UN Global Risk Report Identifies Large-Scale War as Fastest-Rising Global Threat
A survey of 1,300 global stakeholders finds 36% expect a major international conflict within a year, marking the sharpest increase in perceived risk since 2024.
By Hailey Scott
- Multilateral Institutions
- Emphasizes the need for joint government action and the strengthening of international frameworks to prevent conflict.
- National Security Observers
- Focuses on the immediate imminence of the threat, the shifting geopolitical landscape, and the lack of institutional preparedness.
- Economic & Market Analysts
- Highlights the interconnected economic risks of war, including supply chain collapse, financial crises, and cybersecurity threats.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Defense Industry Executives
- Civilian Populations in Conflict Zones
Fast facts
- 36% of surveyed global stakeholders expect a large-scale war within the next 12 months.
- 76% of respondents project a major international conflict will occur within seven years.
- Large-scale war climbed 16 places in the risk rankings since 2024, the steepest rise recorded.
- The multilateral system's preparedness to mitigate war ranked 23rd out of 28 assessed risks.
- Global financial crises and supply chain collapses both moved up 12 places in the 2026 index.
Why this matters
The shift in threat perception from environmental and health crises toward imminent military conflict signals a fundamental realignment in global security priorities. As governments and private sectors reallocate resources to prepare for potential warfare, international supply chains, financial markets, and diplomatic frameworks face immediate structural pressure.
Thirty-six percent of global stakeholders surveyed by the United Nations now expect a large-scale war to significantly impact humanity within the next twelve months. The finding marks a sharp departure from recent years, elevating military conflict from a theoretical long-term concern to an immediate operational baseline for governments and multinational corporations.[1][5]
The 2026 Global Risk Report, released on September 15, aggregates responses from 1,300 officials across government, civil society, the private sector, and academia in 155 countries. Respondents were asked to evaluate 28 distinct political, economic, environmental, societal, and technological threats based on their likelihood, potential severity, and the international community's readiness to manage them.[1][7]
In the inaugural 2024 survey, environmental threats, misinformation, and pandemics dominated the top concerns. Two years later, large-scale war has climbed 16 places in the rankings—the steepest rise recorded among all 28 assessed risks. The threat is now viewed as the most imminent danger facing the global system.[2][5][7]
The anxiety extends well beyond the immediate twelve-month horizon. According to the data, 76 percent of respondents project that a major conflict will materialize and affect a significant share of the global population within seven years.[2][6]
The report highlights a severe gap in institutional capacity to handle this specific threat. Participants ranked the multilateral system's preparedness to detect and mitigate large-scale war at 23rd out of 28 risks, indicating widespread skepticism that current diplomatic frameworks can absorb or defuse the escalating tensions.[6]
The report highlights a severe gap in institutional capacity to handle this specific threat.
The United Nations frames this military threat as deeply interconnected with other systemic vulnerabilities. Global financial crises and supply chain collapses both moved up 12 places in the 2026 index, while cybersecurity breakdowns rose seven spots. Survey respondents identified the link between geopolitical tension and war as the strongest among the 705 risk connections mapped in the report.[5][7]
The geographic distribution of these fears is uniform across the globe. Large-scale war and geopolitical tension now rank among the top 10 threats in all seven regions covered by the survey, and sit in the top five across six of them. In 2024, these risks reached the top five in only one region.[6][7]
While climate change inaction remains the single highest-rated long-term risk overall, environmental risks as a broader category saw a slight decrease in perceived urgency. Conversely, concerns regarding artificial intelligence and frontier technologies surged, with AI-related risks entering the top 10 in Europe and North America.[2][7]
Secretary-General António Guterres noted in the report's foreword that political risks have moved to the center stage, describing the prospect of war as "far more important and far more immediate" than two years prior. He warned that the institutions expected to respond are simultaneously viewed as less capable of acting.[7]
The data indicates that political will and capital are likely to follow this shift in perception. As global attention pivots toward military readiness and geoeconomic confrontation, the findings place immediate pressure on international bodies to reinforce diplomatic guardrails before the projected conflicts materialize.[1][7]
Viewpoints in depth
Multilateral Institutions
Emphasizes the need for joint government action and the strengthening of international frameworks to prevent conflict.
For the United Nations and associated international bodies, the survey results serve as a stark warning about the erosion of diplomatic leverage. Secretary-General António Guterres and other UN officials argue that because risks like resource shortages, economic fragmentation, and misinformation directly fuel geopolitical tension, the only viable response is coordinated, joint government action. They view the declining faith in multilateral institutions not as a reason to abandon them, but as an urgent mandate to reform and empower them before localized disputes escalate into global warfare.
National Security Observers
Focuses on the immediate imminence of the threat, the shifting geopolitical landscape, and the lack of institutional preparedness.
Security analysts and geopolitical strategists point to the uniform geographic spread of the perceived threat as evidence of a systemic breakdown in global deterrence. With large-scale war now ranking in the top five risks across six of the world's seven regions, observers note that the threat is no longer isolated to specific flashpoints. This camp emphasizes that the international community's lack of preparedness—ranked 23rd out of 28 risks—reflects a structural reality: legacy institutions designed for post-Cold War stability are currently ill-equipped to manage an era defined by great-power competition and rapid military modernization.
Economic & Market Analysts
Highlights the interconnected economic risks of war, including supply chain collapse, financial crises, and cybersecurity threats.
Financial and trade sectors view the rising specter of war through the lens of interconnected systemic shocks. Market analysts highlight that the 12-place jumps for both global financial crises and supply chain collapses in the 2026 index are direct corollaries to the fear of military conflict. For this camp, the primary concern is how geopolitical tension accelerates economic fragmentation, prompting nations to weaponize trade, hoard critical resources, and launch cyberattacks against civilian infrastructure, all of which destabilize global markets long before conventional weapons are deployed.
Sources
[1]The United NationsMultilateral InstitutionsGLOBAL RISK REPORT
Read on The United Nations →
[2]PhemexEconomic & Market AnalystsUN Report Flags Large-Scale War as Top Rising Global Risk for 2026
Read on Phemex →
[3]Gate USEconomic & Market AnalystsLarge-Scale Warfare Surges 16 Positions in UN Global Risk Rankings, 76% Expect Within 7 Years
Read on Gate US →
[4]PreventionWeb.netMultilateral InstitutionsUN Global risk report 2026
Read on PreventionWeb.net →
[5]XinhuaNational Security ObserversFear for major war grows sharply as imminent global risk: UN survey
Read on Xinhua →
[6]Chosun IlboNational Security ObserversSurvey of 1,300 global leaders shows large-scale war jumped 16 places in timeline
Read on Chosun Ilbo →
[7]The European StingNational Security ObserversWorld fears major war more than any other global risk, UN survey finds
Read on The European Sting →
Comments
More in World
See all →Strait of Hormuz
Iran's IRGC Strikes Togo-Flagged Tanker in Strait of Hormuz as Trump Weighs 'Annihilation'
5 sources
Central Banking
The Main Refinancing Operations, the Deposit Facility, and the Marginal Lending Facility: How the ECB Manages Eurozone Liquidity
7 sources
IRGC Economy
How Iran's Revolutionary Guard Uses Article 147 to Seize No-Bid Mega-Projects From Civilian Firms
7 sources
Cross-Border Rail
EU Proposes Unified Rail Ticketing as Night Train Network Expands Across Europe
6 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get World stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.




