Meituan Unveils LongCat-2.0, the First Trillion-Parameter AI Model Trained Entirely on Domestic Silicon
Chinese technology giant Meituan has successfully trained a frontier-class AI model without relying on restricted US hardware, proving the viability of alternative silicon ecosystems. The breakthrough relies on novel software optimizations to overcome the networking bottlenecks of domestic chips.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Domestic Tech Optimists
- View this as a triumph of engineering that proves China can achieve full self-sufficiency in the frontier AI race.
- Geopolitical Realists
- Focus on how US export controls inadvertently accelerated the creation of a parallel, independent AI ecosystem.
- Hardware Skeptics
- Emphasize the hidden costs of bypassing Nvidia, particularly the severe energy penalties and manufacturing yield challenges.
What's not represented
- · Environmental advocates concerned about the massive energy footprint of less-efficient AI training clusters.
- · US policymakers assessing the effectiveness of current semiconductor export controls.
Why this matters
For years, the global AI industry assumed that training massive, frontier-tier models required Nvidia hardware. Meituan's achievement demonstrates that alternative silicon ecosystems have matured enough to bypass US export controls, fundamentally reshaping the geopolitical landscape of artificial intelligence.
Key points
- Meituan released LongCat-2.0, a one-trillion parameter AI model trained entirely on domestic Chinese silicon.
- The achievement proves that frontier AI models can be developed without relying on restricted US hardware like Nvidia GPUs.
- Engineers overcame slower hardware interconnect speeds by developing a custom 4D parallel training framework.
- A robust fault-tolerance system allowed the 30,000-chip cluster to recover from hardware failures in under 45 seconds.
- While successful, training on domestic silicon requires significantly more electricity than using Western equivalents.
- The milestone highlights how US export controls have accelerated the bifurcation of the global AI ecosystem.
In a milestone that redefines the boundaries of the global artificial intelligence race, Chinese technology giant Meituan has unveiled LongCat-2.0, a frontier-class AI model boasting one trillion parameters. While the model's scale places it in the upper echelon of global AI systems, its true significance lies in its origin: LongCat-2.0 is the first model of its size to be trained entirely on domestic Chinese silicon.[1]
The announcement challenges a long-held assumption in Silicon Valley and Washington: that the sheer computational density and networking requirements of trillion-parameter models strictly require hardware from US-based Nvidia. By successfully orchestrating a massive cluster of domestic chips, Meituan has provided the most concrete evidence to date that alternative semiconductor ecosystems can support state-of-the-art AI development.[2]
Meituan, primarily known globally as a food delivery and local services behemoth, has aggressively pivoted into foundational AI research over the past three years. The LongCat-2.0 release marks its transition from an AI consumer to a primary architect, positioning the company alongside Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent in China's domestic AI vanguard.[3]
According to the technical report released by Meituan's AI lab, LongCat-2.0 utilizes a Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. This design activates only a subset of its one trillion parameters for any given query, maximizing efficiency. In early benchmarks, the model demonstrates reasoning, coding, and multilingual capabilities roughly on par with the GPT-4 class of models, though it trails the absolute bleeding edge of recently released Western systems.[5][6]

The mechanism behind this achievement is a masterclass in overcoming hardware limitations through software ingenuity. Training a massive AI model is not merely about raw computational power, or FLOPs; it is fundamentally a networking problem. The data must flow seamlessly between tens of thousands of chips. Nvidia's primary moat has long been NVLink, a proprietary interconnect technology that allows its GPUs to share memory at blistering speeds.[4]
Domestic Chinese chips, widely believed to be the latest iteration of Huawei's Ascend series, possess formidable raw compute but historically suffer from slower interconnect bandwidth. To bypass this "memory wall," Meituan's engineers had to rethink the training architecture from the ground up.[4]
The solution came in the form of a custom distributed training framework. Meituan developed a novel 4D parallel training strategy that slices the model across the cluster in a way that minimizes the need for chips to constantly "talk" to one another. By reducing the communication overhead by an estimated 40%, they allowed the domestic chips to spend more time calculating and less time waiting for data.[5][6]
The solution came in the form of a custom distributed training framework.
Software optimization was equally critical. The global AI ecosystem is heavily reliant on CUDA, Nvidia's proprietary software platform. Transitioning to domestic silicon requires rewriting massive codebases to run on alternative platforms like Huawei's CANN (Compute Architecture for Neural Networks). Meituan deployed a custom compiler named "Catapult" that automatically translates and optimizes tensor operations for the specific quirks of the domestic hardware.[6]

Perhaps the most daunting challenge was fault tolerance. Training a trillion-parameter model requires running a cluster of roughly 30,000 chips continuously for over 90 days. In any cluster of that size, hardware failures are a daily occurrence. If a chip fails and the system cannot recover, days of training progress—and millions of dollars in electricity—can be lost.[3][5]
Meituan's technical paper details an asynchronous checkpointing system that saves the model's state every few minutes without pausing the training process. When a domestic node fails, the system automatically isolates the dead hardware, reallocates the workload to idle backup chips, and resumes training within 45 seconds. This robust fault tolerance was the linchpin that made the three-month training run viable.[5][6]

To prove the efficacy of their stack, Meituan has open-sourced a smaller, 70-billion parameter version of LongCat-2.0, along with the inference code optimized for domestic hardware. Independent researchers have already begun testing the open-weight model, confirming that the underlying architecture is sound and highly competitive in open-source leaderboards.[3][4]
Despite the triumph, industry analysts point out the hidden costs of bypassing Nvidia. The primary trade-off is energy efficiency. Domestic silicon, manufactured on slightly older process nodes due to equipment embargoes, requires significantly more power to achieve the same computational output. Estimates suggest Meituan's training run consumed up to 45% more electricity than an equivalent run on Nvidia H100s.[2][4]
Manufacturing yields present another layer of uncertainty. While Meituan successfully acquired the 30,000 chips needed for this run, scaling to the next frontier—models with 10 trillion parameters—will require hundreds of thousands of processors. Whether China's domestic foundries can produce these chips at that volume, with high enough yields to keep costs manageable, remains an open question.[2]

Nevertheless, the geopolitical implications of LongCat-2.0 are profound. US export controls, designed to throttle China's access to advanced AI capabilities, have instead acted as a powerful catalyst for domestic self-sufficiency. By forcing Chinese tech giants to invest heavily in their own software and hardware stacks, the restrictions have inadvertently birthed a parallel, fully independent AI ecosystem.[1]
As the "silicon curtain" hardens, the global AI landscape is bifurcating. Meituan's breakthrough proves that the barrier to entry for frontier AI is no longer strictly controlled by a single Western hardware vendor. The race toward artificial general intelligence is now being run on two entirely separate tracks.[2]
How we got here
Oct 2022
The US implements sweeping export controls restricting the sale of advanced AI chips to China.
Aug 2023
Domestic manufacturers release new generations of AI accelerators designed to fill the void left by Nvidia.
Jan 2026
Meituan begins the 90-day continuous training run for LongCat-2.0 across a cluster of 30,000 domestic chips.
Jul 2026
Meituan officially unveils LongCat-2.0, open-sourcing a smaller 70B version to prove the viability of its software stack.
Viewpoints in depth
Domestic Tech Optimists
View this as a triumph of engineering that proves China can achieve full self-sufficiency in the frontier AI race.
For proponents of China's domestic tech sector, LongCat-2.0 is a watershed moment that validates years of heavy investment in alternative silicon. They argue that the primary barrier to AI independence was never raw manufacturing capability, but the software ecosystem. By successfully rewriting the training stack to bypass Nvidia's CUDA and NVLink, Meituan has proven that the 'memory wall' can be scaled with software ingenuity. This camp views the achievement as proof that the domestic industry has moved past the phase of merely copying Western architectures and is now innovating at the foundational level.
Geopolitical Realists
Focus on how US export controls inadvertently accelerated the creation of a parallel, independent AI ecosystem.
Analysts focusing on the geopolitical stakes argue that LongCat-2.0 represents the exact scenario US export controls were designed to prevent. By cutting off access to the easiest and most efficient hardware (Nvidia), Washington forced Chinese tech giants into a corner, leaving them no choice but to pour billions into domestic alternatives. This camp notes that while the short-term effect of the bans was disruptive, the long-term result is a bifurcated tech ecosystem where the US has zero visibility or leverage over the hardware powering China's most advanced AI models.
Hardware Skeptics
Emphasize the hidden costs of bypassing Nvidia, particularly the severe energy penalties and manufacturing yield challenges.
Semiconductor analysts and hardware skeptics acknowledge the software achievement but point to the unsustainable economics of the underlying silicon. They highlight that domestic chips, manufactured without access to the latest extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines, are inherently less power-efficient. Training a model like LongCat-2.0 on this hardware requires massive, expensive data centers that draw significantly more electricity than Western equivalents. Furthermore, they question whether domestic foundries can achieve the manufacturing yields necessary to produce these chips at the scale required for the next generation of 10-trillion parameter models.
What we don't know
- The exact manufacturing yield rates for the domestic chips used in the cluster, which dictates the true financial cost of the project.
- The specific identity of the chip manufacturer, though it is widely assumed to be Huawei.
- Whether the energy requirements of domestic silicon will prevent Meituan from scaling to the next generation of 10-trillion parameter models.
Key terms
- Parameter
- The internal variables or 'synapses' that an AI model learns during training; a higher parameter count generally correlates with greater capability and nuance.
- Interconnect
- The specialized networking technology that allows thousands of individual AI chips to share memory and communicate with each other at high speeds.
- Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)
- An AI architecture that divides a massive model into smaller, specialized sub-networks, activating only the necessary 'experts' for a specific task to save computing power.
- Fault Tolerance
- The ability of a massive computing cluster to detect a hardware failure, isolate the broken component, and resume operations without crashing the entire system.
- CUDA
- Nvidia's proprietary software platform that allows developers to write programs for its GPUs, serving as a major competitive moat in the AI industry.
Frequently asked
What chips did Meituan use to train LongCat-2.0?
While Meituan has not officially named the manufacturer, industry analysts widely believe the cluster was built using the latest generation of Huawei's Ascend AI processors.
Is LongCat-2.0 as capable as GPT-4 or Gemini?
Early benchmarks suggest LongCat-2.0 performs at a level comparable to the GPT-4 class of models in reasoning and coding, though it may trail the absolute newest iterations of Western models.
Why is training on domestic chips so difficult?
The primary challenge is networking. Domestic chips historically have slower interconnect speeds than Nvidia's NVLink, making it difficult to share data efficiently across the tens of thousands of chips required for a trillion-parameter model.
Can anyone use LongCat-2.0?
Meituan has open-sourced a smaller, 70-billion parameter version for developers, while the full one-trillion parameter model is accessible via an API.
Sources
[1]ReutersGeopolitical Realists
Meituan launches LongCat-2.0, claiming first trillion-parameter model on Chinese chips
Read on Reuters →[2]BloombergGeopolitical Realists
Meituan's Trillion-Parameter AI Shows China's Silicon Resilience
Read on Bloomberg →[3]TechNodeDomestic Tech Optimists
Inside Meituan's LongCat-2.0: How domestic silicon powered a frontier model
Read on TechNode →[4]SemiAnalysisHardware Skeptics
The Interconnect Miracle: How LongCat-2.0 Bypassed NVLink
Read on SemiAnalysis →[5]arXivHardware Skeptics
LongCat-2.0: Scaling Laws and Fault Tolerance on Heterogeneous Domestic Clusters
Read on arXiv →[6]Meituan Tech BlogDomestic Tech Optimists
LongCat-2.0 Technical Report: Training at the Trillion-Parameter Scale
Read on Meituan Tech Blog →
More in ai
See all 5 stories →AI Regulation
How 42 State Attorneys General Are Using Consumer Law to Regulate OpenAI
6 sources
Silicon Sovereignty
$1 Trillion AI Chip Selloff Follows Wave of Custom Silicon Shipments, Reshaping Compute Market
7 sources
Macroeconomics
Federal Reserve Raises US Growth Forecast, Citing Surging AI Infrastructure Investment
4 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get ai stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.









