Skip to main content
Surveillance PolicyLocal Ban· 3 min read· in Community

Bloomington City Council Introduces Ordinance to Ban Automated License Plate Readers

The Bloomington City Council has introduced an ordinance that would permanently prohibit the city's use of automated license plate readers and ban the sharing of surveillance data with third parties. The move follows the expiration of the city's contract with Flock Safety earlier this year.

By Tiago Sousa

Privacy Advocates 50%Law Enforcement 30%Municipal Government 20%
Privacy Advocates
Argue that ALPRs create unchecked administrative databases that track unaccused citizens and infringe on civil liberties.
Law Enforcement
Maintain that automated license plate readers are a highly effective, non-intrusive tool for solving severe crimes and recovering victims.
Municipal Government
Focus on establishing durable, legally binding rules to govern surveillance technology and ensure democratic oversight.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Victims of crimes solved using ALPR data
  • Third-party surveillance vendors

Why this matters

This ordinance represents a rare, definitive municipal rejection of mass surveillance technology. If passed, it ensures that future city administrations cannot quietly rebuild tracking databases without public consent, setting a strong privacy precedent for other local governments.

Key points

  1. The Bloomington City Council introduced Ordinance 2026-22 on September 16, 2026, to permanently ban the city's use of automated license plate readers.
  2. The legislation also prohibits any city department or contractor from sharing surveillance camera data with third parties.
  3. The move follows the expiration of the city's contract with Flock Safety in March 2026 amid public protests over privacy concerns.
  4. A final vote on the ordinance is scheduled for the council's next regular session on October 14, 2026.

On September 16, 2026, the Bloomington City Council introduced Ordinance 2026-22, a measure that would permanently ban the city from acquiring or using automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and prohibit the sharing of surveillance camera data with third parties. Sponsored by Councilmembers Isabel Piedmont-Smith, Isak Nti Asare, and Sydney Zulich, the legislation represents a definitive rejection of mass surveillance tools by the municipal government.[2][4]

The proposed ban legally codifies a shift that began earlier in the year. In March 2026, the city allowed its contract with surveillance vendor Flock Safety to expire, following a month-long internal review and intense public pushback. The new ordinance ensures that this operational pause becomes permanent policy, applying to any city department, board, commission, or contractor.[4]

At the core of the legislation is a mandate to prevent the creation of administrative databases that track the movements and locations of residents without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The text of the ordinance explicitly aims to "protect the health, welfare, privacy, civil liberties, and constitutional rights" of the public, drawing a hard line against technologies that log the daily routines of unaccused motorists.[4]

Automated license plate readers capture images of passing vehicles and log their locations into searchable databases.

The introduction of the ban follows a coordinated effort by local civil liberties advocates, who spent the early months of 2026 protesting the city's use of 11 permanently mounted Flock cameras. Critics raised alarms over data retention policies, the lack of democratic oversight, and the potential for local surveillance data to be accessed by federal agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement.[4][6]

Bloomington's move mirrors a growing skepticism toward ALPR technology across the region. On July 23, 2026, the Monroe County Board of Commissioners voted 2-0 to terminate their own Flock contract, opting to pay a $3,000 cancellation fee to remove cameras operated by the Sheriff's Office. Similar grassroots opposition has emerged in neighboring areas, including a recent petition in rural Lawrence County that gathered over 500 signatures demanding a ban on the technology.[4][5]

Bloomington's move mirrors a growing skepticism toward ALPR technology across the region.

Despite the political momentum against the cameras, law enforcement officials have consistently defended their utility. Prior to the expiration of Bloomington's contract, the Bloomington Police Department credited the ALPR system with providing crucial leads in severe cases. The department cited instances where the cameras helped safely recover a kidnapping victim and identify suspects in homicide and roadside sexual assault investigations.[4][6]

While acknowledging these investigative successes, the council's legislative approach prioritizes structural privacy over technological convenience. The ordinance reflects a consensus among its sponsors that the risks of unchecked data collection outweigh the benefits of the surveillance network, particularly when the software ecosystem and data integrations are managed by private vendors.[3][4]

The council will hold a final vote on the ordinance during its regular session on October 14.

The ALPR ban was introduced during a marathon five-hour council session that also tackled sweeping changes to the city's housing policies. Alongside the surveillance debate, the council voted 5-3 to approve Ordinance 2026-20, which eliminates minimum parking requirements and reduces lot widths in residential zones to spur affordable housing development.[1][4]

The council will hold a second reading and a final vote on the surveillance ban during its next regular session on October 14, 2026. If passed, Bloomington will establish one of the strictest municipal prohibitions on license plate readers in Indiana, forcing local law enforcement to rely entirely on traditional investigative methods and setting a clear precedent for surrounding communities.[4][5]

Viewpoints in depth

Privacy Advocates' View

Concerns over mass surveillance and third-party data sharing.

Civil liberties groups and concerned residents argue that automated license plate readers fundamentally alter the relationship between citizens and the state. By logging the movements of every passing vehicle, the technology creates a searchable database of daily routines without requiring any suspicion of criminal activity. Advocates point to incidents in other jurisdictions where data was accessed for personal use or shared with federal immigration authorities as evidence that standing surveillance infrastructure inevitably expands beyond its original scope.

Law Enforcement's View

The investigative utility of license plate readers.

Police departments emphasize that ALPRs are a force multiplier that provides crucial objective evidence in severe cases. Before the contract expired, Bloomington police credited the cameras with helping to safely recover a kidnapping victim and identify suspects in homicides and sexual assaults. From this perspective, removing the technology entirely—rather than implementing strict access audits and short retention periods—deprives investigators of a proven tool and potentially leaves the community more vulnerable to unsolved crimes.

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Privacy Advocates 50%Law Enforcement 30%Municipal Government 20%
  1. [1]The B Square BulletinMunicipal Government

    Bloomington council approves citywide zoning changes 5–3, eliminates minimums for motor-vehicle parking

    Read on The B Square Bulletin
  2. [2]WBIWMunicipal Government

    Bloomington City Council sets packed agenda addressing tech bans, housing, and board appointments

    Read on WBIW
  3. [3]City of BloomingtonMunicipal Government

    2026 City Council Meetings

    Read on City of Bloomington
  4. [4]Indiana Daily StudentPrivacy Advocates

    City Council discusses affordable housing overhaul, introduces license plate reader ban

    Read on Indiana Daily Student
  5. [5]Crothersville TimesPrivacy Advocates

    Indiana lawmakers looking at license plate cameras amid growing privacy worries

    Read on Crothersville Times
  6. [6]Indiana Public MediaLaw Enforcement

    Bloomington's Flock contract may have ended, but other cameras still active

    Read on Indiana Public Media

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Community stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.