Skip to main content
Energy Resilience· 6 min read· in Defense & Security

US Army Commits $2.2 Billion to Deploy Commercial Nuclear Microreactors at Five Domestic Bases

The Army has selected five companies to build and operate contractor-owned nuclear microreactors at major military installations, aiming to sever critical defense infrastructure from vulnerable civilian power grids.

By Hao Li

When the U.S. military announces plans to place nuclear reactors on domestic bases, the immediate public assumption is often a return to the Cold War era of sprawling, government-run atomic facilities managed by soldiers. The reality of the Army's newly unveiled $2.2 billion Janus program is entirely different.

These are not massive, bespoke military power plants; they are compact, contractor-owned commercial microreactors designed to operate independently of the civilian grid. The initiative is less about militarizing nuclear power and more about insulating critical defense infrastructure from an increasingly vulnerable domestic energy network.[1][2]

The Army confirmed Wednesday that it has selected five commercial firms to build and operate nuclear microreactors at five major military installations across the United States. The initial sites include Fort Bragg in North Carolina, Fort Campbell in Kentucky, Fort Hood in Texas, Fort Benning in Georgia, and Fort Drum in New York. The five vendors—Antares Nuclear, BWXT Advanced Technologies, General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems, Radiant Industries, and Westinghouse Government Services—will share up to $2.2 billion in milestone-based funding over the next five years.[1][2][3]

This deployment represents a fundamental shift in how the Department of Defense procures energy. Under the Janus program, the military will not own or operate the reactors. Instead, the Army is utilizing a contractor-owned, contractor-operated (COCO) model. The vendors will design, build, and run the microreactors on leased base land, and the Army will simply purchase the generated electricity through long-term power purchase agreements. This structure transfers the operational and regulatory burden to the private sector while guaranteeing the military a fixed supply of resilient baseload power.[1][4]

The five initial military installations selected to host contractor-owned microreactors.

The strategic driver behind this $2.2 billion investment is the fragility of the civilian electrical grid. Currently, almost all critical infrastructure on U.S. military bases relies on the commercial power grid, backed up by diesel generators in the event of an outage.

As Jeff Waksman, the Army's principal deputy assistant secretary for installations, energy and environment, noted, the domestic electric grid is increasingly viewed as a potential target in a major conflict. Relying on liquid fossil fuels for backup power introduces a massive logistical vulnerability, as diesel must be continuously trucked into bases during an extended crisis.[1][2]

Nuclear microreactors solve this logistical bottleneck by providing years of uninterrupted power without the need for refueling. Unlike traditional gigawatt-scale nuclear plants that take decades to build and require massive cooling infrastructure, microreactors are designed to generate between 1 and 20 megawatts of electricity.

They are small enough to be manufactured in a factory, transported by truck or cargo plane, and assembled on-site in a matter of days or weeks. For a military installation, a 5-megawatt reactor can sustain essential command, control, and communications infrastructure indefinitely, even if the surrounding civilian grid collapses.[3][5]

The Janus program is not starting from scratch; it builds directly upon the technological foundation laid by 'Project Pele,' a Defense Department initiative launched in 2020 to develop a mobile nuclear reactor. Under Project Pele, the Strategic Capabilities Office partnered with BWXT to design a 1.5-megawatt high-temperature gas-cooled reactor prototype capable of fitting inside standard shipping containers.

That prototype, currently undergoing testing at the Idaho National Laboratory, proved that a microreactor could be built to withstand the rigorous shock and vibration requirements of military transport while operating safely in austere environments.[5][6]

A critical component of both Project Pele and the new Janus microreactors is the use of advanced nuclear fuels, specifically TRISO (TRi-structural ISOtropic) particles. Unlike the fuel rods used in conventional light-water reactors, TRISO fuel encapsulates uranium in layers of carbon and silicon carbide. These microscopic containment vessels are structurally robust and can withstand temperatures far exceeding the melting point of the reactor core. This inherent physical property makes a catastrophic meltdown virtually impossible, a necessary safety feature for reactors deployed near populated military bases.[6]

Microreactors rely on TRISO fuel, which encapsulates uranium in robust layers to prevent meltdowns.

Furthermore, these microreactors will utilize High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU). While traditional commercial reactors use uranium enriched to about 5%, HALEU is enriched to between 5% and 20%. This higher concentration allows the reactor core to be significantly smaller and operate for much longer periods—often up to a decade—without needing replacement fuel. However, the reliance on HALEU introduces a significant supply chain vulnerability, as the United States currently lacks the domestic enrichment capacity to produce HALEU at scale, having historically relied on foreign suppliers.[2]

The Army's timeline for the Janus program is aggressive, driven by a 2025 executive order from the Trump administration mandating that at least one advanced reactor be operational on a domestic military installation by September 30, 2028. While all five selected vendors are receiving initial funding to advance their designs, Army officials acknowledge that not all of them will meet the 2028 deadline. The milestone-based contracts are designed to foster competition, ensuring that the government only pays for successful technical demonstrations.[1][4]

The $2.2 billion allocated by the Army is intended as seed capital rather than full program funding. The military expects the selected vendors to raise the majority of the necessary capital from private markets. By providing a guaranteed customer and a clear regulatory pathway on federal land, the Army hopes to de-risk the technology for private investors. This financial strategy aligns with the broader administration goal of accelerating the commercial nuclear industry to meet skyrocketing civilian power demands, particularly from energy-intensive data centers.[1][4]

Almost all critical infrastructure on U.S. military bases currently relies on the commercial power grid, introducing significant logistical vulnerabilities.

Despite the momentum, significant uncertainties remain. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) must still license these novel reactor designs, a process that has historically been slow and tailored to large, conventional plants. While deploying on federal military land offers some regulatory streamlining, the vendors must still prove that their systems meet stringent safety and environmental standards. Additionally, the local communities surrounding Fort Bragg, Fort Hood, and the other selected bases will likely demand transparent environmental impact assessments before construction begins.[2][5]

If the Janus program succeeds, the downstream consequences extend far beyond military logistics. A successfully demonstrated, contractor-operated microreactor on a U.S. Army base creates a validated operational template for the civilian sector. The same 5-megawatt transportable reactors could eventually be deployed to power remote mining operations, isolated Arctic communities, or disaster relief zones where the grid has been destroyed. In this sense, the Army is acting as the first-mover customer for a technology that could fundamentally reshape the architecture of decentralized power generation.[2][4]

Key points

  • The Army selected five companies to build nuclear microreactors at five major U.S. military bases.
  • The $2.2 billion Janus program aims to insulate critical defense infrastructure from a vulnerable civilian power grid.
  • The reactors will be contractor-owned and operated, with the Army purchasing the generated electricity.
  • Microreactors use advanced TRISO fuel and HALEU, allowing them to operate safely for years without refueling.

Unanswered questions

  • Whether the U.S. can establish a robust domestic supply chain for the High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) required by these reactors.
  • How quickly the Nuclear Regulatory Commission can adapt its licensing process for these novel, decentralized reactor designs.
  • Which of the five selected companies will successfully meet the technical milestones to deploy the first operational reactor by 2028.

How we got here

  1. 1954

    The Army Nuclear Power Program is established to develop small-scale nuclear prototypes for military use.

  2. 2020

    The Defense Department launches Project Pele to design a mobile, transportable microreactor prototype.

  3. May 2025

    An executive order mandates the deployment of an advanced nuclear reactor on a domestic military base by 2028.

  4. August 2026

    The Army awards up to $2.2 billion to five companies under the Janus program to build microreactors at five bases.

  5. September 2028

    The target deadline for the first contractor-owned microreactor to begin generating electricity for the military.

Military Planners 40%Commercial Nuclear Industry 35%Civilian Energy Analysts 25%
Military Planners
Views microreactors as an essential logistical solution to insulate critical defense infrastructure from a vulnerable civilian grid.
Commercial Nuclear Industry
Sees the Army's milestone-based contracts as crucial seed capital that de-risks advanced reactor technology for private investors.
Civilian Energy Analysts
Focuses on the downstream potential for civilian applications, while highlighting the regulatory and supply chain hurdles ahead.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Local communities near the selected bases
  • Non-proliferation advocates concerned about HALEU

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Military Planners 40%Commercial Nuclear Industry 35%Civilian Energy Analysts 25%
  1. [1]Breaking DefenseMilitary Planners

    US Army has whittled down its nuclear microreactor vendor pool

    Read on Breaking Defense →
  2. [2]Defense OneCommercial Nuclear Industry

    Army officials have selected five firms to build nuclear microreactors at U.S. military bases

    Read on Defense One →
  3. [3]Military TimesCivilian Energy Analysts

    The Army is investing billions of dollars to bring nuclear power to military bases

    Read on Military Times →
  4. [4]CBS NewsCivilian Energy Analysts

    The U.S. Army plans to add a nuclear microreactor to a Georgia base

    Read on CBS News →
  5. [5]Defense ScoopMilitary Planners

    Army selects 5 bases, vendors for nuclear microreactor program

    Read on Defense Scoop →
  6. [6]BWXTCommercial Nuclear Industry

    Project Pele: A transportable nuclear power system

    Read on BWXT →

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Defense & Security stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.