Why Schedule Policy/Career Converts 8,000 Senior Federal Jobs to At-Will Status
A new federal job classification has converted thousands of senior career civil servants into at-will employees. Here is how Schedule Policy/Career works, which roles are affected, and what it means for the mechanics of government.
Share this story
In short
- A new executive order has converted approximately 8,000 senior career federal workers to at-will employment status.
- The 'Schedule Policy/Career' classification removes traditional civil service protections and the right to appeal terminations.
- The administration argues the move is necessary to ensure executive accountability and the efficient implementation of policy.
For decades, the federal workforce has operated under a strict civil service system designed to insulate career employees from political transitions and arbitrary dismissal. That fundamental contract is now undergoing its most significant structural change in nearly fifty years.[6]
Approximately 8,000 senior career federal workers have been officially reclassified into a new employment category known as "Schedule Policy/Career" (Schedule P/C). This shift effectively strips these officials of traditional civil service protections, converting them into at-will employees who can be terminated without standard due process.[2]
The mechanism for this overhaul was established by a final rule from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in February 2026 and activated by a subsequent executive order in early June. Schedule P/C specifically targets career positions deemed to have a "confidential, policy-determining, policymaking, or policy-advocating character."[1][4]
In practical terms, employees moved into this new schedule lose the ability to appeal adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). They are now exempt from the standard procedures that require advance notice and an opportunity to respond before a proposed removal can take effect.[2][6]
The initial wave of conversions focuses heavily on the highest non-executive echelons of the federal government. According to administration officials, 97 percent of the targeted roles are at the GS-15 or senior-level (SL) pay grades, representing the most experienced career professionals in the civil service.[5]
While the administration characterizes these as policy-influencing roles, outside analysis indicates the reclassifications heavily impact the legal, personnel, and financial control functions of federal agencies. The converted positions include attorneys who draft regulations, human resources specialists, and the budget officers who execute agency spending.[3]
OPM leadership has framed the shift as a necessary mechanism for executive accountability. The administration argues that to execute the president's elected agenda effectively, agency leaders need the leverage to remove senior staff who allow personal political views to obstruct lawful directives or who fail to perform their duties efficiently.[5]
Administration officials maintain that Schedule P/C is not a return to a 19th-century spoils system. The executive order explicitly prohibits hiring or firing based on an employee's personal political affiliation. Instead, officials assert that terminations must be strictly rooted in job performance and effectiveness in carrying out the law.[5]
Despite these assurances, federal employee unions and management associations have staunchly opposed the reclassification. They argue that removing civil service protections heightens the risk of politicized firings, silences internal dissent, and degrades the institutional knowledge required to run complex federal programs.[3][4]
Schedule P/C is the direct successor to "Schedule F," a nearly identical classification created in October 2020 but rescinded before it could be fully implemented. The 2026 iteration represents the first time such a reclassification has resulted in the actual conversion of thousands of federal workers.[2][3]
The policy is currently the subject of multiple lawsuits from federal employee unions and advocacy groups, who argue it violates the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 and the Administrative Procedures Act. These legal challenges seek to dismantle the broader Schedule P/C framework and restore the affected employees to the competitive service.[2][6]
Looking ahead, the scope of the reclassification remains a point of contention. While early regulatory estimates suggested up to 50,000 federal workers could eventually be moved into the new schedule, the administration has stated it is currently focusing only on the initial 8,000 senior roles. However, the regulatory architecture remains fully in place for future expansions.[1][5]
The historical context of this shift dates back to the Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883, which originally ended the federal spoils system and established that government jobs should be awarded on the basis of merit rather than political patronage. The modern framework was later solidified by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which created the specific appeals processes that Schedule P/C now bypasses.[2][6]
For agency operations, the immediate impact of the conversion is a shift in management dynamics. Supervisors of Schedule P/C employees no longer need to navigate the often months-long performance improvement plans traditionally required to dismiss a career civil servant. This streamlined removal process is designed to make the bureaucracy more responsive to the executive branch's immediate priorities.[5][6]
For agency operations, the immediate impact of the conversion is a shift in management dynamics.
However, public administration experts warn that this responsiveness comes at a cost. Research on at-will employment in the public sector suggests it does not inherently improve agency performance and can lead to higher turnover. As agencies adjust to the new reality of Schedule P/C, the long-term effects on federal recruitment, retention, and the continuity of government operations remain an open question.[3][6]
Key terms
- Excepted Service
- Federal jobs that are not subject to the standard competitive hiring rules and civil service protections, often used for specialized roles or specific agencies.
- At-Will Employment
- An employment arrangement where an employer can terminate an employee at any time for any legal reason, without needing to establish 'just cause' or provide an appeals process.
- Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)
- An independent quasi-judicial agency established to protect federal merit systems and hear appeals from federal employees regarding disciplinary actions.
- General Schedule (GS)
- The predominant pay scale for federal employees, ranging from GS-1 to GS-15, with GS-15 representing the highest non-executive career level.
- Civil Service Reform Act of 1978
- The foundational law that established the modern framework for the federal workforce, creating the MSPB and formalizing protections against arbitrary dismissal.
Reader questions
What exactly is Schedule Policy/Career?
It is a new employment classification in the federal excepted service for career positions deemed to have a policy-determining or policy-advocating character. Employees in this schedule are essentially at-will and lack traditional civil service protections.
How many federal workers are affected?
The initial June 2026 executive order converted approximately 8,000 senior career positions. While early estimates suggested up to 50,000 roles could eventually be reclassified, the administration is currently focusing on this first tranche.
Can these employees be fired for their political beliefs?
Officially, no. The executive order explicitly states that hires and terminations cannot be based on an employee's personal political affiliation, but rather on their job performance and willingness to carry out lawful directives.
Do affected employees have a right to appeal if fired?
No. A defining feature of Schedule P/C is that employees lose the right to appeal adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).
Where opinion splits
Administration Officials
Proponents argue the reclassification is necessary to ensure the executive branch can effectively implement its policy agenda.
From the administration's perspective, the traditional civil service system has made it excessively difficult to remove senior career officials who passively resist or actively obstruct lawful policy directives. By converting these roles to at-will status, agency heads gain the leverage needed to ensure accountability. Officials emphasize that the goal is not to create a partisan spoils system, noting that the executive order explicitly forbids firing based on personal political affiliation, but rather to guarantee that the president's elected mandate is executed efficiently by the bureaucracy.
Federal Employee Advocates
Unions and management associations view the move as a dismantling of the merit-based civil service.
Organizations representing federal workers argue that Schedule P/C strips away the fundamental due process protections established by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. They contend that making senior roles at-will exposes career professionals to politicized firings and creates a chilling effect on internal dissent. If attorneys, budget officers, and human resources specialists fear immediate termination for delivering unwelcome legal or financial advice, advocates warn, the government loses its most critical internal guardrails against waste and illegality.
Public Administration Analysts
Good government groups warn of long-term damage to institutional knowledge and government functionality.
Independent analysts and organizations like the Partnership for Public Service focus on the operational impact of the reclassification. They point out that the targeted GS-15 and senior-level employees are the connective tissue of federal agencies, holding decades of specialized institutional knowledge. Research on public sector at-will employment suggests it often leads to higher turnover and decreased performance. Analysts express concern that the constant threat of removal will drive top talent out of the federal government and deter highly qualified professionals from entering public service.
- Civil Service Defenders
- Unions and management associations view the move as a dismantling of the merit-based civil service.
- Executive Accountability Advocates
- Proponents argue the reclassification is necessary to ensure the executive branch can effectively implement its policy agenda.
- Public Administration Analysts
- Good government groups warn of long-term damage to institutional knowledge and government functionality.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- State-level public administrators
- Federal contractors relying on agency stability
Sources
[1]Office of Personnel ManagementExecutive Accountability AdvocatesImplementing Schedule Policy/Career in the Excepted Service
[2]Government ExecutiveCivil Service DefendersTrump signs order moving thousands of federal employees into Schedule F
[3]Partnership for Public ServicePublic Administration AnalystsAnalysis of the June 3 Executive Order on Schedule Policy/Career
[4]Federal Managers AssociationCivil Service DefendersSchedule Policy/Career (Schedule P/C) Update
[5]U.S. House of RepresentativesExecutive Accountability AdvocatesPress Briefing on Schedule Policy/Career Executive Order
[6]Factlen Editorial TeamPublic Administration AnalystsSynthesis by Factlen editorial team
Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
More in Careers & Work
See all →HR Compliance
EEOC Moves to Scrap EEO-1 Reports, Ending Federal Collection of Workforce Race and Gender Data
4 sources
Compliance Strategy
SEC Proposes Full Rescission of Climate Disclosure Rules: What It Means for Corporate Compliance
3 sources
Employment Law
FTC Officially Removes Non-Compete Ban from Federal Regulations After Court Block, Leaving State Laws in Control
3 sources
Polywork Trend
The Output Illusion: Why 444,000 Americans Can Work Two Full-Time Jobs Simultaneously
7 sources
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get Careers & Work stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.




