Skip to main content
Highway FundingPolicy Explainer· Updated · 4 min read· in Travel

The BUILD America 250 Act Fast-Tracks Tolls on Existing Interstates

The $580 billion BUILD America 250 Act fundamentally alters federal highway funding by streamlining the process for states to toll existing interstates while introducing new federal user fees for electric vehicles. The legislation signals a shift from traditional gas-tax reliance toward user-based charging and public-private partnerships.

By Baran Demir

Share this story

Listen

The federal gas tax has been stuck at 18.4 cents per gallon since 1993. For over three decades, drivers pulling up to the pump on a cross-country road trip have paid the exact same federal rate to fund the nation's interstate highways, even as construction costs soared and electric vehicles began bypassing the pump entirely. Now, the $580 billion BUILD America 250 Act, which advanced out of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on a 62-2 vote in May 2026, is poised to fundamentally rewrite the rules of the road.[3]

The legislation, designed to reauthorize federal surface transportation programs from fiscal year 2027 through 2031, signals a definitive end to the set-it-and-forget-it era of highway funding. Instead of relying solely on dwindling fuel tax revenues to prop up the Highway Trust Fund, the bill introduces a multi-tiered approach that shifts the financial burden directly onto the users of specific corridors. For families planning summer road trips and daily commuters alike, this means the freeways of the future will increasingly look and operate like digital tollways.[4]

The most immediate mechanism for this shift is the drastic streamlining of the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program (ISRRPP). Historically, federal law strictly guarded against adding tolls to existing, federally funded interstate lanes. Bureaucratic red tape meant that while states could apply to toll existing corridors to fund reconstruction, almost none successfully navigated the approval process.

The BUILD America 250 Act cuts through this backlog, allowing states to fast-track applications to implement tolling or managed lanes on existing interstates, provided the revenue is reinvested directly into that specific stretch of pavement's modernization and structural integrity.[1]

How the legislation streamlines the process for tolling existing interstates.

This streamlined pathway is paired with a massive expansion of private capital. The act lifts the cap on Private Activity Bonds (PABs) for surface transportation projects, unlocking billions in private equity and institutional capital.

By shifting the risk of design, construction, and long-term maintenance to private concessionaires through Public-Private Partnerships (P3s), states can deliver complex highway expansions years ahead of schedule. For the driver navigating a newly expanded interstate, this means more Availability Payment and Toll Concession models, where private companies operate the road, maintain the asphalt, and collect the tolls.[6]

However, the legislation also removes some existing tolling flexibilities that cities had hoped to use. The BUILD America 250 Act eliminates the Congestion Relief Program introduced in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). That program provided authority and financial incentives for up to ten urbanized areas to introduce road pricing specifically to manage heavy traffic demand. By cutting this program, the new bill pivots the federal focus away from using tolls primarily as a congestion-management tool and toward using them strictly as a revenue-generation mechanism for structural rehabilitation.[1]

Beyond traditional tolling, the bill takes direct aim at the electric vehicle transition. To address the shortfall in the Highway Trust Fund, the legislation establishes the first new stream of federal transportation revenue in over thirty years: an annual federal registration fee of $130 for electric vehicles and $35 for plug-in hybrids, which will increase biennially.

While the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates these fees will only cover about $30 billion of the bill's cost over a decade, they represent a structural shift toward ensuring all drivers pay for the roads they use, regardless of whether they plug in or fuel up.[1][4][5]

The bill introduces the first new stream of federal transportation revenue in decades via EV registration fees.

Looking further down the road, the act lays the groundwork for a national Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) system. The legislation mandates that within the next 24 months, the U.S. Department of Transportation must establish unified technical, data-privacy, and interoperability standards for Road User Charging frameworks. It also introduces strict timelines for cross-state transaction clearinghouses, ensuring that a driver with an E-ZPass, SunPass, FasTrak, or TxTag can navigate any user-fee facility nationwide with a single, unified account, eliminating the need for a windshield cluttered with different transponders.

Not everyone is celebrating the bill's formula. Urban transportation advocates point out that the BUILD America 250 Act cuts local discretionary grant access by $10 billion compared to the IIJA, eliminating programs like RAISE and Reconnecting Communities. Instead, the vast majority of the $474.4 billion in guaranteed funding will flow directly to state departments of transportation through formula programs, which are historically used to support highway expansion rather than local transit, protected bike lanes, or active transportation projects.[2][4]

New interoperability mandates aim to allow a single transponder to work on any toll facility nationwide.

The uncertainty now lies in the Senate and the appropriations process. While $474.4 billion is guaranteed from the Highway Trust Fund, the remaining $106 billion is subject to future annual appropriations from the General Fund. As the September 2026 expiration of the IIJA approaches, the BUILD America 250 Act sets a clear marker: the future of the American road trip will be highly connected, heavily privatized, and paid for by the mile.[2][4][5]

Perspectives explored

The Infrastructure Industry's View

Tolling authorities and private concessionaires see the bill as a necessary modernization of highway funding.

For decades, the tolling industry has argued that the federal gas tax is a terminal revenue model. Organizations like IBTTA and private operators view the BUILD America 250 Act as a vital pivot toward 'user-pays' systems. By streamlining the ISRRPP and expanding Private Activity Bonds, they argue states can finally leverage private capital to rebuild aging interstates without waiting for federal bailouts. They particularly champion the bill's mandate for national transponder interoperability, which they believe will make cross-country travel frictionless.

City and Transit Advocates' View

Urban planners argue the bill prioritizes highway expansion over local mobility and safety.

Groups like the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) warn that the legislation represents a step backward for urban mobility. By cutting $10 billion in local discretionary grants and eliminating programs like Reconnecting Communities, the bill funnels the vast majority of its $580 billion directly to state departments of transportation. City advocates argue these formula funds are historically used to widen highways rather than invest in transit, leaving local agencies with fewer guarantees and less control over their own infrastructure.

Fiscal Conservatives' View

Budget watchdogs warn the bill exacerbates the national debt despite new EV fees.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget points out that while the bill introduces new revenue streams, it still relies heavily on borrowing. The $130 annual fee on electric vehicles is projected to raise only about $30 billion over a decade, covering a fraction of the bill's $100 billion to $235 billion in new spending. Fiscal conservatives argue that without a structural fix to the Highway Trust Fund, the legislation simply shifts the burden of today's road maintenance onto future taxpayers through General Fund transfers.

Key points

  1. The $580 billion BUILD America 250 Act streamlines the process for states to add tolls to existing interstate highways to fund reconstruction.
  2. The legislation introduces a new annual federal registration fee of $130 for electric vehicles and $35 for plug-in hybrids.
  3. The bill eliminates the IIJA's Congestion Relief Program, pivoting federal focus away from using tolls primarily for traffic demand management.
  4. A mandate requires the DOT to establish unified interoperability standards within 24 months, allowing one transponder to work on any US toll facility.

Open questions

  • Whether the Senate will adopt the House's proposed electric vehicle fees or seek alternative revenue sources for the Highway Trust Fund.
  • How quickly states will actually implement new tolls on existing interstates once the bureaucratic hurdles are removed.
  • Whether future Congresses will reliably appropriate the $106 billion in General Fund transfers required to fully fund the legislation.

Timeline

  1. 1993

    The federal gas tax is raised to 18.4 cents per gallon, where it has remained frozen for over three decades.

  2. November 2021

    The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) is signed into law, providing a massive influx of temporary transportation funding.

  3. May 2026

    The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee passes the BUILD America 250 Act on a bipartisan 62-2 vote.

  4. September 2026

    The current surface transportation authorization under the IIJA is scheduled to expire.

Tolling & Infrastructure Industry 40%City & Transit Advocates 30%Fiscal Conservatives 30%
Tolling & Infrastructure Industry
Argues that user-fee models and P3s are essential to modernize infrastructure as gas tax revenues decline.
City & Transit Advocates
Argues the bill over-allocates formula funding to state highway expansions while cutting discretionary grants for local transit and safety.
Fiscal Conservatives
Argues the bill relies too heavily on General Fund transfers and that the new EV fees are insufficient to cover the massive spending increases.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Rural drivers who lack transit alternatives and face disproportionate toll burdens
  • Privacy advocates concerned about national Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tracking

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Tolling & Infrastructure Industry 40%City & Transit Advocates 30%Fiscal Conservatives 30%
  1. [1]IBTTATolling & Infrastructure Industry

    The BUILD America 250 Act (H.R. 8870)

    Read on IBTTA →
  2. [2]NACTOCity & Transit Advocates

    Less Money, Fewer Guarantees for Cities

    Read on NACTO →
  3. [3]Eno Center for Transportation

    T&I marks up the BUILD America 250 Act

    Read on Eno Center for Transportation →
  4. [4]Engineering News-Record

    BUILD America 250 Act

    Read on Engineering News-Record →
  5. [5]Committee for a Responsible Federal BudgetFiscal Conservatives

    House Highway Bill Costs At Least $100-$235 Billion Over a Decade

    Read on Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget →
  6. [6]FerrovialTolling & Infrastructure Industry

    Public-Private Partnerships: Unlocking New Paths for Growth

    Read on Ferrovial →
Listen

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Travel stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.