Skip to main content
Tribal Sovereignty· 3 min read· in Community

How Muscogee Citizens Defeated a Major AI Data Center on Tribal Lands

In late 2025, grassroots organizers within the Muscogee (Creek) Nation successfully halted a proposed hyperscale AI data center that would have rezoned agricultural land dedicated to tribal food sovereignty. The victory has since become a blueprint for Indigenous communities navigating the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure.

By Tiago Sousa

Share this story

Listen

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence requires massive physical infrastructure, creating a high-stakes tension between tech developers seeking cheap land and communities protecting their natural resources. For the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, this tension peaked when a proposal surfaced to rezone 5,500 acres of tribal territory for a hyperscale data center. Grassroots organizers ultimately resolved the conflict by halting the development, providing a blueprint for how communities can leverage sovereignty to protect local resources from the AI boom.[2][3]

The conflict centered on the Looped Square Ranch in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma. Purchased by the Muscogee Nation in 2021, the sprawling property was dedicated to tribal food sovereignty—hosting a working cattle ranch, youth agricultural programs, and spaces for hunting and gathering.[2][3]

In August 2025, legislation known as NCA 25-077 was introduced to the Muscogee (Creek) National Council. The bill proposed establishing the 'Mvskoke Tech Park,' a massive data center complex that supporters argued would diversify the tribe's economy and reduce reliance on gaming revenues.[1][2]

However, the proposal immediately alarmed many Muscogee citizens. Hyperscale data centers, which house the servers necessary for generative AI, consume millions of gallons of water annually for cooling and require immense amounts of electricity—costs that local communities often bear.[2][5]

Hyperscale data centers require massive amounts of water for cooling and electricity for servers.

Grassroots organizers Jordan Harmon, a policy specialist with the Indigenous Environmental Network, and Mackenzie Roberts, an intake specialist at the Muscogee Nation Center for Victim Services, spearheaded the opposition. They viewed the data center not as an economic lifeline, but as an extractive threat to their land and water.[3][4]

The organizers spent months traveling across the reservation's 11 counties, hosting town halls to educate citizens about the environmental toll of AI infrastructure. They focused on the actionable stakes: trading sustainable agriculture for a data center contradicted Indigenous values and threatened local utility costs.[2][4]

They highlighted the lack of transparency in the proposal, pointing out that developers had not clearly explained how they would mitigate environmental harms or upgrade local water infrastructure in an area already managing service issues.[1][3]

The movement culminated on November 15, 2025, when the Muscogee (Creek) Nation National Council held a regular session to vote on the bill. Outside the Mound Building in Okmulgee, Muscogee citizens and members of the American Indian Movement protested the development.[1]

The Muscogee (Creek) Nation National Council voted 4-11 to reject the data center legislation.

Inside the chamber, representatives debated the merits of the tech park. While sponsors maintained that the tribe needed new revenue streams, critics on the council cited the vague language of the bill and the ethical problems posed by a lack of transparency.[1]

Ultimately, the legislation failed by a decisive 4-11 vote. The rejection safeguarded the Looped Square Ranch, ensuring it would remain dedicated to food security and cultural preservation rather than industrial development.[1][4]

The victory resonated far beyond Oklahoma. In March 2026, Harmon and Roberts were featured on the cover of TIME magazine for a story titled 'The People vs. AI,' which chronicled the growing national pushback against the unchecked expansion of AI infrastructure.[3][4]

Grassroots organizers held town halls across the reservation to educate citizens about the environmental toll of AI infrastructure.

The Muscogee Nation's decision has since inspired other Indigenous communities facing similar pressures. In March 2026, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma enacted a strict moratorium on generative AI technology and hyperscale data center development on their lands.[5][6]

As the AI industry continues its sprint for technological supremacy, the resistance in Indian Country serves as a practical reminder that land is not merely a commodity. For the Muscogee citizens who fought the Mvskoke Tech Park, true sovereignty means having the power to dictate the terms of local development.[3][5]

Viewpoints in depth

Grassroots Organizers

Citizens prioritizing environmental stewardship and food sovereignty.

This camp argues that hyperscale data centers represent a modern form of colonialism, extracting vital resources like water and electricity while offering few long-term benefits to the local community. They emphasize that land purchased for agricultural and cultural purposes must be protected from industrial rezoning, viewing the preservation of natural resources as a core Indigenous value.

Economic Diversification Advocates

Tribal leaders seeking new revenue streams beyond traditional industries.

Proponents of the data center argued that the tribe must look toward the future and secure its financial independence. They viewed the tech park as an opportunity to capitalize on the booming artificial intelligence industry, creating high-paying jobs and reducing the Nation's reliance on gaming and federal funding.

AI Industry Developers

Technology companies seeking space and power for infrastructure.

The tech industry maintains that rapid expansion of data centers is necessary to support the global demand for generative AI and cloud computing. Developers often target rural and Indigenous lands for their abundance of space and relatively low energy costs, promising economic revitalization and technological integration in exchange for land use.

Policy Researchers

Academic and legal experts analyzing the intersection of AI infrastructure and tribal governance.

This perspective focuses on the broader legal and regulatory frameworks surrounding data centers on tribal lands. Researchers emphasize the need for updated environmental standards, grid stability solutions, and ratepayer protections, viewing the Muscogee Nation's decision as a pivotal case study in emerging tribal policy trends.

Key points

  1. A proposed hyperscale AI data center on Muscogee (Creek) Nation land was defeated by a 4-11 tribal council vote in November 2025.
  2. The facility would have rezoned 5,500 acres of the Looped Square Ranch, an area dedicated to tribal food sovereignty and agriculture.
  3. Grassroots organizers successfully mobilized citizens by highlighting the massive water and electricity demands of AI infrastructure.
  4. The organizers' efforts gained national recognition, landing them on the cover of TIME magazine in early 2026.

What we don’t know

  • Whether the developers behind the Mvskoke Tech Park will attempt to propose the project in a different location.
  • How the Muscogee Nation will balance future technological investments with its environmental and cultural priorities.

How we got here

  1. August 2025

    Legislation is introduced to the Muscogee (Creek) National Council to establish the Mvskoke Tech Park on the Looped Square Ranch.

  2. October 2025

    Grassroots organizers hold town halls across the reservation to educate citizens about the environmental impacts of data centers.

  3. November 2025

    The Muscogee (Creek) Nation National Council votes 4-11 to reject the data center proposal.

  4. March 2026

    Organizers Jordan Harmon and Mackenzie Roberts are featured on the cover of TIME magazine for their successful campaign.

Grassroots Organizers 40%Economic Diversification Advocates 25%AI Industry Developers 25%Policy Researchers 10%
Grassroots Organizers
Citizens prioritizing environmental stewardship and food sovereignty over industrial development.
Economic Diversification Advocates
Tribal leaders seeking new revenue streams beyond traditional industries.
AI Industry Developers
Technology companies seeking space and power for infrastructure.
Policy Researchers
Academic and legal experts analyzing the intersection of AI infrastructure and tribal governance.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Local utility providers
  • Water conservation authorities

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

4 viewpoints surfaced

Grassroots Organizers 40%Economic Diversification Advocates 25%AI Industry Developers 25%Policy Researchers 10%
  1. [1]Mvskoke MediaEconomic Diversification Advocates

    Mvskoke Tech Park plan crashes

    Read on Mvskoke Media →
  2. [2]Mother JonesGrassroots Organizers

    When a data center proposal popped up on the Muscogee Reservation, these activists fought to stop it. Their work isn't over yet.

    Read on Mother Jones →
  3. [3]TIMEAI Industry Developers

    The People vs. AI

    Read on TIME →
  4. [4]Native News OnlineGrassroots Organizers

    Two Muscogee Women Featured on Cover of TIME for Leadership on AI Data Center Fight

    Read on Native News Online →
  5. [5]ICT NewsGrassroots Organizers

    In Indian Country, data centers come with a familiar threat of colonialism. These organizers are fighting back.

    Read on ICT News →
  6. [6]University of Oklahoma Native Nations CenterPolicy Researchers

    AI Data Centers and Tribes: Emerging Federal and State Policy Trends and Tribal Governance Options

    Read on University of Oklahoma Native Nations Center →
Listen

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Community stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.