FDA-Approved Cancer Drug Epcoritamab Misses Overall Survival Endpoint in Confirmatory Phase 3 Trial
The bispecific antibody epcoritamab failed to significantly extend overall survival compared to standard chemotherapy in a confirmatory trial for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
By Aylin Aksoy
- Regulatory Watchdogs
- Argue that overall survival remains the gold standard for cancer drug approvals.
- Clinical Oncologists
- Weigh the lack of survival data against the practical need for accessible therapies.
- Drug Developers
- Emphasize the drug's ability to halt disease progression and achieve deep responses.
Fast facts
- The bispecific antibody epcoritamab missed its overall survival primary endpoint in a Phase 3 confirmatory trial.
- The drug demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival, reducing the risk of disease progression by 26 percent.
- Epcoritamab received accelerated FDA approval in 2023 based on early response rates in heavily pretreated lymphoma patients.
- Genmab and AbbVie plan to discuss the totality of the trial data with global regulatory authorities to determine next steps.
Why this matters
Epcoritamab received accelerated FDA approval in 2023 to provide a crucial off-the-shelf option for patients with aggressive lymphoma. Failing to prove an overall survival benefit in this confirmatory trial raises questions about whether that approval will be converted to full authorization or face regulatory restrictions.
In a significant setback for a widely used lymphoma therapy, the bispecific antibody epcoritamab (marketed as Epkinly) has failed to significantly extend overall survival in its confirmatory Phase 3 trial. Genmab and AbbVie clarified that the EPCORE DLBCL-1 study missed its sole primary endpoint for the United States, casting uncertainty over the drug's regulatory future in the country.[1][2]
Epcoritamab was granted accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2023 for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. The accelerated pathway allows drugs for serious conditions to reach the market based on surrogate endpoints—in this case, early response rates. However, drugmakers are required to conduct confirmatory trials to prove that these early responses translate into definitive clinical benefits, such as patients living longer.[1][4]
The EPCORE DLBCL-1 trial enrolled 483 patients globally who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. Participants were randomized to receive either subcutaneous epcoritamab monotherapy or an investigator's choice of standard chemoimmunotherapy regimens. The trial was designed with prespecified primary endpoints that differed by region, with overall survival designated as the sole primary measure of success for the U.S. market.[2]
While the drug demonstrated a 26 percent reduction in the risk of disease progression or death—achieving a median progression-free survival of 3.5 months compared to 3.0 months for standard therapy—it fell short on the ultimate metric. The overall survival hazard ratio was 0.96, meaning there was no statistically significant difference in how long patients lived between the two study arms.[1]
The overall survival hazard ratio was 0.96, meaning there was no statistically significant difference in how long patients lived between the two study arms.
Despite the overall survival miss, the trial did yield positive secondary signals. The complete response rate was notably higher in the epcoritamab arm, at 38 percent versus 26 percent for the control group. Furthermore, responses appeared durable for those who achieved them, with 59 percent of complete responders maintaining their remission at the 36-month mark.[1]
The disconnect between improved progression-free survival and stagnant overall survival is a known challenge in modern oncology trials. In heavily pretreated populations, patients who progress on a study drug often cross over to receive other novel therapies, which can dilute the measurable survival benefit of the initial experimental treatment. The trial was also conducted during the peak of the Omicron variant of the COVID-19 pandemic, which introduced additional mortality variables into the heavily immunocompromised patient cohort.[1][4]
The failure to meet the U.S. primary endpoint places epcoritamab in a precarious regulatory position. The FDA has grown increasingly strict regarding accelerated approvals that fail their confirmatory trials, frequently convening advisory committees to determine whether such drugs should remain on the market, have their indications narrowed, or be withdrawn entirely.[4]
Genmab and AbbVie have emphasized that they will engage with global regulatory authorities to discuss the totality of the data and determine the next steps. The companies are not abandoning the therapy; epcoritamab continues to be evaluated in earlier lines of DLBCL and in combination regimens. It also recently secured an additional FDA approval for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, supported by a separate trial that successfully met its endpoints.[3][5]
For patients and oncologists, the immediate clinical impact remains complex. Epcoritamab is an off-the-shelf bispecific T-cell engager, offering a more accessible alternative to personalized CAR-T cell therapies, which require complex manufacturing and specialized treatment centers. Until the FDA makes a formal determination, the drug remains available, but oncologists may increasingly weigh the lack of a proven survival benefit when sequencing treatments for advanced lymphoma.[4]
Viewpoints in depth
Drug Developers
The companies emphasize the drug's ability to halt disease progression and achieve deep responses in a difficult-to-treat population.
Genmab and AbbVie point to the trial's secondary endpoints as evidence of epcoritamab's clinical utility. They highlight the statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and the higher rate of complete responses compared to standard chemotherapy. The developers argue that these metrics demonstrate deep disease control, suggesting that the lack of an overall survival benefit may be influenced by confounding factors such as subsequent therapies or pandemic-related mortality rather than a lack of drug efficacy.
Regulatory Watchdogs
Advocates for strict trial standards argue that overall survival remains the gold standard for cancer drug approvals.
Regulatory experts and evidence-based medicine advocates maintain that surrogate endpoints like progression-free survival are only valuable if they ultimately translate into patients living longer or better lives. From this perspective, a failed confirmatory trial for an accelerated approval is a clear signal that the initial promise was not fully realized. This camp often pushes the FDA to take decisive action—including potential market withdrawal—when a drug misses its definitive overall survival endpoint, ensuring that the accelerated approval pathway is not used to bypass rigorous efficacy standards.
Clinical Oncologists
Treating physicians weigh the lack of survival data against the practical need for accessible therapies.
For oncologists managing aggressive, relapsed lymphomas, epcoritamab represents a crucial "off-the-shelf" option that can be administered without the logistical delays of personalized CAR-T cell therapy. While the missed survival endpoint is disappointing, many clinicians value the drug's ability to induce complete remissions in a subset of heavily pretreated patients. They often view the therapy as a necessary tool in a limited arsenal, prioritizing immediate disease control for patients who have exhausted standard options.
Sources
[1]OncLiveClinical OncologistsEpcoritamab Misses Sole US Primary End Point of Overall Survival in R/R DLBCL
Read on OncLive →
[2]ClinicalTrials.govA Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Epcoritamab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL (EPCORE DLBCL-1)
Read on ClinicalTrials.gov →
[3]ClinicalTrials.govA Phase 3 Trial of Epcoritamab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (EPCORE FL-1)
Read on ClinicalTrials.gov →
[4]Factlen Editorial TeamRegulatory WatchdogsSynthesis by Factlen editorial team
Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
[5]AbbVie PipelineDrug DevelopersAbbVie Oncology Pipeline and Clinical Trials
Read on AbbVie Pipeline →
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get health stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.
