UN Experts Accuse Sudan's RSF of Crimes Against Humanity and Ethnic Cleansing in El-Fasher
A new United Nations report alleges that the Rapid Support Forces and allied militias have committed widespread ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity during their siege of El-Fasher in North Darfur. The findings escalate international pressure for intervention as the humanitarian crisis in Sudan deepens.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- International Human Rights Monitors
- Argues that the RSF is conducting a deliberate campaign of ethnic cleansing and demands immediate international intervention.
- Regional Analysts
- Focuses on the geopolitical proxy war fueling the conflict and the failure of international diplomacy to halt the violence.
- Rapid Support Forces (RSF)
- Denies targeting civilians based on ethnicity and claims operations are strictly military efforts against the SAF.
What's not represented
- · Trapped civilians in El-Fasher without internet access
- · Local resistance committees
Why this matters
The formal UN designation of 'crimes against humanity' and 'ethnic cleansing' triggers legal obligations for member states and could force the UN Security Council to authorize new sanctions or an arms embargo. For the hundreds of thousands of civilians trapped in El-Fasher, the findings highlight a rapidly closing window for international intervention before the city falls completely.
Key points
- A UN Fact-Finding Mission has formally accused Sudan's RSF of crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing in El-Fasher.
- The report documents targeted killings of non-Arab communities, sexual violence, and the deliberate destruction of healthcare infrastructure.
- The RSF denies the allegations, claiming its operations are strictly military and accusing the SAF of using human shields.
- El-Fasher is the last SAF stronghold in Darfur, currently sheltering approximately 1.5 million civilians.
- Human rights groups are urging the UN Security Council to impose a comprehensive arms embargo to halt the violence.
A panel of United Nations experts has formally accused Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and allied Arab militias of committing crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing during their protracted siege of El-Fasher. The findings, detailed in a comprehensive report released Sunday, document a systematic campaign of targeted killings, sexual violence, and forced displacement against non-Arab communities in the capital of North Darfur. The report marks a significant escalation in the international community's legal and diplomatic framing of the 14-month conflict, shifting the narrative from a civil war to a theater of mass atrocities. Investigators compiled satellite imagery, intercepted communications, and hundreds of survivor testimonies to substantiate claims that the RSF is intentionally attempting to eradicate specific ethnic groups from the region.[1][3]
El-Fasher stands as the last remaining stronghold of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in the vast western region of Darfur. For months, the city has been a refuge for approximately 1.5 million people, many of whom had already fled RSF advances in neighboring states. As the paramilitary group tightened its encirclement, the city transformed from a sanctuary into a death trap. The UN report details how RSF artillery has indiscriminately pounded densely populated neighborhoods, while ground units have systematically looted and burned displacement camps on the city's outskirts. The deliberate destruction of water facilities and the blockade of humanitarian aid routes have engineered famine conditions, leaving hundreds of thousands of civilians on the brink of starvation.[2]
The ethnic dimension of the violence closely mirrors the early 2000s Darfur genocide, a grim historical parallel explicitly drawn by the UN investigators. According to the report, RSF fighters and allied militias have specifically targeted members of the Zaghawa, Masalit, and Fur communities. Testimonies describe checkpoints where civilians are interrogated about their tribal affiliations before being executed or detained. The Fact-Finding Mission highlighted that the rhetoric used by RSF commanders on the ground demonstrates a clear intent to alter the demographic composition of North Darfur permanently. Medical personnel operating in underground clinics have reported a staggering influx of patients with gunshot wounds to the head and chest, indicative of execution-style killings rather than crossfire.[3]

In response to the allegations, the Rapid Support Forces issued a vehement denial, characterizing the UN report as a politically motivated fabrication designed to salvage the collapsing Sudanese Armed Forces. RSF spokespersons maintain that their operations in El-Fasher are strictly military engagements aimed at neutralizing SAF garrisons and allied rebel factions that have refused to surrender. The paramilitary leadership accuses the SAF of using the civilian population as human shields and intentionally militarizing hospitals and displacement camps. Furthermore, the RSF claims to have established "safe corridors" for civilians to exit the city, an assertion that UN monitors and independent journalists have repeatedly debunked, noting that those attempting to flee are routinely ambushed.[4]
The paramilitary leadership accuses the SAF of using the civilian population as human shields and intentionally militarizing hospitals and displacement camps.
The humanitarian catastrophe unfolding inside El-Fasher has been exacerbated by the systematic targeting of healthcare infrastructure. The UN report documents multiple instances where RSF artillery struck the city's main pediatric hospital and the Saudi Maternity Hospital, forcing medical staff to evacuate incubators and perform surgeries without anesthesia. The World Health Organization and Doctors Without Borders have warned that the healthcare system in North Darfur has completely collapsed. With the RSF controlling all major supply routes into the city, international aid agencies have been unable to deliver food, medicine, or clean water for weeks, leading to a surge in preventable deaths among children and the elderly.[2]
The formal accusation of crimes against humanity has triggered immediate calls for decisive international action. Human rights organizations and several UN member states are now pushing the Security Council to impose a comprehensive arms embargo on all warring parties in Sudan, with a specific focus on halting the flow of weapons to the RSF. The report's findings are also expected to accelerate ongoing investigations by the International Criminal Court (ICC), which already has jurisdiction over Darfur due to a 2005 Security Council referral. Legal experts suggest that the detailed documentation of command structures and specific atrocities could lead to a new wave of arrest warrants for high-ranking RSF commanders.[1]

However, the prospect of meaningful intervention remains entangled in complex regional geopolitics. The UN experts implicitly criticized the external actors fueling the conflict, noting that the RSF's sophisticated weaponry—including advanced drones and anti-aircraft systems—could only have been acquired through state-sponsored supply chains. While the report stops short of naming specific countries, regional analysts widely point to the United Arab Emirates as the primary backer of the RSF, an allegation Abu Dhabi has consistently denied. Conversely, the SAF has increasingly relied on military support from Egypt and Iran. This proxy dynamic has paralyzed diplomatic efforts, as regional powers prioritize their strategic interests over the escalating humanitarian disaster.
The fate of El-Fasher carries profound implications for the future of Sudan. If the city falls, the RSF will achieve total military dominance over the entire Darfur region, effectively partitioning the country and establishing a massive, resource-rich stronghold. Security analysts warn that an RSF victory in El-Fasher would likely trigger a final wave of ethnic cleansing, as the paramilitary group seeks to eliminate any remaining pockets of resistance among the non-Arab populations. The collapse of the SAF's last western garrison would also free up thousands of RSF fighters to redeploy toward the capital, Khartoum, and the agricultural heartlands in the east, potentially prolonging the nationwide civil war for years.

As the UN Security Council prepares to debate the findings next week, the window to prevent a total massacre in El-Fasher is rapidly closing. African Union mediators have proposed a localized ceasefire and the deployment of a civilian protection force, but neither the RSF nor the SAF has shown any willingness to halt hostilities. For the 1.5 million civilians trapped in the crossfire, the international community's legal designations offer little immediate relief. The UN report concludes with a stark warning: without immediate, coercive diplomatic intervention and the opening of unconditional humanitarian corridors, the death toll in El-Fasher will soon eclipse the darkest chapters of Darfur's history.[3]
How we got here
April 2023
Conflict erupts between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces in Khartoum.
November 2023
The RSF captures four of the five state capitals in the Darfur region.
April 2024
RSF forces encircle El-Fasher, beginning a protracted and brutal siege.
May 2026
Humanitarian agencies warn of imminent famine inside the city due to aid blockades.
July 2026
UN experts release a report formally accusing the RSF of crimes against humanity.
Viewpoints in depth
UN and Human Rights Monitors
Argues that the RSF is conducting a deliberate campaign of ethnic cleansing and demands immediate international intervention.
International investigators and human rights organizations view the siege of El-Fasher not merely as a military operation, but as a systematic effort to eradicate non-Arab populations from North Darfur. Citing satellite imagery, intercepted communications, and survivor testimonies, they argue that the RSF's tactics—such as interrogating civilians about their tribal affiliations at checkpoints and deliberately shelling hospitals—demonstrate a clear intent to commit genocide. This camp is urgently lobbying the UN Security Council to impose a strict arms embargo and for the International Criminal Court to issue new arrest warrants for RSF commanders.
Rapid Support Forces (RSF)
Denies targeting civilians based on ethnicity and claims operations are strictly military efforts against the SAF.
The RSF leadership dismisses the UN allegations as politically motivated fabrications engineered to protect the collapsing Sudanese Armed Forces. From their perspective, the battle for El-Fasher is a necessary military engagement to neutralize the last remaining SAF garrison in Darfur, which they accuse of harboring radical elements and refusing to surrender. RSF spokespersons argue that any civilian casualties are the result of the SAF intentionally militarizing civilian infrastructure and using the population as human shields, while maintaining that the RSF has attempted to establish safe corridors for evacuation.
Regional Analysts and Diplomats
Focuses on the geopolitical proxy war fueling the conflict and the failure of international diplomacy to halt the violence.
Geopolitical analysts emphasize that the atrocities in El-Fasher are being enabled by external state actors who continue to supply both sides with advanced weaponry. They point to the sophisticated drones and anti-aircraft systems used by the RSF as evidence of covert backing, widely attributed to the United Arab Emirates, while noting the SAF's reliance on support from Egypt and Iran. This camp argues that legal designations like 'crimes against humanity' will remain toothless unless the international community is willing to directly sanction the regional powers treating Sudan as a proxy battleground.
What we don't know
- Whether the UN Security Council will actually authorize an arms embargo or if geopolitical divisions will block a resolution.
- The exact death toll inside El-Fasher, as the collapse of the healthcare system and communication blackouts make accurate counting impossible.
- How the International Criminal Court will proceed with potential new arrest warrants based on the Fact-Finding Mission's evidence.
Key terms
- RSF (Rapid Support Forces)
- A Sudanese paramilitary group that evolved from the Janjaweed militias, currently at war with the national army.
- SAF (Sudanese Armed Forces)
- The official national military of Sudan, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan.
- Ethnic Cleansing
- The systematic forced removal or killing of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given territory.
- Zaghawa, Masalit, and Fur
- Non-Arab ethnic groups in Darfur that have historically been targeted by Arab militias.
Frequently asked
Why is El-Fasher so important?
It is the last major city in the Darfur region still controlled by the Sudanese Armed Forces and serves as a refuge for approximately 1.5 million civilians.
What are the UN experts accusing the RSF of doing?
The UN report alleges the RSF and allied militias are committing crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing by systematically targeting non-Arab communities.
How has the RSF responded to the allegations?
The RSF vehemently denies the allegations, claiming their operations are strictly military and accusing the SAF of using civilians as human shields.
What happens if the RSF captures the city?
Security analysts warn it would give the RSF total control over Darfur, potentially leading to further mass atrocities and a permanent partition of Sudan.
Sources
[1]ReutersInternational Human Rights Monitors
UN experts accuse Sudan's RSF of ethnic cleansing in El-Fasher
Read on Reuters →[2]Al JazeeraRegional Analysts
Former CAR president on trial in absentia over crimes against humanity
Read on Al Jazeera →[3]UN Human Rights OfficeInternational Human Rights Monitors
Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission for the Sudan
Read on UN Human Rights Office →[4]Sudan TribuneRapid Support Forces (RSF)
RSF denies UN allegations of ethnic cleansing in North Darfur capital
Read on Sudan Tribune →
More in news politics
See all 8 stories →Climate Policy
EPA Finalizes Repeal of Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding and Federal Vehicle Emission Standards
4 sources
Immigration Law
Justice Department Activates Untested 'Alien Terrorist Removal Court' for First-Ever Deportation Proceedings
8 sources
Education Policy
House GOP Advances Bill to Permanently Dismantle Education Department
4 sources
Higher Ed Policy
Trump Administration Drafts Sweeping Rule to Exert Ideological Control Over U.S. Higher Education and Research
8 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get news politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.









