Virginia Becomes 19th Jurisdiction to Enact National Popular Vote Law, Nearing 270 Electoral Vote Threshold
Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger has signed legislation entering the state into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, bringing the initiative within 48 electoral votes of the threshold needed to bypass the Electoral College.
Share this story
Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger has signed legislation entering the Commonwealth into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a move that brings the decades-long effort to bypass the Electoral College within striking distance of its goal.[5][6]
The new law, which passed the Democratic-controlled General Assembly earlier this year, pledges Virginia's 13 electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote across all 50 states and Washington, D.C.[4][7]
With Virginia's entry, the compact now includes 18 states and the District of Columbia, representing a combined 222 electoral votes. The agreement is designed to remain dormant until participating states collectively reach the 270 electoral votes required to win the presidency.[3][5]
Once that threshold is met, the compact would automatically trigger, effectively guaranteeing the presidency to the national popular vote winner without requiring a constitutional amendment. The initiative now sits just 48 electoral votes shy of activation.[1][6]
Proponents of the measure argue it is a necessary structural reform to ensure the principle of "one person, one vote." They point to the five instances in U.S. history—including twice this century—where a candidate won the presidency while losing the national popular vote.[1][2]
"This is a very straightforward, long-term plan to get us to a point where the United States is frankly what most people think it is, which is a place where every person's vote counts the same," Governor Spanberger stated following the bill's passage.[6]
Opponents, primarily Republicans and conservative legal groups, argue the compact is an unconstitutional end-run around the Electoral College. They contend it would disenfranchise Virginia voters by potentially forcing the state's electors to cast ballots for a candidate who lost the Commonwealth's own popular vote.[5]
The legal architecture of the compact relies on Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants state legislatures the "exclusive and plenary" authority to determine how their electoral votes are awarded.[5][7]
However, legal scholars widely anticipate that if the compact ever reaches the 270-vote threshold, it will face immediate and intense scrutiny before the Supreme Court, particularly regarding whether states can form such an alliance without explicit congressional consent.[3][5]
The remaining 48 electoral votes present a steep but plausible climb for the compact's organizers. Advocates are heavily targeting swing states with divided governments, such as Michigan, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, where the legislation has previously gained partial traction.[1]
Perspectives explored
Electoral Reform Advocates
Argue the compact is a necessary democratic reform to ensure every American's vote carries equal weight.
Proponents emphasize that the current winner-take-all system disenfranchises millions of voters in non-competitive states and has repeatedly awarded the presidency to candidates who lost the national popular vote. They maintain that Article II of the Constitution gives states the absolute right to allocate their electors however they choose, making the compact a legally sound method to achieve a national popular vote without a constitutional amendment.
Electoral College Defenders
Contend the compact undermines the federalist structure of the United States and disenfranchises state-level majorities.
Opponents argue the Electoral College was intentionally designed to balance power between high-population and low-population states, preventing large coastal cities from dominating national elections. They warn that the compact could force a state's electors to vote against the clear will of their own constituents, and they anticipate severe constitutional challenges regarding whether states can form such an alliance without congressional approval.
Key points
- Virginia has officially joined the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, adding its 13 electoral votes to the initiative.
- The compact now holds 222 electoral votes, leaving it 48 votes short of the 270 required to take effect.
- If activated, participating states would award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.
- The agreement remains dormant until the 270-vote threshold is reached, meaning Virginia's current electoral process remains unchanged for now.
Timeline
2006
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is first introduced as a concept.
2007
Maryland becomes the first state to enact the compact into law.
February 2026
The Virginia General Assembly passes the National Popular Vote bill.
April 2026
Governor Abigail Spanberger signs the bill, making Virginia the 19th jurisdiction to join.
- Neutral News & Legal Observers
- Focus on the legislative mechanics, the remaining 48-vote gap, and the inevitable Supreme Court challenges if the threshold is reached.
- Electoral Reform Advocates
- Argue the compact is a necessary democratic reform to ensure every American's vote carries equal weight.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Conservative Legal Scholars
- Voters in Low-Population States
Sources
[1]Center for American ProgressElectoral Reform AdvocatesVirginia Joining the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact Puts the Finish Line in Sight
Read on Center for American Progress →
[2]The FulcrumElectoral Reform AdvocatesNational Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC): Virginia's Likely Adoption is an Act of Patriotism, Righting an 1800 Wrong
Read on The Fulcrum →
[3]KVCRNeutral News & Legal ObserversVirginia joins a national effort to ensure only popular vote winners become president
Read on KVCR →
[4]National Popular VoteElectoral Reform AdvocatesVirginia becomes the 19th Jurisdiction to Enact National Popular Vote into law
Read on National Popular Vote →
[5]The GuardianNeutral News & Legal ObserversUS edges closer to popular vote deciding winner of presidential elections
Read on The Guardian →
[6]TIMENeutral News & Legal ObserversMomentum is growing behind a push to elect U.S. presidents by the national popular vote after Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger signed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact into law
Read on TIME →
[7]BillTrack50Neutral News & Legal ObserversHB965 - 2026 Regular Session
Read on BillTrack50 →
More in News & Politics
See all →Alberta Separatism
Alberta Voters Overwhelmingly Reject Independence Referendum to Remain in Canada
5 sources
Senate Elections
Czech Senate Elections Deal Blow to Prime Minister Andrej Babis' Governing Coalition
3 sources
Electoral Systems
How District Magnitude Caps Electoral Disproportionality Across Parliaments
8 sources
Constitutional Law
The Caretaker Convention: Why Outgoing Governments Cannot Sign Contracts or Appoint Officials
6 sources
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get News & Politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.




