Skip to main content
ExplainerMotorcycle Safety· 4 min read· in Shopping & Reviews

EN 17092 and EN 1621: How CE Ratings Define a Motorcycle Jacket's Abrasion and Impact Protection

The European CE rating system uses rigorous laboratory testing to classify exactly how much friction and blunt-force impact a motorcycle garment can withstand. Understanding the EN 17092 and EN 1621 standards allows riders to objectively verify their gear's safety.

By Tiago Sousa

Share this story

Listen

In short

  1. The EN 17092 standard rates motorcycle jackets for abrasion resistance across three main tiers: Class A, AA, and AAA.
  2. Class AAA offers the highest level of slide protection for highway speeds, while Class A is intended for low-speed urban commuting.
  3. The EN 1621 standard measures impact armor, dropping a 5-kilogram weight to see how much force reaches the rider.

A rider sliding across highway asphalt in a Class A motorcycle jacket will burn through the fabric in a fraction of the time it takes to wear through a Class AAA garment. Inside that same jacket, a Level 1 back protector allows up to 18 kilonewtons of force to reach the spine during a hard strike, while a Level 2 protector cuts that transmitted impact significantly.

The European CE rating system—specifically the EN 17092 standard for abrasion and EN 1621 for impact—has replaced vague marketing claims with hard, verifiable thresholds. By checking the tags, a buyer knows exactly how many seconds of sliding and how much blunt force their gear is legally certified to withstand.[3][4]

Before 2020, the motorcycle apparel market was flooded with jackets and pants claiming to be reinforced or heavy-duty without any objective baseline to prove it. The introduction of the EN 17092 standard changed the industry by mandating that any garment sold as motorcycle personal protective equipment in the European Union must pass rigorous, independent laboratory testing.

This standard measures a garment's ability to survive a slide, focusing on abrasion resistance, tear strength, and seam integrity. The testing divides garments into distinct classes, allowing riders to match their gear to the actual speeds and risks of their daily commute or weekend track day.[2][3][4]

The highest rating under the EN 17092 standard is Class AAA, designed for high-speed highway riding and track use. Garments in this tier—often heavy leathers or highly engineered technical textiles—must survive the longest duration against a moving abrasive belt before the material breaks open.

Class AA serves as the middle ground, offering a balance of abrasion resistance and ergonomic flexibility that suits most touring and everyday street riders. Class A provides the minimum acceptable level of protection, utilizing lighter materials intended strictly for low-speed urban riding where the risk of a high-speed slide is minimal.[2][3][4]

EN 17092 classifies garments based on their ability to survive high-speed friction.

While EN 17092 dictates how well the jacket's outer shell survives friction, a completely different standard governs the armor underneath. The EN 1621-1:2012 standard measures how effectively the protective inserts at the shoulders, elbows, knees, hips, and spine absorb blunt-force trauma. In the standardized test, a 5-kilogram flat steel striker is dropped onto the armor at a speed of 4.47 meters per second, generating 50 joules of impact energy. Sensors placed beneath the armor measure exactly how much of that force punches through the material and reaches the rider's body.[1][5]

The EN 1621 standard divides impact protectors into two performance tiers: Level 1 and Level 2. "The lower the force that a protector transmits, the more protective a product is considered to be," states the technical documentation from SATRA, an independent research and testing organization. For limb protectors, SATRA notes that "to pass the standard, the mean maximum transmitted force must be below 35kN, and no single value should be over 50kN."

Level 2 limb armor is held to a stricter threshold, absorbing more energy and transmitting significantly less force to the joint. Viscoelastic materials, which remain soft and pliable at rest but instantly harden upon impact, have made it possible to achieve these Level 2 ratings without forcing riders to wear bulky, rigid plastic shells.[1][5]

The certification system applies entirely different math to the spine. Because the spinal column is vastly more vulnerable to catastrophic injury than a shoulder or knee, the EN 1621-2:2014 standard for back protectors enforces much lower force limits. To earn a basic Level 1 rating, a back protector must restrict the mean transmitted force to just 18 kN—roughly half the 35 kN allowed for Level 1 limb armor. A Level 2 back protector is even more protective, further halving the allowed force to ensure maximum energy absorption during a crash.[1][4]

Level 2 armor absorbs significantly more impact energy than Level 1, transmitting less force to the rider's body.

Not all certified garments include impact armor by default, which is why the EN 17092 standard includes specialty classifications to cover modular riding setups. Class B garments provide the exact same abrasion resistance as Class A but are sold without impact protectors, requiring the rider to wear a separate armored shirt underneath.

Conversely, Class C garments are lightweight mesh under-layers designed solely to hold impact armor securely against the joints; they offer zero abrasion resistance and must always be worn under a durable outer shell to prevent the mesh from instantly shredding on the pavement.[2][4]

Understanding these labels fundamentally changes how a rider evaluates a purchase. A heavy leather jacket might look indestructible, but if it only carries a Class A rating, its seams or material burst strength have failed to meet the higher thresholds required for highway speeds. By checking for a Class AA or AAA shell paired with Level 2 EN 1621 armor, a rider guarantees their gear has survived the exact same 50-joule drops and high-speed abrasion tests as the premium equipment worn by professionals.[1][3][6]

Modern viscoelastic armor allows riders to achieve Level 2 protection without sacrificing comfort or mobility.

Terms to know

EN 17092
The European standard that classifies motorcycle garments based on their abrasion resistance, tear strength, and seam integrity during a slide.
EN 1621
The European standard that measures the impact absorption of motorcycle armor inserts using a standardized 50-joule drop test.
Kilonewton (kN)
A unit of force used in CE testing to measure exactly how much impact energy punches through the armor and reaches the rider's body.
Viscoelastic Armor
A specialized material that remains soft and flexible during normal use but instantly hardens into a rigid shield upon impact.

Questions readers ask

What is the difference between EN 17092 and EN 1621?

EN 17092 measures a garment's abrasion resistance and seam strength during a slide, while EN 1621 measures how well the internal armor absorbs blunt-force impacts.

Is Level 1 or Level 2 motorcycle armor better?

Level 2 armor is significantly better. It absorbs more impact energy and transmits less force to the rider's body compared to the baseline Level 1 certification.

Can a textile jacket be as safe as leather?

Yes. If a textile jacket achieves a Class AAA rating under EN 17092, it has passed the same rigorous high-speed abrasion and tear tests as a heavy-duty leather suit.

What does a Class C motorcycle garment mean?

Class C garments are mesh under-layers designed only to hold impact armor. They offer no abrasion resistance and must be worn under a durable outer shell.

Different angles

Track and Highway Riders

Riders who prioritize maximum abrasion and impact resistance for high-speed environments.

This camp argues that anything less than a Class AAA garment with Level 2 armor is an unacceptable compromise for highway speeds. They point to the exponential increase in friction heat and impact energy at speeds above 60 mph, noting that the 50-joule drop test is a minimum baseline, not a worst-case scenario. For these riders, the added weight and reduced breathability of heavy leathers or reinforced textiles are necessary trade-offs for surviving a high-speed slide without requiring skin grafts.

Urban and Casual Commuters

Riders who prioritize flexibility, breathability, and off-bike comfort for low-speed city travel.

Commuters argue that heavy Class AAA gear is impractical for daily urban use, often leading to heat exhaustion and restricted mobility in stop-and-go traffic. They advocate for Class A or AA garments paired with thin, viscoelastic Level 1 armor, emphasizing that city crashes typically involve lower speeds and shorter slide distances. This camp values gear that can be worn comfortably into an office or a store, arguing that the best protective gear is the gear a rider is actually willing to wear every day.

Standards and Testing Bodies

Organizations that define the rigorous laboratory thresholds required to certify motorcycle gear as protective equipment.

Testing organizations focus on creating objective, repeatable laboratory conditions that strip marketing language out of the safety equation. By dropping 5-kilogram steel strikers onto armor and dragging fabrics across standardized abrasive belts, these bodies establish the exact kilonewton and duration thresholds that separate fashion from protection. Their goal is not to force every rider into a racing suit, but to ensure that a consumer buying a Class A jacket knows exactly what limitations they are accepting.

Track and Highway Riders 35%Urban and Casual Commuters 35%Standards and Testing Bodies 30%
Track and Highway Riders
Riders who prioritize maximum abrasion and impact resistance for high-speed environments.
Urban and Casual Commuters
Riders who prioritize flexibility, breathability, and off-bike comfort for low-speed city travel.
Standards and Testing Bodies
Organizations that define the rigorous laboratory thresholds required to certify motorcycle gear as protective equipment.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Emergency Medical Responders
  • Motorcycle Safety Instructors

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Track and Highway Riders 35%Urban and Casual Commuters 35%Standards and Testing Bodies 30%
  1. [1]SATRAStandards and Testing Bodies

    EN 1621 - Motorcyclists' clothing protecting against mechanical impact

    Read on SATRA →
  2. [2]iTeh STANDARD PREVIEWStandards and Testing Bodies

    SIST EN 17092-3:2020

    Read on iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW →
  3. [3]AGVSPORTTrack and Highway Riders

    CE Motorcycle Race Suit Standards: EN 17092-1:2020 Buyers' Guide

    Read on AGVSPORT →
  4. [4]Moto LoungeUrban and Casual Commuters

    CE standards for motorcycle clothes that you should know

    Read on Moto Lounge →
  5. [5]WikipediaStandards and Testing Bodies

    Motorcycle armor

    Read on Wikipedia →
  6. [6]Factlen Editorial TeamStandards and Testing Bodies

    Synthesis by Factlen editorial team

    Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
Listen

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Shopping & Reviews stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.