cessation of hostilities faces immediate tests on the ground, with both the IDF and Hezbollah reporting sporadic clashes and drone activity near the Ali al-Taher Ridge.[1][3]
Key points
- The US, Israel, and Lebanon signed a trilateral framework agreement in Washington to end the war.
- The deal establishes 'pilot zones' where the Lebanese Armed Forces will take exclusive control.
- The agreement requires the complete disarmament of Hezbollah and the eventual withdrawal of Israeli forces.
- Hezbollah rejected the proposal, demanding an unconditional Israeli withdrawal first.
- The US pledged $100 million in humanitarian aid and support to bolster the Lebanese military.
- Israel stated it will maintain its security zone in southern Lebanon until Hezbollah is fully disarmed.
Viewpoints in depth
The US and Israeli Diplomatic View
The framework is a necessary mechanism to permanently remove Hezbollah's military threat and restore state sovereignty to Lebanon.
Proponents of the agreement argue that the pre-2026 status quo, where Hezbollah operated as a heavily armed state-within-a-state, is no longer tenable. By establishing 'pilot zones' under the exclusive control of the Lebanese Armed Forces, the US and Israel aim to systematically dismantle Hezbollah's infrastructure without requiring a permanent Israeli occupation. Israeli officials emphasize that the performance-based nature of the deal ensures the IDF will not withdraw until the Lebanese government proves it can secure its own territory.
Hezbollah and Allied Factions
The agreement is an illegitimate capitulation to Israeli demands that ignores the reality on the ground.
Hezbollah leadership views the Washington-brokered framework as an attempt to achieve through diplomacy what Israel could not achieve militarily. Naim Qassem and other figures argue that the Lebanese Armed Forces are not positioned to replace the 'resistance,' and that demanding Hezbollah's disarmament while Israeli troops remain in southern Lebanon is a non-starter. They insist that any lasting truce must begin with an unconditional Israeli withdrawal, framing the pilot zones as a US-backed plot to spark a Lebanese civil war.
The Lebanese Government's Dilemma
Beirut seeks an end to the devastating war but faces the perilous task of enforcing the agreement against a heavily armed domestic faction.
Lebanese state officials and diplomats recognize the framework as their best chance to end a war that has killed thousands and displaced a fifth of the population. However, the requirement to disarm Hezbollah places the Lebanese Armed Forces in an impossible position. While the US has promised funding and capacity-building, attempting to forcibly disarm Hezbollah risks fracturing the military and plunging the country into internal conflict. Consequently, Beirut is attempting to balance international compliance with domestic survival.
Why this matters
The agreement marks the most significant diplomatic breakthrough since the devastating regional escalation began in March 2026, outlining a concrete path for the Lebanese Armed Forces to reclaim territorial sovereignty. However, with Hezbollah refusing to disarm and Israel vowing to maintain its southern security zone until they do, the framework risks becoming a catalyst for internal Lebanese conflict rather than an immediate peace.
Sources
[1]TimeUS & Israeli DiplomatsWhat are the specifics of the Israel-Lebanon cease-fire plan overseen by Washington?
Read on Time →
[2]L'Orient TodayLebanese State OfficialsLebanon, Israel, US sign trilateral framework agreement in Washington
Read on L'Orient Today →
[3]The GuardianHezbollah LeadershipIsrael and Hezbollah agree to renew ceasefire after flareup of violence
Read on The Guardian →
Comments
More in News & Politics
See all →Trade Dispute Resolution
Bypassing the Appellate Body: How 53 WTO Members Use the MPIA to Settle Trade Disputes
7 sources
International Court of Justice
Germany Asks ICJ to Dismiss Nicaragua's Case Over Arms Exports to Israel
7 sources
IMF Quotas
The Four Variables That Dictate Voting Power Inside the International Monetary Fund
7 sources
Saxony-Anhalt Election
AfD Secures Historic Plurality in Saxony-Anhalt State Election as CDU Support Collapses
6 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get News & Politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.




