Skip to main content
Zoning ReformPolicy Move· 4 min read· in Real Estate

California Legislature Passes Sweeping Housing Package Targeting Zoning and ADU Rules

California lawmakers have sent a comprehensive package of housing bills to Governor Gavin Newsom, aiming to expand accessory dwelling unit capacity and mandate high-rise zoning in major downtowns.

By Tao Yang

Pro-Housing Advocates 50%State Policymakers 30%Local Control Defenders 20%
Pro-Housing Advocates
Argue that state intervention is necessary to bypass local obstruction and increase housing supply.
State Policymakers
Focus on establishing statewide standards to meet housing production goals and revitalize urban centers.
Local Control Defenders
Argue that municipal governments should retain authority over zoning to manage infrastructure and neighborhood character.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Homeowners Associations (HOAs)
  • Municipal Planners

The California Legislature adjourned its 2025-2026 session on August 31, sending a sweeping package of housing bills to Governor Gavin Newsom's desk. The legislation targets local zoning control, accessory dwelling unit (ADU) expansion, and downtown high-rise development, marking another significant state intervention into municipal land-use authority.[1]

The package, which Newsom has until September 30 to sign or veto, includes Assembly Bill 956, Assembly Bill 2074, Senate Bill 1117, and Assembly Bill 2433. Under the California Constitution, any bill passed before September 1 that the governor does not return by the deadline automatically becomes a statute without his signature.[1][5]

For a homeowner with a deep lot, AB 956, authored by Assemblymember Sharon Quirk-Silva, represents a major expansion of property rights. The bill allows the construction of up to two detached ADUs on a single-family property, doubling the current cap of one and opening a cleaner path to multi-generational living or rental income.[2][5]

It also explicitly prohibits homeowners associations (HOAs) from blocking ADUs that comply with state standards. This provision closes a zoning gap that had allowed restrictive covenants to override state housing policy in many newer subdivisions, ensuring that owners in HOA-governed communities have the same building rights as those in older neighborhoods.[2][5]

Senate Bill 1117 would replace the existing 'fee cliff' with a marginal structure, significantly reducing impact fees for ADUs slightly larger than 750 square feet.

Paired with the capacity increase is Senate Bill 1117, introduced by Senator Sabrina Cervantes, which fundamentally alters how cities calculate impact fees for backyard homes. Under existing law, ADUs of 750 square feet or less are exempt from impact fees, but units exceeding that threshold are taxed on their entire square footage—a penalty that often forces owners to shrink their floor plans.[7]

SB 1117 replaces this "fee cliff" with a marginal structure. For the first two ADUs on a property, local governments will only be permitted to charge impact fees on the square footage that exceeds the 750-square-foot threshold. For an 800-square-foot unit, a homeowner would only pay fees on the 50 square feet above the line, potentially saving tens of thousands of dollars in development costs and making a two-bedroom layout financially viable.[7]

SB 1117 replaces this "fee cliff" with a marginal structure.

Beyond single-family lots, the legislature took aim at commercial centers with Assembly Bill 2074, the Downtown Revitalization Act. Authored by Assemblymember Matt Haney, the bill requires California's seven largest transit-rich cities—Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland, and Long Beach—to designate regional transit hub districts.[4][6]

Within these designated zones, which must cover at least 0.25 square miles, cities are prohibited from setting maximum height limits lower than 150 feet. Furthermore, at least 25% of the total area of these districts must allow residential buildings of at least 450 feet, giving developers the certainty needed to finance high-rise projects.[4][6]

Assembly Bill 2074 requires California's seven largest transit-rich cities to designate downtown districts where residential buildings of at least 450 feet are permitted.

"The pandemic is over, but many of our largest cities are still struggling to bring vitality back to their downtown neighborhoods," said Brian Hanlon, CEO of California YIMBY, which co-sponsored the legislation. "AB 2074 will expedite the construction of tall residential buildings, alongside existing commercial buildings."[4]

The package also includes Assembly Bill 2433, authored by Assemblymember David Alvarez, which strengthens the state's 1979 Density Bonus Law. The legislation expands incentives for developers who provide deeper levels of affordability and mandates that cities process concessions and waivers through a ministerial, rather than discretionary, approval process.[3][8]

"California's housing crisis has been decades in the making, but Bonus Law is proof that the right policies work," Alvarez said after the bill cleared the legislature. "AB 2433 builds on that success by making it easier to build homes families can actually purchase."[3]

The bills now await action from Newsom, who has historically championed state-level interventions to force local housing production. If enacted, the new laws will take effect on January 1, 2027, changing the math for property owners deciding what to build in their backyards and for developers eyeing downtown parcels.[1][3]

The stakes

For California homeowners, the legislation could unlock the ability to build a second backyard unit and save tens of thousands of dollars in impact fees, while developers gain a streamlined path to construct high-rise housing in the state's largest downtowns.

The essentials

  • The California Legislature passed a sweeping housing package, sending it to Governor Gavin Newsom ahead of his September 30 deadline.
  • AB 956 would allow homeowners to build up to two detached ADUs on a single-family lot and prohibit HOAs from blocking them.
  • SB 1117 would replace the ADU 'fee cliff' with a marginal structure, charging impact fees only on square footage above 750.
  • AB 2074 requires the state's seven largest cities to designate downtown transit districts allowing residential towers of at least 450 feet.
  • AB 2433 strengthens the Density Bonus Law by expanding incentives for affordable units and mandating ministerial approvals.

Perspectives explored

Housing Advocates and YIMBYs

Pro-housing groups argue the package is necessary to overcome local obstruction and lower the cost of construction.

Organizations like California YIMBY contend that municipal governments and homeowners associations have consistently weaponized local zoning rules to block new housing. By establishing clear, statewide standards for ADUs and downtown high-rises, advocates argue the legislation removes the arbitrary fee cliffs and discretionary approval processes that make residential construction financially unfeasible. They view the package as a critical step toward restoring affordability and revitalizing urban centers hollowed out by the pandemic.

Local Government and Neighborhood Groups

Municipal advocates argue the state is stripping communities of their ability to manage density and infrastructure.

Opponents of the sweeping state interventions, including various neighborhood coalitions and local government representatives, argue that bills like AB 956 and AB 2074 strip cities of their constitutional right to manage local land use. They express concern that mandating 450-foot towers in downtown districts or allowing multiple detached ADUs on single-family lots will strain local infrastructure, alter neighborhood character, and encourage real estate speculation without guaranteeing that the resulting units will be affordable for middle-income families.

Sources

Source coverage

8 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Pro-Housing Advocates 50%State Policymakers 30%Local Control Defenders 20%
  1. [1]Pluribus NewsPro-Housing Advocates

    Lawmakers approve housing package in California

    Read on Pluribus News
  2. [2]California YIMBYPro-Housing Advocates

    California Legislature Votes to Allow Homeowners to Build Two ADUs

    Read on California YIMBY
  3. [3]Davis VanguardLocal Control Defenders

    State Bill Challenges Local Control Over Affordable Housing Development

    Read on Davis Vanguard
  4. [4]California YIMBYPro-Housing Advocates

    California Legislature Votes to Revitalize Cities With Downtown Housing

    Read on California YIMBY
  5. [5]California Legislative InformationState Policymakers

    AB-956 Accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval: single-family dwellings.

    Read on California Legislative Information
  6. [6]California Legislative InformationState Policymakers

    AB-2074 Regional transit hub districts: downtown housing developments.

    Read on California Legislative Information
  7. [7]California Legislative InformationState Policymakers

    SB-1117 Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units.

    Read on California Legislative Information
  8. [8]California Legislative InformationState Policymakers

    AB-2433 Housing development: density bonus.

    Read on California Legislative Information

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Real Estate stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.