Skip to main content
Ticketing RegulationPolicy Move· 4 min read· in Entertainment

House Committee Unanimously Advances MAIN Event Ticketing Act to Target Bot Purchases

A bipartisan bill aimed at strengthening federal protections against automated ticket-buying systems has cleared the House Energy and Commerce Committee by a 36-0 vote. The legislation would require online ticket sellers to implement stricter technological safeguards and report bot attacks to the Federal Trade Commission.

By Joao Marques

Legislators and Regulators 40%Primary Ticketing Platforms 30%Secondary Market Advocates 30%
Legislators and Regulators
Argues that fans deserve a fair shot at tickets and that the FTC needs stronger tools and mandatory reporting to hold platforms accountable.
Primary Ticketing Platforms
Supports anti-bot legislation in principle but emphasizes the massive scale of automated attacks and the compliance burden of reporting.
Secondary Market Advocates
Supports targeting malicious bot operators while defending the legitimate resale market for human buyers.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Independent Venue Owners
  • Touring Artists

Inside the House Energy and Commerce Committee markup room on Wednesday, September 16, lawmakers moved swiftly through a slate of 16 bills. Among them was H.R. 2713, a measure targeting the automated software systems that routinely drain concert inventory within seconds of an on-sale, leaving human fans staring at loading screens. The committee advanced the Mitigating Automated Internet Networks for Event Ticketing Act—mercifully shortened to the MAIN Event Ticketing Act—to the full House by a unanimous 36-0 roll call vote.[3][4]

The bipartisan legislation, introduced in April 2025 by Representative Diana Harshbarger (R-TN) and original co-sponsor Representative Troy Carter (D-LA), represents the most significant proposed overhaul of America’s anti-bot framework in a decade. Carter noted the bill aims to ensure fans are not "priced out or misled by deceitful actors" in the digital queue. It seeks to expand the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act of 2016, shifting the regulatory burden directly onto the platforms that issue the tickets.[1][2][4]

Under the amended text approved by the committee, online ticket issuers that operate their own sales services would be legally required to maintain specific technological controls designed to enforce their posted purchase limits. The bill defines circumvention broadly, covering any automated application used to avoid, bypass, remove, or deactivate a security measure or access control system.[1][3]

The legislation also introduces a strict reporting mandate, effectively forcing ticketing giants to admit when they have been beaten. When companies discover that their systems have been defeated by bots, they would have exactly 30 days to notify the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Following a breach, the platforms must take reasonable, documented steps to improve the compromised security measures.[2]

Proposed civil penalties for ticketing platforms under H.R. 2713.

To enforce these new duties, the bill establishes severe minimum financial penalties that scale quickly. Violators would face civil fines of at least $10,000 for every day an infraction continues, plus a minimum of $1,000 per individual violation. If regulators determine the circumvention or failure to report was intentional, companies could be hit with an additional $10,000 penalty per violation.[1][2]

To enforce these new duties, the bill establishes severe minimum financial penalties that scale quickly.

The FTC would be tasked with creating a public reporting website within 180 days of the bill’s enactment, allowing consumers to directly flag ticketing platforms that fail to meet these obligations. The agency would then share those complaints, along with the mandatory reports from issuers, with state attorneys general to coordinate enforcement across jurisdictions.[1][3]

The unanimous committee vote arrives at a highly sensitive moment for the live entertainment industry. The FTC, alongside seven states, is currently suing Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster in federal court. That antitrust lawsuit, filed in September 2025, alleges the ticketing giant allowed professional brokers to breach its own purchase limits and subsequently profited when those tickets were resold on its secondary marketplace.[2][3]

The legislation aims to prevent automated bot networks from draining ticket inventory before human buyers can access it.

Despite being the target of that litigation, Live Nation has publicly thrown its weight behind the MAIN Event Ticketing Act. In a letter to lawmakers, Dan Wall, Live Nation’s Executive Vice President for Corporate and Regulatory Affairs, previously expressed support for strengthening the BOTS Act while simultaneously calling the FTC’s collusion allegations "categorically false." The company has, however, raised logistical concerns about how the 30-day reporting obligations would function when platforms face massive, coordinated bot attacks during high-demand on-sales.[2][3]

The secondary ticketing market has also signaled its approval of the legislative push, eager to distance legitimate brokers from automated scalpers. The Coalition for Ticket Fairness, a lobbying group representing resale brokers, commended the committee's vote following the markup session. "Bad actors who use bots to unfairly scoop up tickets and restrict consumer choice should be held accountable, and we commend the Committee for prioritizing this issue," said Geoff Vetter, a spokesperson for the coalition.[3]

While the 36-0 committee vote represents a major legislative hurdle cleared, the bill is not yet law. H.R. 2713 now awaits a floor vote in the full House of Representatives, which has not yet been scheduled. A companion measure in the Senate, S. 196, advanced through the Senate Commerce Committee earlier and currently sits on the Senate Legislative Calendar. Both chambers must pass identical text before the measure can be sent to the president's desk.[2][4]

The stakes

For fans repeatedly priced out of live events by instant sell-outs and exorbitant resale markups, this legislation represents a concrete step toward leveling the playing field. By forcing ticketing platforms to actively defend against bots and face steep fines for failures, the bill targets the automated systems that siphon inventory away from human buyers.

The essentials

  1. The House Energy and Commerce Committee unanimously advanced the MAIN Event Ticketing Act by a 36-0 vote.
  2. The bill requires online ticket sellers to maintain technological controls to enforce posted purchase limits.
  3. Platforms must report known bot circumventions to the FTC within 30 days and improve their security systems.
  4. Violators face minimum civil penalties of $10,000 per day for ongoing infractions, plus $1,000 per violation.
  5. The FTC would establish a public website for consumers to report non-compliant ticketing platforms.
  6. The legislation now awaits a full floor vote in the House, while a companion bill sits on the Senate calendar.

Perspectives explored

Legislators and Regulators

Focuses on consumer protection and market fairness.

Lawmakers driving the MAIN Event Ticketing Act argue that the current regulatory framework is insufficient to deter sophisticated bot operators. By mandating that platforms report breaches within 30 days and establish a public complaint database, proponents believe the FTC will finally have the data necessary to pursue meaningful enforcement actions against both the bot operators and the platforms that fail to stop them.

Primary Ticketing Platforms

Highlights the operational realities of defending against automated attacks.

While major ticketing companies publicly support stronger anti-bot laws, they caution against overly broad reporting mandates. Industry representatives note that platforms face tens of thousands of automated hits daily during high-demand on-sales. Their concern centers on ensuring that the requirement to report "known attempts to circumvent" controls does not translate into an impossible compliance burden that distracts from actually stopping the attacks.

Secondary Market Advocates

Differentiates between automated fraud and legitimate resale.

Lobbying groups for the secondary ticketing market support the crackdown on bots, arguing that automated hoarding restricts consumer choice and damages the reputation of the entire resale ecosystem. However, they maintain that enforcement should remain strictly focused on technological circumvention rather than imposing broader restrictions on a fan's ability to resell legitimately purchased tickets.

Sources

Source coverage

4 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Legislators and Regulators 40%Primary Ticketing Platforms 30%Secondary Market Advocates 30%
  1. [1]DorkSecondary Market Advocates

    US House committee advances ticketing bill aimed at bots

    Read on Dork
  2. [2]RockumPrimary Ticketing Platforms

    MAIN Event Ticketing Act Advances 36-0 in U.S. House Committee, Targeting Ticket Bots

    Read on Rockum
  3. [3]Music Business WorldwidePrimary Ticketing Platforms

    MAIN Event Ticketing Act clears House committee 36-0 – as Live Nation fights an FTC lawsuit under the law it would strengthen

    Read on Music Business Worldwide
  4. [4]The PolitibaseLegislators and Regulators

    MAIN Event Ticketing Act - H.R. 2713

    Read on The Politibase

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Entertainment stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.