Skip to main content
Wage LawPolicy DecisionAug 21, 2026, 1:28 AM· 3 min read· in careers work

DOL Clarifies Midday Commute During Split-Shift Telework is Not Compensable Time

The U.S. Department of Labor has issued new guidance stating that voluntary midday commutes by employees splitting their workday between home and the office do not count as compensable hours under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

By Isabella Vega

Employer Defense Counsel 45%Human Resources Professionals 35%State Compliance Analysts 20%
Employer Defense Counsel
Legal advisors emphasize the liability protection the ruling offers, provided companies strictly document the voluntary nature of the schedule.
Human Resources Professionals
HR practitioners see the guidance as a tool to extend flexible work arrangements to nonexempt staff.
State Compliance Analysts
Regional legal experts caution that federal guidance does not override stricter state-level labor protections.

Why this matters

As hybrid work arrangements become standard, employers have hesitated to allow flexible split-shifts out of fear that the midday drive would trigger wage-and-hour liability under the continuous workday doctrine. This ruling provides a legal safe harbor for companies to offer off-peak commuting options without incurring extra payroll costs.

For years, human resources departments have faced a structural trap when trying to offer flexible schedules: the Fair Labor Standards Act's "continuous workday" doctrine. If an hourly employee starts their morning answering emails at home, drives to the office at 10:30 a.m. to avoid rush hour, and finishes the afternoon at their desk, that midday transit time technically falls between their first and last principal activities of the day. For employers, this raised the risk that granting a flexible split-shift would inadvertently convert an unpaid commute into compensable work time, exposing the company to back-pay liability.[1][3]

The U.S. Department of Labor has now resolved that tension, issuing a formal opinion letter that creates a clear safe harbor for voluntary midday commutes. In Opinion Letter FLSA2026-9, the Wage and Hour Division clarified that when an employee chooses to split their workday between home and the office for their own convenience, the travel between those locations remains an ordinary, non-compensable commute.[2][4]

The guidance addresses a specific but increasingly common scenario in the hybrid work era. In the primary example evaluated by the agency, a nonexempt employee scheduled to work from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. requests to shift their commute to off-peak hours. Instead of battling 8:00 a.m. traffic, the employee works from home for two hours, drives to the office mid-morning, and later returns home to finish the final hours of their shift.[2][4]

Employees who choose to work from home in the morning before commuting to the office off-peak will not have their travel time counted as hours worked.

According to the Department of Labor, this arrangement primarily benefits the employee by allowing them to avoid congestion and manage personal obligations. Because the travel is genuinely voluntary and the employee is fully relieved of duties during the drive, the agency concluded that the transit time does not count as hours worked.[1][6]

According to the Department of Labor, this arrangement primarily benefits the employee by allowing them to avoid congestion and manage personal obligations.

"An ordinary home-to-work commute isn't paid time whether it happens before the workday, after it, or in the middle of it, so long as it's genuinely ordinary," noted legal analysts reviewing the decision. The critical distinction rests entirely on who initiates the schedule split. If the employer mandates the midday travel or requires the employee to perform tasks while in transit, the continuous workday doctrine still applies, and the time must be paid.[3][4]

The agency simultaneously issued a companion directive, Opinion Letter FLSA2026-10, addressing field service workers who do not have a fixed office. This second letter clarified that briefly receiving electronic assignments at home before driving to a first worksite does not convert the subsequent commute into compensable time.[1][6]

For field workers, the DOL noted that passively receiving electronic assignments at home does not convert the subsequent drive into compensable time.

However, the Department of Labor drew a sharp line between passively receiving a schedule and actively performing administrative work. If a field technician spends time at home calling clients to coordinate arrival times or scheduling other engineers before getting into their vehicle, that pre-shift activity is considered integral to their job. In those cases, the subsequent drive to the first customer location becomes compensable travel between worksites.[1][6]

Employment attorneys are advising companies to audit their remote work policies to ensure compliance with the new framework. The primary recommendation is to document that any split-shift arrangements are initiated by the employee rather than mandated by management. State-level regulations also remain a factor; legal experts note that states like California often apply stricter tests regarding employer control that could supersede the federal guidance.[3][5]

The ruling is expected to accelerate the adoption of asynchronous and split-schedule models for hourly and nonexempt staff, a demographic that has historically been excluded from the flexibility afforded to salaried knowledge workers. By removing the threat of wage-and-hour litigation over off-peak commuting, the Department of Labor has effectively lowered the regulatory barrier to hybrid work for millions of hourly employees.[1][2]

Viewpoints in depth

Employer Defense Counsel

Legal advisors emphasize the liability protection the ruling offers, provided companies strictly document the voluntary nature of the schedule.

Management-side attorneys view the opinion letter as a necessary modernization of the Fair Labor Standards Act for the hybrid era. They note that the continuous workday doctrine, originally designed to prevent factory owners from exploiting unpaid transit between job sites, had inadvertently become a barrier to employee-requested flexibility. However, counsel warns that the safe harbor is fragile: if a manager even subtly pressures an employee to adopt a split shift to cover specific office hours, the commute immediately reverts to compensable time.

Human Resources Professionals

HR practitioners see the guidance as a tool to extend flexible work arrangements to nonexempt staff.

For human resources departments, the ruling solves a persistent equity problem. While exempt, salaried employees have long enjoyed the freedom to leave the office mid-afternoon and finish their work at home, extending that same privilege to hourly workers carried unacceptable payroll risks. HR advocates argue that this clarification allows companies to offer uniform flexibility policies across their entire workforce, improving retention and morale among nonexempt staff who previously had to endure peak rush-hour traffic.

State Compliance Analysts

Regional legal experts caution that federal guidance does not override stricter state-level labor protections.

While the Department of Labor has cleared the federal hurdle, compliance analysts warn that employers in worker-friendly jurisdictions must still tread carefully. In states like California, wage-and-hour courts apply a stricter 'control test' that often supersedes federal interpretations. Analysts advise that until state labor boards issue parallel guidance, companies operating in heavily regulated regions should consult local counsel before rolling out blanket split-shift policies.

Key points

  • The Department of Labor issued an opinion letter stating that voluntary midday commutes during a split-shift workday are not compensable time under the FLSA.
  • The ruling provides a safe harbor for employers to offer flexible, off-peak commuting options to nonexempt hourly workers without triggering wage liability.
  • The exemption only applies if the schedule split is initiated by the employee for their own convenience and no work is performed during transit.
  • A companion letter clarified that field workers who passively receive electronic assignments at home before driving to their first site are also not entitled to commute pay.

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Employer Defense Counsel 45%Human Resources Professionals 35%State Compliance Analysts 20%
  1. [1]SHRMHuman Resources Professionals

    DOL Opinion Letter Clarifies Midday Commute to Telework is Not Compensable FLSA Time

    Read on SHRM
  2. [2]HRMorningHuman Resources Professionals

    New DOL Opinion Letter: Is Commute Time Compensable for Partial Day Remote Work?

    Read on HRMorning
  3. [3]The Employer HandbookEmployer Defense Counsel

    When a Midday Commute Between Home and Work Stays an Unpaid Commute, According to the DOL

    Read on The Employer Handbook
  4. [4]Bricker GraydonEmployer Defense Counsel

    Is the midday commute considered worktime?

    Read on Bricker Graydon
  5. [5]Shaw Law GroupState Compliance Analysts

    The DOL Says a Midday Commute Can Still Be Unpaid—But California Employers Should Read the Fine Print

    Read on Shaw Law Group
  6. [6]AkermanEmployer Defense Counsel

    DOL Clarifies Compensability of Commuting Time for Hybrid and Field Workers

    Read on Akerman

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get careers work stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.