Skip to main content
ExplainerAviation SecurityExplainer· 5 min read· in Travel

The 100-Milliliter Limit: How the ICAO Annex 17 Standard Actually Dictates Carry-On Liquid Restrictions at Global Airports

The universal 100-milliliter limit on carry-on liquids is not a local airport policy, but a global security standard mandated by the International Civil Aviation Organization. Understanding how this rule is enforced across jurisdictions explains why container capacity, rather than remaining liquid volume, determines what clears security.

By Ranya Suleiman

Aviation Security Regulators 60%Airport Operators 20%Independent Analysts 20%
Aviation Security Regulators
National agencies prioritize strict, universal adherence to the 100-milliliter limit to maintain a consistent baseline of global security.
Airport Operators
Airports advocate for the rapid deployment of advanced screening technology to improve passenger throughput and phase out manual liquid checks.
Independent Analysts
Editorial researchers analyzing the cross-jurisdictional alignment of aviation security protocols.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Aviation Security Equipment Manufacturers
  • Airline Cabin Crews

The 100-milliliter limit on carry-on liquids is not an arbitrary rule invented by local airport security, but a global mandate dictated by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) under Annex 17 of the Chicago Convention. This standard requires all 193 member states to enforce a universal maximum container size of 100 milliliters for liquids, aerosols, and gels to mitigate the threat of liquid explosives. By establishing a unified baseline, the ICAO ensures that a passenger's carry-on bag cleared in one country will not trigger a security breach during an international connection. This alignment prevents the global aviation network from fracturing into conflicting regional security protocols.[1]

The framework that governs this restriction is Annex 17, titled 'Security: Safeguarding International Civil Aviation against Acts of Unlawful Interference.' First adopted by the ICAO Council in March 1974, the annex contains the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) that member states must implement in their national civil aviation security programs. The specific liquid restrictions were rapidly developed and integrated into global protocols following a foiled August 2006 terror plot in London, which involved liquid explosives disguised as everyday beverages. Since then, the standard has served as the definitive rulebook for airport checkpoints worldwide.[1]

To comply with Annex 17, national aviation authorities translate the ICAO standards into domestic regulations that travelers encounter every day. In the United States, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces this through its widely recognized 3-1-1 rule. 'You are allowed to bring a quart-sized bag of liquids, aerosols, gels, creams and pastes in your carry-on bag and through the checkpoint. These are limited to travel-sized containers that are 3.4 ounces (100 milliliters) or less per item,' the TSA states in its official guidelines. This localized branding helps passengers remember the rule, but the underlying metric is entirely international.[2]

Under ICAO standards, security personnel measure the maximum capacity of the container, not the volume of liquid remaining inside.

Across international borders, the core metric remains identical, even if the branding changes. The Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA) and the United Kingdom's government both enforce the strict 100-milliliter container limit at their respective checkpoints. This cross-jurisdictional alignment is the direct result of the ICAO's mandate. Without a standardized volume limit, the global aviation network would force passengers to discard compliant items at every international layover, creating massive bottlenecks and frustrating travelers who packed according to their departure country's rules.[3][4]

The science behind the 100-milliliter threshold is rooted in explosive chemistry and the physical constraints of an aircraft cabin. Security experts determined that 100 milliliters is the maximum volume of a precursor chemical that can be safely permitted on board. Even if a bad actor attempts to combine multiple 100-milliliter containers from a single one-liter clear bag, mixing a viable, stable explosive device in a pressurized cabin without specialized laboratory equipment is practically impossible at that scale. The limit is specifically calibrated to neutralize the threat while still allowing passengers to travel with essential personal care items.[7]

The science behind the 100-milliliter threshold is rooted in explosive chemistry and the physical constraints of an aircraft cabin.

A critical and often misunderstood component of the Annex 17 standard is its focus on the container's capacity rather than the volume of liquid inside. A 250-milliliter toothpaste tube that is nearly empty will still be confiscated at the checkpoint. The regulation strictly dictates that the container itself must not exceed 100 milliliters, as security officers cannot rapidly and accurately measure the remaining volume of a partially filled bottle during the high-throughput screening process. This strict interpretation ensures that the screening line moves efficiently without requiring subjective judgment calls from individual officers.[2][4]

The standard also mandates how these containers must be presented to security personnel. The ICAO guidelines require that all 100-milliliter containers fit comfortably within a single, transparent, resealable plastic bag with a maximum capacity of one liter. This presentation allows security personnel to quickly visually inspect the items and limits the total volume of liquids any single passenger can bring into the sterile area of the airport. By capping the total aggregate volume, the standard further reduces the risk of a coordinated attack using multiple small containers.[1][2]

Advanced CT scanners can analyze the molecular structure of liquids, prompting some airports to temporarily relax the 100-milliliter rule before regulators reinstated it.

While the 100-milliliter limit has been a fixture of air travel for nearly two decades, technological advancements are beginning to test the boundaries of the Annex 17 framework. Next-Generation Security Checkpoints (NGSC) equipped with advanced computed tomography (CT) scanners can analyze the molecular structure of liquids inside a bag, theoretically rendering the volume limit obsolete. Some airports, including London City Airport, temporarily allowed passengers to leave larger liquids in their bags, signaling a potential shift in how aviation security is managed.[5]

However, the transition to new technology has not been entirely seamless. In June 2024, the UK Department for Transport abruptly reintroduced the 100-milliliter restriction nationwide, including at London City Airport. The airport's official guidance notes that while passengers must adhere to the 100-milliliter limit, they 'can still keep everything, including all liquids and large electronics, in their hand luggage when passing through security' thanks to the CT scanners. This hybrid approach maintains the volume limit while improving the passenger experience at the checkpoint.[5]

The ICAO Council continues to adopt updated aviation security standards to address both emerging threats and new screening capabilities. Until advanced CT scanners are universally deployed and the ICAO formally amends the Annex 17 SARPs to increase the baseline volume, the 100-milliliter container limit remains the definitive global standard. For the foreseeable future, international travelers must continue to pack their liquids in compliance with a rule designed to keep the skies secure, regardless of which airport they are flying out of.[6]

Key points

  • The 100-milliliter carry-on liquid limit is mandated globally by the ICAO under Annex 17, not invented by local security agencies.
  • The standard regulates the maximum capacity of the container itself, meaning half-empty bottles larger than 100 milliliters will be confiscated.
  • National agencies like the TSA and CATSA enforce this identical volume limit, ensuring compliant bags clear international connections.
  • While advanced CT scanners can analyze liquids, the 100-milliliter baseline remains in effect globally until the ICAO formally amends the standard.

Key terms

ICAO Annex 17
The foundational document established by the International Civil Aviation Organization that dictates global security standards to safeguard civil aviation against unlawful interference.
Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs)
The technical specifications and rules adopted by the ICAO Council that all member states are required to implement in their national aviation security programs.
Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner
An advanced 3D imaging machine used at modern airport security checkpoints that can analyze the molecular structure of liquids and electronics inside a bag.
Next-Generation Security Checkpoint (NGSC)
An upgraded airport security lane equipped with advanced CT scanners, which theoretically allows passengers to leave liquids and laptops inside their carry-on luggage.

Sources

Source coverage

7 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Aviation Security Regulators 60%Airport Operators 20%Independent Analysts 20%
  1. [1]ICAOAviation Security Regulators

    Annex 17 - Aviation Security Policy Section

    Read on ICAO
  2. [2]Transportation Security Administration - TSAAviation Security Regulators

    Liquids, Aerosols, and Gels Rule

    Read on Transportation Security Administration - TSA
  3. [3]GOV.UKAviation Security Regulators

    Hand luggage restrictions at UK airports: Liquids

    Read on GOV.UK
  4. [4]CATSA-ACSTA.gC.CAAviation Security Regulators

    Liquids, Non-solid Food & Personal Items

    Read on CATSA-ACSTA.gC.CA
  5. [5]London City AirportAirport Operators

    Security and Baggage Requirements

    Read on London City Airport
  6. [6]ICAOAviation Security Regulators

    The ICAO Council adopts updated aviation security standards

    Read on ICAO
  7. [7]Factlen Editorial TeamIndependent Analysts

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Travel stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.