Chinese Humanoid Robot Breaks Usain Bolt's 100-Meter World Record in 9.39 Seconds
Tiangong Ultra shattered the human sprinting record at the World Humanoid Robot Games, though the machine required a foam crash pad to stop.
By Lila Morgan
In short
- Tiangong Ultra completed a 100-meter sprint in 9.39 seconds at the World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing.
- The time breaks Usain Bolt's 9.58-second human world record set in 2009.
- A second robot, Honor's Lightning, also beat the human record with a time of 9.47 seconds.
A few meters after crossing the finish line in a blistering 9.39 seconds, the world's fastest humanoid robot slammed directly into a thick foam wall. It had just shattered Usain Bolt's legendary 100-meter dash record, but it had absolutely no idea how to stop.[1]
The spectacle unfolded this weekend at the second annual World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing, an Olympic-style event designed to push the physical limits of bipedal machines.[1][3]
Tiangong Ultra, a headless, white-paneled robot developed by the Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, clocked the record-breaking sprint during a preliminary heat.[1]
It was closely followed by "Lightning," a humanoid built by Chinese smartphone manufacturer Honor, which crossed the line in 9.47 seconds.[1]
Both machines comfortably eclipsed the 9.58-second human world record set by Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt at the 2009 World Athletics Championships in Berlin.[2][4]
For robotics engineers, the raw speed is less surprising than the year-over-year rate of improvement.[5]
At the inaugural World Humanoid Robot Games in 2025, the winning time for the 100-meter dash was a sluggish 21.50 seconds.[1][3]
Cutting that time by more than half in a single year highlights the massive influx of capital and engineering talent currently flooding into China's robotics sector.[5]
However, the chaotic finish lines reveal the current limitations of embodied artificial intelligence.[1][5]
Running in a straight line on a perfectly flat, predictable arena surface is a relatively straightforward physics problem. It requires powerful actuators and rapid balance calculations, but it does not require complex decision-making.[5]
Decelerating safely, navigating uneven terrain, or performing fine motor tasks like folding laundry remain exponentially more difficult for a machine than running fast.[5]
The robots competing in Beijing were heavily optimized for single metrics. Honor's Lightning, for example, reportedly had its mechanical legs lengthened by 10 centimeters specifically to increase its stride length for the sprint.[5]
Despite the caveats, the event serves a vital engineering purpose. Pushing robots to sprint at peak speeds acts as an extreme stress test for battery management, thermal dissipation, and joint durability.[5]
The hardware breakthroughs achieved on the track will eventually trickle down to general-purpose robots designed to work alongside humans in factories, hospitals, and homes.[5]
Key terms
- Bipedal Locomotion
- The ability of a machine or organism to walk or run on two legs, requiring complex balance and continuous center-of-mass calculations.
- Actuator
- The mechanical component responsible for moving or controlling a mechanism, acting as the 'muscle' of a robot.
- Embodied AI
- Artificial intelligence that interacts with the physical world through a robotic body, learning from physical constraints and sensory feedback.
Frequently asked
Did the robots actually run faster than Usain Bolt?
Yes. Tiangong Ultra completed a 100-meter sprint in 9.39 seconds, surpassing Usain Bolt's human world record of 9.58 seconds set in 2009.
Are these robots ready for real-world use?
Not yet. While they possess immense straight-line speed, they currently struggle with basic tasks like braking safely and require controlled environments to operate.
Why are robots competing in sports?
Sporting events act as extreme stress tests for robotic hardware, pushing the limits of battery life, motor strength, and thermal management in a measurable way.
Viewpoints in depth
The Hardware Optimists' View
Argues that the sheer speed of these robots proves that the mechanical bottlenecks of robotics are largely solved.
For those bullish on the robotics industry, the 9.39-second sprint is a watershed moment. It demonstrates that the physical limitations of bipedal machines—such as actuator strength, battery discharge rates, and dynamic balance—are no longer the primary hurdles. By cutting the 100-meter sprint time by more than half in a single year, engineers have proven that the hardware platform is maturing at an exponential rate, paving the way for highly capable physical bodies.
The AI Skeptics' View
Counters that running on a flat track is a parlor trick compared to the cognitive demands of navigating a cluttered human environment.
Skeptics within the AI and robotics communities are quick to point out the cognitive bias inherent in sprinting. While running fast looks impressive to humans, it is a relatively simple physics problem for a machine operating on a known, flat surface. The fact that the robots could not brake and had to crash into foam pads highlights a severe lack of environmental awareness and dynamic decision-making. To these critics, a robot that can slowly fold laundry or navigate a messy room represents a far greater technological leap than one that can sprint blindly into a wall.
The Industrial Strategists' View
Views the games not as a sporting event, but as a public stress test for components that will soon power automated manufacturing.
From an industrial perspective, the World Humanoid Robot Games are less about sports and more about supply chain dominance. Pushing a robot to sprint at 14.5 meters per second forces components to their absolute limits, identifying weaknesses in thermal management and joint durability. The companies competing in Beijing are using these extreme conditions to refine the exact same actuators and batteries that will eventually be mass-produced for factory robots, logistics drones, and household assistants.
- Robotics Optimists
- Focuses on the rapid hardware improvements and the milestone of surpassing human physical limits.
- Technical Skeptics
- Points out that straight-line speed is computationally simpler than unstructured real-world tasks, and highlights the lack of braking ability.
- Athletics Traditionalists
- Maintains the distinction between human athletic achievement and engineered mechanical speed.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Human track and field athletes
- Industrial automation buyers
Sources
[1]EngadgetRobotics OptimistsHumanoid robots have beaten Usain Bolt's 100-meter dash record
Read on Engadget →
[2]WikipediaAthletics TraditionalistsUsain Bolt
Read on Wikipedia →
[3]WikipediaAthletics TraditionalistsWorld Humanoid Robot Games
Read on Wikipedia →
[4]World AthleticsAthletics Traditionalists100 Metres - men - senior - all
Read on World Athletics →
[5]Factlen Editorial TeamTechnical SkepticsSynthesis by Factlen editorial team
Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
More in Technology
See all →Humanoid Robotics
How Humanoid Robots Finally Moved From Viral Videos to the Factory Floor
2 sources
Motion Control
The Open-Loop vs. Closed-Loop Trade-off: Why Stepper Motors Offer Simplicity but Servo Motors Guarantee Position
9 sources
Tactile Sensing
How Tactile Sensors Are Solving the Robotics Manipulation Bottleneck
5 sources
Robot Kinematics
The Engineering Trade-off Between Position Control and Impedance Control in Robotics
8 sources
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get Technology stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.




