Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down Florida's 'Stop Woke Act' in Higher Education
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Florida cannot restrict university professors from discussing race and gender, declaring the state's 'salary-for-speech' argument a violation of the First Amendment.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Academic Freedom Advocates
- Argue that universities must remain centers of free inquiry where students can debate controversial ideas without government censorship.
- State Authority Proponents
- Argue that because professors are state employees, the government has the right to dictate the curriculum and prevent taxpayer-funded endorsement of concepts they view as discriminatory.
What's not represented
- · K-12 educators still operating under the law
- · Current Florida university students
Why this matters
This ruling establishes a major federal precedent protecting academic freedom, ensuring that state governments cannot dictate or censor the concepts debated in public university classrooms. It serves as a legal firewall against similar legislation proposed in over 30 other states.
Key points
- The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the higher education provisions of Florida's Stop WOKE Act in a 2-1 decision.
- The court ruled that the state cannot dictate university curricula or ban unpopular ideas from classroom discussions.
- Judges rejected Florida's argument that professors' lectures constitute 'government speech' subject to legislative control.
- The ruling is a major victory for First Amendment rights and sets a precedent against similar classroom censorship bills nationwide.
- The law's restrictions on K-12 public school classrooms remain in effect, as this ruling only applied to higher education.
On July 7, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit struck down the higher education provisions of Florida's "Stop WOKE Act," delivering a landmark victory for academic freedom and First Amendment rights on public university campuses.[1]
The 2-1 decision decisively rejected the state's argument that it could control the speech of public university professors simply because they are government employees.
Writing for the majority, Judge Britt C. Grant—an appointee of President Donald Trump—called Florida's position a "breathtaking assertion of power to ban unpopular ideas from public discourse."
The ruling ensures that Florida's public colleges and universities will remain environments where complex, controversial, and challenging ideas can be debated freely, without the "pall of orthodoxy" mandated by state politicians.[1]

Passed in 2022 and championed by Governor Ron DeSantis, the Individual Freedom Act sought to prohibit instruction that "espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels" belief in eight specific concepts related to race, sex, and national origin.[2][3]
These targeted concepts included the idea that an individual is inherently racist or sexist by virtue of their race or sex, or that a person bears responsibility for historical actions committed by members of their same demographic group.[2][3]
The state argued that the law was necessary to prevent "indoctrination" and protect students from feeling psychological distress or guilt over historical injustices.[2]
However, the appellate court dismantled this rationale, emphasizing that higher education is fundamentally designed to expose adult students to a wide spectrum of thought. "The ideas Florida targets may well be noxious. Or maybe not," Judge Grant wrote. "Either way, in this context the First Amendment trusts students to figure it out for themselves."[1]

The legal battle began when the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed lawsuits in 2022 on behalf of professors and students, arguing the law was unconstitutionally vague and discriminatory.[1]
A federal district court initially blocked the higher education provisions in late 2022, a preliminary injunction that Tuesday's appellate ruling has now affirmed and cemented.
The state's core legal defense relied on the "government speech" doctrine, asserting that because professors are paid by the state, their classroom instruction is effectively the state's speech, which the government can regulate at will.
The 11th Circuit firmly rejected this "salary-for-speech" rule. The majority noted that applying such total control would destroy the traditional constitutional protections for academic freedom that are essential to a functioning university system.

Judge Barbara Lagoa, another Trump appointee, issued a dissenting opinion arguing that while the First Amendment protects viewpoints in the public square, it "does not compel all viewpoints to be worthy of state-sponsored endorsement."[3]
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier immediately praised Lagoa's dissent, suggesting her deference to state legislative power over public institutions makes her a model jurist who belongs on the Supreme Court.
Despite the dissent, civil rights advocates celebrated the majority's decision as a crucial firewall against a growing national trend. Since the Stop WOKE Act was introduced, more than 30 other states have proposed similar legislation attempting to restrict higher education curricula.
"This ruling sets a strong precedent that higher education cannot be limited to the whims of politicians," said Leah Watson, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Racial Justice Program.

Educators echoed this relief. Robert Cassanello, President of the United Faculty of Florida, emphasized that professors are content experts who have a constitutional right to determine their curriculum without being compelled to repeat state-drafted political speech.
What remains uncertain is the fate of K-12 education. While the higher education and workplace training provisions of the Stop WOKE Act have now both been struck down by the 11th Circuit, the law's restrictions on K-12 public school classrooms remain in effect.
Legal experts suggest that Tuesday's sweeping defense of free inquiry in higher education could provide a new framework for future challenges to K-12 censorship, though courts traditionally grant states more leeway over curriculum for minors.
For now, the ruling guarantees that Florida's university students will return to campuses this fall where the exchange of ideas—however difficult or controversial—remains protected by the highest laws of the land.[1]
How we got here
April 2022
Governor Ron DeSantis signs the Individual Freedom Act (Stop WOKE Act) into law.
August 2022
Civil rights groups and educators file lawsuits challenging the higher education provisions.
November 2022
A federal district court issues a preliminary injunction blocking the higher education restrictions.
March 2024
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down the workplace training provisions of the law in a separate ruling.
July 2026
The 11th Circuit officially strikes down the higher education provisions, declaring them unconstitutional.
Viewpoints in depth
Academic Freedom Advocates
Civil rights groups and educators argue that universities must remain independent centers of free inquiry.
Organizations like the ACLU and FIRE, alongside faculty unions, maintain that the First Amendment strictly prohibits the government from dictating what ideas can be explored in a university setting. They argue that higher education is designed to challenge adult students with diverse and sometimes uncomfortable perspectives. By attempting to ban specific concepts related to race and gender, they contend the state was not preventing indoctrination, but rather enforcing its own political orthodoxy and crippling students' ability to critically analyze systemic issues.
State Government Defenders
State officials argue that taxpayer-funded institutions should not endorse concepts they view as discriminatory.
Proponents of the Stop WOKE Act, including Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General James Uthmeier, rely on the 'government speech' doctrine. They argue that because public university professors are state employees paid by taxpayers, their classroom instruction is an extension of the state. From this perspective, the legislature has a democratic mandate to ensure that state funds are not used to promote ideologies that assign inherent guilt or superiority based on race or sex. Judge Barbara Lagoa's dissent echoed this, emphasizing that the state is not constitutionally compelled to sponsor or endorse all viewpoints in its own institutions.
What we don't know
- Whether the State of Florida will appeal the 11th Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
- How this appellate precedent will impact ongoing legal challenges to the K-12 provisions of the Stop WOKE Act.
Key terms
- Stop WOKE Act
- A 2022 Florida law that restricted how race, gender, and systemic inequality could be taught in schools or discussed in workplace trainings.
- First Amendment
- The U.S. Constitutional amendment protecting freedom of speech, which the court ruled prevents the state from censoring university classroom debates.
- 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
- The federal appellate court with jurisdiction over federal cases originating in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.
- Government Speech Doctrine
- A legal principle asserting that the government can regulate its own speech, which Florida unsuccessfully argued should apply to university professors' lectures.
Frequently asked
Does this ruling affect K-12 schools in Florida?
No. The July 2026 ruling specifically strikes down the higher education provisions of the Stop WOKE Act. The restrictions on K-12 public school classrooms remain in effect.
Can Florida professors now teach critical race theory?
Yes. The ruling protects the First Amendment rights of professors to discuss and debate controversial topics, including systemic racism and gender issues, without state censorship.
What was the state's main legal argument?
Florida argued that because public university professors are paid by the state, their classroom instruction constitutes 'government speech' that the state legislature has the authority to control.
Will this case go to the Supreme Court?
It is possible. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has strongly supported the dissenting opinion, and the state could appeal the 11th Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sources
[1]FIREAcademic Freedom Advocates
VICTORY: Federal appeals court decisively rejects Florida's 'Stop WOKE Act'
Read on FIRE →[2]News From The StatesAcademic Freedom Advocates
Instead of the state determining what will be taught in university classrooms, students must be free to hear ideas
Read on News From The States →[3]Miami HeraldState Authority Proponents
Federal court blocks part of Florida law restricting college instruction
Read on Miami Herald →
Every angle. Every day.
Get education stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.



