Grid TransitionExplainerJul 16, 2026, 8:44 PM· 6 min read

Global Nuclear Capacity Stagnates with Marginal 133 MW Net Gain in 2025 as Major Reactors Retire

Despite surging policy interest and new construction, global nuclear capacity grew by just 133 megawatts in 2025 as the retirement of aging European and Asian plants offset new grid connections.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Nuclear Advocates 40%Renewable Energy Proponents 35%Energy Transition Analysts 25%
Nuclear Advocates
Industry proponents argue that the current stagnation is a temporary bottleneck before a massive wave of new capacity comes online.
Renewable Energy Proponents
Critics of nuclear expansion emphasize that atomic energy is too slow and expensive to compete with wind and solar.
Energy Transition Analysts
Grid and policy analysts focus on the geopolitical implications and the friction of replacing an aging fleet.

What's not represented

  • · Local communities hosting decommissioned plants
  • · Uranium mining and fuel supply chain operators

Why this matters

Understanding the actual pace of nuclear deployment is critical for evaluating global climate goals. While political rhetoric suggests a rapid atomic renaissance, the physical reality of grid transition is much slower, requiring massive investments just to replace aging 20th-century infrastructure.

Key points

  • Global nuclear capacity saw a net gain of just 133 MW in 2025, as new additions barely outpaced retirements.
  • Three new reactors came online in Russia, India, and China, adding 2,956 MW of capacity.
  • Seven older reactors were permanently shut down in Belgium, Taiwan, and Russia, removing 2,823 MW.
  • The global fleet is aging, with an average reactor age of 32.4 years, forcing a wave of decommissioning.
  • Despite the stagnation, over 60 reactors are currently under construction globally, and 2026 is projected to see zero shutdowns.
133 MW
Net global capacity gain in 2025
2,956 MW
Capacity added from 3 new reactors
2,823 MW
Capacity lost from 7 retired reactors
32.4 years
Average age of operating global reactors
60+
Reactors currently under construction globally

For all the press releases, policy reversals, and ambitious pledges surrounding atomic energy over the past year, the actual expansion of the global nuclear grid in 2025 tells a much quieter story. Despite a surge in political momentum, the world’s operating nuclear capacity grew by a razor-thin margin of just 133 megawatts (MW) last year. To put that figure into perspective, a single large-scale offshore wind turbine can now boast a capacity of 15 MW. The stagnation highlights a fundamental friction in the global energy transition: the race to build next-generation nuclear plants is currently locked in a dead heat with the retirement of the 20th-century fleet.[1][2]

The math behind the 133 MW net gain is straightforward but revealing. According to data from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, only three new nuclear reactors were connected to the global grid in 2025. These new units—located in Russia, India, and China—added a combined 2,956 MW of fresh generating capacity. However, that progress was almost entirely erased by the permanent shutdown of seven older reactors worldwide, which removed 2,823 MW from the grid.[1][3][4]

The three new additions reflect the current center of gravity for nuclear engineering. Russia commissioned the Kursk 2-1 reactor, adding 1,200 MW of capacity. India connected the 630 MW Rajasthan-7 unit, while China brought the 1,126 MW Zhangzhou-2 reactor online. These projects represent years of capital-intensive construction finally reaching the finish line, underscoring the dominance of Asian and Eastern European state-backed developers in executing large-scale nuclear infrastructure.[1][5]

The 2025 global nuclear capacity balance sheet.
The 2025 global nuclear capacity balance sheet.

On the other side of the ledger, the retirements were driven by a mix of aging infrastructure and long-standing political mandates. Belgium led the retreat by shuttering three major units: Doel 1, Doel 2, and Tihange-1. Together, these closures removed over 1,800 MW of capacity. The shutdowns proceeded even as Belgian lawmakers fiercely debated the country's broader nuclear phaseout, illustrating how difficult it is to reverse course once a plant's decommissioning process is set in motion.[1][2]

Taiwan also marked a historic milestone in 2025, permanently closing the Maanshan-2 reactor on the island's southern tip. The 938 MW unit was the last operating nuclear power plant in Taiwan, and its closure completed the territory's long-planned exit from atomic energy. Rounding out the global retirements, Russia decommissioned three tiny 11 MW units at the Bilibino plant in the Arctic, replacing them with newer floating nuclear technology.[1][2]

To understand why the global nuclear fleet is treading water, one must look at the demographics of the reactors themselves. The world currently relies on roughly 410 operating commercial reactors, but the fleet is undeniably graying. The average age of an operating nuclear reactor is now 32.4 years. More than 260 of these units have been in service for over three decades, and over 140 have surpassed the 40-year mark.[4][7]

Nuclear power plants are marvels of engineering, but they are not immortal. Components degrade under intense radiation and thermal stress, and upgrading a 40-year-old facility to meet modern safety standards often requires billions of dollars. For many utilities, especially those operating in competitive, deregulated electricity markets, the math simply does not support life extensions. As a result, the industry is fighting a constant battle of attrition, needing to build massive new plants just to replace the baseline capacity that is aging out of the system.[3][7]

Nuclear power plants are marvels of engineering, but they are not immortal.

This dynamic explains why the much-discussed "nuclear renaissance" has yet to materialize in actual generation statistics. While global electricity demand is surging—driven by electrification, data centers, and artificial intelligence—nuclear's share of global commercial electricity generation slipped to roughly 9% in 2024 and 2025. This represents its lowest share in four decades, a stark contrast to the explosive, exponential growth of solar and wind power over the same period.[3][7]

The aging global nuclear fleet is driving a wave of permanent reactor shutdowns.
The aging global nuclear fleet is driving a wave of permanent reactor shutdowns.

Yet, industry analysts caution against interpreting the 2025 stagnation as a terminal decline. The current data reflects investment decisions made a decade or more ago, owing to the notoriously long lead times of nuclear construction. Today, the pipeline of future capacity tells a very different story. There are currently over 60 reactors under construction across 15 countries, representing nearly 80 gigawatts (GW) of future capacity. This is one of the highest levels of active nuclear construction seen in the last 30 years.[2][4]

The geographic distribution of this pipeline, however, is heavily skewed. China alone accounts for roughly half of the global capacity under construction, with plans to reach 100 GW of installed nuclear capacity by 2030. Over the past decade, 94% of the nuclear reactors that began construction worldwide were of Chinese or Russian design. This shift has raised alarms in Western capitals, where policymakers are increasingly viewing nuclear energy not just as a climate tool, but as a critical pillar of national security and technological leadership.[4][5]

In response, Western nations are deploying a two-pronged strategy. First, they are aggressively pursuing Long-Term Operation (LTO) licenses to keep their existing fleets running. By extending the operational lifespan of a reactor from 40 to 60—or even 80—years, countries can preserve their zero-carbon baseload power without the crippling capital costs of new builds. The International Atomic Energy Agency notes that these life extensions are currently the most cost-effective way to maintain global nuclear capacity.[4][6]

Second, the industry is betting heavily on the commercialization of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Unlike traditional gigawatt-scale plants, which are bespoke mega-projects prone to massive cost overruns and decade-long delays, SMRs are designed to be manufactured in factories and assembled on-site. While China and Russia already operate early-stage SMRs, Western developers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom are racing to deploy their own commercial models by the early 2030s.[4][6]

Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are designed to overcome the high capital costs and long build times of traditional plants.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are designed to overcome the high capital costs and long build times of traditional plants.

The turning point for the global fleet may arrive sooner than the SMR revolution. According to projections from BloombergNEF, 2026 is slated to be the first year in at least a decade and a half where zero reactors worldwide are scheduled for permanent shutdown. With the wave of retirements temporarily pausing, the new reactors coming online over the next few years will finally translate into pure net growth for the grid.[2]

The International Atomic Energy Agency recently revised its long-term projections upward for the fifth consecutive year, estimating that global nuclear capacity could more than double by 2050 in its high-case scenario. Achieving that, however, will require the industry to overcome its historical struggles with supply chain bottlenecks, specialized labor shortages, and financing hurdles.[6]

Ultimately, the story of nuclear energy in 2025 is one of a massive, slow-turning ship. The 133 MW net gain is a humble figure, reflecting the heavy anchor of an aging 20th-century fleet. But beneath the surface, the engines are running hotter than they have in decades. As the retirement curve flattens and the current wave of global construction reaches completion, the atomic grid is quietly positioning itself for its next era of expansion.[2][4][7]

How we got here

  1. 2011

    The Fukushima Daiichi accident prompts several nations, including Taiwan and Belgium, to initiate long-term nuclear phaseout plans.

  2. 2024

    Global nuclear electricity generation hits a record high of 2,677 TWh, though its overall share of the global electricity mix drops to 9%.

  3. May 2025

    Taiwan permanently closes its Maanshan-2 reactor, officially completing its exit from nuclear energy.

  4. December 2025

    The year ends with a net global capacity gain of just 133 MW, as 7 retirements offset 3 new grid connections.

  5. 2026 (Projected)

    For the first time in at least 15 years, zero nuclear reactors are scheduled for permanent shutdown globally.

Viewpoints in depth

Nuclear Advocates

Industry proponents argue that the current stagnation is a temporary bottleneck before a massive wave of new capacity comes online.

From the perspective of nuclear advocates, the 133 MW net gain in 2025 is a lagging indicator that fails to capture the industry's underlying momentum. They point to the 60+ reactors currently under construction and the fact that 2026 is projected to see zero shutdowns. For this camp, the focus should be on the record-breaking generation numbers achieved by the existing fleet and the rapid advancement of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which they believe will solve the historical challenges of high capital costs and long build times.

Renewable Energy Proponents

Critics of nuclear expansion emphasize that atomic energy is too slow and expensive to compete with wind and solar.

Renewable energy proponents view the 2025 data as proof that nuclear power cannot scale fast enough to address the immediate climate crisis. They contrast the 2.9 GW of new nuclear capacity added globally with the hundreds of gigawatts of solar and wind deployed in the same timeframe. This camp argues that the 10-to-15-year construction timelines and massive capital requirements of nuclear plants make them a poor investment compared to the rapidly falling costs and quick deployment of renewable technologies and battery storage.

Energy Transition Analysts

Grid and policy analysts focus on the geopolitical implications and the friction of replacing an aging fleet.

For energy transition analysts, the story of 2025 is less about the viability of nuclear power and more about a geographic and generational changing of the guard. They highlight that 94% of recent construction starts are of Chinese or Russian design, signaling a major shift in global energy leadership away from the West. This camp emphasizes the pragmatic need for Long-Term Operation (LTO) extensions, arguing that keeping existing, paid-off reactors running safely is the most critical near-term priority for maintaining grid stability while next-generation technologies mature.

What we don't know

  • Whether the projected halt in reactor shutdowns for 2026 will hold, or if unexpected maintenance issues will force early retirements.
  • How quickly Western nations can commercialize and deploy Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) to compete with established Chinese and Russian designs.
  • If the massive 100 GW nuclear expansion planned by China will encounter the same supply chain and construction delays that have historically plagued Western projects.

Key terms

Net Capacity Gain
The total amount of new power generation added to the grid minus the amount of power removed due to facility closures.
Megawatt (MW)
A unit of power equal to one million watts, used to measure the output of power plants. A typical commercial nuclear reactor produces around 1,000 MW.
Gigawatt (GW)
A unit of power equal to one billion watts, or 1,000 megawatts.
Small Modular Reactor (SMR)
Advanced nuclear reactors with a smaller footprint and capacity than traditional plants, designed to be factory-built and assembled on-site to reduce costs.
Long-Term Operation (LTO)
The process of upgrading and relicensing an existing nuclear power plant to operate beyond its original designed lifespan, typically from 40 to 60 or 80 years.

Frequently asked

Why did global nuclear capacity only grow by 133 MW in 2025?

While three new reactors added 2,956 MW of capacity, seven older reactors were permanently shut down, removing 2,823 MW from the grid and nearly offsetting the gains.

Which countries built new nuclear reactors in 2025?

Russia, India, and China were the only countries to connect new commercial nuclear reactors to the grid in 2025.

Why are so many nuclear reactors shutting down?

The global fleet is aging, with an average reactor age of 32.4 years. Upgrading older facilities to meet modern safety standards is often too expensive, leading to permanent decommissioning.

Is the nuclear industry expected to grow in the future?

Yes. There are currently over 60 reactors under construction globally, and 2026 is projected to be the first year in over a decade with zero scheduled reactor shutdowns.

Sources

Source coverage

7 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Nuclear Advocates 40%Renewable Energy Proponents 35%Energy Transition Analysts 25%
  1. [1]Renewable Energy IndustryRenewable Energy Proponents

    Global nuclear capacity stagnates in 2025: marginal net growth of 133 MW

    Read on Renewable Energy Industry
  2. [2]Canary MediaEnergy Transition Analysts

    Despite all the hype, global nuclear capacity shrunk in 2025

    Read on Canary Media
  3. [3]World Nuclear Industry Status ReportEnergy Transition Analysts

    World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2025

    Read on World Nuclear Industry Status Report
  4. [4]International Atomic Energy AgencyEnergy Transition Analysts

    Power Reactor Information System (PRIS) 2025 Data

    Read on International Atomic Energy Agency
  5. [5]World Nuclear AssociationNuclear Advocates

    World Nuclear Performance Report 2025

    Read on World Nuclear Association
  6. [6]American Nuclear SocietyNuclear Advocates

    IAEA revises up nuclear power projections for fifth consecutive year

    Read on American Nuclear Society
  7. [7]RinnovabiliRenewable Energy Proponents

    World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2025 shows slowdown risks

    Read on Rinnovabili
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get energy stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.