Skip to main content
Infrastructure FundingPolicy DecisionAug 18, 2026, 1:55 PM· 3 min read· in transportation

DOT Secretary Proposes Eliminating Federal Funding for Mass Transit and Bike Lanes

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has urged Congress to eliminate the Highway Trust Fund's mass transit account and restrict grants for bicycle infrastructure, prioritizing highway expansion in the upcoming surface transportation bill.

By Layla Zaher

The Administration 35%Transit Advocates 35%Local Governments 30%
The Administration
Prioritizes highway expansion and motor vehicle throughput over non-motorized transport.
Transit Advocates
Argues for multi-modal transportation funding to support public transit and roadway safety.
Local Governments
Seeks reliable federal funding to implement locally designed urban planning and safety projects.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has formally proposed eliminating the federal government's primary funding mechanism for public transit, urging Congress to redirect billions of dollars toward highway expansion and away from what he characterized as "DEI" infrastructure.[1]

The proposal, outlined in a July 22 letter to Senate leaders, targets the Highway Trust Fund's mass transit account, which was established in 1982 to ensure a dedicated revenue stream for public transportation. Duffy's plan would abolish the account entirely, a move the American Public Transportation Association warns would put more than 85% of federal transit and passenger rail funding at risk.

Beyond mass transit, the Department of Transportation is seeking to restrict competitive and formula grant funding for bicycle lanes, pedestrian safety projects, and electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The administration has explicitly targeted the "Complete Streets" program, arguing that investments in non-motorized transport reduce travel throughput for cars and contribute to congestion.[1]

The Department of Transportation has proposed restricting federal grants for bicycle lanes, arguing they reduce travel throughput for motor vehicles.

The policy shift is already affecting local infrastructure projects nationwide. The DOT has begun rescinding previously awarded grants for road diets and bike lanes in cities across the country, citing their "hostile" impact on motor vehicles. The Federal Highway Administration has also removed bike lanes from its official list of proven safety countermeasures.

The policy shift is already affecting local infrastructure projects nationwide.

Duffy has framed the cuts as a necessary correction to prioritize core infrastructure, stating that the administration's focus is on repairing critical roads and bridges that connect Americans to jobs and bolster national security. In social media posts and official communications, the DOT has labeled bicycle lanes and climate-focused transit initiatives as "DEI" (diversity, equity, and inclusion) programs that waste taxpayer money.[1][2]

Transportation advocates and urban planners have strongly condemned the proposal, pointing to data that contradicts the DOT's claims. The League of American Bicyclists noted that the DOT's own historical research shows bike lanes can reduce all roadway crashes by up to 53% without increasing congestion.[1]

Eliminating the mass transit account would put more than 85% of federal public transit and passenger rail funding at risk.

The financial rationale for the cuts is also facing scrutiny. An analysis by Transportation for America found that eliminating the mass transit account and transferring its funds to highways would only delay the Highway Trust Fund's projected insolvency by a single year, pushing it from 2027 to 2028.

The proposals set the stage for a contentious battle over the next surface transportation reauthorization bill, which Congress must pass to fund the nation's infrastructure for the next five years. With the current authorization expiring on September 30, lawmakers face a stark choice between the administration's car-centric vision and the multi-modal approach favored by transit advocates and many local governments.

The stakes

The proposal would fundamentally reshape how the U.S. funds its transportation network, potentially stripping billions from public transit and pedestrian safety projects to accelerate highway expansion.

The essentials

  • DOT Secretary Sean Duffy proposed eliminating the Highway Trust Fund's mass transit account.
  • The proposal would restrict federal grants for bike lanes, pedestrian safety, and EV infrastructure.
  • The DOT has characterized bike lanes and climate-focused transit initiatives as "DEI" programs.
  • Transit advocates warn the move puts over 85% of federal public transit funding at risk.
  • The DOT has already begun rescinding previously awarded grants for road diets and bike lanes.
  • The proposals outline the administration's priorities for the upcoming surface transportation reauthorization bill.

Perspectives explored

The Administration's View

Prioritizing motor vehicle throughput and core highway infrastructure.

The Department of Transportation argues that federal funding should be strictly focused on repairing and expanding roads and bridges that facilitate motor vehicle traffic and freight movement. Secretary Sean Duffy has characterized investments in bike lanes, pedestrian infrastructure, and mass transit as ideological "DEI" initiatives that artificially constrain roadway capacity, increase congestion, and waste taxpayer dollars.

Transit and Safety Advocates

Warning that the cuts will devastate public transportation and increase roadway fatalities.

Organizations like the American Public Transportation Association and the League of American Bicyclists argue that eliminating dedicated transit funding will cripple local agencies and strand millions of riders. They also point to decades of research showing that "Complete Streets" designs and protected bike lanes significantly reduce traffic fatalities for all road users, including drivers, and argue that removing these safety measures will make American roads deadlier.

Local Governments

Facing the immediate disruption of long-planned urban development projects.

City planners and municipal leaders are grappling with the sudden cancellation of federally funded safety and transit grants. Many local governments have spent years designing multi-modal transportation networks to handle population growth and reduce emissions, only to find their projects deemed "hostile to motor vehicles" and defunded by the current DOT administration.

Sources

Source coverage

2 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

The Administration 35%Transit Advocates 35%Local Governments 30%
  1. [1]Fast CompanyLocal Governments

    The policy won't make roads faster. Is transportation choice woke?

    Read on Fast Company
  2. [2]CarscoopsThe Administration

    DOT redirects $1.73B away from 'DEI bike lanes' to roads and bridges

    Read on Carscoops

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get transportation stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.