Skip to main content
App Store RulesPolicy ShiftJun 28, 2026, 9:35 AM· 4 min read· in technology

Apple Complies With US Court Order, Allows Zero-Commission External Payment Links on App Store

Following a federal contempt ruling, Apple has updated its US App Store guidelines to let developers link to outside payment systems without paying a commission.

By Lila Morgan

App Developers & Publishers 40%Apple & Platform Defenders 30%Antitrust & Legal Analysts 30%
App Developers & Publishers
Creators view the zero-commission ruling as a watershed victory for fair competition.
Apple & Platform Defenders
Apple maintains that commissions are necessary to fund the platform's infrastructure and security.
Antitrust & Legal Analysts
Legal experts view the ruling as a textbook rejection of corporate 'malicious compliance.'

Apple has officially updated its App Store guidelines for the United States, allowing developers to link users to external payment systems without paying any commission to the tech giant. The sweeping policy change marks a watershed moment in the mobile software industry, effectively breaking the 30% "Apple Tax" that has governed iOS app monetization for over a decade.[1][3]

The update is a direct result of a federal court order stemming from the long-running antitrust battle between Apple and Epic Games. Under the revised rules, developers can now place a single, clearly labeled link or button within their apps that directs users to a web-based checkout page. Crucially, Apple will not collect a percentage of the revenue generated through these external links while the current injunction remains in effect.[2][4]

Previously, Apple had attempted to comply with the court's anti-steering injunction by allowing external links but imposing a 27% fee on any resulting transactions. The company also required developers to display intimidating warning messages—widely dubbed "scare screens"—cautioning users about the supposed dangers of leaving the Apple ecosystem to make a purchase.[3]

That approach was struck down by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who found Apple in willful contempt of court. She labeled the 27% fee and the friction-heavy user experience as "malicious compliance" designed to make external payments economically unviable. The court subsequently banned Apple from collecting any commission on off-app purchases until a "reasonable, non-prohibitive" rate could be established.[1][5]

How Apple's commission structure for external payments has shifted under court mandate.

With the new guidelines now live, the 27% fee has been entirely suspended. Furthermore, Apple has removed the requirement for aggressive warning screens. Developers are now only required to show a neutral, informational "leaving the app" notice before the user is handed off to the external web browser.[3]

With the new guidelines now live, the 27% fee has been entirely suspended.

The developer community has reacted with widespread celebration. Companies ranging from massive streaming platforms like Spotify to creator-focused startups like Patreon have long argued that Apple's mandatory in-app purchase system stifled their business models. By routing users to their own websites, developers can now retain 100% of their revenue minus standard credit card processing fees, which typically hover around 3%.[4]

For consumers, this shift is expected to translate directly into lower prices. Because developers no longer have to bake Apple's 30% cut into their pricing models, many are preparing to offer discounted subscription tiers for users who choose to check out via the web rather than through Apple's native interface.[2]

Developers are rushing to integrate web-based checkout flows to take advantage of the zero-commission window.

Despite the immediate victory for developers, the zero-commission landscape is technically temporary. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the contempt finding against Apple but ruled that the company is eventually entitled to charge a "reasonable" fee based on the actual costs of coordinating external links and maintaining platform security.[1]

The exact percentage of that future fee is now the subject of intense legal wrangling. The district court is tasked with determining what rate qualifies as fair, a process that could take months. In the meantime, Apple has filed emergency requests with the US Supreme Court in an attempt to pause the fee-setting phase entirely, arguing that the contempt ruling was fundamentally flawed.[4]

The financial stakes for Apple are astronomical. The company recently reported that the App Store ecosystem facilitated over $1.4 trillion in billings and sales in 2025. While Apple notes that more than 90% of those transactions are commission-free (such as physical goods or ad-supported apps), the high-margin revenue from digital subscriptions and in-app purchases is a cornerstone of its booming Services division.[2][5]

Apple's Services division, heavily reliant on App Store commissions, faces new headwinds from the policy change.

The US policy shift also highlights a fracturing global regulatory environment for the iPhone maker. In the European Union, Apple faces massive fines under the Digital Markets Act for similar anti-steering practices. Meanwhile, in markets like Japan and Brazil, Apple has proactively introduced reduced 15% commissions for alternative billing systems to appease local regulators.[1]

While Apple continues to defend its integrated payment system as the safest and most seamless option for consumers, the zero-commission window in the US represents a profound structural change. Even if a small coordination fee is eventually reinstated by the courts, the precedent has been set: the era of the mandatory 30% toll on iOS is coming to an end.[3][5]

Key points

  1. Apple has updated its US App Store guidelines to allow external payment links with a 0% commission.
  2. The change complies with a federal court order that found Apple's previous 27% fee to be 'malicious compliance.'
  3. Developers no longer have to display intimidating 'scare screens' when directing users to web checkouts.
  4. The 0% rate is temporary while a district court determines a 'reasonable' long-term coordination fee.
  5. Developers are expected to offer cheaper subscription prices to users who purchase via the web.

Key terms

Anti-Steering Rules
Platform policies that prevent app developers from informing users about cheaper payment options available outside the app.
In-App Purchase (IAP)
Apple's proprietary payment system, which historically took a 15% to 30% cut of all digital goods sold within iOS apps.
Malicious Compliance
The act of strictly following the letter of a rule or court order while intentionally violating its spirit or intended outcome.
Walled Garden
A closed technology ecosystem where the platform provider strictly controls the hardware, software, and payment infrastructure.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

App Developers & Publishers 40%Apple & Platform Defenders 30%Antitrust & Legal Analysts 30%
  1. [1]ReutersAntitrust & Legal Analysts

    Apple drops App Store external payment fees in US to comply with court order

    Read on Reuters
  2. [2]BloombergAntitrust & Legal Analysts

    Apple Allows Zero-Commission External Links in US App Store Following Legal Defeat

    Read on Bloomberg
  3. [3]The VergeApp Developers & Publishers

    Siri AI makes the Apple Watch finally feel like a wrist computer

    Read on The Verge
  4. [4]The Wall Street JournalApp Developers & Publishers

    Apple Bows to Court Order, Pauses Fees on Outside App Payments

    Read on The Wall Street Journal
  5. [5]CNBCAntitrust & Legal Analysts

    Apple in talks with startup that shrinks AI models to run on an iPhone

    Read on CNBC

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get technology stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.