Women's FootballLabor RightsJun 24, 2026, 10:34 AM· 4 min read· #17 of 17 in sports

Landmark CAS Ruling Orders Lazio to Compensate Maja Göthberg Over Pregnancy Dispute

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has ruled that Italian club Lazio Women unlawfully terminated Swedish defender Maja Göthberg's employment due to her pregnancy, setting a historic precedent for labor rights in women's football.

By Factlen Editorial Team

Player Advocates 45%Regulatory Authorities 35%International Observers 20%
Player Advocates
Argue that maternity protections are fundamental labor rights and clubs must honor agreements regardless of pregnancy.
Regulatory Authorities
Focus on the strict enforcement of FIFA statutes and the legal definition of an employment relationship.
International Observers
Highlight the global impact of the ruling on the professionalization of women's sports.

What's not represented

  • · Lower-league female players without union backing
  • · Clubs operating on marginal budgets

Why this matters

This ruling cements the enforceability of FIFA's maternity regulations, ensuring that female athletes cannot be discarded or have their medical privacy violated simply for becoming pregnant. It sets a legal precedent that protects the careers and livelihoods of professional women's footballers worldwide.

Key points

  • The Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled Lazio Women unlawfully terminated Maja Göthberg's employment over her pregnancy.
  • The club was ordered to pay compensation for lost salary and moral damages for breaching medical privacy.
  • CAS determined a valid employment relationship existed despite the new contract not being formally signed.
  • The landmark decision is the first CAS precedent enforcing FIFA's strengthened maternity regulations.
  • Player advocates hailed the ruling as a major victory for labor rights and fairness in women's football.
14 weeks
Minimum FIFA maternity leave
2024
Year FIFA maternity rules were enhanced

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has delivered a landmark ruling in favor of Swedish defender Maja Göthberg, finding that Italian club Lazio Women unlawfully terminated her employment due to her pregnancy. The decision marks a watershed moment for labor rights in the rapidly professionalizing women's game.[1][2]

The ruling is the first time CAS has established a legal precedent regarding pregnancy-related contract terminations in professional football. It serves as a definitive test of FIFA’s recently strengthened maternity regulations, sending a clear message to clubs worldwide about the strict enforceability of player protections.[3]

The dispute centered on the summer of 2024. Göthberg, a former Sweden youth international, had just helped Lazio Women secure promotion to Italy’s top tier during a successful 2023-24 campaign. Following the promotion, the 28-year-old entered negotiations to renew her contract with the Rome-based club.[2][3]

By late June, both parties had verbally agreed on the key terms of a new one-year deal, including salary figures and housing arrangements. However, the formal paperwork had not yet been officially signed by the player and the club's management.[2][3]

Timeline of the events leading to the landmark CAS decision.
Timeline of the events leading to the landmark CAS decision.

In mid-July, before putting pen to paper, Göthberg discovered she was pregnant. Despite having no legal obligation to disclose her medical status at that specific stage of the unfinalized contract process, she chose to inform Lazio's sporting director transparently.[2][3]

According to evidence presented to CAS, Lazio immediately withdrew from the contract agreement upon learning the news. Furthermore, the club's management requested medical certification, and Göthberg's pregnancy was subsequently disclosed to her teammates without her consent, causing significant emotional distress.[3]

Göthberg initially took her grievance to FIFA’s Dispute Resolution Chamber but lost the case in March 2025, prompting her to escalate the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland.[2][3]

During the CAS proceedings, Lazio's defense hinged on the technicality that the proposed new contract had never been formally signed. The club argued that without a signature, they were not legally bound to finalize the employment relationship once the player's availability changed.[3]

The Court of Arbitration for Sport determined that a valid employment relationship existed despite the lack of a formal signature.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport determined that a valid employment relationship existed despite the lack of a formal signature.
During the CAS proceedings, Lazio's defense hinged on the technicality that the proposed new contract had never been formally signed.

CAS, however, ruled decisively in the player's favor. The tribunal determined that a valid employment relationship already existed based on the agreed-upon terms, and that Lazio had unlawfully disadvantaged Göthberg specifically because of her pregnancy.[3]

The court ordered the Italian club to pay Göthberg compensation for the lost salary, as well as moral damages for the unauthorized and unethical disclosure of her sensitive medical information.[3]

"This case was never only about football: it was about being treated fairly and with respect at an important moment in my life," Göthberg said in a statement following the victory. She emphasized that the ruling ensures pregnancy will not be treated as a barrier to labor opportunities in the sport.[2][4]

The global players' union, FIFPRO, which supported Göthberg throughout the legal battle, hailed the decision as a massive victory. Alexandra Gómez Bruinewoud, FIFPRO’s legal director, noted that the ruling proves FIFA’s maternity regulations "are not just words on paper and that they provide real protections for players."[2]

FIFA first introduced mandatory maternity leave and working rights for female players in 2020, guaranteeing at least 14 weeks of paid leave and obliging clubs to reintegrate players afterward. These rules were further enhanced in 2024 to close loopholes regarding contract renewals and medical privacy.[2]

Key protections guaranteed under FIFA's updated maternity regulations.
Key protections guaranteed under FIFA's updated maternity regulations.

The Göthberg precedent firmly establishes that clubs cannot simply walk away from an agreed employment relationship—even an unformalized one—the moment they learn a player is expecting a child.[2]

For women's football, which has seen rapid professionalization and investment in recent years, the CAS ruling represents a crucial maturation of labor rights, ensuring athletes no longer have to choose between their careers and starting a family.[4]

How we got here

  1. May 2024

    Göthberg helps Lazio Women win promotion to Italy's top tier.

  2. June 2024

    Göthberg and Lazio reach a verbal agreement on the key terms of a new one-year contract.

  3. July 2024

    Göthberg discovers she is pregnant, informs the club, and Lazio withdraws the contract offer.

  4. March 2025

    FIFA's Dispute Resolution Chamber initially dismisses Göthberg's claim for compensation.

  5. June 2026

    The Court of Arbitration for Sport overturns the FIFA decision, ruling in Göthberg's favor.

Viewpoints in depth

Player Advocates

Emphasize that maternity protections are fundamental labor rights that must be respected.

Organizations like FIFPRO and individual athletes view this ruling as a necessary defense of basic human rights within the sport. They argue that female athletes have historically been forced to choose between their careers and starting a family due to precarious contracts. For player advocates, the CAS decision proves that verbal agreements and employment relationships cannot be voided simply because a player becomes pregnant, ensuring that FIFA's regulations provide tangible, enforceable security rather than just performative guidelines.

Regulatory Authorities

Focus on the strict legal interpretation of employment and the enforcement of FIFA statutes.

For bodies like CAS and FIFA, the case was a critical test of the 2024 maternity regulations. Their perspective centers on the legal definition of an employment relationship, which CAS determined can exist even without a formal signature if key terms have been agreed upon. By penalizing Lazio for both the contract withdrawal and the unauthorized disclosure of medical information, regulatory authorities are setting a hard legal precedent that closes loopholes clubs might use to circumvent maternity obligations.

Club Administration

Highlight the complexities of finalizing contracts when a player's availability suddenly changes.

While Lazio Women ultimately lost the case, their defense illustrates the perspective of club management navigating unfinalized deals. The club argued that because the contract was not yet signed, they were not legally bound to assume the financial and sporting risks of a player who would be unavailable for the upcoming season. From an administrative standpoint, clubs often view the period before a signature as a non-binding negotiation phase, a stance that CAS has now firmly rejected in cases involving pregnancy.

What we don't know

  • The exact financial sum Lazio Women was ordered to pay Göthberg in compensation and moral damages.
  • Whether Lazio Women will face additional sporting sanctions from FIFA following the CAS ruling.
  • How this precedent will affect contract negotiations for female players in lower-tier leagues with fewer resources.

Key terms

Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
An international quasi-judicial body established to settle disputes related to sport through arbitration.
FIFPRO
The worldwide representative organization for professional footballers, acting as a global players' union.
FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber
FIFA's deciding body that provides arbitration and dispute resolution on the basis of equal representation of players and clubs.
Moral Damages
Compensation awarded for non-financial losses, such as emotional distress or reputational harm, in this case related to the unauthorized disclosure of medical information.

Frequently asked

What did the Court of Arbitration for Sport decide?

CAS ruled that Lazio Women unlawfully ended Maja Göthberg's employment due to her pregnancy and ordered the club to pay compensation and moral damages.

Did Göthberg have a signed contract with Lazio?

No, the formal contract was not yet signed, but CAS determined that a valid employment relationship already existed based on verbally agreed-upon terms.

What are FIFA's maternity regulations?

Introduced in 2020 and enhanced in 2024, they guarantee female players at least 14 weeks of paid maternity leave and protect them from being fired or disadvantaged due to pregnancy.

Why is this ruling important for women's football?

It sets the first CAS precedent enforcing FIFA's maternity rules, proving that clubs cannot use pregnancy to deny labor opportunities or violate a player's medical privacy.

Sources

Source coverage

4 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Player Advocates 45%Regulatory Authorities 35%International Observers 20%
  1. [1]BBC SportRegulatory Authorities

    Lazio to pay compensation in pregnancy dispute case

    Read on BBC Sport
  2. [2]The GuardianPlayer Advocates

    Lazio Women to pay compensation after landmark Cas pregnancy discrimination ruling

    Read on The Guardian
  3. [3]Court of Arbitration for SportRegulatory Authorities

    CAS 2025/A/11527 Maja Göthberg v. Lazio Women

    Read on Court of Arbitration for Sport
  4. [4]The Straits TimesInternational Observers

    Landmark CAS ruling upholds maternity rights in women's football

    Read on The Straits Times
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get sports stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.