Skip to main content
Primordial Black HolesPlanck Observatory· 6 min read· in Science

Stupendously Large Primordial Black Holes Excluded as Primary Dark Matter Source

An analysis of the cosmic microwave background has ruled out black holes larger than 100 billion solar masses as a major component of dark matter. The findings also eliminate the hypothetical giants as the source of the universe's gravitational wave background.

By Sofia Matos

Share this story

Listen

When physicists hunt for dark matter, they typically search for microscopic, subatomic particles that pass invisibly through the Earth. One alternative hypothesis, however, went in the exact opposite direction. It proposed that the universe's missing mass might be locked inside primordial black holes larger than entire galaxies.[1][5]

These hypothetical objects are known as "stupendously large black holes," or SLABs. To qualify for the title, a black hole must contain at least 100 billion times the mass of our sun. Some theoretical models suggested they could reach up to 10 million billion solar masses.[3][5]

Now, an international team of theoretical physicists has closed the door on that idea. By analyzing the faint afterglow of the Big Bang, researchers have demonstrated that SLABs cannot constitute a significant fraction of the universe's dark matter. The findings were published in the journal Physical Review Letters.[2][3]

Dark matter remains one of the most stubborn mysteries in modern astrophysics. It exerts a gravitational pull that keeps galaxies from spinning apart, and it is thought to make up roughly five-sixths of all matter in the cosmos. Yet it emits, reflects, and absorbs no light.[1][5]

Because black holes are inherently dark and extremely massive, they have long been considered natural candidates for this unseen substance. Astronomers know that supermassive black holes exist at the centers of most galaxies, but even the largest known examples weigh in at around 36 billion solar masses.[1][5]

Stupendously large black holes would dwarf those galactic anchors. Because no observatory has ever detected a black hole of that magnitude, researchers knew they could not be hiding inside modern galaxies. But theorists wondered if they might drift in the vast, empty voids between galactic clusters.[1][5]

To qualify as a stupendously large black hole, an object must contain at least 100 billion times the mass of the sun.

Reading the cosmic microwave background

To determine whether these giants actually exist, the research team looked back to the dawn of the universe. They focused on the cosmic microwave background, or CMB. This faint radiation is the oldest light in the cosmos, released when the universe was just 380,000 years old.[3][5]

At that time, the expanding universe had finally cooled enough for the hot, opaque plasma to dissipate and form the first atoms. The light that escaped during this transition has been traveling through space ever since. It carries a pristine record of how matter was distributed in the early universe.[3][5]

If dark matter were composed of stupendously large black holes, that distribution would look very different. Rather than being spread out like a fine, invisible dust, the mass would be concentrated into a handful of unimaginably dense, gigantic objects. This concentration would leave a specific signature.[3][5]

"If these SLABs had existed in large numbers and contained significant amounts of dark matter, they would have left a characteristic imprint on the CMB," said Nicholas Leister, a theoretical physicist at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. "Through their unique perturbations, or, in a word, making it grainy."[3][5]

In physics terms, these imprints are known as isocurvature perturbations. A local overdensity of mass inside a giant black hole would initially be balanced by a deficit of radiation. As the universe expanded and radiation diluted, this balance would shift, creating gravitational potentials that alter the CMB.[2][4]

The Planck satellite's enduring legacy

To search for that graininess, the team relied on data from the European Space Agency's Planck space observatory. Planck spent four and a half years mapping the cosmic microwave background with unprecedented precision. Although the satellite was shut down in October 2013, its dataset remains the gold standard for cosmologists.[3][4]

"That we are still generating new insights into the universe's evolution and structure 13 years after it was shut down only emphasizes how important the Planck satellite was and is to physicists," said Christopher Gerlach, a theoretical physicist at the Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics.[3]

The Planck measurements show that the temperature of the CMB is remarkably uniform, varying from place to place by only about one part in 100,000. The research team modeled exactly how SLABs would disrupt that smoothness and compared their theoretical imprint to the actual satellite data.[3][5]

Data from the European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which operated until 2013, remains the gold standard for analyzing the early universe.

The actual universe is simply not grainy enough to hide them. The smooth temperature variations in the cosmic microwave background strictly limit how much mass could be locked up in such massive objects. The researchers concluded that SLABs cannot be a significant part of the dark matter.[3][5]

The findings also clarify the origins of these hypothetical giants. Unlike the black holes we observe today, which form when massive stars collapse at the end of their lives, SLABs would have to be "primordial." They would have formed directly from dense clumps of matter in the first fractions of a second after the Big Bang.[3][5]

Closing the door on early universe puzzles

Ruling out SLABs as a primary dark matter source has a cascading effect on other cosmological mysteries. In recent years, theorists had proposed stupendously large black holes as a convenient solution for several unexplained phenomena observed in the early universe.[2][3]

One of those mysteries is the nano-Hertz gravitational-wave background. Pulsar Timing Arrays recently detected a low-frequency "hum" of gravitational waves washing over the Earth. Some physicists suggested that mergers between stupendously large primordial black holes could be generating those massive ripples in spacetime.[2][3]

Another puzzle emerged from the James Webb Space Telescope, which has spotted galaxies in the early universe that appear surprisingly large and mature. A competing theory proposed that SLABs might have acted as the gravitational seeds that rapidly pulled these early galaxies together.[2][3]

The new CMB analysis effectively eliminates both of those theories. Because the Planck data shows that SLABs did not exist in large numbers, they cannot be responsible for the gravitational wave background, nor can they be the architects of the James Webb telescope's impossible galaxies.[2][3]

"These questions are also unlikely to be answered by SLABs, since our findings show that they didn't exist in large numbers," Leister noted. "The early universe still has many puzzles waiting to be solved."[3]

The search shifts to the microscopic

While the study closes the mass window for stupendously large black holes, it does not rule out primordial black holes entirely. The researchers emphasize that their findings only apply to objects heavier than 100 billion solar masses. Smaller primordial black holes remain a viable, if constrained, possibility.[2][5]

With giant black holes ruled out, physicists are now investigating whether dark matter could be made of microscopic, asteroid-mass black holes.

In fact, the only mass range where non-spinning primordial black holes could still theoretically constitute all of the universe's dark matter is the "asteroidal window." These hypothetical black holes would be incredibly dense but physically tiny, packing the mass of a large asteroid into a space smaller than an atom.[2][5]

The Mainz research team is now investigating whether they can use similar cosmological constraints to rule out those itty-bitty black holes as well. If they succeed, the primordial black hole hypothesis for dark matter may be entirely dismantled, forcing physicists to look elsewhere.[3][5]

For now, the true nature of dark matter remains hidden. Whether it consists of undiscovered subatomic particles, microscopic black holes, or something entirely beyond the current Standard Model, the answer will have to fit within the smooth, pristine light left over from the Big Bang.[1][5]

Key points

  • Theoretical "stupendously large" black holes, weighing over 100 billion solar masses, have been ruled out as the primary source of dark matter.
  • Researchers analyzed data from the Planck satellite, finding the cosmic microwave background is too smooth to hide such massive objects.
  • The findings also eliminate these giant black holes as the cause of the nano-Hertz gravitational wave background and early massive galaxies.
  • Physicists are now investigating whether much smaller, asteroid-mass primordial black holes could still account for the universe's missing mass.

What we don’t know

  • Whether dark matter consists of undiscovered subatomic particles or microscopic, asteroid-mass primordial black holes.
  • What is generating the nano-Hertz gravitational wave background detected by Pulsar Timing Arrays, now that giant black holes are ruled out.
  • How the surprisingly large and mature early galaxies observed by the James Webb Space Telescope managed to form so quickly.

How we got here

  1. 13.8 billion years ago

    The Big Bang occurs, potentially spawning primordial black holes from dense clumps of matter.

  2. 380,000 years after Big Bang

    The universe cools enough for atoms to form, releasing the light now seen as the cosmic microwave background.

  3. October 2013

    The European Space Agency shuts down the Planck satellite after four and a half years of mapping the early universe.

  4. October 2026

    Physicists publish an analysis of Planck data ruling out stupendously large black holes as a major dark matter component.

Theoretical Cosmologists 40%Observational Astronomers 35%Particle Physicists 25%
Theoretical Cosmologists
Focus on mathematical models of the early universe and how primordial density fluctuations could spawn massive objects.
Observational Astronomers
Rely on empirical data from instruments like the Planck satellite and JWST to constrain theoretical models of the cosmos.
Particle Physicists
Favor subatomic particle candidates for dark matter, such as axions or WIMPs, over macroscopic black hole models.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Particle physicists advocating for axions or WIMPs as dark matter candidates, whose models gain indirect support when macroscopic candidates are ruled out.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Theoretical Cosmologists 40%Observational Astronomers 35%Particle Physicists 25%
  1. [1]NatureObservational Astronomers

    Even stupendous black holes can't explain dark matter

    Read on Nature →
  2. [2]Physical Review LettersTheoretical Cosmologists

    Closing the Mass Window for Stupendously Large Black Holes

    Read on Physical Review Letters →
  3. [3]Johannes Gutenberg University MainzTheoretical Cosmologists

    Mainz researchers rule out “stupendously large” primordial black holes as significant part of dark matter

    Read on Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz →
  4. [4]arXivTheoretical Cosmologists

    Closing the Mass Window for Stupendously Large Black Holes

    Read on arXiv →
  5. [5]Phys.orgParticle Physicists

    'Stupendously large' primordial black holes ruled out as a dark matter source

    Read on Phys.org →
Listen

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Science stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns, free every day.