LACMA ExpansionExplainerJul 28, 2026, 6:39 AM· 7 min read· #1 of 4 in culture

Peter Zumthor's LACMA David Geffen Galleries Open, Challenging Museum Hierarchies

After two decades of planning and controversy, LACMA's new $724 million expansion elevates its permanent collection onto a single, non-hierarchical plane.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Curatorial Progressives 40%Architectural Skeptics 35%Civic & Cultural Boosters 25%
Curatorial Progressives
Believe the single-level layout dismantles outdated Western-centric art history hierarchies and democratizes the viewing experience.
Architectural Skeptics
Argue the massive concrete structure sacrificed essential gallery space and prioritized atmospheric aesthetics over functional art display.
Civic & Cultural Boosters
View the ambitious, elevated design as a bold modernization that cements Los Angeles as a forward-thinking global arts capital.

What's not represented

  • · Local Los Angeles Residents
  • · Indigenous Art Curators

Why this matters

The $724 million David Geffen Galleries represent a radical rethinking of how human history is displayed, discarding centuries of Western-centric museum hierarchies. Its success or failure will influence how cultural institutions worldwide design their spaces and curate their collections for decades to come.

Key points

  • LACMA has officially opened the $724 million David Geffen Galleries, designed by Pritzker Prize-winning architect Peter Zumthor.
  • The elevated concrete structure spans Wilshire Boulevard, lifting the museum's permanent collection 30 feet above street level.
  • The design features a single-level, non-hierarchical layout intended to dismantle traditional Western-centric museum hierarchies.
  • The inaugural installation abandons chronological wings, instead grouping artworks thematically around the world's major oceans.
  • The project faced significant controversy over its reduced gallery space, cost overruns, and the demolition of historic campus pavilions.
$724 million
Estimated construction cost
110,000 sq ft
Total gallery exhibition space
30 feet
Elevation above street level
150,000
Objects in LACMA's permanent collection
26
Distinct inner galleries within the structure

After more than two decades of planning, fundraising, and fierce civic debate, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) has officially opened the doors to its David Geffen Galleries. The $724 million expansion, designed by Pritzker Prize-winning Swiss architect Peter Zumthor, represents one of the most ambitious and polarizing cultural projects in recent American history. Opening to the public in the spring of 2026, the structure replaces four aging buildings on the museum's East Campus with a single, sweeping monolithic form. But beyond its striking silhouette, the building represents a radical philosophical gamble by LACMA Director Michael Govan. It is an attempt to fundamentally rewrite the spatial rules of the encyclopedic art museum, discarding centuries of institutional tradition in favor of a completely new way for the public to encounter human creativity.[2][5]

The physical presence of the David Geffen Galleries is impossible to ignore. Rather than a traditional multi-story edifice anchored to the ground, Zumthor's design lifts the entire exhibition floor nearly 30 feet into the air. The sinuous, sand-colored concrete and glass structure stretches across the museum's campus and physically bridges Wilshire Boulevard, one of the city's busiest arterial roads. This elevated "pancake" rests on seven massive, irregularly spaced concrete pavilions at ground level. These foundational blocks do not hold art; instead, they house the museum's functional organs—the auditorium, educational centers, restaurants, bookstores, and elevators. By pushing the infrastructure to the ground floor, the architects freed the elevated level to serve as an uninterrupted, continuous plane dedicated entirely to the display of the permanent collection.[3][5]

The decision to elevate the galleries was driven by a specific curatorial mandate: the desire to create a "non-hierarchical" museum. For centuries, encyclopedic museums have relied on multi-story layouts that inherently impose a value system on the art they display. Grand staircases often lead to European masterworks on the upper floors, while indigenous, ancient, or non-Western artifacts are frequently relegated to basements or peripheral wings. Govan and Zumthor sought to dismantle this built-in Western pecking order. By mandating that the entire 150,000-object permanent collection be displayed on a single, continuous level, the architecture forces all cultures, eras, and mediums onto an equal democratic plane. There is no "important art upstairs," because there is no upstairs.[4][6][7]

The scale and scope of the David Geffen Galleries.
The scale and scope of the David Geffen Galleries.

Executing this single-level vision required abandoning the traditional chronological and geographical wings that define institutions like the Louvre or the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Inside the David Geffen Galleries, visitors will not find a "19th-Century French Painting" wing followed neatly by a "20th-Century Modernism" wing. Instead, the layout is intentionally unpredictable and meandering, designed to avoid linear histories or prescribed paths. Govan explicitly instructed Zumthor that he did not want "anyone in the front." The architecture encourages visitors to wander, allowing them to draw their own connections between disparate cultures and time periods rather than following a rigid, curator-dictated timeline.[1][4]

This philosophical shift is immediately apparent in the building's inaugural installation. Rather than organizing the art by nation-states or centuries, the curators have used the world's major bodies of water—the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans, and the Mediterranean Sea—as thematic frameworks. This approach highlights the historical trade routes, migrations, and cultural exchanges that have shaped human history, creating surprising juxtapositions. A single gallery might place a Qing Dynasty court robe in dialogue with a contemporary sculpture, emphasizing global interconnectedness over isolated regional development. The architecture's fluid, open-plan perimeter supports this cross-pollination, allowing sightlines to stretch across different curatorial zones.[3][8]

This philosophical shift is immediately apparent in the building's inaugural installation.

The gallery level itself is a complex spatial puzzle. Within the sweeping exterior envelope, Zumthor has arranged 26 distinct inner galleries. These enclosed spaces range dramatically in size, from intimate 15-square-meter rooms designed for light-sensitive textiles to expansive 300-square-meter halls capable of holding monumental sculptures. The spaces between these enclosed galleries form a wide, meandering perimeter promenade wrapped entirely in floor-to-ceiling glass. This layout allows visitors to constantly step out of the dense, focused art environments and into the light-filled corridors, reorienting themselves against the sweeping panoramic views of the Los Angeles skyline and the adjacent La Brea Tar Pits.[2][3]

How the single-level design dismantles traditional curatorial hierarchies.
How the single-level design dismantles traditional curatorial hierarchies.

Light plays a central, defining role in the Zumthor experience, challenging another entrenched museum convention. Most modern museums rely heavily on artificially lit, climate-controlled "black boxes" to protect artworks and control the viewing environment. Zumthor, renowned for his atmospheric and sensory-driven designs like the Therme Vals in Switzerland, insisted on bathing the perimeter spaces in natural California sunlight. To protect the collection, the massive glass walls are heavily UV-treated, and custom-designed metallic gauze curtains of varying densities can be deployed to modulate the glare. Inside the enclosed galleries, narrow clerestory windows and custom wall brackets cast a soft, even glow, fighting the fatigue that often accompanies hours spent in artificial lighting.[3][5]

The material palette of the David Geffen Galleries is uncompromisingly raw and tactile, a stark departure from the pristine white drywall typical of contemporary art spaces. The exterior and interior walls are constructed from poured-in-place concrete, left unadorned to reveal the marks of its making. The floors are a dark concrete terrazzo embedded with tiny white shells, a subtle nod to the fact that the Los Angeles basin was once a prehistoric seabed. To soften the brutalist aesthetic inside the galleries, the concrete walls are coated in a specialized silicon-based paint in deep tones of indigo, dark red, and black, providing a rich, textured backdrop for the artwork.[3][4]

Achieving this uncompromising vision came at a steep cost, both financially and spatially, fueling a decade of intense controversy. To make way for the new structure, LACMA demolished three original 1965 pavilions designed by William Pereira, as well as a 1986 addition by Hardy Holzman Pfeiffer Associates. Preservationists mourned the loss of the historic campus, but the sharpest criticism centered on the new building's size. The David Geffen Galleries offer roughly 110,000 square feet of gallery space—a significant reduction from the square footage of the buildings it replaced. Critics have argued that spending over $700 million to shrink the region's only encyclopedic museum is a dereliction of civic duty.[4][5][7]

Zumthor's material palette relies on raw concrete, terrazzo, and natural light to create an atmospheric viewing experience.
Zumthor's material palette relies on raw concrete, terrazzo, and natural light to create an atmospheric viewing experience.

The construction process itself was fraught with delays and budget escalations. Building a massive, heavy concrete structure in an active earthquake zone is inherently complex; building it next to the bubbling asphalt of the La Brea Tar Pits proved monumental. During excavation, crews unearthed significant Ice Age fossils, including thirteen saber-tooth tiger skulls, which required careful paleontological extraction and halted progress. As the budget swelled toward $835 million by some estimates, Zumthor's original concept—which envisioned a dark, tar-colored building dubbed the "Black Flower"—was repeatedly value-engineered. The footprint shrank, and the color shifted from black to tan before settling on the raw gray concrete seen today.[4][7]

The architectural reception has been fiercely polarized. Detractors have likened the sprawling, elevated concrete mass to a freeway overpass or an "amoebic pancake," arguing that the stark interior walls are hostile to the delicate act of hanging paintings. Some prominent donors even publicly broke with the museum over the non-linear curatorial strategy. Yet, defenders of the project argue that these critiques miss the fundamental point. The downstream challenges—the reduced square footage, the complex wayfinding, the raw materials—are not bugs in the execution, but the inevitable costs of committing to the single-level, non-hierarchical concept. To have a truly democratic, one-story encyclopedic museum, the building had to sprawl, and compromises had to be made.[4][6][7]

Ultimately, the David Geffen Galleries represent a bold, high-stakes experiment in cultural infrastructure. By refusing to default to the standard multi-story, chronological template, LACMA has forced a global conversation about how institutions frame human history. Whether visitors find the meandering, sun-drenched concrete spaces liberating or disorienting, the building succeeds in its primary goal: it offers an experience that cannot be found in London, Paris, or New York. It is a museum inextricably tied to the horizontality, light, and ambition of Los Angeles, challenging the rest of the world to rethink what a 21st-century institution can be.[1][3][8]

The sprawling footprint of the galleries required navigating the complex, fossil-rich terrain of the La Brea Tar Pits.
The sprawling footprint of the galleries required navigating the complex, fossil-rich terrain of the La Brea Tar Pits.

How we got here

  1. 2006

    Michael Govan is appointed director of LACMA and begins collaborating with architect Peter Zumthor on a new vision for the museum.

  2. 2013

    Zumthor's initial concept, a dark, sprawling structure dubbed the 'Black Flower,' is unveiled to the public.

  3. 2015

    The design undergoes significant revisions to avoid encroaching on the adjacent La Brea Tar Pits, resulting in the decision to bridge Wilshire Boulevard.

  4. 2020

    Demolition begins on the four existing East Campus buildings, including William Pereira's original 1965 pavilions.

  5. 2024

    Major construction of the concrete structure is completed, though interior build-outs and art installation continue.

  6. April 2026

    The David Geffen Galleries officially open to the public, unveiling the single-level, non-hierarchical display of the permanent collection.

Viewpoints in depth

The Curatorial Progressives' View

Advocates argue the single-level layout successfully dismantles outdated, Western-centric art history hierarchies.

For decades, museum architecture has subtly reinforced cultural dominance by placing European masterworks in grand, upper-level galleries while relegating indigenous or non-Western art to basements. Curatorial progressives view Zumthor's single-level design as a necessary, radical corrective. By forcing all 150,000 objects onto a single democratic plane, the architecture physically prevents the museum from prioritizing one culture over another. Supporters argue that the meandering, non-linear layout empowers visitors to draw their own thematic connections—such as tracing trade routes across the Pacific or Indian Oceans—rather than being force-fed a rigid, chronological narrative dictated by curators.

The Architectural Skeptics' View

Critics argue the building sacrificed essential gallery space and functional utility for the sake of an uncompromising aesthetic.

To architectural traditionalists and preservationists, the David Geffen Galleries represent a triumph of ego over utility. Their primary grievance is spatial: LACMA spent nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars to demolish four historic pavilions, only to replace them with a building that offers significantly less gallery square footage. Skeptics point out that the raw concrete walls are inherently hostile to hanging delicate paintings, and the heavy reliance on natural light—even with UV-protected glass—poses long-term risks to sensitive artifacts. To this camp, the building is an 'amoebic pancake' that prioritizes Zumthor's atmospheric, brutalist aesthetic over the practical realities of displaying an encyclopedic collection.

The Civic Boosters' View

Local leaders and cultural advocates see the ambitious structure as a bold modernization that elevates Los Angeles on the global stage.

Beyond the internal debates of the art world, civic boosters view the new LACMA as a monumental win for Los Angeles. By physically bridging Wilshire Boulevard, the building creates a striking new gateway for the city's expanding public transit network, specifically the new subway station opening across the street. Supporters in this camp argue that Los Angeles, a city defined by its horizontality and car culture, deserves a museum that reflects its unique geography rather than mimicking the stacked, classical institutions of the East Coast or Europe. For them, the cost overruns and construction delays are temporary growing pains for a landmark that will define the city's cultural skyline for the next century.

What we don't know

  • How the raw concrete walls and abundant natural light will affect the long-term preservation of sensitive artworks.
  • Whether the non-linear, meandering layout will cause severe wayfinding fatigue for everyday visitors.
  • If the reduction in overall gallery space will force LACMA to keep more of its 150,000-object collection in permanent storage.

Key terms

Non-hierarchical layout
An exhibition design that places all artworks on a single level, avoiding the traditional practice of putting 'more important' art on upper floors.
Encyclopedic museum
A large institution that aims to collect, preserve, and display art from all cultures, regions, and periods of human history.
Pritzker Prize
Often referred to as the Nobel Prize of architecture, it is awarded annually to honor a living architect for their significant contributions to humanity and the built environment.
Clerestory
A high section of wall that contains windows above eye level, used to admit natural light and fresh air into a large space.
Value-engineering
A systematic method to improve the value of a project by reducing costs, which often involves simplifying designs or substituting cheaper materials during construction.

Frequently asked

Why is the new LACMA building elevated?

The building is lifted 30 feet into the air to allow the surrounding park space to flow underneath it, and to keep the entire permanent collection on a single, continuous level without requiring visitors to use stairs or elevators between galleries.

Did the museum lose gallery space with this new design?

Yes. The David Geffen Galleries offer approximately 110,000 square feet of exhibition space, which is a reduction from the combined square footage of the four older buildings that were demolished to make way for it.

How is the art organized if not by time period?

Instead of traditional chronological wings, the inaugural installation groups artwork thematically around the world's major bodies of water—the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans, and the Mediterranean Sea—to highlight global trade and cultural exchange.

Why did the project take so long to complete?

The project faced numerous hurdles over its two-decade development, including multiple design revisions, budget escalations, and the complex discovery of Ice Age fossils (including saber-tooth tiger skulls) during excavation near the La Brea Tar Pits.

Sources

Source coverage

8 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Curatorial Progressives 40%Architectural Skeptics 35%Civic & Cultural Boosters 25%
  1. [1]ArchDailyCuratorial Progressives

    LACMA Opens New David Geffen Galleries Designed by Peter Zumthor

    Read on ArchDaily
  2. [2]ArtsyCuratorial Progressives

    Inside LACMA's New David Geffen Galleries

    Read on Artsy
  3. [3]WallpaperCivic & Cultural Boosters

    Explore LACMA's new David Geffen Galleries

    Read on Wallpaper
  4. [4]The GuardianArchitectural Skeptics

    LACMA's new $720m art museum building nears completion

    Read on The Guardian
  5. [5]Christie'sCivic & Cultural Boosters

    Peter Zumthor's magnificent new building showing LACMA's permanent collection

    Read on Christie's
  6. [6]Depix.aiCivic & Cultural Boosters

    The Fight Over LACMA's Concrete Misses the Point

    Read on Depix.ai
  7. [7]Punchlist MagArchitectural Skeptics

    Zumthor's LACMA Design: Angst, Anticipation, and Debate

    Read on Punchlist Mag
  8. [8]LACMACuratorial Progressives

    LACMA's New David Geffen Galleries Open

    Read on LACMA
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get culture stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.