DNC Panel Taps South Carolina to Host First 2028 Presidential Primary Over Nevada
A Democratic National Committee panel voted to recommend South Carolina as the first state in the 2028 presidential primary calendar, prioritizing the party's most loyal voting base over Nevada's swing-state demographics.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- South Carolina Advocates
- Argue that prioritizing South Carolina rewards the party's most loyal voting bloc and defends against voting rights rollbacks.
- Nevada Advocates
- Believe Nevada's swing-state status and diverse, working-class population make it the ideal testing ground for the general election.
- Traditionalists
- Maintain that smaller states with a history of retail politics offer the best grassroots vetting process for candidates.
What's not represented
- · Voters in states outside the early window who feel their primary votes carry less weight.
- · Independent voters in swing states who are excluded from closed partisan primary processes.
Why this matters
The order of presidential primaries heavily dictates which candidates gain early momentum and funding. By placing South Carolina first, the Democratic Party is ensuring that future presidential hopefuls must immediately appeal to Black voters, rather than tailoring their initial platforms to the demographics of Iowa or Nevada.
Key points
- A DNC panel voted 26-19 to recommend South Carolina over Nevada for the first 2028 presidential primary.
- The proposed calendar schedules South Carolina for January 22, 2028, followed by Nevada on February 1.
- South Carolina advocates successfully argued for prioritizing Black voters, the party's most loyal base.
- Nevada supporters argued their state better represents the diverse, swing-state coalition needed to win the general election.
- New Mexico was added to the early voting window to increase the influence of Latino voters.
- The full Democratic National Committee will vote to finalize the calendar in August.
South Carolina is poised to retain its status as the first state to vote in the Democratic presidential primary, following a decisive vote by the Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee. In a 26-to-19 decision on Friday, the panel selected the Palmetto State over Nevada to kick off the 2028 nominating calendar, cementing a dramatic departure from the party's decades-long tradition of starting in Iowa.[1]
The vote followed months of intense lobbying and public presentations, culminating in a contentious debate over which demographic coalition the party should prioritize. South Carolina advocates argued that the party must reward its most loyal voting bloc—Black voters—while Nevada representatives contended that their swing-state status and rapidly growing Latino and working-class populations provided a better roadmap for winning the general election.[2]
During the proceedings in Washington, D.C., former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile delivered an emotional speech urging the committee to select South Carolina. She cited the Supreme Court's recent dismantling of Voting Rights Act protections and the resulting loss of Black congressional districts across the South as urgent reasons to elevate the state. "We should begin the 2028 presidential primary season in the South," Brazile told the panel, arguing that the party must start its process where democracy is actively being fought for.[1]

Jaime Harrison, another former DNC chair and South Carolina native, echoed this sentiment, framing the decision as a necessary statement of solidarity. He noted that keeping South Carolina first signals to Black voters that the party recognizes their crucial role in past electoral victories, particularly after they helped salvage President Joe Biden's struggling 2020 campaign.[3]
Nevada's delegation, however, pushed back forcefully. Daniele Monroe-Moreno, the chairwoman of the Nevada Democratic Party, argued that choosing her state was a strategic necessity for the party's long-term survival. She emphasized that Nevada represents the diverse, working-class coalition that Democrats have been losing ground with in recent cycles, including Latinos, Asian American Pacific Islanders, and low-propensity voters.[2]
Daniele Monroe-Moreno, the chairwoman of the Nevada Democratic Party, argued that choosing her state was a strategic necessity for the party's long-term survival.
Nevada advocates also highlighted their state's expansive voting access laws, contrasting them with the more restrictive voting environment in the South. Artie Blanco, a DNC vice chair from Nevada, argued that the state should not be penalized for making it easier for working people to vote. However, concerns were raised during the panel about Nevada's vote-counting timeline, with some members expressing unease that mail-in ballots can still be counted days after the primary concludes.
The tension between the two camps occasionally spilled into public view. Christale Spain, chairwoman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, warned against framing the decision as a zero-sum game between minority groups. "If Nevada gets elevated over South Carolina, it would be because of their Latino vote," she said prior to the vote. "So you would then be telling Black voters that you matter less than brown voters. And I refuse to believe that our party wants to send any type of message like that."

Beyond the top spot, the committee also finalized the rest of the early voting window. Under the proposed calendar, South Carolina will hold its primary on January 22, 2028. Nevada will follow closely on February 1, with New Hampshire on February 8, New Mexico on February 15, Michigan on February 22, and Virginia on February 29. Super Tuesday is scheduled for March 7.[1]
The inclusion of New Mexico in the early window was seen as a significant concession to Latino voters, ensuring that a border state with a heavy Hispanic population will have a prominent voice before Super Tuesday. Party officials noted that this marks the first time a border state has been included in the exclusive early voting block, signaling a real investment in the region.

New Hampshire, which historically held the first-in-the-nation primary by state law, received only four votes for the top spot. The state held an unsanctioned Democratic primary in 2024 after refusing to comply with the DNC's revamped calendar, leading to temporary delegate penalties. While New Hampshire remains in the early window for 2028, its demotion from the lead-off position appears permanent under the current party leadership.[1]
The Rules and Bylaws Committee's recommendation is not the final step in the process. The proposed calendar must now be approved by the full Democratic National Committee membership, which is scheduled to meet next month in Austin, Texas. Given the decisive nature of Friday's committee vote, the schedule is widely expected to be ratified without major alterations.[2][3]
How we got here
2020
Joe Biden's overwhelming victory in the South Carolina primary salvages his struggling campaign, propelling him to the nomination.
2022
President Biden urges the DNC to move South Carolina to the front of the 2024 calendar, displacing Iowa.
Jan 2024
New Hampshire holds an unsanctioned primary in defiance of the DNC's new calendar.
May 2026
Representatives from 12 states make their pitches to the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee for early primary slots.
July 24, 2026
The DNC panel officially recommends South Carolina to hold the first 2028 primary, beating out Nevada.
Viewpoints in depth
South Carolina Advocates
Argue that the party must reward its most loyal voting bloc and protect Black voters' influence.
Supporters of South Carolina's first-in-the-nation status emphasize loyalty and defense against disenfranchisement. They argue that Black voters consistently deliver victories for the Democratic Party and deserve the outsized influence that comes with vetting presidential candidates first. Furthermore, advocates point to recent Supreme Court decisions weakening the Voting Rights Act and the subsequent redrawing of congressional maps in the South as urgent reasons to elevate a Southern state, ensuring that civil rights and voting access remain central to the primary debate.
Nevada Advocates
Believe the primary calendar should reflect the diverse, working-class coalition needed to win general elections.
Nevada's backers argue that the primary process should be a strategic testing ground for the general election. They point out that Nevada is a true battleground state with a rapidly growing population of Latinos, Asian American Pacific Islanders, and working-class union members—demographics where Democratic support has recently shown signs of eroding. By placing Nevada first, they argue, the party would force candidates to immediately build the exact multi-racial, working-class coalition required to win the presidency, rather than focusing on a solidly red state like South Carolina.
Traditionalists
Maintain that states with a long history of retail politics, like New Hampshire, offer the best vetting process.
Though largely sidelined in this cycle's debate, defenders of the traditional calendar argue that smaller states like New Hampshire force candidates to engage in face-to-face "retail politics" rather than relying on expensive media markets. They contend that this rigorous, grassroots vetting process tests a candidate's stamina and unscripted appeal in ways that larger, more demographically complex states do not. New Hampshire officials also frequently cite their state law requiring them to hold the first primary, setting up recurring logistical and legal clashes with the national party.
What we don't know
- Whether New Hampshire will again attempt to hold an unsanctioned primary ahead of South Carolina in defiance of the DNC.
- How the finalized calendar will impact the campaign strategies and spending of early 2028 presidential hopefuls.
Key terms
- Rules and Bylaws Committee (RBC)
- A powerful panel within the Democratic National Committee responsible for setting the rules and schedule for the presidential nominating process.
- Super Tuesday
- A day early in the presidential primary season when the greatest number of U.S. states hold primary elections and caucuses simultaneously.
- Retail Politics
- A style of political campaigning in which the candidate attends local events to directly interact with voters on a small-scale, face-to-face basis.
Frequently asked
Is the 2028 primary calendar officially finalized?
Not yet. The Rules and Bylaws Committee's recommendation must be approved by the full Democratic National Committee at their August meeting in Austin, Texas.
Why didn't Iowa or New Hampshire go first?
The DNC has deliberately moved away from Iowa and New Hampshire to elevate states with more diverse electorates that better reflect the party's base. Iowa was removed from the top spot ahead of 2024, and New Hampshire was demoted to the early window rather than the lead-off position.
What happens if a state holds its primary out of order?
The DNC can penalize states that violate the calendar by stripping them of their delegates at the national convention, meaning their votes won't officially count toward nominating the candidate.
Sources
[1]The Washington PostSouth Carolina Advocates
South Carolina would be first 2028 Democratic primary under DNC panel vote
Read on The Washington Post →[2]CBS NewsNevada Advocates
South Carolina is one step away from becoming the first-in-the-nation Democratic primary state for 2028
Read on CBS News →[3]PBS NewsHourSouth Carolina Advocates
South Carolina selected to lead off Democratic Party's 2028 presidential nominating schedule
Read on PBS NewsHour →
Every angle. Every day.
Get news politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.





