World Athletics Launches Overhaul of Pregnancy and Maternity Policies for Elite Athletes
The global governing body for track and field is developing comprehensive new guidelines to protect the income, healthcare, and competitive rankings of athletes who take maternity leave. The initiative marks a significant shift in how the sports industry handles pregnancy, aiming to eliminate the financial penalties historically faced by female competitors.
By Omar Haddad
World Athletics has officially launched a sweeping initiative to overhaul how pregnancy and childbirth are handled across elite track and field, signaling a major shift in the business of women's sports. The global governing body announced the formation of a dedicated project team tasked with drafting comprehensive policies that protect the income, healthcare, and competitive standing of athletes who choose to start families during their careers.
Historically, the sports industry has treated pregnancy as an injury or a breach of contract, leaving female competitors vulnerable to sudden losses of income and sponsorship support. This new framework aims to establish a baseline of rights that will apply universally across the sport.[1][2]
The core mechanism of the new initiative involves a multi-pronged approach to athlete welfare, focusing heavily on the financial architecture of track and field. Unlike athletes in major team sports who are salaried employees of a franchise, track and field competitors are essentially independent contractors. Their income relies on a fragile combination of prize money, appearance fees, and corporate sponsorships.
When an athlete steps away to give birth, they traditionally trigger "reduction clauses" in their apparel contracts, which allow sponsors to pause or slash their pay if they fail to compete in a minimum number of events. World Athletics is now working to create standardized contract language that explicitly bans these reductions for a minimum of 12 to 18 months surrounding a pregnancy.[3]
The push for systemic change did not happen in a vacuum; it is the culmination of years of intense advocacy by high-profile athletes who risked their careers to expose the industry's practices. The turning point occurred in 2019, when several prominent runners publicly disclosed that their primary sponsors had drastically reduced their pay during their pregnancies.
This public relations crisis forced major apparel brands to quietly revise their internal policies, but the changes were largely voluntary and varied wildly from company to company. By stepping in as the global regulator, World Athletics is attempting to move maternity protections from the realm of corporate goodwill into codified, enforceable sporting law.[4]
Beyond financial guarantees, the project is tackling the complex issue of competitive seeding and world rankings. In track and field, an athlete's world ranking dictates their eligibility for major championships and lucrative Diamond League meets. Under the old system, a 12-month absence for childbirth would cause an athlete's ranking points to decay to zero, forcing them to start from scratch at low-tier events upon their return.
The new framework proposes a "ranking freeze" mechanism, allowing athletes to lock in their pre-pregnancy standing for up to two years. This ensures that returning mothers can immediately access the high-stakes competitions necessary to rebuild their careers.[2][3]
World Athletics is drawing heavily on data and policy frameworks developed by advocacy groups like the Women's Sports Foundation, which has long argued that the physiological realities of female athletes require distinct regulatory structures. The foundation's research highlights that postpartum recovery for elite athletes involves highly specialized medical support, including pelvic floor rehabilitation and carefully phased return-to-play protocols.
The new World Athletics initiative seeks to mandate that national federations provide continued access to state-of-the-art medical facilities and physical therapy during maternity leave, treating postpartum recovery with the same urgency and funding as a major sports injury.[1][5]
The business calculus surrounding athlete pregnancies is also undergoing a profound transformation. For decades, corporate sponsors viewed maternity leave strictly as a loss of return on investment, as the athlete was not wearing the brand's logo on television. However, sports marketing analysts note that the paradigm has shifted dramatically.
Brands are increasingly recognizing that the narrative of a mother returning to elite competition resonates deeply with consumers. Athletes who share their pregnancy and postpartum journeys often see significant spikes in social media engagement and brand loyalty, transforming what was once seen as a liability into a highly marketable asset.[3]
To build this framework, World Athletics is looking closely at precedents set by other sports organizations that have recently modernized their maternity policies. The Women's Tennis Association (WTA) pioneered the concept of the "Special Ranking" rule, which allows players returning from childbirth to use their previous ranking to enter up to 12 tournaments over a three-year period.
Similarly, the Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA) secured a landmark collective bargaining agreement in 2020 that guaranteed fully paid maternity leave, a childcare stipend, and two-bedroom apartments for players with children. These examples serve as proof-of-concept that robust maternity protections do not hinder the commercial viability of a sport.[2][4]
The most significant hurdle facing World Athletics will be enforcement. Because the governing body does not directly pay the athletes' sponsorship contracts, it cannot unilaterally dictate the terms between a runner and a private apparel company. To circumvent this, the project team is exploring the creation of a "certified sponsor" badge. Under this proposed system, brands that agree to the minimum maternity standards would receive official recognition and preferred placement at World Athletics events, while those that refuse could face public pressure and restricted access to the sport's premier stages.
The cultural impact of this policy shift extends far beyond the track. By normalizing motherhood during peak athletic years, the initiative challenges the long-held assumption that a female athlete's career must end when she decides to start a family. Advocates argue that this will ultimately extend the longevity of women's careers in the sport, raising the overall level of competition.
The cultural impact of this policy shift extends far beyond the track.
As World Athletics gathers feedback from current and former competitors over the coming months, the final guidelines are expected to be ratified ahead of the 2027 World Championships, setting a new global standard for how the sports business values its female stars.[1][4]
The essentials
- World Athletics is drafting new policies to protect the income and rankings of pregnant athletes.
- The initiative aims to eliminate 'reduction clauses' that historically allowed sponsors to cut pay during maternity leave.
- A proposed 'ranking freeze' would allow returning mothers to maintain their competitive seeding for up to two years.
- The governing body is exploring a certification system to pressure private apparel brands into compliance.
- The move follows similar successful maternity policy overhauls in the WNBA and professional tennis.
Timeline
2019
High-profile track athletes publicly reveal that major sponsors drastically reduced their pay during pregnancy, sparking industry-wide backlash.
2020
The WNBA signs a landmark collective bargaining agreement guaranteeing fully paid maternity leave for its players.
2024
The WTA expands its Special Ranking rule, giving tennis players more flexibility to return to competition after childbirth.
June 2026
World Athletics officially launches a dedicated project team to overhaul maternity policies across global track and field.
2027
Target deadline for the ratification and implementation of the new World Athletics maternity framework.
- Athlete Advocates
- Argue that guaranteed base pay and ranking freezes are essential labor rights that prevent female athletes from being penalized for their biology.
- Corporate Sponsors
- Historically focused on performance metrics, but increasingly view maternity protections as a vital component of modern brand ambassadorship and public relations.
- Governing Bodies
- Focused on creating standardized, enforceable rules that balance athlete welfare with the logistical realities of global competition seeding.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Lower-ranked athletes who rely entirely on prize money rather than sponsorships
- Independent meet directors who manage event budgets and appearance fees
Sources
[1]BBC SportGoverning BodiesWorld Athletics seeks to improve pregnancy support
Read on BBC Sport →
[2]ReutersGoverning BodiesWorld Athletics announces comprehensive maternity policy review
Read on Reuters →
[3]The AthleticCorporate SponsorsA Mayor Is Taking Maternity Leave in Japan. Some Men Are Furious.
Read on The Athletic →
[4]ESPNAthlete AdvocatesThe fight for pregnancy protections in global sports
Read on ESPN →
[5]Women's Sports FoundationAthlete AdvocatesMaternity and Pregnancy in Elite Athletics: A Policy Framework
Read on Women's Sports Foundation →
More in Sports
See all →Las Vegas Expansion
Competing Bids for Las Vegas NBA Expansion Team Top $10 Billion Valuation as League Eyes 2028 Launch
3 sources
NRL Rights
NRL Secures Record $5.3 Billion Broadcast Deal Through 2034
3 sources
Texas Expansion
NHL Launches Six-Month, $3.5 Billion Expansion Process for 33rd Franchise in Texas
7 sources
Sports Finance
Premier League Precedent: Everton Ordered to Pay Burnley £26M in Damages for Financial Rule Breach
4 sources
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get Sports stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.




