Boy George Launches 'Artist Included', an AI Startup Aiming to Help Legacy Musicians Reclaim Their Masters
A new music technology company backed by major industry players is using 'artist-approved' AI to help heritage acts re-record their classic hits and regain control of their commercial rights.
- Artist Empowerment Advocates
- Proponents argue that ethical AI can correct historic industry imbalances by giving legacy artists control over their masters.
- Music Industry Skeptics
- Critics question the consumer demand for AI-assisted re-recordings compared to the beloved originals.
- AI Technology Developers
- Technologists emphasize the collaborative, human-in-the-loop nature of this specific AI application.
Key points
- Artist Included is a newly launched music tech startup aiming to help legacy musicians reclaim their master recordings.
- The company uses 'artist-approved' AI to process newly recorded vocals, matching the historic sound of classic hits.
- Boy George serves as a creative director and launched the platform with a new version of the 1983 hit 'Karma Chameleon.'
- The model allows artists to bypass traditional record labels and own their new masters outright, unlocking lucrative licensing opportunities.
- The venture is backed by major Silicon Valley seed investors and music industry management firms.
The music industry’s relationship with artificial intelligence has largely been defined by fear, lawsuits, and unauthorized deepfakes. But a newly launched startup is attempting to flip the narrative, pitching AI as a tool for financial liberation rather than exploitation.[1]
"Artist Included," a Los Angeles-based music technology company, officially launched this week with a provocative mission: using AI to help legacy musicians reclaim ownership of their classic catalogs.[2]
The company was co-founded by entrepreneur Paul "PK" Kemsley and entertainment attorney Jeremy Rosen, with Culture Club frontman Boy George serving as a marquee collaborator and creative director.[1]
To demonstrate the model, Artist Included released a newly recorded version of Culture Club’s 1983 global smash "Karma Chameleon," timed to coincide with Boy George’s 65th birthday.[2]
The process relies on what the company calls "artist-approved" and "ethical" voice AI. Rather than generating a synthetic track from scratch, Boy George performed new vocals in the studio.[2]
The AI platform—developed by Irvine, California-based tech partner Syntiant—was then used to process the new performance. The software captures the specific tonal qualities and youthful timbre that audiences associate with the original 1980s recording, blending the artist's current performance with their historic sound.
The business mechanism behind the technology is where the true disruption lies. By creating a new, sonically identical or enhanced master recording, artists can bypass the original master rights typically held by major record labels.[1][2]
The business mechanism behind the technology is where the true disruption lies.
This allows heritage acts from the 1960s through the 2000s to own their new masters outright, unlocking fresh commercial opportunities across streaming, film and TV syncs, advertising, and video games.
Seed investors in the venture include major players from both Silicon Valley and the music establishment, such as Structure Capital founding partner Mike Walsh—an early investor in Uber and Salesforce—and Red Light Management, one of the world's largest independent artist management firms.
The launch arrives at a critical inflection point for music economics. For decades, artists signed away their master rights in perpetuity in exchange for upfront advances and distribution, leaving them with fraction-of-a-penny streaming royalties while their labels reaped the long-term value.[2]
While Taylor Swift famously re-recorded her early albums to regain control of her masters, that strategy requires massive capital, studio time, and a rabid fanbase willing to stream the new versions over the originals. Artist Included is betting that AI can democratize this reclamation process for a much wider array of legacy acts.
Skeptics, however, question whether fans will actually embrace AI-assisted re-recordings. Music critics note that while the technology might be impressive, listeners often prefer the original tracks they grew up with, complete with their analog imperfections.
Yet the commercial applications for sync licensing—where ad agencies and film supervisors need high-quality, easily clearable tracks—could prove highly lucrative, even if everyday fans stick to the originals on Spotify. When an artist owns the master, they can approve a lucrative commercial placement instantly, without needing a label's sign-off.[1]
The startup's founders emphasize that their model is built entirely on consent, transparency, and rights clearance. By bringing artists into the cap table and giving them control over how their voice models are used, the company hopes to shift the industry paradigm from piracy to partnership.[2]
For Boy George, the project represents a deliberate act of reclamation. The goal was never to replace the original, he noted, adding that the technology allows a song he once couldn't control to keep evolving for new audiences.[1]
Why this matters
For decades, legacy musicians have watched the long-term value of their most famous songs flow to record labels who own the master rights. If this AI-assisted re-recording model succeeds, it could fundamentally shift the balance of power and wealth back to the original creators.
Viewpoints in depth
Artist Empowerment Advocates
Proponents argue that ethical AI can correct historic industry imbalances by giving legacy artists control over their masters.
Founders and allied artists view the traditional record label model as inherently extractive, locking creators out of the long-term value of their own work. By using AI to efficiently produce high-quality re-recordings, they argue that heritage acts can finally participate in the lucrative sync licensing and streaming markets on their own terms, turning a technology often feared by musicians into a tool for financial liberation.
Music Industry Skeptics
Critics question the consumer demand for AI-assisted re-recordings compared to the beloved originals.
While the economic logic for artists is clear, skeptics point out that music is fundamentally emotional. Fans form deep attachments to the specific analog recordings they grew up with, complete with their flaws and era-specific production. Observers note that while mega-stars like Taylor Swift successfully convinced fans to switch to re-recorded masters, it remains unproven whether audiences will accept AI-enhanced versions of classic hits from artists with smaller, less mobilized fanbases.
AI Technology Developers
Technologists emphasize the collaborative, human-in-the-loop nature of this specific AI application.
Rather than focusing on fully synthetic generation—which has sparked massive copyright lawsuits across the industry—technology partners in this space highlight their role as an advanced production tool. By requiring the original artist to perform new vocals in the studio and using AI solely to process and match historic tonal qualities, developers argue they are building a consent-based framework that enhances human creativity rather than replacing it.
Sources
[1]ForbesArtist Empowerment AdvocatesBoy George Isn’t Afraid Of AI; A Reborn ‘Karma Chameleon’ Proves Why
Read on Forbes →
[2]Business WireArtist Empowerment AdvocatesArtist Included launches with Boy George's new “Karma Chameleon” recording, using artist-approved AI to help creators own more of their work
Read on Business Wire →
Comments
Every angle. Every day.
Get business stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.
