France Publishes 2035 National Security Plan Warning of Sea, Space, and Hybrid Conflict
France's strategic planning body has released a sweeping 2035 national security framework, warning that the seabed, outer space, and critical digital infrastructure will become primary domains of strategic confrontation. The plan calls for a rapid shift toward high-intensity combat readiness and societal resilience to counter escalating hybrid threats.
By Hunter Cole
- French Strategic Planners
- Argue that the military must pivot to high-intensity multi-domain combat readiness to survive hybrid threats.
- Civil Resilience Advocates
- Emphasize that because hybrid warfare targets society directly, defense must be civilian-led and decentralized.
- Conventional Defense Traditionalists
- Maintain that while hybrid threats are disruptive, the primary existential threat remains conventional territorial invasion.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Budgetary Watchdogs
- Private Sector Infrastructure Operators
While traditional defense doctrines often treat hybrid warfare as a secondary nuisance to conventional military deterrence, the French government's newly published 2035 national security framework explicitly reverses that hierarchy. The 40-page document, released Tuesday by the Haut-commissariat à la stratégie et au plan (HCSP), asserts that critical digital infrastructure, the seabed, and outer space will operate as the primary domains of strategic confrontation over the next decade.[1][4]
The report, titled 'France 2035, France 2050 - Focus Défense et sécurité nationale,' models a durably degraded security landscape. 'Critical digital infrastructure, the seabed and outer space will increasingly become areas of strategic confrontation between states, as well as between private and state actors,' the report states. The HCSP projects that an increasing share of global power—and corresponding vulnerability—is concentrating in spaces that remain largely invisible to the civilian population, requiring a fundamental realignment of how the state protects its assets.[1][4]
This strategic pivot is driven by an immediate escalation in multi-domain pressure. French President Emmanuel Macron confirmed this week that France and neighboring European nations have absorbed intensified Russian hybrid operations. 'In recent weeks, the threat—particularly the Russian hybrid threat—facing Europeans and France has intensified,' Macron told reporters following a national security meeting at the Élysée. Between 2022 and 2024, the number of Russia-attributed hybrid warfare operations across Europe surged from fewer than 10 instances to nearly 50, systematically testing energy grids, communication networks, and democratic institutions.[2][4][5]
Hybrid warfare deliberately exploits the regulatory and operational gray zone between peace and war. By combining conventional military posturing with cyber intrusions, disinformation campaigns, and economic coercion, adversarial actors complicate the traditional threshold for invoking collective defense treaties. The French framework acknowledges that these methods are designed to destabilize societies and degrade infrastructure without triggering a direct conventional military response.[1][5]
The seabed and outer space represent the most acute structural vulnerabilities for modern European states. Undersea cable networks carry roughly 95 percent of global internet traffic and trillions of dollars in daily financial transactions, while orbital assets govern everything from GPS navigation to early warning missile detection. The HCSP identifies these domains as highly susceptible to deniable attacks, where attributing sabotage to a specific state actor is technically and politically difficult.[1][4]
The seabed and outer space represent the most acute structural vulnerabilities for modern European states.
To secure these vectors, the framework recommends fast-tracking the transformation of the French Armed Forces. Military planners are urging a definitive shift away from the expeditionary counter-terrorism model that defined the 2010s, prioritizing instead large-scale, high-intensity combat readiness. This structural overhaul includes adopting a war-economy approach to defense procurement and expanding the military's operational reserve from 40,000 to 100,000 personnel by 2035.[4][6]
The operational burden of this shift will fall heavily on the French Navy and the Air and Space Force. The Marine Nationale will be required to expand its deep-sea surveillance and intervention capabilities to protect underwater infrastructure across France's extensive exclusive economic zone. Simultaneously, the Air and Space Force is expected to accelerate the deployment of orbital space-control systems to monitor and defend French satellites against kinetic and non-kinetic interference.[4][6]
Beyond physical military assets, a central pillar of the 2035 strategy is reducing Europe's reliance on foreign technology. Earlier this year, Paris laid out plans to establish a Digital Sovereignty Observatory to map the government's and associated businesses' dependence on non-European digital infrastructure. The HCSP report reinforces this initiative, arguing that technological autonomy is a strict prerequisite for national security in an environment where digital networks are routinely weaponized.[4]
Domestically, the framework treats societal resilience as a core component of national defense. The HCSP warns that future crises will unfold primarily in the cognitive domain, making the ability to identify and neutralize information-based attacks essential to maintaining state cohesion. In response, the French government is activating territorial authorities to defend critical infrastructure at the local level and is reportedly developing a survival manual to help households prepare for cyber incidents, security crises, and armed conflict.[1][2][3]
Rather than pursuing full European military integration, the 2035 objective focuses on building rapid-response collaboration among like-minded allies. The report argues that the continent must develop the capacity to act quickly and decisively, relying on coalitions of the willing rather than waiting for unanimous institutional consensus. This approach aims to deliver results at the speed required by hybrid threats, which often bypass traditional diplomatic timelines.[1][4]
The budgetary effort required of the nation, the report states, must align with a clear European objective: the ability to prevent any attack aimed at testing the continent's unity and credibility. The HCSP has defined the necessary architecture to secure France's interests in the seabed, space, and the cognitive domain. The speed at which the government can fund and deploy these capabilities ahead of the 2026 budget negotiations will determine whether the 2035 plan functions as a deterrent or merely a diagnosis.[1][4]
Key points
- France's Haut-commissariat à la stratégie et au plan published a 2035 national security framework focusing on multi-domain threats.
- The report warns that the seabed, outer space, and digital infrastructure will be the primary arenas for strategic confrontation.
- President Emmanuel Macron confirmed a recent intensification of Russian hybrid operations targeting European nations.
- The military is urged to shift to high-intensity combat readiness and expand its operational reserve to 100,000 personnel.
- The government is activating territorial authorities and preparing a survival manual to build societal resilience against cognitive attacks.
Viewpoints in depth
The Multi-Domain Imperative
Strategic planners argue that future conflicts will be won or lost in spaces invisible to the public.
For French military strategists, the 2035 framework represents a necessary break from the expeditionary mindset of the last two decades. By identifying the seabed and outer space as primary vectors of attack, planners are acknowledging that adversaries can cripple a modern state without ever crossing its physical borders. This perspective insists that heavy investment in orbital surveillance, deep-sea drones, and cyber defense is not optional, but the baseline requirement for maintaining national sovereignty in a highly networked world.
The Societal Defense Model
Civil resilience advocates emphasize that the population itself is the ultimate target of hybrid warfare.
Because hybrid operations frequently bypass military installations to target civilian infrastructure and public opinion, this camp argues that defense can no longer be the exclusive domain of the armed forces. The activation of territorial authorities and the distribution of survival manuals reflect a philosophy that national security begins at the household level. From this viewpoint, a resilient population capable of absorbing cyber disruptions and information manipulation is a more effective deterrent than traditional kinetic weapons.
Why this matters
As warfare moves beyond traditional battlefields into the seabed, outer space, and digital networks, civilian infrastructure is increasingly becoming the primary target. France's strategic pivot signals that European powers are preparing their militaries—and their populations—for a prolonged era of invisible, high-stakes hybrid conflict.
Sources
[1]Haut-commissariat à la stratégie et au planFrench Strategic PlannersFrance 2035, France 2050 - Focus Défense et sécurité nationale : préparer la Nation et défendre l'Europe face aux menaces de demain
Read on Haut-commissariat à la stratégie et au plan →
[2]LIGA.netCivil Resilience AdvocatesFrance is preparing to defend its critical infrastructure in the face of hybrid threats from Russia
Read on LIGA.net →
[3]DemócrataCivil Resilience AdvocatesFrance strengthens its defense against hybrid threats
Read on Demócrata →
[4]Breaking DefenseFrench Strategic PlannersFrance's 2035 national security plan warns of increased conflict in sea, outer space
Read on Breaking Defense →
[5]WikipediaConventional Defense TraditionalistsHybrid warfare
Read on Wikipedia →
[6]WikipediaConventional Defense TraditionalistsFrench Armed Forces
Read on Wikipedia →
Comments
More in Defense & Security
See all →Nuclear Deterrence
The Bus, the Post-Boost Vehicle, and the Reentry Vehicles: How a MIRV System Delivers Multiple Warheads to Separate Targets
6 sources
Military Logistics
The Ten Classes of Supply: How the Military Categorizes Sustainment and Where the System is Breaking Down
6 sources
GNSS Architecture
The Four Components of GPS Error: Ephemeris, Clock, Ionosphere, and Troposphere
6 sources
Low Observable Tech
The Mechanics of Stealth Technology: Comparing Radar Cross-Section Reduction, Infrared Suppression, and Low-Probability-of-Intercept Radar
6 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get Defense & Security stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.




